Objective: Using finite element method (FEM) analysis of a clear aligner (CA), this study aimed to investigate the effects of varying the edentulous space on canine distal bodily movement during space closure following maxillary first premolar extraction. Methods: FEM analysis was used to simulate distal canine bodily movement following maxillary first premolar extraction using CAs. Four CA designs for edentulous spaces were compared: no-pontic, full-pontic, halfpontic, and beam. Three-dimensional models of the tooth components and CA were created. The target was set at a 0.25-mm distal canine movement. Long-term tooth movement was simulated using an iterative calculation method. Results: All the groups initially showed crown displacement, distal tipping, and distal rotation.Over time, the movement patterns differed in relation to the design. The no-pontic design exhibited the greatest displacement and tipping. The beam design exhibited the largest initial displacement but showed the lowest displacement and tipping thereafter. Full- and half-pontic designs yielded intermediate results. Significant force reduction was observed immediately after CA application, and was followed by a gradual decrease. The mean tooth-movement achievement rate was approximately 76.7%. Conclusions The edentulous space design of the CA substantially affected tooth-movement behavior. An iterative simulation is necessary to evaluate longterm tooth-movement patterns. The beam design demonstrated optimal suitability for bodily movement with minimal tipping. For optimal results, additional setup or overcorrection may be necessary.

Objective: Using finite element method (FEM) analysis of a clear aligner (CA), this study aimed to investigate the effects of varying the edentulous space on canine distal bodily movement during space closure following maxillary first premolar extraction. Methods: FEM analysis was used to simulate distal canine bodily movement following maxillary first premolar extraction using CAs. Four CA designs for edentulous spaces were compared: no-pontic, full-pontic, halfpontic, and beam. Three-dimensional models of the tooth components and CA were created. The target was set at a 0.25-mm distal canine movement. Long-term tooth movement was simulated using an iterative calculation method. Results: All the groups initially showed crown displacement, distal tipping, and distal rotation.Over time, the movement patterns differed in relation to the design. The no-pontic design exhibited the greatest displacement and tipping. The beam design exhibited the largest initial displacement but showed the lowest displacement and tipping thereafter. Full- and half-pontic designs yielded intermediate results. Significant force reduction was observed immediately after CA application, and was followed by a gradual decrease. The mean tooth-movement achievement rate was approximately 76.7%. Conclusions The edentulous space design of the CA substantially affected tooth-movement behavior. An iterative simulation is necessary to evaluate longterm tooth-movement patterns. The beam design demonstrated optimal suitability for bodily movement with minimal tipping. For optimal results, additional setup or overcorrection may be necessary.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Objective: Using finite element method (FEM) analysis of a clear aligner (CA), this study aimed to investigate the effects of varying the edentulous space on canine distal bodily movement during space closure following maxillary first premolar extraction. Methods: FEM analysis was used to simulate distal canine bodily movement following maxillary first premolar extraction using CAs. Four CA designs for edentulous spaces were compared: no-pontic, full-pontic, halfpontic, and beam. Three-dimensional models of the tooth components and CA were created. The target was set at a 0.25-mm distal canine movement. Long-term tooth movement was simulated using an iterative calculation method. Results: All the groups initially showed crown displacement, distal tipping, and distal rotation.Over time, the movement patterns differed in relation to the design. The no-pontic design exhibited the greatest displacement and tipping. The beam design exhibited the largest initial displacement but showed the lowest displacement and tipping thereafter. Full- and half-pontic designs yielded intermediate results. Significant force reduction was observed immediately after CA application, and was followed by a gradual decrease. The mean tooth-movement achievement rate was approximately 76.7%. Conclusions The edentulous space design of the CA substantially affected tooth-movement behavior. An iterative simulation is necessary to evaluate longterm tooth-movement patterns. The beam design demonstrated optimal suitability for bodily movement with minimal tipping. For optimal results, additional setup or overcorrection may be necessary.

Objective: Using finite element method (FEM) analysis of a clear aligner (CA), this study aimed to investigate the effects of varying the edentulous space on canine distal bodily movement during space closure following maxillary first premolar extraction. Methods: FEM analysis was used to simulate distal canine bodily movement following maxillary first premolar extraction using CAs. Four CA designs for edentulous spaces were compared: no-pontic, full-pontic, halfpontic, and beam. Three-dimensional models of the tooth components and CA were created. The target was set at a 0.25-mm distal canine movement. Long-term tooth movement was simulated using an iterative calculation method. Results: All the groups initially showed crown displacement, distal tipping, and distal rotation.Over time, the movement patterns differed in relation to the design. The no-pontic design exhibited the greatest displacement and tipping. The beam design exhibited the largest initial displacement but showed the lowest displacement and tipping thereafter. Full- and half-pontic designs yielded intermediate results. Significant force reduction was observed immediately after CA application, and was followed by a gradual decrease. The mean tooth-movement achievement rate was approximately 76.7%. Conclusions The edentulous space design of the CA substantially affected tooth-movement behavior. An iterative simulation is necessary to evaluate longterm tooth-movement patterns. The beam design demonstrated optimal suitability for bodily movement with minimal tipping. For optimal results, additional setup or overcorrection may be necessary.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Objective: Using finite element method (FEM) analysis of a clear aligner (CA), this study aimed to investigate the effects of varying the edentulous space on canine distal bodily movement during space closure following maxillary first premolar extraction. Methods: FEM analysis was used to simulate distal canine bodily movement following maxillary first premolar extraction using CAs. Four CA designs for edentulous spaces were compared: no-pontic, full-pontic, halfpontic, and beam. Three-dimensional models of the tooth components and CA were created. The target was set at a 0.25-mm distal canine movement. Long-term tooth movement was simulated using an iterative calculation method. Results: All the groups initially showed crown displacement, distal tipping, and distal rotation.Over time, the movement patterns differed in relation to the design. The no-pontic design exhibited the greatest displacement and tipping. The beam design exhibited the largest initial displacement but showed the lowest displacement and tipping thereafter. Full- and half-pontic designs yielded intermediate results. Significant force reduction was observed immediately after CA application, and was followed by a gradual decrease. The mean tooth-movement achievement rate was approximately 76.7%. Conclusions The edentulous space design of the CA substantially affected tooth-movement behavior. An iterative simulation is necessary to evaluate longterm tooth-movement patterns. The beam design demonstrated optimal suitability for bodily movement with minimal tipping. For optimal results, additional setup or overcorrection may be necessary.

Background/Aims: Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with small coronary artery disease. However, further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of DEBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods: In total, 492 patients (age, 67.9 ± 11.0 years; 339 men) with small coronary artery lesions (diameter < 2.75 mm) were randomly assigned to group I (DEB) (n = 104; age, 67.2 ± 10.7 years; 83 men) and group II (DES) (n = 388; age, 68.0 ± 11.1 years; 254 men). For inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, the study population was stratified into groups I (n = 269) and II (n = 280). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups during 12 months of clinical follow-up. Results: Group I had shorter device lengths (22.4 ± 5.8 mm) compared with group II (27.4 ± 9.3 mm; p < 0.001). Additionally, devices in group I were smaller in diameter (2.4 ± 0.1 mm) compared with those in group II (2.6 ± 0.1 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in group I (53.8% ± 12.6%) than in group II (58.6% ± 11.9%; p < 0.001). After IPTW, no significant differences in LVEF were observed between groups I and II. During 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of total MACE did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy between DEB and DES for the treatment of small coronary artery disease. Therefore, DEB can be considered a viable alternative to DES in patients with small coronary artery disease.