1.ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus singlefulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Jae Hwan JEONG ; Seung Soo HONG ; Munseok CHOI ; Seoung Yoon RHO ; Pejman RADKANI ; Brian Kim Poh GOH ; Yuichi NAGAKAWA ; Minoru TANABE ; Daisuke ASANO ; Chang Moo KANG
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(1):48-54
Background:
s/Aims: In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to reduce the number of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes. ArtiSential®is a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument that incorporates the ergonomic features of robotic surgery, potentially overcoming the spatial limitations of laparoscopic surgery. ArtiSential® LC can be performed using only two ports. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of ArtiSential® LC with those of single-fulcrum LC.
Methods:
This retrospective study compared ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC among LCs performed for gallbladder (GB) stones at the same center, analyzing the basic characteristics of patients; intraoperative outcomes, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative GB rupture; and postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
Results:
A total of 88 and 63 patients underwent ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC for GB stones, respectively. Analysis showed that ArtiSential® LC resulted in significantly fewer cases of surgeries longer than 60 minutes (30 vs. 35 min, p = 0.009) and intraoperative GB ruptures (2 vs. 10, p = 0.007). In terms of postoperative outcomes, ArtiSential® LC showed better results in the respective visual analog scale (VAS) scores immediately after surgery (2.59 vs. 3.73, p < 0.001), and before discharge (1.44 vs. 2.02, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
ArtiSential® LC showed better results in terms of surgical outcomes, especially postoperative pain. Thus, ArtiSential®LC is considered the better option for patients, compared to single-fulcrum LC.
2.ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus singlefulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Jae Hwan JEONG ; Seung Soo HONG ; Munseok CHOI ; Seoung Yoon RHO ; Pejman RADKANI ; Brian Kim Poh GOH ; Yuichi NAGAKAWA ; Minoru TANABE ; Daisuke ASANO ; Chang Moo KANG
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(1):48-54
Background:
s/Aims: In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to reduce the number of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes. ArtiSential®is a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument that incorporates the ergonomic features of robotic surgery, potentially overcoming the spatial limitations of laparoscopic surgery. ArtiSential® LC can be performed using only two ports. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of ArtiSential® LC with those of single-fulcrum LC.
Methods:
This retrospective study compared ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC among LCs performed for gallbladder (GB) stones at the same center, analyzing the basic characteristics of patients; intraoperative outcomes, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative GB rupture; and postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
Results:
A total of 88 and 63 patients underwent ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC for GB stones, respectively. Analysis showed that ArtiSential® LC resulted in significantly fewer cases of surgeries longer than 60 minutes (30 vs. 35 min, p = 0.009) and intraoperative GB ruptures (2 vs. 10, p = 0.007). In terms of postoperative outcomes, ArtiSential® LC showed better results in the respective visual analog scale (VAS) scores immediately after surgery (2.59 vs. 3.73, p < 0.001), and before discharge (1.44 vs. 2.02, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
ArtiSential® LC showed better results in terms of surgical outcomes, especially postoperative pain. Thus, ArtiSential®LC is considered the better option for patients, compared to single-fulcrum LC.
3.ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus singlefulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Jae Hwan JEONG ; Seung Soo HONG ; Munseok CHOI ; Seoung Yoon RHO ; Pejman RADKANI ; Brian Kim Poh GOH ; Yuichi NAGAKAWA ; Minoru TANABE ; Daisuke ASANO ; Chang Moo KANG
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2025;29(1):48-54
Background:
s/Aims: In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to reduce the number of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes. ArtiSential®is a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument that incorporates the ergonomic features of robotic surgery, potentially overcoming the spatial limitations of laparoscopic surgery. ArtiSential® LC can be performed using only two ports. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of ArtiSential® LC with those of single-fulcrum LC.
Methods:
This retrospective study compared ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC among LCs performed for gallbladder (GB) stones at the same center, analyzing the basic characteristics of patients; intraoperative outcomes, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative GB rupture; and postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
Results:
A total of 88 and 63 patients underwent ArtiSential® LC and single-fulcrum LC for GB stones, respectively. Analysis showed that ArtiSential® LC resulted in significantly fewer cases of surgeries longer than 60 minutes (30 vs. 35 min, p = 0.009) and intraoperative GB ruptures (2 vs. 10, p = 0.007). In terms of postoperative outcomes, ArtiSential® LC showed better results in the respective visual analog scale (VAS) scores immediately after surgery (2.59 vs. 3.73, p < 0.001), and before discharge (1.44 vs. 2.02, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
ArtiSential® LC showed better results in terms of surgical outcomes, especially postoperative pain. Thus, ArtiSential®LC is considered the better option for patients, compared to single-fulcrum LC.
4.General Public Knowledge Regarding Topical Corticosteroids: A Nationwide Survey in South Korea
Heenam SEO ; Seoung Yeon SONG ; Dahye KIM ; Ji Hwan PARK ; Yoonho SHIN ; Kang Hyuk LEE ; Soo An CHOI ; Ju-Yeun LEE ; Do Young KIM ; Wan Gyoon SHIN ; Eunyoung KIM
Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2022;32(2):84-92
Background:
Topical corticosteroids (TCs) are available both as over-the-counter drugs and prescription medicines at pharmacies.Although they are generally safe drugs, inappropriate and excessive use could result in potential side effects. Thus, it is important to have appropriate knowledge regarding the use of TCs. We performed a cross-sectional survey to assess public knowledge and the potential misuse or overuse of TCs.
Methods:
A cross-sectional and nationwide online survey was conducted among participants who were aware of TCs. The survey items included sources of information, indications, potential side effects, and methods of application of TCs. A comparative analysis was conducted between those with (TC users) and without (TC non-users) an experience of using TCs. Results: Among 3,000 participants, 74.4% were TC users. The mass media was the most common information source of TCs, and only one-third of the surveyed people relied on pharmacists or doctors for information. Regarding indications and application methods, incorrect answer rate was high in some items, but respondents showed adequate knowledge. However, awareness of the safety of TCs was low. Overall, the TC users showed a higher knowledge of TCs than TC non-users.
Conclusions
Public knowledge of the use of TCs appears to be appropriate. However, we found potential misuse or overuse of some items and a lack of awareness of the side effects concerning TCs. Thus, healthcare professionals’ significant role is required.
5.The usefulness of trabecular bone score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Seoung Wan NAM ; Yoon-Kyoung SUNG ; Dam KIM ; Soo-Kyung CHO ; Yoonah SONG ; Yun Young CHOI ; Yongjin SIM ; Tae-Hwan KIM
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2021;36(5):1211-1220
Background:
s/Aims: This study was performed to reveal the usefulness of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in assessing bone strength in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods.
Methods:
A total of 215 AS patients (75.8% male) were enrolled from a single university hospital in Korea. Demographic and clinical information were assessed. Patients completed X-rays of the cervical and lumbar spine (L-spine), and spinal ankyloses were quantified using the modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS). Hip, anteroposterior and lateral L-spine bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS were assessed by DXA methods. Clinical characteristics and bone strength measurement results were compared between male and female AS patients. The accuracy of each bone strength evaluation method in predicting Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores indicating moderate or higher fracture risk was compared by receiver operating characteristic curves in patients aged ≥ 40 years. Correlations between each bone strength measurement method and mSASSS were examined.
Results:
Male patients showed higher mSASSS and less prevalent peripheral joint involvement compared to female patients (p < 0.05). TBS, hip BMD, and L-spine lateral BMD showed comparably high areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting FRAX-major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) ≥ 10% (AUC ranged 0.72 to 0.76). TBS negatively correlated with mSASSS in both male and female patients (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
TBS could predict the risk of MOF and is not influenced by spinal osteoproliferation in AS patients, even in those with advanced spinal changes.
6.The usefulness of trabecular bone score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Seoung Wan NAM ; Yoon-Kyoung SUNG ; Dam KIM ; Soo-Kyung CHO ; Yoonah SONG ; Yun Young CHOI ; Yongjin SIM ; Tae-Hwan KIM
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2021;36(5):1211-1220
Background:
s/Aims: This study was performed to reveal the usefulness of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in assessing bone strength in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods.
Methods:
A total of 215 AS patients (75.8% male) were enrolled from a single university hospital in Korea. Demographic and clinical information were assessed. Patients completed X-rays of the cervical and lumbar spine (L-spine), and spinal ankyloses were quantified using the modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS). Hip, anteroposterior and lateral L-spine bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS were assessed by DXA methods. Clinical characteristics and bone strength measurement results were compared between male and female AS patients. The accuracy of each bone strength evaluation method in predicting Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores indicating moderate or higher fracture risk was compared by receiver operating characteristic curves in patients aged ≥ 40 years. Correlations between each bone strength measurement method and mSASSS were examined.
Results:
Male patients showed higher mSASSS and less prevalent peripheral joint involvement compared to female patients (p < 0.05). TBS, hip BMD, and L-spine lateral BMD showed comparably high areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting FRAX-major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) ≥ 10% (AUC ranged 0.72 to 0.76). TBS negatively correlated with mSASSS in both male and female patients (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
TBS could predict the risk of MOF and is not influenced by spinal osteoproliferation in AS patients, even in those with advanced spinal changes.
7.Comparison of Fusion Rate between Demineralized Bone Matrix versus Autograft in Lumbar Fusion : Meta-Analysis
Sanghyun HAN ; Bumsoo PARK ; Jeong-Wook LIM ; Jin-Young YOUM ; Seoung-Won CHOI ; Dae Hwan KIM ; Dong Ki AHN
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2020;63(6):673-680
The demineralized bone matrix (DBM) as the bone graft material to increase the fusion rate was widely used in spinal fusion. The current study aimed to compare the fusion rate of DBM to the fusion rate of autograft in lumbar spine fusion via meta-analysis of published literature. After systematic search, comparative studies were selected according to eligibility criteria. Checklist (risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized study) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included nonrandomized controlled studies. The corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. We also used subgroup analysis to analyze the fusion rate of posterolateral lumbar fusion and lumbar interbody fusion. Eight studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. These eight studies included 581 patients. Among them, 337 patients underwent spinal fusion surgery using DBM (DBM group) and 204 patients underwent spinal fusion surgery with mainly autologous bone and without using DBM (control group). There was no significant differences of fusion rate between the two groups in posterolateral fusion analysis (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90–1.17; p=0.66) and interbody fusion analysis (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.91–1.39; p=0.27). Based on the available evidence, the use of DBM with autograft in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion and lumbar interbody fusion showed a slightly higher fusion rate than that of autograft alone; however, there was no statistically different between two groups.
8.Repeat hepatectomy for recurred colorectal liver metastasis: is it justified?
Jangho PARK ; Seung Duk LEE ; Sung Sik HAN ; Seoung Hoon KIM ; Sang Jae PARK ; Jae Hwan OH ; Jungnam JOO
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2019;97(1):7-14
PURPOSE: Liver resection is considered the only curative treatment modality for colorectal liver metastasis. The recurrence rate after hepatectomy is >50%. Two or more hepatectomies are applied to treat recurred metastases. We assessed the efficiency and feasibility of repeat hepatectomy and analyzed the prognostic factors after a repeat hepatectomy. METHODS: In total, 248 patients were diagnosed with recurred liver metastasis between January 2003 and May 2016. Second and third hepatectomies were performed in 70 and 7 patients, respectively. The other 171 patients did not undergo a repeat hepatectomy. Clinical features were collected from the medical records. We analyzed survival rates of the repeat hepatectomy group and the nonrepeat hepatectomy group. We also investigated factors affecting overall and disease-free survival of patients who received a repeat hepatectomy using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Median overall survival was significantly higher in the repeat hepatectomy group than in the nonrepeat group (83.0 months vs. 25.0 months, P < 0.001). The morbidity and mortality rates of repeat hepatectomy were 9.1% and 0%, respectively. Median overall and disease-free survival of the repeat hepatectomy group were 62.0 and 51.0 months, respectively. The number of recurred tumors was the only significant factor for disease-free survival (P = 0.029). None of the factors affected overall survival. CONCLUSION: Repeat hepatectomy is necessary, effective, and safe for treating recurred colorectal liver metastasis. Repeat hepatectomy can be considered in patients with fewer than three recurred metastatic tumors.
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Feasibility Studies
;
Hepatectomy
;
Humans
;
Liver
;
Medical Records
;
Mortality
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prognosis
;
Recurrence
;
Survival Rate
9.The Effect of Hospital Case Volume on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Analysis (KROG-1106).
Boram HA ; Kwan Ho CHO ; Sung Ho MOON ; Chang Geol LEE ; Ki Chang KEUM ; Yeon Sil KIM ; Hong Gyun WU ; Jin Ho KIM ; Yong Chan AHN ; Dongryul OH ; Jae Myoung NOH ; Jong Hoon LEE ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Won Taek KIM ; Young Taek OH ; Min Kyu KANG ; Jin Hee KIM ; Ji Yoon KIM ; Moon June CHO ; Chul Seoung KAY ; Jin Hwa CHOI
Cancer Research and Treatment 2019;51(1):12-23
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 1,073 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were collected from a multi-institutional retrospective database (KROG 11-06). All patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) either with three-dimensional-conformal RT (3D-CRT) (n=576) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n=497). The patients were divided into two groups treated at high volume institution (HVI) (n=750) and low volume institution (LVI) (n=323), defined as patient volume ≥ 10 (median, 13; range, 10 to 18) and < 10 patients per year (median, 3; range, 2 to 6), respectively. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, the outcomes were significantly better in those treated at HVI than at LVI. For the 614 patients of propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year OS and LRPFS were consistently higher in the HVI group than in the LVI group (OS: 78.4% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001; LRPFS: 86.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). According to RT modality, significant difference in 5-year OS was observed in patients receiving 3D-CRT (78.7% for HVI vs. 58.9% for LVI, p < 0.001) and not in those receiving IMRT (77.3% for HVI vs. 75.5% for LVI, p=0.170). CONCLUSION: A significant relationship was observed between HVI and LVI for the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC. However, the difference in outcome becomes insignificant in the IMRT era, probably due to the standardization of practice by education.
Cohort Studies
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Education
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
;
Radiotherapy
;
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Treatment Outcome
10.Therapeutic Efficacy of Lamivudine in Children and Adolescents with Chronic Hepatitis B
Yujung CHOI ; Kil Seoung BAE ; Ki Hwan KIM ; Dae Kyun KOH ; Jong Hyun KIM
Pediatric Infection & Vaccine 2018;25(2):72-81
PURPOSE: This prospective study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of lamivudine in children with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. METHODS: During July 2003 through October 2015, children with chronic hepatitis B who visited our institution were included in this study. Fifty-five patients, who received first-line treatment of lamivudine (3 mg/kg, 100 mg maximum) for over three months, were enrolled. After initiating lamivudine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV-DNA, and HBV markers were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months, thereafter. The treatment endpoint was determined as 1) normalization of ALT, 2) HBeAg seroconversion, and 3) anti-HBe positivity for twelve consecutive months. RESULTS: Thirty-one male (56.4%) and 24 female (43.6%) patients were included. The mean age at treatment initiation was 8.1 years. The mean duration of treatment was 23.4 months. ALT normalization was found in 98.2% (54 of 55). Anti-HBe seroconversion was found in 70.6% (36/51). Loss of HBsAg was found in 10.9% (6/55). All biochemical responses occurred under age seven. The rate of virologic response (defined as HBV-DNA <2,000 IU/mL) at six months after treatment initiation was 78.7% (37/47). At twelve months after reaching treatment endpoint, 87.2% (34/39) maintained their virologic response. Resistance to lamivudine was found in 16.4% (9/55). CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine treatment in Korean pediatric patients with chronic hepatitis B showed better outcomes compared with other studies that implemented similar protocols in foreign populations. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of newly recommended antiviral drugs on the Korean pediatric population.
Adolescent
;
Alanine Transaminase
;
Antiviral Agents
;
Child
;
Female
;
Hepatitis B e Antigens
;
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
;
Hepatitis B, Chronic
;
Hepatitis, Chronic
;
Humans
;
Lamivudine
;
Male
;
Prospective Studies
;
Seroconversion

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail