Background: The advantages of using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for implantbased breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients are well-documented across multiple studies. However, there have been no previous instances of using multilayered ADM for reconstruction following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstruction employing multilayered ADM for volume replacement using a local glandular flap post-BCS, and aims to underscore the advantages of this surgical approach. Methods: Breast cancer patients who underwent BCS using several layers of ADM from August 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with at least 3 years of follow-up were included in this study. The anticipated postoperative complications were breast deformity, seroma, hematoma, and infection. Results: Seventy-four patients were included in this study. Most patients experienced symptoms of hard palpation at the reconstruction site, which indicated the surface of the ADM inserted into the breast. Ten patients developed breast deformities, accounting for 13.5% of the cases, and required surgical correction. Other complications were less frequent: four patients (5.3%) had a confirmed seroma for 6 months or longer, two patients (2.6%) experienced fat necrosis, and one patient (1.3%) underwent re-operation to remove the ADM. Conclusions Reconstruction with a glandular flap and ADM following BCS is generally simpler and requires less surgical time compared to using a latissimus dorsi flap or other local flaps. Additionally, it avoids complications at the donor site, presenting a feasible surgical alternative for BCS in breasts with small defects.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Background: The advantages of using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for implantbased breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients are well-documented across multiple studies. However, there have been no previous instances of using multilayered ADM for reconstruction following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstruction employing multilayered ADM for volume replacement using a local glandular flap post-BCS, and aims to underscore the advantages of this surgical approach. Methods: Breast cancer patients who underwent BCS using several layers of ADM from August 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with at least 3 years of follow-up were included in this study. The anticipated postoperative complications were breast deformity, seroma, hematoma, and infection. Results: Seventy-four patients were included in this study. Most patients experienced symptoms of hard palpation at the reconstruction site, which indicated the surface of the ADM inserted into the breast. Ten patients developed breast deformities, accounting for 13.5% of the cases, and required surgical correction. Other complications were less frequent: four patients (5.3%) had a confirmed seroma for 6 months or longer, two patients (2.6%) experienced fat necrosis, and one patient (1.3%) underwent re-operation to remove the ADM. Conclusions Reconstruction with a glandular flap and ADM following BCS is generally simpler and requires less surgical time compared to using a latissimus dorsi flap or other local flaps. Additionally, it avoids complications at the donor site, presenting a feasible surgical alternative for BCS in breasts with small defects.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Background: The advantages of using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for implantbased breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients are well-documented across multiple studies. However, there have been no previous instances of using multilayered ADM for reconstruction following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstruction employing multilayered ADM for volume replacement using a local glandular flap post-BCS, and aims to underscore the advantages of this surgical approach. Methods: Breast cancer patients who underwent BCS using several layers of ADM from August 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with at least 3 years of follow-up were included in this study. The anticipated postoperative complications were breast deformity, seroma, hematoma, and infection. Results: Seventy-four patients were included in this study. Most patients experienced symptoms of hard palpation at the reconstruction site, which indicated the surface of the ADM inserted into the breast. Ten patients developed breast deformities, accounting for 13.5% of the cases, and required surgical correction. Other complications were less frequent: four patients (5.3%) had a confirmed seroma for 6 months or longer, two patients (2.6%) experienced fat necrosis, and one patient (1.3%) underwent re-operation to remove the ADM. Conclusions Reconstruction with a glandular flap and ADM following BCS is generally simpler and requires less surgical time compared to using a latissimus dorsi flap or other local flaps. Additionally, it avoids complications at the donor site, presenting a feasible surgical alternative for BCS in breasts with small defects.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

Background: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction surgery with nipple-sparing mastectomy has recently been favored by patients. However, in patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures, it is difficult to select the appropriate implant size, making it challenging to achieve a symmetrical breast shape. Therefore, this study investigated the differences in breast asymmetry and other complications in patients who underwent a two-stage procedure or direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction to determine whether the two-stage procedure can produce more favorable outcomes. Methods: The participants of this study were patients who underwent immediate two-stage breast reconstruction or DTI breast reconstruction from May 2018 to April 2022, did not receive postoperative radiotherapy, and did not wish to undergo any balancing procedures. An acellular dermal matrix was used for breast reconstruction in all patients, and a single reconstructive surgeon performed all the operations. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results: No significant differences in complications were found between the patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction and those who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction. In the two-stage breast reconstruction group, breast volume asymmetry was observed in 18.4% (seven patients), which was significantly lower than the percentage of 44.7% (17 patients) observed in the DTI group. Conclusions Breast asymmetry was observed in a significant proportion of the patients in both groups. However, because breast volume asymmetry was more common in the DTI group than in the two-stage breast reconstruction group, two-stage breast reconstruction may be a favorable method for patients who do not wish to undergo balancing procedures.