Purpose: This study aimed to compare outcomes of opioid patients-controlled anesthesia (PCA) and intraoperative local anesthesia in terms of postoperative pain, lab results, patient surveys, and discharge scores to evaluate the feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Patients who underwent LC for acute cholecystitis were assigned to the outpatient surgery (OPS) group or inpatient surgery (IPS) group according to the surgeon. In the OPS group, a mixture of bupivacaine and epinephrine was injected into trocar sites and sprayed on the surgical dissection field. Oral opioid and analgesics were given twice a day. In the IPS group, patients received opioid PCA. Numeric rating scale (NRS) for walking, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, self-assessed survey on general physical condition and discharge, and discharge score of ambulatory surgery were assessed postoperatively. Results: NRS was significantly lower in the OPS group. There were no significant differences in ESR and CRP between the groups. Self-assessed survey on general conditions and the possibility of discharge were significantly better in the OPS group. The discharge scores at 3, 6, and 9 hours were significantly higher in the OPS group. Conclusion Intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine at port sites and dissection fields had a better effect on short-term postoperative pain, patient surveys, and discharge criteria of ambulatory surgery than opioid PCA.

Purpose: Surgery is prioritized for a splenic injury when the patient is hemodynamically unstable or the injury is severe and there is an increased risk of bleeding. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of splenectomies where a surgical stapling device was used to reduce operation time and rapidly control bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients who underwent a splenectomy for traumatic splenic injury at Chosun University Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Clinical outcomes including operation time (duration), blood transfusion amount (number of units), length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and mortality rate were compared between patients who received conventional ligation [conventional group (CG)] and patients who received a splenectomy where a surgical stapling device was used [stapling group (SG)]. Results: The SG showed an average operation time of 17 minutes less than the CG, although the reduction was not statistically significant. No significant differences in estimated blood loss and blood transfusion amount were determined between the 2 groups, although the SG received 1 more unit of red blood cells for transfusion in the 48-hour post-operative period compared with the CG. One case of pancreatic fistula as a postoperative complication was reported in the SG. Conclusion The use of a surgical stapling device in a splenectomy may be considered for a hemodynamically unstable patient with splenic injury which caused severe anatomical damage.

Purpose: Surgery is prioritized for a splenic injury when the patient is hemodynamically unstable or the injury is severe and there is an increased risk of bleeding. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of splenectomies where a surgical stapling device was used to reduce operation time and rapidly control bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients who underwent a splenectomy for traumatic splenic injury at Chosun University Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Clinical outcomes including operation time (duration), blood transfusion amount (number of units), length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and mortality rate were compared between patients who received conventional ligation [conventional group (CG)] and patients who received a splenectomy where a surgical stapling device was used [stapling group (SG)]. Results: The SG showed an average operation time of 17 minutes less than the CG, although the reduction was not statistically significant. No significant differences in estimated blood loss and blood transfusion amount were determined between the 2 groups, although the SG received 1 more unit of red blood cells for transfusion in the 48-hour post-operative period compared with the CG. One case of pancreatic fistula as a postoperative complication was reported in the SG. Conclusion The use of a surgical stapling device in a splenectomy may be considered for a hemodynamically unstable patient with splenic injury which caused severe anatomical damage.

Purpose: The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared. Results: Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392). Conclusion Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.

No abstract available.
Diospyros* ; Intussusception*

No abstract available.
Aneurysm, False* ; Blood Pressure Monitors* ; Blood Pressure* ; Compression Bandages* ; Humans ; Radial Artery*

No abstract available.
Aneurysm, False ; Blood Pressure Monitors ; Blood Pressure ; Compression Bandages ; Humans ; Radial Artery

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard management for acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) may be an alternative interim strategy before surgery in elderly patients with comorbidities. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PTGBD for elderly patients (>60 years) with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis between January 2009 and December 2013. Group I included patients who underwent PTGBD, and patients of group II did not undergo PTGBD before LC. RESULTS: All 116 patients (72.7 +/- 7.1 years) were analyzed. The preoperative details of group I (n = 39) and group II (n = 77) were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in operative time (P = 0.057) and intraoperative estimated blood loss (P = 0.291). The rate of conversion to open operation of group I was significantly lower than that of group II (12.8% vs. 32.5%, P < 0.050). No significant difference of postoperative morbidity was found between the two groups (25.6% vs. 26.0%, P = 0.969). In addition, perioperative mortality was not significantly different. Preoperative hospital stay of group I was significantly longer than that of group II (10.3 +/- 5.7 days vs. 4.4 +/- 2.8 days, P < 0.050). However, two groups were not significantly different in total hospital stay (16.3 +/- 9.0 days vs. 13.4 +/- 6.5 days, P = 0.074). CONCLUSION: PTGBD is a proper preoperative management before LC for elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.
Aged* ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholecystitis, Acute* ; Comorbidity ; Drainage* ; Gallbladder* ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Operative Time

PURPOSE: Extremely elderly patients who present with complicated gallstone disease are less likely to undergo definitive treatment. The use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in older patients is complicated by comorbid conditions that are concomitant with advanced age and may increase postoperative complications and the frequency of conversion to open surgery. We aimed to evaluate the results of LC in patients (older than 80 years). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients who underwent LC for acute cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2013. Total patients were divided into three groups: group 1 patients were younger than 65 years, group 2 patients were between 65 and 79 years, and group 3 patients were older than 80 years. Patient characteristics were compared between the different groups. RESULTS: The conversion rate was significantly higher in group 3 compared to that in the other groups. Hematoma in gallbladder fossa and intraoperative bleeding were higher in group 3, the difference was not significant. Wound infection was not different between the three groups. Operating time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher in group 3 compared to those in the other groups. There was no reported bile leakage and operative mortality. Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were performed more frequently in group 3 than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: LC is safe and feasible. It should be the gold-standard approach for extremely elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.
Aged* ; Bile ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholecystitis, Acute ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Drainage ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones ; Hematoma ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Infection

PURPOSE: Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMC), which are not palpable and have no clinical symptoms are 1.0 cm or less in diameter. The optimal extent of thyroid tumor resection has been controversial. We investigated clinicopathological findings of PTMC of 5 mm or less in diameter for reasonable therapeutic approach. METHODS: From, Jan. 2002 to Dec. 2006, 366 patients underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid papillary carcinoma at our institution. Among these patients, 62 patients with a mass measuring less than 5 mm and 103 patients with a mass 5 mm to 1.0 cm were selected. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records. RESULTS: There was no significant difference on the clinical characteristics except multifocality. We performed more unilateral lobectomy, near total thyroidectomy with or without neck node dissection in patients with PTMC of less than 5 mm (P=0.13). In permanent biopsy, lymph node metastasis more frequently occurred in patients with PTMC of less than 5 mm (P=0.03). There were no differences in capsular invasion, distant metastasis or recurrence. CONCLUSION: In papillary thyroid microcarcinoma less than 0.5 cm, it is very uncommon for capsular invasion, distant metastasis and locoregional metastasis to exist. The extent of tumor resection may be limited less than near total thyroidectomy for suitable cases, because there was no locoregional metastasis or distant metastasis in the follow-up period. Longer follow-up periods would be required to confirm that limited surgery is sufficient for tumors less than 0.5 cm in size.
Biopsy ; Carcinoma ; Carcinoma, Papillary ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Medical Records ; Neck ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Thyroid Gland ; Thyroid Neoplasms ; Thyroidectomy