1.Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion
Seunghwan CHOI ; In Seon BAEK ; Kyungjoon LEE ; Sun Kwang KIM
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2025;29(1):109-116
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study
Sun Oh KIM ; Hong-Ju KIM ; Jong-Il PARK ; Kang-Un CHOI ; Jong-Ho NAM ; Chan-Hee LEE ; Jang-Won SON ; Jong-Seon PARK ; Sung-Ho HER ; Ki-Yuk CHANG ; Tae-Hoon AHN ; Myung-Ho JEONG ; Seung-Woon RHA ; Hyo-Soo KIM ; Hyeon-Cheol GWON ; In-Whan SEONG ; Kyung-Kuk HWANG ; Seung-Ho HUR ; Kwang-Soo CHA ; Seok-Kyu OH ; Jei-Keon CHAE ; Ung KIM
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42(1):18-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion
Seunghwan CHOI ; In Seon BAEK ; Kyungjoon LEE ; Sun Kwang KIM
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2025;29(1):109-116
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion
Seunghwan CHOI ; In Seon BAEK ; Kyungjoon LEE ; Sun Kwang KIM
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2025;29(1):109-116
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study
Sun Oh KIM ; Hong-Ju KIM ; Jong-Il PARK ; Kang-Un CHOI ; Jong-Ho NAM ; Chan-Hee LEE ; Jang-Won SON ; Jong-Seon PARK ; Sung-Ho HER ; Ki-Yuk CHANG ; Tae-Hoon AHN ; Myung-Ho JEONG ; Seung-Woon RHA ; Hyo-Soo KIM ; Hyeon-Cheol GWON ; In-Whan SEONG ; Kyung-Kuk HWANG ; Seung-Ho HUR ; Kwang-Soo CHA ; Seok-Kyu OH ; Jei-Keon CHAE ; Ung KIM
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42(1):18-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study
Sun Oh KIM ; Hong-Ju KIM ; Jong-Il PARK ; Kang-Un CHOI ; Jong-Ho NAM ; Chan-Hee LEE ; Jang-Won SON ; Jong-Seon PARK ; Sung-Ho HER ; Ki-Yuk CHANG ; Tae-Hoon AHN ; Myung-Ho JEONG ; Seung-Woon RHA ; Hyo-Soo KIM ; Hyeon-Cheol GWON ; In-Whan SEONG ; Kyung-Kuk HWANG ; Seung-Ho HUR ; Kwang-Soo CHA ; Seok-Kyu OH ; Jei-Keon CHAE ; Ung KIM
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42(1):18-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion
Seunghwan CHOI ; In Seon BAEK ; Kyungjoon LEE ; Sun Kwang KIM
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2025;29(1):109-116
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study
Sun Oh KIM ; Hong-Ju KIM ; Jong-Il PARK ; Kang-Un CHOI ; Jong-Ho NAM ; Chan-Hee LEE ; Jang-Won SON ; Jong-Seon PARK ; Sung-Ho HER ; Ki-Yuk CHANG ; Tae-Hoon AHN ; Myung-Ho JEONG ; Seung-Woon RHA ; Hyo-Soo KIM ; Hyeon-Cheol GWON ; In-Whan SEONG ; Kyung-Kuk HWANG ; Seung-Ho HUR ; Kwang-Soo CHA ; Seok-Kyu OH ; Jei-Keon CHAE ; Ung KIM
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42(1):18-
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Low-frequency auricular vagus nerve stimulation facilitates cerebrospinal fluid influx by promoting vasomotion
Seunghwan CHOI ; In Seon BAEK ; Kyungjoon LEE ; Sun Kwang KIM
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2025;29(1):109-116
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is one of the promising neuromodulation techniques due to its non-invasiveness, convenience, and effectiveness. aVNS has been suggested as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases showing impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. Improving CSF flow has been proposed as a key mechanism of the therapeutic effect on neurodegenerative diseases. However, aVNS parameters have been set empirically and the effective parameter that maximize the effect remains elusive. Here we show that 30 minutes of low-frequency aVNS increased arterial vasomotion events and enhanced cortical CSF influx along the branches of middle cerebral arteries. By using in vivo two photon imaging or widefield fluorescence microscopy with plasma and CSF tracers for visualizing blood vessels and perivascular spaces, arterial vasomotion and cortical CSF influx dynamics were acquired. The low-frequency (2 Hz) aVNS, but not middleand high-frequency (40 and 100 Hz) aVNS, significantly increased the number of vasomotion events compared to the sham group. Accordingly, in the CSF imaging, 2 Hz of aVNS markedly enhanced the CSF influx. Our findings demonstrate that lowfrequency aVNS is the effective parameter in respect to modulating vasomotion and CSF influx, resulting in brain clearance effect. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Analgesic Effect of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in a Rodent Model
In Seon BAEK ; Seunghwan CHOI ; Heera YOON ; Geehoon CHUNG ; Sun Kwang KIM
Experimental Neurobiology 2024;33(3):129-139
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Cancer chemotherapy often triggers peripheral neuropathy in patients, leading to neuropathic pain in the extremities. While previous research has explored various nerve stimulation to alleviate chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), evidence on the effectiveness of noninvasive auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of non-invasive aVNS in relieving CIPN pain. To induce CIPN in experimental animals, oxaliplatin was intraperitoneally administered to rats (6 mg/kg). Mechanical and cold allodynia, the representative symptoms of neuropathic pain, were evaluated using the von Frey test and acetone test, respectively. The CIPN animals were randomly assigned to groups and treated with aVNS (5 V, square wave) at different frequencies (2, 20, or 100 Hz) for 20 minutes. Results revealed that 20 Hz aVNS exhibited the most pronounced analgesic effect, while 2 or 100 Hz aVNS exhibited weak effects. Immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrated increased c-Fos expression in the locus coeruleus (LC) in the brain of CIPN rats treated with aVNS compared to sham treatment. To elucidate the analgesic mechanisms involving the adrenergic descending pathway, α 1 -, α 2 -, or β-adrenergic receptor antagonists were administered to the spinal cord before 20 Hz aVNS. Only the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist, propranolol, blocked the analgesic effect of aVNS.These findings suggest that 20 Hz aVNS may effectively alleviate CIPN pain through β-adrenergic receptor activation. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail