Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Purpose: This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity. Methods: Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . Results: The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.

Purpose: This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity. Methods: Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . Results: The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.

Purpose: This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity. Methods: Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . Results: The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.

Purpose: Perspectives of radiation oncologists on oligometastatic disease was investigated using multi-layered survey. Materials and Methods: Online survey on the oligometastatic disease was distributed to the board-certified regular members of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology. The questionnaire consisted of four domains: five questions on demographics; five on the definition of oligometastatic disease; four on the role of local therapy; and three on the oligometastatic disease classification, respectively. Results: A total of 135 radiation oncologists participated in the survey. The median length of practice after board certification was 22.5 years (range, 1 to 44 years), and the vast majority (94.1%) answered affirmatively to the clinical experience in oligometastatic disease management. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents considered the number of involved organs as an independent factor in defining oligometastasis. Most frequently perceived upper limit on the numerical definition of oligometastasis was 5 (64.2%), followed by 3 (26.0%), respectively. Peritoneal and brain metastasis were nominated as the sites to be excluded from oligometastastic disease by 56.3% and 12.6% of the participants, respectively. Vast majority (82.1%) agreed on the role of local treatment in the management of oligometastatic disease. Majority (72%) of the participants acknowledged the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)–European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification of oligometastatic disease, however, only 43.3% answered that they applied this classification in their clinical practice. Underlying reasons against the clinical use were ‘too complicated’ (66.0%), followed by ‘insufficient supporting evidence’ (30.0%), respectively. Conclusion While most radiation oncologists supported the role of local therapy in oligometastatic disease, there were several inconsistencies in defining and categorizing oligometastatic disease. Continued education and training on oligometastatic disease would be also required to build consensus among participating caregivers.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate whether pediatric emergency practice has improved since the introduction of pediatric specialist care (PSC). Methods: Retrospective observational study was conducted using the data retrieved from the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary university hospital in Cheongju, Korea. Patients younger than 19 years who visited the ED from January 2019 through December 2023 were enrolled in this study. Hospitalization (overall and intensive care unit [ICU]), in-hospital mortality, and return visit within 24 hours were compared between the periods before (January 2019-January 2021) and after (June 2021-December 2023) the introduction of PSC. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes using multivariable logistic regression. Results: During the study period, a total of 36,162 patients visited the ED. The visits increased from 12,196 before to 22,387 after the introduction of PSC (increase by 83.6%). Annual numbers of the visits have increased since 2020 and reached 10,942 in 2023. After the introduction of PSC, decreases were noted in the hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.72) and return visit within 24 hours (0.73; 0.61-0.88). Hospitalization to the ICU increased (2.90; 2.29-3.69), while there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality (1.31; 0.77-2.25). Conclusion After the introduction of PSC, overall hospitalization and return visit decreased, while hospitalization to the ICU increased without a difference in the in-hospital mortality. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed to continue providing the pediatric specialist-centered emergency practice.

Objective: Epinephrine is a first-line drug for anaphylaxis, but a poor prognosis can occur if not administered properly. This study compared the clinical features of patients with anaphylaxis in the emergency department (ED) according to epinephrine administration. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using ED-based data retrieved from a tertiary university hospital. Patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. The patients with anaphylaxis were classified according to epinephrine administration, and the clinical features were compared. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the main factors associated with epinephrine use. Results: Among 205 eligible patients with anaphylaxis, 157 (76.6%) were treated with epinephrine. The main contributing factors influencing epinephrine use were patients with cardiovascular symptoms (AOR=2.97; 95% CI, 1.26-7.01) and patients transferred from other hospitals (AOR=0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.85). Conclusion The major factors influencing epinephrine use in the ED when patients with anaphylaxis presented with cardiovascular symptoms were identified. It is essential to prevent potentially fatal consequences in patients with anaphylaxis through appropriate epinephrine administration.