Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored. Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due tovarious reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6%of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain.However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role. Conclusions Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored. Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due tovarious reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6%of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain.However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role. Conclusions Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored. Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due tovarious reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6%of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain.However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role. Conclusions Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored. Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due tovarious reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6%of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain.However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role. Conclusions Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored. Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due tovarious reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6%of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain.However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role. Conclusions Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

Objective: To determine whether variations in the termination of the small saphenous vein predict small saphenous vein incompetence. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study, evaluating 133 patients diagnosed with either an isolated small saphenous vein incompetence (study group, n=47) or an isolated great saphenous vein incompetence (control group, n=86) between December 2014 and June 2015. The variations in the termination of the small saphenous vein were assessed using color Doppler ultrasound and classified according to the modified Kosinski’s classification. Data were compared between two groups. Results: Type 1 variation was more common (41/47, 87%) in patients with small saphenous vein incompetence compared to those with isolated great saphenous vein incompetence (54/86, 63%). No patients had Type 3 variation. Although not statistically significant, small saphenous vein incompetence was less common in patients with type 2 variation in the termination of small saphenous vein (16% vs. 43%; p=0.055). Conclusion While awareness of small saphenous vein termination variations cannot predict saphenous vein incompetence, since we encounter these variations frequently, it is important to determine the type of variation before surgical treatment in order to prevent recurrence.

Background: Pain intensity has been reported to fluctuate throughout the day in various clinical situations. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between postoperative pain and circadian rhythm after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery. Methods: Two hundred patients, aged 6–18 years, undergoing acute appendicitis surgery were included in this prospective observational study. The patients were divided into four groups according to the time they underwent surgery: the night group, 01:01–07:00; morning group, 07:01–13:00; afternoon group, 13:01–19:00; and evening group, 19:01–01:00. Intraoperative and postoperative vital signs, postoperative 24-h Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACEs) scores, and the amount of analgesic required were recorded. Results: A total of 186 patients were analyzed in the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic characteristics of the patient groups. Additionally, no differences were observed in intraoperative and postoperative vital signs among the four groups. However, patients in the night group had significantly higher FACEs values than those in the other groups at each time point (1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th h) up to 12 h (P = 0.007, P = 0.023, P = 0.048, and P = 0.003, respectively). The amount of analgesic required in the night group was statistically higher than in the other groups until 12 h (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.004, respectively). Conclusion A relationship was found between acute appendicitis operations performed at night (01:01 to 07:00) under general anesthesia and circadian rhythm in children. We believe that considering circadian time in the relief of postoperative pain would be beneficial.

Objective: Several immunological factors are emphasized in the etiology of autoimmune thyroid diseases and obsessivecompulsive disorder. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) are commonly seen in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between OCS and antithyroid antibodies. Methods: The study included 145 patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis or Graves’ disease and 42 healthy controls. Thyroid function tests and serum thyroid autobody levels (anti-thyroglobulin [TG], anti-thyroid peroxidase [TPO], and anti-thyroid stimulating hormone [TSH]) of the patients were measured. The socio-demographic data and OCS of the participants were evaluated with Dimensional OCS (DOCS). Results: DOCS scores were higher in patients than in the control group. There was not found a significant relationship between free T3, free T4, and TSH levels and DOCS scores. Anti-TG positivity in females was associated with lower DOCS scores. Anti-TPO positivity in males had a positive correlation with DOCS scores. There was no correlation between sex and the presence of anti-TSH in terms of OCS severity. Univariate analysis found the highest OCS scores in anti-TPO positive, anti-TG, and anti-TSH negative patients. The group with the lowest OCS scores was found to be anti-TG positive, anti-TPO, and anti-TSH negative patients. Conclusion OCS severity could be affected by different thyroid autoantibody profiles in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. While anti-TG serves a protective role against OCS in females, the presence of anti-TPO may worsen the OCS in men. Additionally, the co-existence of different antithyroid antibodies may affect the severity of OCS differently according to sex.