1.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
2.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
3.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
4.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
5.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
6.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
7.Efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Cancer Prevention and Its Putative Mechanisms
Sakshi GUPTA ; Saurabh YADAV ; Pawan KUMAR
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2024;29(1):6-15
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is an attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis. Although it was developed as a prophylactic vaccine against tuberculosis (TB), researchers have also evaluated it for preventing cancer development or progression. These studies were inspired by the available data regarding the protective effects of microbial infection against cancers and an inverse relationship between TB and cancer mortality. Initial studies demonstrated the efficacy of BCG in preventing leukemia, melanoma and a few other cancers. However, mixed results were observed in later studies. Importantly, these studies have led to the successful use of BCG in the tertiary prevention of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, wherein BCG therapy has been found to be more effective than chemotherapy. Moreover, in a recently published 60-year follow-up study, childhood BCG vaccination has been found to significantly prevent lung cancer development. In the present manuscript, we reviewed the studies evaluating the efficacy of BCG in cancer prevention and discussed its putative mechanisms. Also, we sought to explain the mixed results of BCG efficacy in preventing different cancers.
8.Orbital IgG4 Disease: Imaging Findings on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT
Saurabh ARORA ; Nishikant A DAMLE ; Rachna MEEL ; Sanjay SHARMA ; Seema SEN ; Chandrasekar BAL ; Kanak LATA ; Sneha PRAKASH ; Divya YADAV ; Meivel ANGAMUTHU
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2019;53(6):432-435
Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)–related diseases are a spectrum of systemic inflammatory conditions of unknown etiology, which are characterized by infiltration of tissues by IgG4 plasma cells and sclerosing inflammation (Cheuk and Chan Adv Anat Pathol 17:303-32, 2010). Although this condition was initially described in relation to autoimmune pancreatitis, now it has been reported in almost every organ system of body (Zen and Nakanuma Am J Surg Pathol 34:1812-9, 2010, Masaki et al. Ann Rheuma Dis 68:1310-5, 2009). Orbital involvement by IgG4 disease can involve extraocular muscles (EOM), lacrimal glands, conjunctiva, eyelids, infraorbital nerve, orbital fat, and nasolacrimal system (McNab and McKelvie. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:167-78, 2015, Katsura et al. Neuroradiology 54:873-82, 2012). The basis of using ⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in IgG4 orbital disease is the known expression of somatostatin receptors in chronic inflammatory cells (Cuccurullo et al. Indian J Radiol Imaging 27:509-16, 2017) and also avidity shown previously in other IgG4-related diseases (Cheng et al. Clin Nucl Med 43:773-6, 2018).
Conjunctiva
;
Eyelids
;
Immunoglobulin G
;
Immunoglobulins
;
Inflammation
;
Lacrimal Apparatus
;
Muscles
;
Orbit
;
Orbital Diseases
;
Pancreatitis
;
Plasma Cells
;
Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
;
Receptors, Somatostatin
9.Orbital IgG4 Disease: Imaging Findings on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT
Saurabh ARORA ; Nishikant A DAMLE ; Rachna MEEL ; Sanjay SHARMA ; Seema SEN ; Chandrasekar BAL ; Kanak LATA ; Sneha PRAKASH ; Divya YADAV ; Meivel ANGAMUTHU
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2019;53(6):432-435
Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)–related diseases are a spectrum of systemic inflammatory conditions of unknown etiology, which are characterized by infiltration of tissues by IgG4 plasma cells and sclerosing inflammation (Cheuk and Chan Adv Anat Pathol 17:303-32, 2010). Although this condition was initially described in relation to autoimmune pancreatitis, now it has been reported in almost every organ system of body (Zen and Nakanuma Am J Surg Pathol 34:1812-9, 2010, Masaki et al. Ann Rheuma Dis 68:1310-5, 2009). Orbital involvement by IgG4 disease can involve extraocular muscles (EOM), lacrimal glands, conjunctiva, eyelids, infraorbital nerve, orbital fat, and nasolacrimal system (McNab and McKelvie. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:167-78, 2015, Katsura et al. Neuroradiology 54:873-82, 2012). The basis of using â¶â¸Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in IgG4 orbital disease is the known expression of somatostatin receptors in chronic inflammatory cells (Cuccurullo et al. Indian J Radiol Imaging 27:509-16, 2017) and also avidity shown previously in other IgG4-related diseases (Cheng et al. Clin Nucl Med 43:773-6, 2018).
10.High risk of tuberculosis during infliximab therapy despite tuberculosis screening in inflammatory bowel disease patients in India.
Ashish AGARWAL ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Saransh JAIN ; Vipin GUPTA ; Sawan BOPANNA ; Dawesh P YADAV ; Sandeep GOYAL ; Venigalla Pratap MOULI ; Rajan DHINGRA ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2018;16(4):588-598
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The data on the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation with infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from TB endemic countries, like India, is limited. The risk of TB reactivation on IFX and its predictors in patients with IBD was assessed. METHODS: This retrospective review included consecutive patients with IBD who received IFX, and were on follow-up from January 2005 to November 2017. The data was recorded on age/disease duration, indications for IFX, screening for latent tuberculosis (LTB) before IFX, response to IFX, incidence and duration when TB developed after IFX, and type of TB (pulmonary [PTB]/extra-pulmonary [EPTB]/disseminated). RESULTS: Of 69 patients (22 ulcerative colitis/47 Crohn’s disease; mean age, 35.6±14.5 years; 50.7% males; median follow-up duration after IFX, 19 months [interquartile range, 5.5–48.7 months]), primary non-response at 8 weeks and secondary loss of response at 26 and 52 weeks were seen in 14.5%, 6% and 15% patients respectively. Prior to IFX, all patients were screened for LTB, 8 (11.6%) developed active TB (disseminated, 62.5%; EPTB, 25%; PTB, 12.5%) after a median of 19 weeks (interquartile range, 14.0–84.5 weeks) of IFX. Of these 8 patients’ none had LTB, even when 7 of 8 were additionally screened with contrast-enhanced chest tomography. Though not statistically significant, more patients with Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis (14.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.21), and those with past history of TB (25% vs. 9.8%, P=0.21), developed TB. Age, gender, disease duration, or extraintestinal manifestations could not predict TB reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: There is an extremely high rate of TB with IFX in Indian patients with IBD. Current screening techniques are ineffective and it is difficult to predict TB after IFX.
Colitis, Ulcerative
;
Crohn Disease
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
India*
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases*
;
Infliximab*
;
Interferon-gamma Release Tests
;
Latent Tuberculosis
;
Male
;
Mass Screening*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Thorax
;
Tuberculosis*
;
Ulcer

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail