Background: Commutability refers to the consistency of results from different measurement procedures in regards to a reference material (RM) and representative samples. In this study, we evaluated the commutability of laboratory-prepared pooled sera and commercial quality control materials in the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) proficiency testing program of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service. Methods: Serum TSH from 30 patients was measured in triplicate. Two levels of lab-prepared pooled sera and three levels of commercial materials (Bio-Rad Liquichek Immunoassay Plus) were tested in triplicate at five positions per immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 800, Abbott Alinity i, Roche Cobas e801, Siemens Atellica IM 1600). Commutability was assessed by comparing method differences in patient samples to RMs using the ‘International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine’ protocol with a desirable bias of 10% based on biological variation. Results: The median TSH level for the 30 patient samples was 2.51–3.07 μIU/mL, with a coefficient of variation ranging from 1.51% to 4.32%.The median TSH levels of the in-house prepared materials were 0.912– 1.01 μIU/mL for RM2 and 9.10–10.9 μIU/mL for RM4. The median TSH levels of the commercial materials were 0.391–0.464 μIU/mL for RM1, 4.39–5.24 μIU/mL for RM3, and 28.2–35.5 μIU/mL for RM5. The in-house prepared materials (RM2, RM4) demonstrated commutability across all six method combinations. Among the commercial materials, RM1 and RM3 showed commutability in four method combinations, while RM5 showed commutability in three method combinations. Conclusions The evaluation results for the TSH proficiency testing materials showed that the in-house prepared materials had higher commutability than the commercial materials.

Background: The preanalytical phase is more vulnerable to errors. This study aimed to establish preanalytical quality indicators (QIs) suitable for Korean clinical laboratories and investigate the current status of preanalytical phase performance monitoring in Korea using these QIs. Methods: We reviewed previous studies investigating preanalytical QIs including the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) model of QIs, to establish a set of QIs for Korean clinical laboratories. An e-mail survey consisting of this QI set was sent to 90 clinical laboratories. The collected data were analyzed, and performance measures were evaluated according to the quality specifications defined by the IFCC and the sigmascale method. Results: A model consisting of 23 preanalytical phase QIs was established.Approximately 47% (42/90) of clinical laboratories responded to the survey.The average result submission rate for each QI was 56% (standard deviation, 26%). The QIs with the highest and lowest result submission rates were “rejected samples due to hemolysis” (95%) and “recollected sample due to errors caused outside the laboratory” (17%). The QIs with the highest and lowest error rates were “hemolyzed sample detected by hemolytic index” (median, 0.546%; sigma performance level, “good”) and “samples not received” (median, 0.001%; sigma performance level, “very good”), respectively. Conclusions This survey findings on preanalytical phase QIs could serve as a foundation for developing an external quality assessment program for clinical laboratories in Korea.

The Weight Management Health Note application, developed by the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO), was designed to assist individuals in weight management and enhance overall well-being. The Committee of IT-Convergence Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome of the KSSO designed this application. Committee members reviewed and supervised the application’s underlying driving algorithms and scientific rationale. A healthcare-specific application developer subsequently finalized the application. This application encompasses a myriad of features, including a comprehensive food diary, an exercise tracker, and tailor-made lifestyle recommendations aligned with individual needs and aspirations. Moreover, it facilitates connections within a community of like-minded individuals endeavoring to manage their weight, fostering mutual support and motivation. Importantly, the application is rich in evidence-based health content curated by the KSSO, ensuring users access accurate information for effective obesity management. Looking ahead, the KSSO is committed to orchestrating diverse academic research endeavors linked to this application and refining its functionalities through continuous feedback from users. The KSSO aspires for this application to serve as a valuable resource for individuals striving to manage their health and enhance their quality of life.

Background: Commutability refers to the consistency of results from different measurement procedures in regards to a reference material (RM) and representative samples. In this study, we evaluated the commutability of laboratory-prepared pooled sera and commercial quality control materials in the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) proficiency testing program of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service. Methods: Serum TSH from 30 patients was measured in triplicate. Two levels of lab-prepared pooled sera and three levels of commercial materials (Bio-Rad Liquichek Immunoassay Plus) were tested in triplicate at five positions per immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 800, Abbott Alinity i, Roche Cobas e801, Siemens Atellica IM 1600). Commutability was assessed by comparing method differences in patient samples to RMs using the ‘International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine’ protocol with a desirable bias of 10% based on biological variation. Results: The median TSH level for the 30 patient samples was 2.51–3.07 μIU/mL, with a coefficient of variation ranging from 1.51% to 4.32%.The median TSH levels of the in-house prepared materials were 0.912– 1.01 μIU/mL for RM2 and 9.10–10.9 μIU/mL for RM4. The median TSH levels of the commercial materials were 0.391–0.464 μIU/mL for RM1, 4.39–5.24 μIU/mL for RM3, and 28.2–35.5 μIU/mL for RM5. The in-house prepared materials (RM2, RM4) demonstrated commutability across all six method combinations. Among the commercial materials, RM1 and RM3 showed commutability in four method combinations, while RM5 showed commutability in three method combinations. Conclusions The evaluation results for the TSH proficiency testing materials showed that the in-house prepared materials had higher commutability than the commercial materials.

Background: The preanalytical phase is more vulnerable to errors. This study aimed to establish preanalytical quality indicators (QIs) suitable for Korean clinical laboratories and investigate the current status of preanalytical phase performance monitoring in Korea using these QIs. Methods: We reviewed previous studies investigating preanalytical QIs including the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) model of QIs, to establish a set of QIs for Korean clinical laboratories. An e-mail survey consisting of this QI set was sent to 90 clinical laboratories. The collected data were analyzed, and performance measures were evaluated according to the quality specifications defined by the IFCC and the sigmascale method. Results: A model consisting of 23 preanalytical phase QIs was established.Approximately 47% (42/90) of clinical laboratories responded to the survey.The average result submission rate for each QI was 56% (standard deviation, 26%). The QIs with the highest and lowest result submission rates were “rejected samples due to hemolysis” (95%) and “recollected sample due to errors caused outside the laboratory” (17%). The QIs with the highest and lowest error rates were “hemolyzed sample detected by hemolytic index” (median, 0.546%; sigma performance level, “good”) and “samples not received” (median, 0.001%; sigma performance level, “very good”), respectively. Conclusions This survey findings on preanalytical phase QIs could serve as a foundation for developing an external quality assessment program for clinical laboratories in Korea.

Background: Commutability refers to the consistency of results from different measurement procedures in regards to a reference material (RM) and representative samples. In this study, we evaluated the commutability of laboratory-prepared pooled sera and commercial quality control materials in the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) proficiency testing program of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service. Methods: Serum TSH from 30 patients was measured in triplicate. Two levels of lab-prepared pooled sera and three levels of commercial materials (Bio-Rad Liquichek Immunoassay Plus) were tested in triplicate at five positions per immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 800, Abbott Alinity i, Roche Cobas e801, Siemens Atellica IM 1600). Commutability was assessed by comparing method differences in patient samples to RMs using the ‘International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine’ protocol with a desirable bias of 10% based on biological variation. Results: The median TSH level for the 30 patient samples was 2.51–3.07 μIU/mL, with a coefficient of variation ranging from 1.51% to 4.32%.The median TSH levels of the in-house prepared materials were 0.912– 1.01 μIU/mL for RM2 and 9.10–10.9 μIU/mL for RM4. The median TSH levels of the commercial materials were 0.391–0.464 μIU/mL for RM1, 4.39–5.24 μIU/mL for RM3, and 28.2–35.5 μIU/mL for RM5. The in-house prepared materials (RM2, RM4) demonstrated commutability across all six method combinations. Among the commercial materials, RM1 and RM3 showed commutability in four method combinations, while RM5 showed commutability in three method combinations. Conclusions The evaluation results for the TSH proficiency testing materials showed that the in-house prepared materials had higher commutability than the commercial materials.

Background: The preanalytical phase is more vulnerable to errors. This study aimed to establish preanalytical quality indicators (QIs) suitable for Korean clinical laboratories and investigate the current status of preanalytical phase performance monitoring in Korea using these QIs. Methods: We reviewed previous studies investigating preanalytical QIs including the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) model of QIs, to establish a set of QIs for Korean clinical laboratories. An e-mail survey consisting of this QI set was sent to 90 clinical laboratories. The collected data were analyzed, and performance measures were evaluated according to the quality specifications defined by the IFCC and the sigmascale method. Results: A model consisting of 23 preanalytical phase QIs was established.Approximately 47% (42/90) of clinical laboratories responded to the survey.The average result submission rate for each QI was 56% (standard deviation, 26%). The QIs with the highest and lowest result submission rates were “rejected samples due to hemolysis” (95%) and “recollected sample due to errors caused outside the laboratory” (17%). The QIs with the highest and lowest error rates were “hemolyzed sample detected by hemolytic index” (median, 0.546%; sigma performance level, “good”) and “samples not received” (median, 0.001%; sigma performance level, “very good”), respectively. Conclusions This survey findings on preanalytical phase QIs could serve as a foundation for developing an external quality assessment program for clinical laboratories in Korea.