Purpose: To compare axial length (AL), keratometry (K), and refractive measurements using Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1 autorefractor. Methods: The study involved 44 eyes of 44 children who visited our clinic. We compared AL, flat K, steep K, mean K, and spherical equivalent (SE) measured by Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1. We utilized a paired t-test and RM-ANOVA to compare mean differences and used Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Pearson correlation tests for agreement analysis. Results: The mean ALs (mm) measured with Myopia Master and Lenstar were 24.59 ± 0.91 mm and 24.60 ± 0.91 mm, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.085). Both the ICC and Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.999. The mean SEs (D) measured with Myopia Master and KR-1 were -3.32 ± 1.75 D and -3.18 ± 1.68 D, respectively, with significant differences (p < 0.001). The ICC was 0.996 and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.995. The mean K (D) values measured by Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar were 43.15 ± 1.59 D, 43.38 ± 1.58 D, and 43.32 ± 1.63 D, respectively, and differed significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions While statistical differences emerged in SEs between Myopia Master and KR-1, the differences were not clinically significant and the tools may be used interchangeably due to their good agreement. However, measured K values differed among Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar, so these tools are not interchangeable. Based on the results from paired t-tests, ICCs, and Pearson correlations, AL measurements were in good agreement between Myopia Master and Lenstar but caution should be exercised due to the wider range of measured values.

Purpose: To compare axial length (AL), keratometry (K), and refractive measurements using Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1 autorefractor. Methods: The study involved 44 eyes of 44 children who visited our clinic. We compared AL, flat K, steep K, mean K, and spherical equivalent (SE) measured by Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1. We utilized a paired t-test and RM-ANOVA to compare mean differences and used Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Pearson correlation tests for agreement analysis. Results: The mean ALs (mm) measured with Myopia Master and Lenstar were 24.59 ± 0.91 mm and 24.60 ± 0.91 mm, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.085). Both the ICC and Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.999. The mean SEs (D) measured with Myopia Master and KR-1 were -3.32 ± 1.75 D and -3.18 ± 1.68 D, respectively, with significant differences (p < 0.001). The ICC was 0.996 and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.995. The mean K (D) values measured by Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar were 43.15 ± 1.59 D, 43.38 ± 1.58 D, and 43.32 ± 1.63 D, respectively, and differed significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions While statistical differences emerged in SEs between Myopia Master and KR-1, the differences were not clinically significant and the tools may be used interchangeably due to their good agreement. However, measured K values differed among Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar, so these tools are not interchangeable. Based on the results from paired t-tests, ICCs, and Pearson correlations, AL measurements were in good agreement between Myopia Master and Lenstar but caution should be exercised due to the wider range of measured values.

Purpose: To compare axial length (AL), keratometry (K), and refractive measurements using Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1 autorefractor. Methods: The study involved 44 eyes of 44 children who visited our clinic. We compared AL, flat K, steep K, mean K, and spherical equivalent (SE) measured by Myopia Master, Lenstar, and KR-1. We utilized a paired t-test and RM-ANOVA to compare mean differences and used Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Pearson correlation tests for agreement analysis. Results: The mean ALs (mm) measured with Myopia Master and Lenstar were 24.59 ± 0.91 mm and 24.60 ± 0.91 mm, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.085). Both the ICC and Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.999. The mean SEs (D) measured with Myopia Master and KR-1 were -3.32 ± 1.75 D and -3.18 ± 1.68 D, respectively, with significant differences (p < 0.001). The ICC was 0.996 and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.995. The mean K (D) values measured by Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar were 43.15 ± 1.59 D, 43.38 ± 1.58 D, and 43.32 ± 1.63 D, respectively, and differed significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions While statistical differences emerged in SEs between Myopia Master and KR-1, the differences were not clinically significant and the tools may be used interchangeably due to their good agreement. However, measured K values differed among Myopia Master, KR-1, and Lenstar, so these tools are not interchangeable. Based on the results from paired t-tests, ICCs, and Pearson correlations, AL measurements were in good agreement between Myopia Master and Lenstar but caution should be exercised due to the wider range of measured values.

BACKGROUND: Several factors contribute to differences in Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype distribution. We investigated the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae isolated between 2014 and 2016 in Korea. METHODS: We collected a total of 1,855 S. pneumoniae isolates from 44 hospitals between May 2014 and May 2016, and analyzed the serotypes by sequential multiplex PCR. We investigated the distribution of each serotype by patient age, source of the clinical specimen, and antimicrobial resistance pattern. RESULTS: The most common serotypes were 11A (10.1%), followed by 19A (8.8%), 3 (8.5%), 34 (8.1%), 23A (7.3%), and 35B (6.2%). The major invasive serotypes were 3 (12.6%), 19A (7.8%), 34 (7.8%), 10A (6.8%), and 11A (6.8%). Serotypes 10A, 15B, 19A, and 12F were more common in patients ≤5 years old, while serotype 3 was more common in patients ≥65 years old compared with the other age groups. The coverage rates of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)7, PCV10, PCV13, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 were 11.8%, 12.12%, 33.3%, and 53.6%, respectively. Of the 1,855 isolates, 857 (46.2%) were multi-drug resistant (MDR), with serotypes 11A and 19A predominant among the MDR strains. The resistance rates against penicillin, cefotaxime, and levofloxacin were 22.8%, 12.5%, and 9.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant changes in the major S. pneumoniae serotypes in the community. Non-PCV13 serotypes increased in patients ≤5 years old following the introduction of national immunization programs with the 10- and 13-polyvalent vaccines.
Cefotaxime ; Humans ; Immunization Programs ; Korea ; Levofloxacin ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Penicillins ; Pneumococcal Vaccines ; Pneumonia ; Serogroup ; Streptococcus pneumoniae ; Streptococcus ; Vaccines

While radioactive isotope analysis has proved to be a useful method in disciplines such as archaeology and forensic anthropology, more recently, radiocarbon dating has allowed for a more nuanced biological profile of human skeletal remains. Radiocarbon dating has been made possible by the above ground nuclear bomb test conducted in 1963, which raised the level of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration to almost twice the natural level. Because the annually measured tropospheric ¹⁴C concentrations are integrated into the bomb peak curve, the time of birth and death of an individual can be estimated by comparing the radiocarbon content of a skeletal sample to the bomb-curve value. In July 2017, about 1,000 skeletal remains were excavated at the construction site of Sokcho. For medico-legal purposes, we conducted anthropological and odontological examinations of all the human remains. We then conducted the radiocarbon analysis on seven femora (head and body portions), five mandibular teeth, and soil from the site through a request to the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources. The results demonstrated that the estimated year of birth or death was prior to the 1950s. Due to the diverse distribution of results, we deduced that the human remains were from the local mass grave. This study supports and suggests the use of radiocarbon dating more frequently in the analysis of human skeletal remains.
Archaeology ; Bombs ; Earth Sciences ; Forensic Anthropology ; Gangwon-do ; Humans ; Korea ; Methods ; Miners ; Parturition ; Radiometric Dating ; Soil ; Tooth

While radioactive isotope analysis has proved to be a useful method in disciplines such as archaeology and forensic anthropology, more recently, radiocarbon dating has allowed for a more nuanced biological profile of human skeletal remains. Radiocarbon dating has been made possible by the above ground nuclear bomb test conducted in 1963, which raised the level of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration to almost twice the natural level. Because the annually measured tropospheric ¹⁴C concentrations are integrated into the bomb peak curve, the time of birth and death of an individual can be estimated by comparing the radiocarbon content of a skeletal sample to the bomb-curve value. In July 2017, about 1,000 skeletal remains were excavated at the construction site of Sokcho. For medico-legal purposes, we conducted anthropological and odontological examinations of all the human remains. We then conducted the radiocarbon analysis on seven femora (head and body portions), five mandibular teeth, and soil from the site through a request to the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources. The results demonstrated that the estimated year of birth or death was prior to the 1950s. Due to the diverse distribution of results, we deduced that the human remains were from the local mass grave. This study supports and suggests the use of radiocarbon dating more frequently in the analysis of human skeletal remains.

This correction is being published to correct the errors of sentences and spelling in abstract.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to analyze the cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants (Osstem Implant Co., Ltd.) over a seven-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients who had 467 Osstem implants that were placed at the Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) from June 2003 through December 2005 were analyzed. The life table method and a cross-tubulation analysis, log rank test were used to evaluate the survival curve and the influence that the prognostic factors. The prognostic factors, i.e., age and gender of patients, diameter and length, type of implants, bone graft history and loading time were determined with a Cox proportional hazard model based on logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The seven-year cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants was 95.37%. The Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the following factors had a significant influence on survival rate; increased diameter, reduced prosthetic loading period and performance of bone grafting. CONCLUSION: The osstem implants showed satisfactory results over the seven-year study period.
Bone Transplantation ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Life Tables ; Logistic Models ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Seoul ; Survival Rate* ; Transplants

Cowden's disease, a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by benign hamartomatous overgrowth of various tissues, increases the risk of cancer of the thyroid, breast, endometrium, prostate, and possibly other organs. Generally, germline mutations in the coding sequence for PTEN are found in 80% of patients with Cowden's disease. Here we report a rare case of incidentally discovered gastric polyposis during esophagogastroscopy for medical screening in a patient with a history of surgery for breast and thyroid cancer. Identifyng the mutation in the PTEN gene to a diagnosis of Cowden's disease.
Breast ; Clinical Coding ; Endometrium ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Germ-Line Mutation ; Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Prostate ; Thyroid Neoplasms

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of both the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) or adenocarcinoma, and the histologic grading (HG) of endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC). METHODS: Ninety-three cases of EH or adenocarcinomas were reviewed independently by 21 pathologists of the Gynecologic Pathology Study Group. A consensus diagnosis was defined as agreement among more than two thirds of the 21 pathologists. RESULTS: There was no agreement on the diagnosis in 13 cases (14.0%). According to the consensus review, six of the 11 EH cases (54.5%) were diagnosed as EH, 48 of the 57 EC cases (84.2%) were EC, and 5 of the 6 serous carcinomas (SC) (83.3%) were SC. There was no consensus for the 6 atypical EH (AEH) cases. On the HG of EC, there was no agreement in 2 cases (3.5%). According to the consensus review, 30 of the 33 G1 cases (90.9%) were G1, 11 of the 18 G2 cases (61.1%) were G2, and 4 of the 4 G3 cases (100.0%) were G3. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus study showed high agreement for both EC and SC, but there was no consensus for AEH. The reproducibility for the HG of G2 was poor. We suggest that simplification of the classification of EH and a two-tiered grading system for EC will be necessary.
Adenocarcinoma