1.Clinical implications of pleural effusion following left ventricular assist device implantation
So-Min LIM ; Ah-Ram KIM ; Junho HYUN ; Sang-Eun LEE ; Pil-Je KANG ; Sung-Ho JUNG ; Min-Seok KIM
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(1):169-178
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Studies on the association between pleural effusion (PE) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are limited. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and the clinical impact of PE following LVAD implantation. Methods: This study is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from June 2015 to December 2022. We investigated the prognostic impact of therapeutic drainage (TD) on clinical outcomes. We also compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes between early and late PE and examined the factors related to the development of late PE. Results: A total of 71 patients was analyzed. The TD group (n=45) had a longer ward stay (days; median [interquartile range]: 31.0 [23.0–46.0] vs. 21.0 [16.0–34.0], P=0.006) and total hospital stay (47.0 [36.0–82.0] vs. 31.0 [22.0–48.0], P=0.002) compared to the no TD group (n=26). Early PE was mostly exudate, left-sided, and neutrophil-dominant even though predominance of lymphocytes was the most common finding in late PE. Patients with late PE had a higher rate of reintubation within 14 days (31.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.004) and longer hospital stays than those without late PE (67.0 [43.0–104.0] vs. 36.0 [28.0–48.0], P<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that female sex, low body mass index, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with late PE. Conclusions: Compared to patients not undergoing TD, those undergoing TD had a longer hospital stay but not a higher 90-day mortality. Patients with late PE had poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, the correction of risk factors, like hypoalbuminemia, may be required.  
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Clinical implications of pleural effusion following left ventricular assist device implantation
So-Min LIM ; Ah-Ram KIM ; Junho HYUN ; Sang-Eun LEE ; Pil-Je KANG ; Sung-Ho JUNG ; Min-Seok KIM
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(1):169-178
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Studies on the association between pleural effusion (PE) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are limited. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and the clinical impact of PE following LVAD implantation. Methods: This study is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from June 2015 to December 2022. We investigated the prognostic impact of therapeutic drainage (TD) on clinical outcomes. We also compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes between early and late PE and examined the factors related to the development of late PE. Results: A total of 71 patients was analyzed. The TD group (n=45) had a longer ward stay (days; median [interquartile range]: 31.0 [23.0–46.0] vs. 21.0 [16.0–34.0], P=0.006) and total hospital stay (47.0 [36.0–82.0] vs. 31.0 [22.0–48.0], P=0.002) compared to the no TD group (n=26). Early PE was mostly exudate, left-sided, and neutrophil-dominant even though predominance of lymphocytes was the most common finding in late PE. Patients with late PE had a higher rate of reintubation within 14 days (31.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.004) and longer hospital stays than those without late PE (67.0 [43.0–104.0] vs. 36.0 [28.0–48.0], P<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that female sex, low body mass index, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with late PE. Conclusions: Compared to patients not undergoing TD, those undergoing TD had a longer hospital stay but not a higher 90-day mortality. Patients with late PE had poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, the correction of risk factors, like hypoalbuminemia, may be required.  
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Clinical implications of pleural effusion following left ventricular assist device implantation
So-Min LIM ; Ah-Ram KIM ; Junho HYUN ; Sang-Eun LEE ; Pil-Je KANG ; Sung-Ho JUNG ; Min-Seok KIM
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(1):169-178
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Studies on the association between pleural effusion (PE) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are limited. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and the clinical impact of PE following LVAD implantation. Methods: This study is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from June 2015 to December 2022. We investigated the prognostic impact of therapeutic drainage (TD) on clinical outcomes. We also compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes between early and late PE and examined the factors related to the development of late PE. Results: A total of 71 patients was analyzed. The TD group (n=45) had a longer ward stay (days; median [interquartile range]: 31.0 [23.0–46.0] vs. 21.0 [16.0–34.0], P=0.006) and total hospital stay (47.0 [36.0–82.0] vs. 31.0 [22.0–48.0], P=0.002) compared to the no TD group (n=26). Early PE was mostly exudate, left-sided, and neutrophil-dominant even though predominance of lymphocytes was the most common finding in late PE. Patients with late PE had a higher rate of reintubation within 14 days (31.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.004) and longer hospital stays than those without late PE (67.0 [43.0–104.0] vs. 36.0 [28.0–48.0], P<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that female sex, low body mass index, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with late PE. Conclusions: Compared to patients not undergoing TD, those undergoing TD had a longer hospital stay but not a higher 90-day mortality. Patients with late PE had poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, the correction of risk factors, like hypoalbuminemia, may be required.  
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Clinical implications of pleural effusion following left ventricular assist device implantation
So-Min LIM ; Ah-Ram KIM ; Junho HYUN ; Sang-Eun LEE ; Pil-Je KANG ; Sung-Ho JUNG ; Min-Seok KIM
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(1):169-178
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Studies on the association between pleural effusion (PE) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are limited. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and the clinical impact of PE following LVAD implantation. Methods: This study is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from June 2015 to December 2022. We investigated the prognostic impact of therapeutic drainage (TD) on clinical outcomes. We also compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes between early and late PE and examined the factors related to the development of late PE. Results: A total of 71 patients was analyzed. The TD group (n=45) had a longer ward stay (days; median [interquartile range]: 31.0 [23.0–46.0] vs. 21.0 [16.0–34.0], P=0.006) and total hospital stay (47.0 [36.0–82.0] vs. 31.0 [22.0–48.0], P=0.002) compared to the no TD group (n=26). Early PE was mostly exudate, left-sided, and neutrophil-dominant even though predominance of lymphocytes was the most common finding in late PE. Patients with late PE had a higher rate of reintubation within 14 days (31.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.004) and longer hospital stays than those without late PE (67.0 [43.0–104.0] vs. 36.0 [28.0–48.0], P<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that female sex, low body mass index, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with late PE. Conclusions: Compared to patients not undergoing TD, those undergoing TD had a longer hospital stay but not a higher 90-day mortality. Patients with late PE had poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, the correction of risk factors, like hypoalbuminemia, may be required.  
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review and Position Statement of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association
Jaehyun BAE ; Eugene HAN ; Hye Won LEE ; Cheol-Young PARK ; Choon Hee CHUNG ; Dae Ho LEE ; Eun-Hee CHO ; Eun-Jung RHEE ; Ji Hee YU ; Ji Hyun PARK ; Ji-Cheol BAE ; Jung Hwan PARK ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Kyung-Soo KIM ; Mi Hae SEO ; Minyoung LEE ; Nan-Hee KIM ; So Hun KIM ; Won-Young LEE ; Woo Je LEE ; Yeon-Kyung CHOI ; Yong-ho LEE ; You-Cheol HWANG ; Young Sang LYU ; Byung-Wan LEE ; Bong-Soo CHA ;
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1015-1028
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Central Anticholinergic Syndrome Induced by Atropine Eye Drops: A Case Report
Jung Sun HEO ; Je Jin LEE ; Sang Uk CHOI ; Nam Ju MOON ; Joon Hyung YEO
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2024;65(11):745-748
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			We present a case of central anticholinergic syndrome following the administration of atropine eye drops.Case summary: A 60-year-old male presented with decreased visual acuity in his left eye and was diagnosed with intraocular lens dislocation. Preoperatively, Isopto atropine® eye drops (1 drop at 15-minutes intervals) were used for pupil dilation. Within an hour of the first instillation, the patient exhibited drowsiness, disorientation, agitation, and urinary retention. Laboratory tests and computed tomography of the brain were unremarkable. Considering the recent administration of atropine eye drops, a diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome was made. The surgery was postponed and the patient recovered fully after 3 hours of observation. He remained asymptomatic during an additional day of hospitalization. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			A small dose of atropine eye drops even at a therapeutic dose can induce central anticholinergic syndrome. Therefore, ophthalmologists should be aware of this rare and severe complication. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review and Position Statement of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association
Jaehyun BAE ; Eugene HAN ; Hye Won LEE ; Cheol-Young PARK ; Choon Hee CHUNG ; Dae Ho LEE ; Eun-Hee CHO ; Eun-Jung RHEE ; Ji Hee YU ; Ji Hyun PARK ; Ji-Cheol BAE ; Jung Hwan PARK ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Kyung-Soo KIM ; Mi Hae SEO ; Minyoung LEE ; Nan-Hee KIM ; So Hun KIM ; Won-Young LEE ; Woo Je LEE ; Yeon-Kyung CHOI ; Yong-ho LEE ; You-Cheol HWANG ; Young Sang LYU ; Byung-Wan LEE ; Bong-Soo CHA ;
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1015-1028
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review and Position Statement of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association
Jaehyun BAE ; Eugene HAN ; Hye Won LEE ; Cheol-Young PARK ; Choon Hee CHUNG ; Dae Ho LEE ; Eun-Hee CHO ; Eun-Jung RHEE ; Ji Hee YU ; Ji Hyun PARK ; Ji-Cheol BAE ; Jung Hwan PARK ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Kyung-Soo KIM ; Mi Hae SEO ; Minyoung LEE ; Nan-Hee KIM ; So Hun KIM ; Won-Young LEE ; Woo Je LEE ; Yeon-Kyung CHOI ; Yong-ho LEE ; You-Cheol HWANG ; Young Sang LYU ; Byung-Wan LEE ; Bong-Soo CHA ;
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1015-1028
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Central Anticholinergic Syndrome Induced by Atropine Eye Drops: A Case Report
Jung Sun HEO ; Je Jin LEE ; Sang Uk CHOI ; Nam Ju MOON ; Joon Hyung YEO
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2024;65(11):745-748
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			We present a case of central anticholinergic syndrome following the administration of atropine eye drops.Case summary: A 60-year-old male presented with decreased visual acuity in his left eye and was diagnosed with intraocular lens dislocation. Preoperatively, Isopto atropine® eye drops (1 drop at 15-minutes intervals) were used for pupil dilation. Within an hour of the first instillation, the patient exhibited drowsiness, disorientation, agitation, and urinary retention. Laboratory tests and computed tomography of the brain were unremarkable. Considering the recent administration of atropine eye drops, a diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome was made. The surgery was postponed and the patient recovered fully after 3 hours of observation. He remained asymptomatic during an additional day of hospitalization. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			A small dose of atropine eye drops even at a therapeutic dose can induce central anticholinergic syndrome. Therefore, ophthalmologists should be aware of this rare and severe complication. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review and Position Statement of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association
Jaehyun BAE ; Eugene HAN ; Hye Won LEE ; Cheol-Young PARK ; Choon Hee CHUNG ; Dae Ho LEE ; Eun-Hee CHO ; Eun-Jung RHEE ; Ji Hee YU ; Ji Hyun PARK ; Ji-Cheol BAE ; Jung Hwan PARK ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Kyung-Soo KIM ; Mi Hae SEO ; Minyoung LEE ; Nan-Hee KIM ; So Hun KIM ; Won-Young LEE ; Woo Je LEE ; Yeon-Kyung CHOI ; Yong-ho LEE ; You-Cheol HWANG ; Young Sang LYU ; Byung-Wan LEE ; Bong-Soo CHA ;
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1015-1028
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail