Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of arthroscopy-assisted rotator cuff tendon transfer in treating irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT). METHODS: From May 2015 to May 2018, 23 patients with unrepairable rotator cuff tears were treated with arthroscopy-assisted rotator cuff tendon transfer, and 21 patients were followed up finally, including 8 males and 13 females, aged from 48 to 82 years old with an average of(64.3±9.1) years old;the courses of disease ranged from 6 to 36 months with an average of (14.0±6.4) months. American Rotator and Elbow Surgeons Score(ASES) and Constant-Murley score were used to evaluate clinical efficacy before surgery and at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: All 21 patients were followed up for 36 to 54 months with an average of (39.4±4.4) months. Axillary incision of 1 patient was redness, swelling and exudation after surgery, which healed after 3 weeks of dressing change, and exudate culture was negative. At the latest follow-up, MRI showed partial tearing of the metastatic tendon in 2 patients, but pain and movement of the affected shoulder were still better than before surgery. ASES increased from preoperative (41.0±9.6) scores to the latest follow-up (75.6±14.0) scores, and had statistical difference (t=10.50, P<0.01). Constant-Murley score increased from (49.8±7.1) scores before operation to (67.5±11.6) scores at the latest follow-up (t=11.27, P<0.01). CONCLUSION Arthroscopic assisted latissimus dorsalis tendon transposition restores physiological and anatomical structure of glenohumeral joint by reconstructing balance of horizontal and vertical couples of shoulder joint, thus achieving the stability of the shoulder joint, relieving shoulder pain and improving shoulder joint function.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery* ; Superficial Back Muscles ; Rotator Cuff ; Treatment Outcome ; Shoulder Joint/surgery* ; Tendon Transfer ; Arthroscopy ; Range of Motion, Articular/physiology*

Child ; Humans ; Factor VII Deficiency

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of Guizhi Fuling Capsule (GZFLC) on myeloma cells and explore the mechanisms. METHODS: MM1S and RPMI 8226 cells were co-cultured with different concentrations of serum and the cell experiments were divided into negative (10%, 20% and 40%) groups, GZFLC (10%, 20%, and 40%) groups and a control group. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays and flow cytometry were used to detect the viability and apoptosis levels of myeloma cells. The effects on mitochondria were examined by reactive oxygen specie (ROS) and tetrechloro-tetraethylbenzimidazol carbocyanine iodide (JC-1) assays. Western blot was used to detect the expression of B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X (Bax), cleaved caspase-3, -9, cytochrome C (Cytc) and apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 (Apaf-1). RPMI 8226 cells (2 × 10⁷) were subcutaneously inoculated into 48 nude mice to study the in vivo antitumor effects of GZFLC. The mice were randomly divided into four groups using a completely randomized design, the high-, medium-, or low-dose GZFLC (840, 420, or 210 mg/kg per day, respectively) or an equal volume of distilled water, administered daily for 15 days. The tumor volume changes in and survival times of the mice in the GZFLC-administered groups and a control group were observed. Cytc and Apaf-1 expression levels were detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: GZFLC drug serum decreased the viability and increased the apoptosis of myeloam cells (P<0.05). In addition, this drug increased the ROS levels and decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential (P<0.01). Western blot showed that the Bcl-2/Bax ratios were decreased in the GZFLC drug serum-treated groups, whereas the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3, -9, Cytc and Apaf-1 were increased (all P<0.01). Over time, the myeloma tumor volumes of the mice in the GZFLC-administered groups decreased, and survival time of the mice in the GZFLC-administered groups were longer than that of the mice in the control group. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissues from the mice in the GZFLC-administered groups revealed that the Cytc and Apaf-1 expression levels were increased (P<0.05). CONCLUSION GZFLC promoted apoptosis of myeloma cells through the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and significantly reduced the tumor volumes in mice with myeloma, which prolonged the survival times of the mice.
Mice ; Animals ; Caspase 3/metabolism* ; Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism* ; Wolfiporia ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; bcl-2-Associated X Protein/metabolism* ; Mice, Nude ; Apoptosis ; Mitochondria/metabolism*

Objective: To identify the internal nasal valve (INV) and to evaluate its key parameters in the established 3D models of nasal cavity space via Mimics from CT images, in order to provide evidence for quantitative diagnosis of nasal valve compromise. Methods: A total of 32 Han adults without nasal diseases who underwent maxillofacial CT test in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively recruited, including 16 males and 16 females, with the age ranged from 20 to 80 years (50% age<50 years old). Maxillofacial CT images were used to create 3D model of nasal cavity space. The INV was identified and the following parameters were measured: the angle between the INV and the nasal bone (θ_INV-B), unilateral cross-sectional area of the INV (A_INV-R, A_INV-L), total cross-sectional area of the INV (A_INV), unilateral height of the INV (H_INV-R, H_INV-L), unilateral nasal valve angle (α_INV-R, α_INV-L), and the sum of nasal valve angle (α_INV). The A_INV in our study was compared with the results of the previously adopted planes (Plane_C, perpendicular to the hard palate and Plane_B, plane perpendicular to the nasal bone). The parameters above were compared among genders, age and race groups. SPSS 26 and GraphPad Prism 9 software were used for statistical analysis and mapping of data. Results: The A_INV in our study was (214.87±52.94) mm², which was significantly less than that of Plane_C (254.97±47.80) mm² and Plane_B (226.07±57.36) mm². The measured parameters were as follows: θ_INV-B was (82.07±7.06)°; A_INV-R was (112.66±31.39) mm²; A_INV-L was (102.21±27.14) mm²; A_INV was (214.87±52.94) mm²; H_INV-R was (24.87±4.62) mm; H_INV-L was (24.35±4.86) mm; α_INV-R was (20.48±2.99)°; α_INV-L was (19.65±3.82)°; α_INV was (40.13±6.24)°. The A_INV-R was larger than A_INV-L (t=2.33, P<0.05); The H_INV, A_INV-R, A_INV-L and A_INV of males were more than those of females (t value was 5.77, 3.21, 2.91 and 3.52, respectively, all P<0.01). The A_INV of the young group (<50 years) was larger than that of the old group (t=2.83, P<0.01); The θ_INV-B was different between the Han people and the Caucasian (t=2.92,P<0.01). The α_INV of the Han people was larger than that of Caucasians (Z=-6.92, P<0.01), but the H_INV was smaller (Z=-3.89, P<0.01). Conclusion: The A_INV carried out in 3D models of nasal cavity space is significantly smaller than that obtained by the previous methods of CT evaluation. INV static parameters differ among genders, age and race groups.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Young Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Nasal Cavity/diagnostic imaging* ; Retrospective Studies ; China ; Nose ; Nasal Bone

AIM: To compare the consistency and feasibility of objective ocular torsion measured with GMPE module-based optical coherence tomography(OCT)and fundus color photography(FCP).METHODS: Patients were enrolled in our strabismus clinic from December 2020 to March 2021, and the objective ocular torsion of the eyes was measured by both GMPE module-based OCT and FCP on the same day. FCP was used to measure the fovea-disc angle(FDA)manually by using the Adobe Photoshop software, while the GMPE module-based OCT software positioned automatically the macula and the center of the optic disc to measure the FDA.RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included, the FDA measured by OCT was -6.6°±4.5° in the right eye and -8.8°±4.7° in the left eye, respectively; The FDA measured by FCP was -6.6°±4.7° in the right eye and -8.4°±4.1° in the left eye, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the results of the two methods(Pright eye=0.90, Pleft eye=0.08). In patients with exotropia, the FDA measured by OCT was -5.8°±4.9° in the right eye and -9.1°±4.5° in the left eye, respectively, the FDA measured by FCP was -5.7°±5.0° in the right eye and -8.6°±4.3° in the left eye, respectively,(Pright eye=0.75, Pleft eye=0.15). Similarly, the patients with esotropia, the FDA measured by OCT was -9.0°±7.3° in the right eye and -11.3°±3.5° in the left eye, respectively, while the FDA measured by FCP was -10.0°±7.0° in the right and -10.1°±2.8° in the left eye(Pright eye=0.21, Pleft eye=0.10), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two methods in patients with esotropia or exotropia(P>0.05). The results of both Pearson test and Bland-Altman analysis were highly correlated(rright eye=0.93, rleft eye=0.94, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: GMPE module-based OCT can be used for objective ocular torsion measurement with high reliability and reproducibility, and is a promising clinical alternative to the fundus color photographic method.