Objective:To investigate the intervention effect of binary coping strategy based on systemic interaction model on the postoperative survival quality of patients with oral cancer.Methods:A total of 99 patients with oral cancer admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of a tertiary hospital from Jun 2021 to Jun 2022 was selected.They were randomly divided into the control group(50 cases)and the observation group(49 cases)with random number table method.The control group received routine nursing for oral cancer.On this basis,the observation group also received the binary coping strategy based on the systemic interaction model.The scores of UW-QOL quality of life scale and binary coping scale were compared between the two groups before surgery,at the 3rd and 9th weeks after surgery.Results:The UW-QOL scores of both groups at the 3rd and 9th weeks after surgery were lower than those at admission,and the UW-QOL score in the control group was lower than that in the observation group(P＜0.05).At the 3rd week after surgery,the score of coping with the partner in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P＜0.05).At the 9th week after surgery,the total score,negative coping,stress communication,coping together,and supportive coping scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P＜0.05).Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that there was an interaction between time and group for the total score of binary coping scale(P＜0.05).And there was a significant main effect of time and group on the total score of binary coping scale(P＜0.05).Conclusions:The quality of life of patients with oral cancer is poor.The binary coping strategy based on the systemic interaction model can improve the quality of life of patients,enhance the intimacy of patients with their partners,and contribute to the disease recovery of patients with oral cancer.

Objective:To analyze the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for analgesia in patients with non-mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU).Methods:From December 2018 to August 2021, a multicenter randomized controlled clinical study was conducted to select non-mechanical ventilation patients with analgesic needs admitted to ICU of four hospitals in Henan Province and Guizhou Province. Patients were randomly assigned to nalbuphine group and fentanyl group. The nalbuphine group was given continuous infusion of nalbuphine [0.05~0.20 mg/(kg·h)], and the fentanyl group was given continuous infusion of fentanyl [0.5~2.0 μg/(kg·h)]. The analgesic target was critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) score<2. The observation time was 48 hours. The primary endpoint was CPOT score, the secondary endpoints were Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS), ICU length of stay, adverse events, and proportion of mechanical ventilation. The quantitative data of the two groups were compared by t test or Mann-Whitney U test. The enumeration data were compared by chi square test or Fisher exact probability method. The data at different time points between groups were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance. Results:A total of 210 patients were enrolled, including 105 patients in the nalbuphine group and 105 patients in the fentanyl group. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in CPOT score between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group at each time point after medication ( P>0.05), the CPOT score of both groups at each time point after medication was significantly lower than that before medication, and the analgesic target could be achieved and maintained 2 hours after medication. There was no significant difference in RASS between the two groups at each time point after medication ( P>0.05), which was significantly lower than that before medication, and the target sedative effect was achieved 2 hours after medication. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group [5.0(4.0,7.5) d vs. 5.0(4.0,8.0) d, P=0.504]. The incidence of delirium, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, pruritus, vertigo and other adverse events in the nalbuphine group was lower than that in the fentanyl group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other adverse events such as deep sedation, hypotension and bradycardia between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression in nalbuphine group was not significantly different from that in fentanyl group ( P>0.05), but the proportion of mechanical ventilation was significantly lower than that in the fentanyl group [1.9% (2/105) vs. 8.6%(9/105), P=0.030]. Conclusions:Nalbuphine could be used for analgesia in ICU patients with non-mechanical ventilation. The target analgesic effect could be achieved within 2 hours, and it had a certain sedative effect with a low incidence of adverse reactions.

Objective: QL1604 is a highly selective, humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the efficacy and safety of QL1604 plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with advanced cervical cancer and not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy were enrolled to receive QL1604 plus paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, followed by QL1604 maintenance treatment. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled and the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. An 84.8% of patients had recurrent disease and 13.0% had stage IVB disease. The objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Advanced Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was 58.7% (27/46). The immune ORR per immune RECIST was 60.9% (28/46).The median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.5–not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI=5.7–14.0). Fortyfive (97.8%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs (>30%) were neutrophil count decrease (50.0%), anemia (32.6%), and white blood cell count decrease (30.4%). Conclusion QL1604 plus paclitaxel-cisplatin/carboplatin showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option for the patient population who have contraindications or can’t tolerate bevacizumab, which needs to be further verified in phase III confirmatory study.

Objective: First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/ placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2). Results: Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP. Conclusion Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

Objective: QL1604 is a highly selective, humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the efficacy and safety of QL1604 plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with advanced cervical cancer and not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy were enrolled to receive QL1604 plus paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, followed by QL1604 maintenance treatment. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled and the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. An 84.8% of patients had recurrent disease and 13.0% had stage IVB disease. The objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Advanced Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was 58.7% (27/46). The immune ORR per immune RECIST was 60.9% (28/46).The median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.5–not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI=5.7–14.0). Fortyfive (97.8%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs (>30%) were neutrophil count decrease (50.0%), anemia (32.6%), and white blood cell count decrease (30.4%). Conclusion QL1604 plus paclitaxel-cisplatin/carboplatin showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option for the patient population who have contraindications or can’t tolerate bevacizumab, which needs to be further verified in phase III confirmatory study.

Objective: First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/ placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2). Results: Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP. Conclusion Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

Objective: QL1604 is a highly selective, humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the efficacy and safety of QL1604 plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with advanced cervical cancer and not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy were enrolled to receive QL1604 plus paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, followed by QL1604 maintenance treatment. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled and the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. An 84.8% of patients had recurrent disease and 13.0% had stage IVB disease. The objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Advanced Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was 58.7% (27/46). The immune ORR per immune RECIST was 60.9% (28/46).The median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.5–not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI=5.7–14.0). Fortyfive (97.8%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs (>30%) were neutrophil count decrease (50.0%), anemia (32.6%), and white blood cell count decrease (30.4%). Conclusion QL1604 plus paclitaxel-cisplatin/carboplatin showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option for the patient population who have contraindications or can’t tolerate bevacizumab, which needs to be further verified in phase III confirmatory study.

Objective: First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/ placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2). Results: Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP. Conclusion Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

Objective:To analyze clinical data related to mineral and bone disorder(MBD)in elderly maintenance hemodialysis patients and provide a basis for the development of precise clinical treatment strategies.Methods:A total of 267 patients receiving regular hemodialysis at Beijing Huairou Hospital and Huairou District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between April 2022 and June 2022 were selected and divided into an elderly group(age≥60 years)with 129 patients and a younger group(age<60 years)with 138 patients.Patients' general information, medication use, and laboratory data including routine blood work, blood calcium, blood phosphorus, and intact parathyroid hormone were collected, and a survey questionnaire was conducted to collect data on hyperphosphatemia patients' knowledge about diet and medication use.Differences in the rate of meeting calcium and phosphorus target ranges, medication use, and questionnaire scores were compared between patients in the two groups.Results:(1)The rates of controlled Ca(2.3±0.2)mmol/L, P(1.9±0.6)mmol/L and iPTH[213.5(93.5, 359.9)ng/L]levels in the elderly group were 65.1%(84/129), 43.4%(56/129)and 51.2%(66/129), respectively.There were no statistically significant differences compared with the younger group(all P>0.05). The prevalence of hyperphosphatemia in the elderly group(66/129, 51.2%)was lower than that in the younger group(90/138, 65.2%)( χ2=5.422, P=0.020). (2)Compared with the younger group, the elderly group had lower levels of serum creatinine[(796.6±225.2)μmol/L vs.(1025.6±281.4)μmol/L], uric acid[(416.9±97.0)μmol/L vs.(445.0±106.6)μmol/L], albumin[(37.9±2.9)g/L vs.(39.0±3.0)g/L]and serum phosphorus[(1.9±0.6)mmol/L vs.(2.1±0.6)mmol/l]( t=7.289, 2.238, 2.941, 2.820, P<0.05), and a higher blood glucose level[6.9(5.2, 9.8)mmol/L vs.6.1(4.9, 8.2)mmol/l, Z=2.314, P=0.015]. (3)Compared with the younger group, the elderly group had significantly lower utilization rates of calcium-free phosphate binders[12.4%(16/129) vs.23.9%(33/138)]and calcimimetics[2.3%(3/129) vs.10.9%(15/138)]( χ2=5.895, 7.742, P<0.05, respectively). (4)Compared with the younger group, the elderly group had a lower total questionnaire score(36.8±6.6 vs.39.5±6.0), a lower hyperphosphatemia knowledge score(4.7±3.1 vs.6.0±2.8), a lower diet knowledge score(2.8±2.2 vs.4.0±1.9)and a lower medication knowledge score(2.1±1.9 vs.3.1±1.8, t=3.442, 3.694, 4.677, 4.398, respectively, P<0.05 for all), but had a higher compliance score(17.3±1.9 vs.16.4±2.4, t=3.390, P=0.001). (5)Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen( OR=1.082, 95% CI: 1.011-1.159, P=0.024)and serum creatinine( OR=1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.005, P=0.036)were independent predictors of hyperphosphatemia in elderly hemodialysis patients. Conclusions:Compared with the younger group, the serum albumin and phosphorus levels were lower, the utilization rates of calcium-free phosphate binders and calcimimetics were lower, and the total score of the hyperphosphatemia questionnaire was also lower in the elderly group.However, the compliance score was significantly higher in the elderly group.We should focus on the relevant weak links to bolster diet education and medication management for elderly hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE To mine the signals of adverse dr ug events （ADE）for tolvaptan based on FAERS database ，and to provide reference for safe use of drugs in clinic. METHODS The data of tolvaptan-induced ADE were collected from FAERS database during the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2020；the reporting odds ratio （ROR）method and the proportional reporting ratio （PRR）method of disproportional method were used for data mining. RESULTS A total of 4 744 ADE reports of the target drug tolvaptan were extracted ，involving 1 279 ADEs. The reporting countries were mainly the United States and Japan ，etc. A total of 199 ADE signals were obtained ，involving 21 system organ classes （SOCs），which mainly focused on various examinations（n＝56），hepatobiliary disorders （n＝17），renal and urinary disorders （n＝14），etc. Among them ，80 signals were not mentioned in existing instructions for tolvaptan in China ，such as decreased glomerular filtration rate ，positional vertigo ， rupture of renal cyst ，renal cyst infection ，pulmonary malignant tumor. CONCLUSIONS Before using tolvaptan ，drug evaluation should be performed well ，especially the patients with basic diseases such as heart failure ，liver insufficiency and renal insufficiency. During treatment ，the indexes of liver function and renal function should be closely monitored ；timely intervention measures should be taken to avoid related injury and disease deterioration caused by ADE when ADE or disease progression occurs.