Paclitaxel， a highly effective natural antitumor drug， has been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of a variety of cancers， including breast cancer， ovarian cancer， and lung cancer. The traditional paclitaxel injections have been observed to present certain issues， including overt adverse reactions and a decline in the quality of life of patients following treatment. This ultimately leads to an inability to meet the comprehensive needs of patients， thereby limiting the clinical applications of the drugs. Compared with injectable administration， the oral administration can avoid the risk of infection present in the invasive route， is conducive to improving patient compliance and quality of life， and reduces healthcare costs， and has a good application prospect. However， paclitaxel has low solubility， poor permeability， and is susceptible to the exocytosis of P-glycoprotein， which presents a significant challenge in the development of its oral preparations. Novel drug delivery technologies can enhance the solubility of paclitaxel and facilitate its controlled release， which is beneficial for the oral absorption and efficacy. The paper reviews the development history of oral preparations of paclitaxel， and summarizes the delivery technologies such as polymer micelles， nanoparticles， nanoemulsions and nanocrystals， and discusses the application mechanisms， advantages and limitations of these technologies and their adaptability in different cancer treatments. Finally， the challenges faced in the development of oral preparations of paclitaxel are summarized， and future research directions are proposed in order to provide new ideas for the development of oral delivery of paclitaxel.

Paclitaxel， a highly effective natural antitumor drug， has been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of a variety of cancers， including breast cancer， ovarian cancer， and lung cancer. The traditional paclitaxel injections have been observed to present certain issues， including overt adverse reactions and a decline in the quality of life of patients following treatment. This ultimately leads to an inability to meet the comprehensive needs of patients， thereby limiting the clinical applications of the drugs. Compared with injectable administration， the oral administration can avoid the risk of infection present in the invasive route， is conducive to improving patient compliance and quality of life， and reduces healthcare costs， and has a good application prospect. However， paclitaxel has low solubility， poor permeability， and is susceptible to the exocytosis of P-glycoprotein， which presents a significant challenge in the development of its oral preparations. Novel drug delivery technologies can enhance the solubility of paclitaxel and facilitate its controlled release， which is beneficial for the oral absorption and efficacy. The paper reviews the development history of oral preparations of paclitaxel， and summarizes the delivery technologies such as polymer micelles， nanoparticles， nanoemulsions and nanocrystals， and discusses the application mechanisms， advantages and limitations of these technologies and their adaptability in different cancer treatments. Finally， the challenges faced in the development of oral preparations of paclitaxel are summarized， and future research directions are proposed in order to provide new ideas for the development of oral delivery of paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE To standardize the main processes and related technical links of the clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs， and provide guidance and reference for improving the quality of comprehensive evaluation evidence and its transformation and application value. METHODS The construction of Guideline for the Workflow of Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Drugs was based on the standard guideline formulation method of the World Health Organization （WHO）， strictly followed the latest definition of guidelines by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States， and conformed to the six major areas of the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool Ⅱ. Delphi method was adopted to construct the research questions； research evidence was established by applying the research methods of evidence-based medicine. The evidence quality classification system of the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center was adopted for evidence classification and evaluation. The recommendation strength was determined by the recommendation strength classification standard formulated by the Oxford University Evidence-Based Medicine Center， and the recommendation opinions were formed through the expert consensus method. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS The Guideline for the Workflow of Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Drugs covers 4 major categories of research questions， including topic selection， evaluation implementation， evidence evaluation， and application and transformation of results. The formulation of this guideline has standardized the technical links of the entire process of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs， which can effectively guide the high-quality and high-efficient development of this work， enhance the standardized output and transformation application value of evaluation evidence， and provide high-quality evidence support for the scientific decision-making of health and the rationalization of clinical medication.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the preferences of patients who underwent solid organ transplantation regarding therapeutic drug monitoring （TDM） of mycophenolic acid （MPA） and explore the factors influencing patients’ decision-making process， so as to provide support for the development of individualized medication guidelines for MPA and improvement of clinical decision-making. METHODS The cross-sectional study was used to design the questionnaire on the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM， and involved patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and received MPA treatment at two tertiary hospitals in Beijing from April 14， 2022， to June 27， 2022. The Likert 5-level scoring method was used to score the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM， the influencing factors and their correlation of the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis and binary Logistic regression analysis， and the nonparametric test and chi-square test were used to rank and analyze the consistency of the factors affecting patients’ preference decision. RESULTS A total of 140 questionnaires were collected， and the effective recovery rate was 77.35%. The average preference score of 140 patients to receive MPA TDM was （4.01±0.65）， and the overall preference value was high. There were 116 （82.86%） patients agreed or strongly agreed with MPA TDM. Significant differences were observed in preference scores between patients who had previously undergone MPA TDM and those who had never undergone it （[ 4.30±0.53） scores vs. （3.80±0.65） scores， P＜0.001]. Additionally， patients’ preference scores were significantly influenced by their understanding level and attention level （P＜0.001）. The ranking of factors contributing to decision-making exhibited consistency （P＜0.001）. The factors were ranked in descending order of clinical efficacy， safety， comfortability， economy and time cost. CONCLUSIONS The patients who underwent solid organ transplantation hold high preferences towards MPA TDM. The primary factors influencing their decisions are their prior experience， understanding level， and attention level.

Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of teriprizumab combined with bevacizumab in above the second line treatment of high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.Methods:From February 2019 to September 2019, 56 patients with MSI-H mCRC admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University were selected and divided into control group and test group by random number table method, with 28 cases in each group. The control group was treated with bevacizumab, and the test group was treated with teriprizumab combined with bevacizumab. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:The ORR and DCR of the test group were 60.71% (17/28) and 75.00% (21/28) respectively, higher than 28.57% (8/28) and 46.63% (13/28) of the control group, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=5.85, P=0.016; χ2=4.79, P=0.029). The median progression-free survival of patients in the control group and the test group were 3.5 months and 5.8 months respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=9.83, P=0.003). The median overall survival of patients in the control group and the test group were 12.1 months and 16.2 months respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=6.13, P=0.007). There were no significant diffe-rences in the incidences of hematological reaction (17.86% vs. 14.29%, χ2=0.13, P=0.716), cardiovascular injury (10.71% vs. 14.29%, χ2=0.16, P=0.686), liver and kidney function injury (25.00% vs. 21.43%, χ2=0.10, P=0.752), gastrointestinal reaction (28.57% vs. 35.71%, χ2=0.33, P=0.567), skin and mucosal injury (7.14% vs. 10.71%, χ2=0.35, P=0.553), nervous system disease (3.57% vs. 14.29%, χ2=2.25, P=0.134), endocrine reaction (3.57% vs. 10.71%, χ2=1.29, P=0.256), alopecia (14.29% vs. 17.86%, χ2=0.13, P=0.716) and fatigue (25.00% vs. 28.57%, χ2=0.27, P=0.605) between the control group and the test group. Conclusion:The combination of teriprizumab and bevacizumab can improve the short-term and medium-long-term efficacy of patients with MSI-H mCRC, which is safe and reliable.

Objective To investigate the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and the treatment measures for poor response in previously untreated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with high viral load. Methods A total of 165 CHB patients who received antiviral therapy and met the inclusion criteria in Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, from June 2016 to July 2021 were enrolled. The patients enrolled had a baseline HBV DNA level of > 6lg copies/ml and were previously untreated CHB patients who had used ETV or TDF for 48 weeks, and quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure HBV DNA. Virologic response rate was calculated after 48 weeks of treatment; a logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the influencing factors for the response of HBV DNA < 500 copies/mL and HBV DNA < 100 copies /mL at 48 weeks; a stratified analysis was performed to compare the virologic response rate of HBV DNA < 500 copies /ml and HBV DNA < 100 copies/ml after 48 weeks between the patients with different ages, sexes, baseline HBV DNA levels, baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, types of first-line medication, and HBeAg statuses. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between two groups, the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups, and the binary logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results After 48 weeks of treatment, 85.5% (141/165) of the patients achieved an HBV DNA load of < 500 copies/mL, and 66.1% (109/165) of the patients achieved an HBV DNA load of < 100 copies /mL, with no significant difference in treatment outcome between the ETV group and the TDF group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sex( OR =2.793, 95% CI : 1.197-6.517), baseline HBV DNA( OR =0.369, 95% CI : 0.142-0.959), baseline ALT( OR =4.556, 95% CI : 1.770-11.732), and baseline HBeAg( OR =0.120, 95% CI : 0.033-0.429) were influencing factors for complete virologic response(all P < 0.05). For the patients with normal ALT (≤40 U/L) at baseline, 75.6% (34/45) achieved an HBV DNA load of < 500 copies/mL after 48 weeks of treatment, and 53.3% (24/45) achieved an HBV DNA load of < 100 copies/mL, with no significant difference in treatment outcome between the ETV group and the TDF group. For the patients with abnormal ALT (> 40 U/L) at baseline, 89.2% (107/120) achieved an HBV DNA load of < 500 copies/mL after 48 weeks of treatment, and the proportion of such patients in the TDF group was significantly higher than that in the ETV group (96.1% vs 84.1%, χ 2 =4.386, P =0.036); 70.8% (85/120) achieved an HBV DNA load of < 100 copies/mL, the proportion of such patients was no significant difference between the TDF group and the ETV group (78.4% vs 65.2%). The response of HBV DNA < 100 copies/ml of the normal baseline ALT group and the abnormal baseline ALT group, there were no significant differences between the patients aged≤30 years and aged > 30 years (77.8% vs 47.2%, 85.2% vs 66.7%). For the patients who did not achieve complete virologic response (HBV DNA ≥100 copies/mL) after 48 weeks of treatment, 87.9% (29/33) achieved complete virologic response after the original treatment regimen was prolonged for 48 weeks, and 100% (9/9) of the patients achieved complete virologic response after switching to or adding the first-line nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) without cross-resistance sites with the original regimen for another 48 weeks. Conclusion The patients aged > 30 years should receive antiviral therapy as early as possible, regardless of viral load and ALT level, especially those with a family history of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma; the patients aged ≤30 years who have a normal ALT level and a high viral load should consider initiating antiviral therapy after providing informed consent. For the patients with poor response after 48 weeks of treatment, first-line NUCs without cross-resistance sites with the original regimen should be switched to or added in time.

Objective:To identify the key genes related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by to the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and experimental verification to find key genes related to RA.Methods:The microarray data of RA were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene network was constructed, and the genes were classified into different modules using WGCNA. HUB genes in modules related to RA clinical symptoms were analyzed by gene ontology. Subsequently, different data sets of GEO were used to verify the expression profile and diagnostic capacity of the HUB gene [receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)]. In addition, the expression of HUB gene in RA was verified by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot, and the relationship between key genes and disease activity score 28 joints (DAS28) was analyzed. Paired-sample t-test and Pearson's correlation analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 5 413 differentially expressed genes were filtered. Weighted gene coexpression network was constructed and genes were classified into 23 modules. Among them, the black module is closely related to the clinical symptoms of RA, which contained 346 genes. Enrichment analysis and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) signal pathway analysis showed that it was to be enriched in the positive regulation of interleukin 6, interleukin 1 beta secretion, osteoclast differentiation, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, T helper cell 17 (Th17) cell differentiation and many other pathways closely related to RA. Motile sperm domain-containing protein 2 (MOSPD2) was significantly correlated with clinical symptoms. It was highly expressed in blood monocytes and bone marrow monocytes ( t=2.238, P=0.032; t=3.153, P=0.006), and positively correlated with blood expression in RA joint synovial fluid ( r=0.683, P=0.03). ROC curve analysis determined that MOSPD2 could distinguish RA from the control group (the area under the curve was 0.855 and 0.726) respectively. RT-PCR and Western blotting results showed that MOSPD2 was up-regulated in RA patients ( t=-3.96, P=0.02). MOSPD2 expression levels in blood were positively correlated with DAS28 in RA patients ( r=0.884 6, P=0.046 2). Conclusion:MOSDP2 is closely related to the clinical symptoms of RA patients, and may be one of the targets for the diagnosis and treatment of RA.

Objective:In general, patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are considered to show an aggressive disease course. However, the relationship between the two subgroups in disease severity is controversial. Our study is aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and prognosis of double-seropositive and seronegative RA in China through a real-world large scale study.Methods:RA patients who met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria or the 2010 ACR/European Anti-Rheumatism Alliance RA classification criteria, and who attended the 10 hospitals across the country from September 2015 to January 2020, were enrolled. According to the serological status, patients were divided into 4 subgroups [rheumatoid factor (RF)(-) anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody (-), RF(+), RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+), anti-CCP antibody(+)] and compared the disease characteristics and treatment response. One-way analysis of variance was used for measurement data that conformed to normal distribution, Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for measurement data that did not conform to normal distribution; paired t test was used for comparison before and after treatment within the group if the data was normally distributed else paired rank sum test was used; χ2 test was used for count data. Results:① A total of 2 461 patients were included, including 1 813 RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) patients (73.67%), 129 RF(+) patients (5.24%), 245 RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) patients (9.96%), 74 anti-CCP antibody(+) patients (11.13%). ② Regardless of the CCP status, RF(+) patients had an early age of onset [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) (51±14) years old, anti-CCP antibody(+) (50±15) years old, RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) (48±14) years old, RF(+)(48±13) years old, F=3.003, P=0.029], longer disease duration [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 50 (20, 126) months, anti-CCP antibody(+) 60(24, 150) months, RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 89(35, 179) months, RF(+) 83(25, 160) months, H=22.001, P<0.01], more joint swelling counts (SJC) [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 2(0, 6), Anti-CCP antibody(+) 2(0, 5), RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 2(0, 7), RF(+) 2(0, 6), H=8.939, P=0.03] and tender joint counts (TJC) [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 3(0, 8), anti-CCP antibody(+) 2(0, 6), RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 3(1, 9), RF(+) 2(0, 8), H=11.341, P=0.01] and the morning stiff time was longer [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 30(0, 60) min, anti-CCP antibody(+) 20(0, 60) min, RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 30(10, 60) min, RF(+) 30(10, 60) min, H=13.32, P<0.01]; ESR [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 17(9, 38) mm/1 h, anti-CCP antibody(+) 20(10, 35) mm/1 h, RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 26(14, 45) mm/1 h, RF(+) 28(14, 50) mm/1 h, H=37.084, P<0.01] and CRP [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) 2.3 (0.8, 15.9) mm/L, Anti-CCP antibody(+) 2.7(0.7, 12.1) mm/L, RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) 5.2(1.3, 17.2) mm/L, RF (+) 5.2(0.9, 16.2) mm/L, H=22.141, P<0.01] of the RF(+)patients were significantly higher than RF(-) patients, and RF(+) patients had higher disease severity(DAS28-ESR) [RF(-) anti-CCP antibody(-) (4.0±1.8), anti-CCP antibody(+) (3.8±1.6), RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) (4.3±1.8), RF(+) (4.1±1.7), F=7.269, P<0.01]. ③ The RF(+) anti-CCP antibody(+) patients were divided into 4 subgroups, and it was found that RF-H anti-CCP antibody-L patients had higher disease severity [RF-H anti-CCP antibody-H 4.3(2.9, 5.6), RF-L anti-CCP antibody-L 4.5(3.0, 5.7), RF-H anti-CCP antibody-L 4.9(3.1, 6.2), RF-L anti-CCP antibody-H 2.8(1.8, 3.9), H=20.374, P<0.01]. ④ After 3-month follow up, the clinical characteristics of the four groups were improved, but there was no significant difference in the improvement of the four groups, indicating that the RF and anti-CCP antibody status did not affect the remission within 3 months. Conclusion:Among RA patients, the disease activity of RA patients is closely related to RF and the RF(+) patients have more severe disease than RF(-) patients. Patients with higher RF titer also have more severe disease than that of patients with low RF titer. After 3 months of medication treatment, the antibody status does not affect the disease remission rate.

OBJECTIVE： To provide reference for improving emergency capacity of the hospital pharmacy department in response to the novel coronavirus pneumonia （COVID-19） epidemic. METHODS ：According to the related regulations and requirements of Law of the People ’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases ，combined with the situation of COVID- 19 epidemic prevention and control ，and management experience of relevant hospitals ，on the basis of in-depth analysis of drug supply and quality assurance ，drug dispensing management ，provision of clinical pharmaceutical services and other related material support of hospital pharmacy department，integrated emergency management model was constructed for COVID- 19 epidemic prevention and control ，and the precautions and response measures of each link were sorted out. RESULTS ：Integruted emergency management mode for COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control in hospital pharmacy department included but was not limited to human resource management，drug and disinfection products supply management （mainly including key treatment drugs and disinfection product list formulation，control，inventory increase ，etc.）；drug dispensing management （mainly including prescription ，pharmacy window ， planning quantitative reserve ， drug return ， etc.）；clinical pharmaceutical care management （mainly including providing pharmaceutical information support ，online pharmaceutical service ，monitoring drug safety ，etc.）；personnel protection and disinfection （mainly including personnel protection ，environment and window ，equipment and container ，paper prescription disinfection，etc.）；special management of donated drugs ；prevention and control knowledge training ；pharmaceutical education and scientific research management ，etc. CONCLUSIONS ：The integrated emergency management model for epidemic prevention and control is helpful for hospital pharmacy to manage public health emergencies. During the outbreak of COVID- 19，hospital pharmacy department should start integrated emergency management mode for epidemic prevention and control ，strengthen the risk control of each link ，and play a good role in the key functional departments in the special period.

OBJECTIVE：To p rovide reference for related pharmacy work for developing evidence-based pharmacy information support to respond for novel coronavirus pneumonia （COVID-19） epidemic. METHODS ：The PubMed，CNKI and Wanfang database were consulted to obtain treatment progress of COVID-19，prohibited for use with lopinavir/ritonavir and adverse drug reactionas until February 12，2020；so were package insert and UpToDate at the same time. Those information were summarized and evaluated. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS ：Totally 14 literatures introduced chemical drugs for COVID- 19，involving 7 categories， 20 kinds of chemical drugs as antiviral drugs （interferon α/interferon α-2 β ， lopinavir/litonavir， etc.）， immunomodulatory agents （such as glucocorticoid ，gamma globulin ），antimalarial drugs （such as chloroquine phosphate ）. The existing evidence of drug treatment mainly comes from in vitro cell test or currently progressing RCT ，with low-level evidence and recommendation intensity （Oxford evidence level is level 5，recommendation intensity is level D ）. For lopinavir/ritonavir that recommended in the diagnosis and treatment recommendations for COVID- 19 published by the National Health Commission ，it is a CYP3A inhibitor ，which resulted in increased plasma concentrations of some medications such as antiarrhythmic drugs ，antitumor targeted drugs and antibacterial drugs ，and should not be used in combination with drugs such as afzosin ，ivabradine，amiodarone， etc. Its common adverse reactions mainly involved igestive system （diarrhea，taste disorders ，vomiting，etc.），respiratory system （upper respiratory tract infection ），endocrine and metabolic system （hypercholesterolemia，etc.），skin and its appendents （skin rash），which should be monitored clinically.