Objective: To report the clinical profile and treatment outcomes of neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done in a single tertiary hospital. Medical records of patients diagnosed with NVG from January 2000 to August 2018 were reviewed and pertinent data were collected. Study outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) and were analyzed for eyes that received any of the following: intravitreal bevacizumab (IVBe), pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), trabeculectomy with mitomycin (trab-MMC), or diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (DLCP) with at least 1 month of follow-up. Results: There were 162 patients (181 eyes) diagnosed with NVG. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 55.6 ± 14 years. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was observed in 81 (45%) eyes and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in 48 (27%) eyes. Baseline VA was hand movement in 67 (37%) eyes and no light perception (NLP) in 49 (27%) eyes. Only 60 (33%) eyes had ≥1 month of follow up (mean of 73 ± 119.1 weeks) after procedures were done. IVBe was done in 22 (37%) eyes, trab-MMC in 20 (33%), PRP in 22 (37%), and DLCP in 24 (40%) eyes. IOP decreased from 45 to 20 mmHg (p<0.001) but VA decreased from LogMAR 1.7 to 2.1 (p<0.01). There was significant VA decrease in eyes that underwent a single procedure (p<0.02) but none in eyes that underwent 2 or 3 procedures. Nonetheless, there was significant IOP decrease (p<0.05) when one procedure was done. Of the 49 eyes that had baseline sight, 19 (41%) converted to NLP (p<0.01). Conclusion Most patients presenting with advanced NVG had DR and CRVO. Procedures led to better IOP but not VA and some lost vision. Aggressive screening for NVG among high-risk groups is warranted to institute treatment early.
Bevacizumab ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; Glaucoma, Neovascular ; Trabeculectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of 0.1% topical bromfenac as an adjunctive treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients.METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 68 eyes of 68 patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to BRVO who were treated with IVB injection and followed up for at least 12 months. Of the 68 eyes, 38 were treated with IVB combined with 0.1% topical bromfenac and 30 were treated with IVB alone. IVB reinjection was performed in cases of recurrence. The primary outcome measurement was the number of IVB injections. Changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) during the 12-month follow-up were compared.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the BCVA or CFT between the two groups at the initial and final examinations. However, the number of IVB injections was significantly lower in the 0.1% bromfenac-treated eyes (p < 0.01) than in the control eyes (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 5.0 ± 0.6 times).CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IVB monotherapy, topical bromfenac as an adjunctive treatment with IVB injection of eyes with ME secondary to BRVO did not affect visual outcomes, but it reduced the number of IVB injections.
Bevacizumab ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Macular Edema ; Recurrence ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients and macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients after intravitreal preservative-free Triamcinolone injection.METHODS: This study included 36 patients diagnosed with DME and 44 patients diagnosed with BRVO with macular edema. Both groups were treated with intravitreal preservative-free Triamcinolone (Maqaid®, Wakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) injection, and we compared the IOPs of the two groups determined before injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after injection. We also compared the IOP elevation ratios and durations, and central foveal thickness (CFT) changes using optical coherence tomography.RESULTS: In both groups, there was no statistical significance in the IOP before injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after injection. However, the IOP elevation ratio in the DME patients (38.9%) was significantly higher than that in the BRVO patients (15.9%) (p = 0.02). The duration of IOP elevation in the DME patients (1.14 ± 1.85 months) was significantly longer than that in the BRVO patients (0.30 ± 1.20 months) (p = 0.03). When the IOP was not controlled, we used IOP-lowering agents, and two patients in the DME were treated with glaucoma surgery. There was no statistical significance in the CFT before injection and at 1, 2, or 3 months after injection between the two groups (p = 0.72, p = 0.26, p = 0.66, p = 0.34, respectively). However, the CFT after 6 months was 328 ± 103 µm in the DME group and 434 ± 189 µm in the BRVO; this difference was significant (p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of preservative-free Triamcinolone was effective in the treatment of both DME patients and macular edema patients associated with BRVO. Furthermore, Triamcinolone was more safely injected in macular edema associated with BRVO patients than in DME patients.
Glaucoma ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Triamcinolone

PURPOSE: We analyzed and compared retinal ganglion cell damage between patients with glaucoma and those with branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We performed two types of visual field examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 glaucoma eyes and 40 BRVO eyes. We compared the median deviation (MD), the pattern standard deviation (PSD), and sensitivity of damaged visual hemifield from frequency-doubling technology (FDT) C24-2 and standard automated perimetry (SAP) C24-2 visual field tests evaluation. We sought correlations between the MDs and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as revealed by optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: MDs did not differ between the groups. PSD value was higher in glaucoma patients with FDT C24-2 test (p = 0.022), but no difference between two groups with SAP C24-2 test (p = 0.144). In terms of the sensitivity of the damaged visual hemifield, glaucoma patients had larger areas of damage in the FDT C24-2 test (p < 0.01). In regression analyses, the log R2 values of both tests were higher in glaucoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma patients had a greater damaged visual field area in the FDT C24-2 test than the SAP C24-2 test. The BRVO patients exhibited similar extents of damage in both tests. Thus, the subtypes and distributions of damaged retinal ganglion cells may differ between the conditions, facilitating differential diagnosis.
Diagnosis, Differential ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Nerve Fibers ; Retinal Ganglion Cells ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields

PURPOSE: To report the short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab alone, low-dose bevacizumab combined with low-dose triamcinolone injection, and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) injection in patients with macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: The medical records of 70 patients (70 eyes) with macular edema secondary to CRVO were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 25 eyes (IVB group) were injected with intravitreal bevacizumab, 23 eyes (intravitreal low-dose bevacizumab and triamcinolone injection [IVB+IVTA] group) were injected with low-dose bevacizumab (0.625 mg/0.025 mL) combined with low-dose triamcinolone (1 mg/0.025 mL), and 20 eyes (intravitreal dexamethasone implant [IVD] group) were injected with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) of treated eyes were measured before injection and at 1 month and 3 months after injection. RESULTS: Groups were similar in age and gender distribution. At 1 month, the CMT of all groups was significantly lower, and the BCVA of all groups had increased significantly in patients with CRVO; there were no significant differences among the three groups (p = 0.246, p = 0.974). At 3 months, the CMT and BCVA had improved significantly only in the IVD and IVB+IVTA groups; the short-term effect was comparable to the IVD group. IOP showed no significant change at 3 months after injection for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering various clinical variables in the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO, intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, low-dose bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone, and dexamethasone implants may be used selectively.
Bevacizumab ; Dexamethasone ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema ; Medical Records ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retrospective Studies ; Triamcinolone ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To examine whether disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRILs) at baseline and after treatment was associated with visual acuity in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) who were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants. METHODS: A retrospective review of records of 22 patients with treatment-naive CRVO with centrally involved macular edema treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography images were obtained during each visit. The DRIL extent and additional parameters were evaluated in a 2,000 µm-wide foveal centered area. RESULTS: In the 22 patients (74.5 ± 8.92 years), baseline DRIL was observed in 21 eyes (94.5%). Using univariate analysis, baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly associated with the extent of baseline DRIL (p = 0.005, r = −0.58), and the extent of external limiting membrane disruption and ellipsoid zone (p = 0.015, r = −0.51; p = 0.011, r = −0.533, respectively). The final BCVA was significantly correlated with the baseline BCVA (p < 0.001, r = 0.74) and extent of DRIL (p = 0.04, r = −0.35). Changes in the BCVA were correlated with changes of DRIL between baseline and the final visit (p = 0.041, r = 0.439). CONCLUSIONS: The extents of baseline DRIL and DRIL changes after treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implants for macular edema secondary to CRVO may be useful parameter for visual acuity improvement.
Dexamethasone ; Humans ; Macular Edema ; Membranes ; Prognosis ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical presentations of focal choroidal excavation and to report long-term outcomes of cases without retinal disorders at the initial presentation. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients diagnosed with focal choroidal excavation. Concomitant retinal disorders at the initial presentation were identified. In cases without retinal disorders, the development of retinal disorders during follow-up was also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes in 45 patients were examined in this study. Focal choroidal excavation was accompanied with retinal disorders in 16 eyes (35.6%). In the remaining 29 eyes, only focal choroidal excavation was noted without any accompanying retinal disorders. The accompanying retinal disorders included choroidal neovascularization (n = 8), central serous chorioretinopathy (n = 4), epiretinal membrane (n = 1), macular hole (n = 1), branch retinal vein occlusion (n = 1), and uveitis (n = 1). Of the 29 eyes without retinal disorders, 22 were followed up for a mean period of 33.5 ± 18.2 months. Consequently, choroidal neovascularization was found to have developed in one eye at 59 months, and subretinal fluid had developed in two eyes at 17 and 28 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Focal choroidal excavation was accompanied by retinal disorders in 35.6% of the included patients. In patients without retinal disorders, the development of a retinal disorder was noted in some eyes, suggesting the need for long-term regular follow-up in patients diagnosed with focal choroidal excavation.
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy ; Choroid ; Choroidal Neovascularization ; Epiretinal Membrane ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Retinal Perforations ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinaldehyde ; Retrospective Studies ; Subretinal Fluid ; Uveitis

PURPOSE: To determine changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in eyes with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: Forty-four patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for unilateral macular edema due to RVO were retrospectively reviewed. Before injection, patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, dilated fundus examination, fluorescein angiography, and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Changes in BCVA, SCT, and central macular thickness (CMT) of the RVO eyes were evaluated and compared with those of the normal contralateral eyes at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. RESULTS: The mean SCT in RVO eyes (265.41 ± 43.02 µm) was significantly thicker than that in the fellow eyes (244.77 ± 30.35 µm) at baseline (p < 0.001). The mean SCT was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months after intravitreal bevacizumab injection (all p < 0.001), and the change in SCT was significantly correlated with the change in CMT (r = 0.327, p = 0.030). While there was an improvement in BCVA together with a reduction in SCT (p < 0.001), no significant correlation was found (p = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: Subfoveal choroidal thickness in RVO eyes with macular edema was greater than that in the normal fellow eyes, and decreased significantly after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. The SCT reduction was significantly correlated with CMT reduction.
Bevacizumab ; Choroid ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of epiretinal membrane (ERM) on the outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) treatment for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Thirty eyes of 30 patients who received Ozurdex treatment for ME secondary to BRVO, and were followed-up for at least 6 months were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (ERM [+] or absence ERM [−]) of ERM at baseline. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), recurrence of ME, and retreatment rate were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after Ozurdex injection. RESULTS: Ten eyes of 30 eyes (33%) showed ERM at baseline. While the mean CFT was significantly reduced at 1 month after Ozurdex injection, it began to increase gradually thereafter in both groups. The ERM (+) group showed a significantly higher mean CFT than the corresponding values of the ERM (−) group at 1 (p = 0.022) and 6 months (p = 0.001) after Ozurdex injection. However, no significant difference was found in the BCVA between the two groups at every visit. The proportion of eyes with ME was significantly higher in the ERM (+) group (90%) than that in the ERM (−) group (35%) at 6 months after Ozurdex injection (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the percentage of retreatment, time to retreatment, and type of materials used for retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ME secondary to BRVO, the treatment effect of Ozurdex was low and the duration of treatment was short when ERM was concurrently present. However, the presence of ERM did not significantly affect visual outcomes after treatment with Ozurdex.
Dexamethasone ; Edema ; Epiretinal Membrane ; Humans ; Macular Edema ; Recurrence ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Retreatment ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To compare retinal layer thickness and chorioretinal vascular density (VD) between acute and chronic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: This study included patients with BRVO. The VD of the superficial capillary plexus (VDs), the VD of the deep capillary plexus (VDd), and VD of the choriocapillaris were obtained using optical coherence tomography angiography. Acute and chronic BRVO data were compared to assess differences between the involved and uninvolved areas. RESULTS: We included 17 eyes with acute BRVO and 23 eyes with chronic BRVO. The VDs in the involved area were not significantly different between the involved area and in the uninvolved area in acute BRVO (p = 0.551). However, the difference was significant in chronic BRVO (p = 0.013). The VDd in the involved area was lower than in the uninvolved area in both acute and chronic BRVO (p = 0.020, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, the VD of the choriocapillaris values did not differ significantly between acute and chronic BRVO, or between involved and uninvolved areas. The VDs in the involved area in chronic BRVO were lower than in acute BRVO (p = 0.047), and the VDd did not differ between acute and chronic BRVO in all areas. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular impaired patterns in the retinal layer differed between acute and chronic BRVO. These results may suggest that vascular change and remodeling develops differently in acute and chronic phases in BRVO.
Angiography ; Capillaries ; Humans ; Retinal Vein Occlusion ; Retinal Vein ; Retinaldehyde ; Tomography, Optical Coherence