OBJECTIVETo clarify the natural course and explore impact factors of distant metastasis in rectal cancer patients who received total mesorectal excision(TME) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODSBetween Januray 2008 and December 2013, 317 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical surgical resection following neoadjuvant CRT (pre- and postoperative simple fluorouracil or fluorouracil combined with oxaliplatin plus preoperative three dimensional conformal radiotherapy) at Department of Colorectal Surgery in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were included. Univariate analysis and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the clinicopathological parameters that may be associated with distant metastasis.

RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 39 months(range 15 - 89 months), 72 patients(22.7%) had disease recurrence, including local recurrence in 8 patients, and distant metastasis in 67 patients (among whom 3 patients had both). Distant metastasis occurred in 86.5%(58/67) patients during the first three years after surgery. The 3-year cumulative distant metastatic rate in all the patients was 22.4%. The 5-year overall survival rate in distant metastatic patient was significantly lower than that of non-distant metastatic patients following neoadjuvant CRT (36.2% vs. 81.2%, P=0.000). Univariate analysis showed that ypT stage (χ(2)=13.304, P=0.010), ypN stage(χ(2)=23.416, P=0.000), ypTNM stage (χ(2)=31.765, P=0.000) and RCRG(χ(2)=16.246, P=0.000) were associated with distant metastasis. Cox regression revealed that ypTNM stage(HR=1.959, 95% CI:1.171 ~ 3.277, P=0.010) was the only independent risk factor of distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONSDistant metastasis is the early event during the progression in rectal cancer. ypTNM stage is the only independent risk factor of distant metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer patients who undergo TME following neoadjuvant CRT.

Chemoradiotherapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Fluorouracil ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Rectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; surgery ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate

No abstract available.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects ; Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use ; Biopsy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/*drug therapy/pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate/*adverse effects ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/*chemically induced/diagnosis ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis/*isolation & purification ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/*adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/pathology/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis/drug therapy/*microbiology

OBJECTIVETo summarize and analyze the clinicopathological features and surgical management of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer, and to explore the rational treatment of this entity.

METHODSClinical data of fifty-two patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer admitted to the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1994 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. They were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved pathological complete response in the primary tumor. The preoperative clinical staging were stage II (cT3~4N0) in 10 cases and stage III (cT3~4N+) in 42 cases. After the neoadjuvant therapy, 10 cases achieved clinical complete response (cCR) (19.2%).

RESULTSRadical surgery was performed in 51 patients. Among them, five patients (9.8%) had pathological lymph node metastasis. One cCR patient underwent transanal local excision. The postoperative complication rate was 21.2%. During a median follow-up of 23.6 months, only one patient developed bone metastasis and another one had enlarged mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymph nodes detected by imaging. All the patients were alive by the last follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival rate was 96.2% and overall survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONSRadical surgery remains the standard therapy for cCR patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Local excision and "wait and see" should be recommended with great caution and limited to patients who cannot tolerate or refuse radical surgery with a strong demanding for sphincter saving, or applied in clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; methods ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to investigate the value of postoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients who reached pathological ypT1-4N0 after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODSWe performed a retrospective study of 104 patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection, who achieved pathological ypT1-4N0, between Mar 2003 and Dec 2010. There were 73 patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and the other 31 patients did not. The distribution of final pathologic stages for these patients was ypT1-2N0 in 39 cases and ypT3-4N0 in 65 cases.

RESULTSThe median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year overall survival rate (OS) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) for the whole group (ypT1-4N0) were 93.4% and 85.3%, respectively. The 3-year OS and RFS in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and non-adjuvant chemotherapy group were 95.5%, 88.6% and 88.6%, 77.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 3-year RFS (P = 0.108) and OS (P = 0.106) between the two groups. The 3-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates in the adjuvant chemotherapy group were 4.1% (3/73) and 5.5% (4/73), while for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group, the 3-year local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate were 3.2% (1/31) and 16.1% (5/31), respectively. Significant difference was found in distant metastasis rates (P = 0.030) between the two groups, but not in local recurrence rates (P = 0.676).Further subgroup analysis indicated that for the ypT1-2N0 patients, there were no significant differences in 3-year OS (P = 0.296) and RFS (P = 0.939) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant chemotherapy groups, while negative results displayed in 3-year local recurrence rates (P = 0.676) and distant metastasis rates (P = 0.414). However, for patients with ypT3-4N0, significant differences were showed in both the 3-year OS (P = 0.034) and RFS (P = 0.025), and further analysis revealed that the 3-year distant metastasis rate was significantly higher in the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (P = 0.010) , but with non-significant difference in the 3-year local recurrence (P = 0.548).

CONCLUSIONSAdjuvant chemotherapy may not improve survival for ypT1-2N0 patients. However, it may be clinically meaningful for ypT3-4N0 patients by decreasing distant metastasis rate. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm our results.

Adenocarcinoma ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Deoxycytidine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Leucovorin ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Postoperative Period ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; Rectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Young Adult

We report herein a case of 35-years-old woman in whom portal hypertension (esophageal varix and splenomegaly) developed after 12 cycles of oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. She was transferred for the evaluation of etiology of new-onset portal hypertension. The esophageal varix and splenomegaly were absent before the oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy. Thorough history taking and serological exam revealed no evidence of chronic liver disease. Liver biopsy was done and there was no cirrhotic nodule formation. Instead, perivenular fibrosis was noted. Considering new development of esophageal varices and splenomegaly after 12 cycles of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, we could conclude that portal hypertension in this patient were due to sinusoidal injury by oxaliplatin. Finally, we recommend regular follow-up with endoscopy and radiologic examination for checking the development of varices and for screening of varices and splenomegaly in patients with colo-rectal cancer who receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/chemically induced ; Female ; Fibrosis ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/chemically induced/*diagnosis ; Liver/pathology ; Organoplatinum Compounds/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Rectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/surgery ; Splenomegaly/chemically induced ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

We report herein a case of 35-years-old woman in whom portal hypertension (esophageal varix and splenomegaly) developed after 12 cycles of oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. She was transferred for the evaluation of etiology of new-onset portal hypertension. The esophageal varix and splenomegaly were absent before the oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy. Thorough history taking and serological exam revealed no evidence of chronic liver disease. Liver biopsy was done and there was no cirrhotic nodule formation. Instead, perivenular fibrosis was noted. Considering new development of esophageal varices and splenomegaly after 12 cycles of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, we could conclude that portal hypertension in this patient were due to sinusoidal injury by oxaliplatin. Finally, we recommend regular follow-up with endoscopy and radiologic examination for checking the development of varices and for screening of varices and splenomegaly in patients with colo-rectal cancer who receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/chemically induced ; Female ; Fibrosis ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/chemically induced/*diagnosis ; Liver/pathology ; Organoplatinum Compounds/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Rectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/surgery ; Splenomegaly/chemically induced ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

No abstract available.
Antigens, Neoplasm/metabolism ; Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis/drug therapy/secondary ; Disease Progression ; Humans ; Interferons/therapeutic use ; Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis/drug therapy/secondary ; Male ; Melanoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Rectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; S100 Proteins/metabolism ; Tamoxifen/therapeutic use ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVETo analyze the survival status and prognostic factors of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODSThe survival rate and prognostic factors of 112 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, who had complete follow-up data, were retrospectively assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTSThe median survival time of the 112 patients was 18.25 months. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 60.8%, 35.0%, 20.3% and 4.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that gender, age, primary tumor site, chemotherapy and pathological types had no significant correlation with the overall survival. But the treatment of primary tumor, time of liver metastasis, gross type of tumor, resection of liver metastases and clinical stage status were all independently related with the prognosis of patients. Multivariate regression analysis showed that resection of liver metastases, gross type of tumor and clinical stage were key factors affecting the prognosis of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONPatients with advanced stage, infiltrative gross type of colorectal cancer should be followed-up closely so that liver metastases from the cancer can be diagnosed and treated early. Resection of both the primary tumor and liver metastasis may improve survival of the patients.

Adenocarcinoma ; pathology ; secondary ; surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous ; pathology ; secondary ; surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colonic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; secondary ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo study the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) and unclear K-ras status.

METHODSClinical data of 102 ACRC patients, treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center from March 2005 to December 2008, were collected. The cumulative survival rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) of the cases were calculated. The difference in ORR, DCR, PFS and oval survival (OS) between the regimens used as first-line and non-first-line treatment, and between the regimens including oxaliplatin and irinotecan were compared.

RESULTSThe overall ORR of cetuximab plus chemotherapy was 43.1%, DCR 73.5%, median PFS 4.0 months, OS 28.5 months, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rate was 89.2%, 50.9% and 27.5%, respectively. The differences in ORR (50.0% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.344), DCR (78.1% vs. 72.9%, P = 0.571) and OS (51.0 months vs. 35.0 months, P = 0.396) between the regimens as first line and as non-first line treatment were not statistically significant. However, the PFS of the regimen as first-line was longer than that as non-first-line treatment (PFS 5.5 months vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.001). The differences in ORR (54.2% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.223), DCR (79.2% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.654), PFS (5.0 months vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.726) and OS (36.0 months vs. 40.0 months, P = 0.759) between cetuximab plus oxliplatin and irinotecan were not statistically significant. The most common side effects of cetuximab plus chemotherapy were acneiform eruption (80.4%, grade 3-4 in 9.8%), neutropenia (66.7%, grade 3-4 in 18.6%), and diarrhea (19.6%, grade 3-4 in 5.9%). No treatment-related death was recorded.

CONCLUSIONPatients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy have good ORR and OS, and the regimen is safe with less adverse events for them. There is no significant difference between the efficacies of regimens as first line and as non-first line treatment, and between cetuximab plus oxliplatin and cetuximab plus irinotecan regimens.

Acneiform Eruptions ; chemically induced ; Adenocarcinoma ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; secondary ; surgery ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Cetuximab ; Colonic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; surgery ; Diarrhea ; chemically induced ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; secondary ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; secondary ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; administration & dosage ; Rectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; pathology ; surgery ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; ras Proteins ; metabolism

OBJECTIVETo explore the prognostic factors for rectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases.

METHODSData from a total of 77 cases of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases treated in our center from January 2002 to December 2008 were collected and reviewed. The total survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression model with SPSS 17.0 software were used to analyze 13 factors including clinicopathological factors and treatment choices.

RESULTSThe median survival time of the 77 cases was 12 months. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 47.7%, 28.0%, 13.1%, and 1.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier method revealed that the differentiation of the primary tumor, T-stage, N status, the distribution, number and size of liver metastases, extrahepatic disease, serum CEA level at diagnosis and treatment modality were prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the differentiation of the primary tumor (P = 0.007), T-stage (P = 0.027), the size of liver metastases (P = 0.003), serum CEA value at diagnosis (P = 0.000) were independent prognostic factors for rectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONThe factors affecting the prognosis for rectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases are the differentiation of the primary tumor, T-stage, N status, the distribution, number and size of liver metastases, extrahepatic disease, serum CEA level at diagnosis and treatment modality. The differentiation of the primary tumor, T-stage, the size of liver metastases, and serum CEA value at diagnosis are independent prognostic factors.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; blood ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; pathology ; secondary ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Rectal Neoplasms ; blood ; drug therapy ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate