BACKGROUND

Perampanel is an antagonist of the a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor. It is currently FDA-approved to treat focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy, but recent evidence suggests its potential in treating severe and refractory tremors.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of perampanel in treating tremors via a systematic review of existing literature. 

METHODS

We performed a literature search on five large databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, HERDIN, and Scopus) for clinical studies within the last 10 years and screened a total of 1,539 unique articles for full assessment. We filtered out papers on epilepsy as well as hypokinetic diseases and assessed nine articles for quality assessment and review.

RESULTS

A total of four case reports/series, four open-label trials, and one randomized controlled trial were assessed to be of fair to good quality. All trials showed that low-dose perampanel (2-4 mg/day) was safe and well-tolerated with minor adverse events reported by participants. A net benefit from baseline was observed in patients with essential and primary orthostatic tremors. However, current evidence is weak because the trials employed a non-randomized before-after study design with a small sample size and significant dropout rates.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose perampanel at 2-4 mg/day shows promising potential in treating refractory tremors and myoclonus in recent clinical studies, but current evidence is weak or anecdotal. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the conclusive benefit of perampanel for hyperkinesia.

Human ; Perampanel ; Receptors, Ampa ; Dystonia ; Tremor ; Myoclonus ; Hyperkinesia ; Hyperkinesis

BACKGROUND

Perampanel is an antagonist of the a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor. It is currently FDA-approved to treat focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy, but recent evidence suggests its potential in treating severe and refractory tremors.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of perampanel in treating tremors via a systematic review of existing literature. 

METHODS

We performed a literature search on five large databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, HERDIN, and Scopus) for clinical studies within the last 10 years and screened a total of 1,539 unique articles for full assessment. We filtered out papers on epilepsy as well as hypokinetic diseases and assessed nine articles for quality assessment and review.

RESULTS

A total of four case reports/series, four open-label trials, and one randomized controlled trial were assessed to be of fair to good quality. All trials showed that low-dose perampanel (2-4 mg/day) was safe and well-tolerated with minor adverse events reported by participants. A net benefit from baseline was observed in patients with essential and primary orthostatic tremors. However, current evidence is weak because the trials employed a non-randomized before-after study design with a small sample size and significant dropout rates.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose perampanel at 2-4 mg/day shows promising potential in treating refractory tremors and myoclonus in recent clinical studies, but current evidence is weak or anecdotal. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the conclusive benefit of perampanel for hyperkinesia.

Human ; Perampanel ; Receptors, Ampa ; Dystonia ; Tremor ; Myoclonus ; Hyperkinesia ; Hyperkinesis