With the effects of activating blood and resolving stasis, and moving Qi to relieve pain, Jingtong Granules is widely used in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy in China. Long-term clinical application and related evidence have shown that the prescription has ideal effect in alleviating the pain in neck, shoulder, and upper limbs, stiffness or scurrying numbness, and scurrying pain caused by this disease. However, there is a lack of consensus on the clinical application of Jingtong Granules. Therefore, clinical first-line experts and methodology experts from all over the country were invited to compile this expert consensus. This expert consensus is expected to guide clinicians to use Jingtong Granules in a standardized and reasonable way, improve clinical efficacy, reduce medication risks, and benefit patients. First, according to the clinical experience of experts and the standard development procedures, the indications, syndrome characteristics, clinical advantages, and possible adverse reactions of Jingtong Granules were summarized. Then, through face-to-face interview of clinical doctors in traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine and survey of the clinical application, the clinical problems were summed up, and the consensus was reached with the nominal group method to form the final clinical problems. Third, evidence retrieval was carried out for the clinical problems, and relevant evidence was evaluated. The GRADE system was employed to rate the quality of evidence. Fourth, 5 recommendation items and 3 consensuses items were summarized with the nominal group method. Opinions and peer reviews on the consensus content were solicited through expert meetings and letter reviews. The final consensus includes the summary of evidence on the clinical indications, effectiveness, and safety of Jingtong Granules, which can serve as a reference for clinicians in hospitals and primary health institutions.
Humans ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects* ; Consensus ; Radiculopathy/drug therapy* ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Pain/drug therapy*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of lumbar transforaminal epidural block (LTEB) for treatment of low back pain with radicular pain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 patients with low back pain and radicular pain admitted to the Department of Orthopedics of Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital from March, 2017 to April, 2019. Thirty-three of the patients received treatment with LTEB (LTEB group), and 45 received comprehensive conservative treatment including traction, massage, acupuncture and physiotherapy (control group). The demographic and clinical data of the two groups were compared. The patients were followed up for 3 to 24 months, and numerical rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores of the patients were evaluated before the treatment and at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after discharge to assess the efficacy of the treatment. RESULTS: The mean operation time of LTEB was 25.7 7.5 min (15-45 min). After the operation, 5 patients developed weakness of the lower limbs but all recovered within 24-72 h. The patients receiving LTEB all showed significantly decreased NRS scores for low back and radicular pain and ODI scores after the operation ( CONCLUSIONS As a minimally invasive approach, LTEB is effective for treatment of low back pain with radicular pain and can produce good short-term effects of pain relief and functional improvement.
Humans ; Injections, Epidural ; Low Back Pain/drug therapy* ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Radiculopathy/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) can be defined as an ectopic ossification in the tissues of spinal ligament showing a hyperostotic condition. OPLL is developed mostly in the cervical spine and clinical presentations of OPLL are majorly myelopathy and/or radiculopathy, with serious neurological pathology resulting in paralysis of extremities and disturbances of motility lowering the quality of life. OPLL is known to be an idiopathic and multifactorial disease, which genetic factors and non-genetic factors including diet, obesity, physical strain on the posterior longitudinal ligament, age, and diabetes mellitus, are involved into the pathogenesis. Up to now, surgical management by decompressing the spinal cord is regarded as standard treatment for OPLL, although there might be the risk of development of reprogression of ossification. The molecular pathogenesis and efficient therapeutic strategy, especially pharmacotherapy and/or preventive intervention, of OPLL has not been clearly elucidated and suggested. Therefore, in this review, we tried to give an overview to the present research results on OPLL, in order to shed light on the potential pharmacotherapy based on molecular pathophysiologic aspect of OPLL, especially on the genetic/genomic factors involved into the etiology of OPLL.
Diabetes Mellitus ; Diet ; Drug Therapy ; Extremities ; Ligaments ; Longitudinal Ligaments ; Obesity ; Ossification, Heterotopic ; Paralysis ; Pathology ; Quality of Life ; Radiculopathy ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Diseases ; Spine

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is caused by nerve damage attributable to the cancer per se, and/or treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery; the prevalence is reported to be as high as 40%. The etiologies of NCP include direct nerve invasion or nerve compression by the cancer, neural toxicity, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. NCP is subdivided into plexopathy, radiculopathy, and peripheral neuropathies, among several other categories. The clinical characteristics of NCP differ from those of nociceptive pain in terms of both the hypersensitivity symptoms (burning, tingling, and an electrical sensation) and the hyposensitivity symptoms (numbness and muscle weakness). Recovery requires several months to years, even after recovery from injury. Management is complex; NCP does not usually respond to opioids, although treatments may feature both opioids and adjuvant drugs including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and anti-arrhythmic agents, all of which improve the quality-of-life. This review addresses the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics and management of NCP, and factors rendering pain control difficult.
Analgesics, Opioid ; Anticonvulsants ; Antidepressive Agents ; Drug Therapy ; Hypersensitivity ; Neuralgia ; Nociceptive Pain ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases ; Prevalence* ; Radiculopathy ; Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Although both pregabalin and gabapentin are known to be useful for treating lumbar radiating pain and reducing the incidence of surgery, the oral corticosteroids sometimes offer a dramatic effect on severe radiating pain despite the lack of scientific evidence. METHODS: A total of 54 patients were enrolled among 703 patients who complained of lumbar radiating pain. Twenty patients who received an oral corticosteroid was classified as group A and 20 patients who received the control drugs (pregabalin or gabapentin) as group B. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Revised Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, lumbar radiating pain, objective patient satisfaction, and objective improvement of patients or physicians were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after medication. RESULTS: No difference in the sex ratio and age was observed between the groups (p = 0.70 and p = 0.13, respectively). Group A showed greater improvement in radiating pain after 2, 6, and 12 weeks than group B (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). No differences were observed between the groups in satisfaction at the beginning and 12 weeks after taking the medication (p = 0.062 and p = 0.061, respectively) and in objective improvement of patients and physicians (p = 0.657 and p = 0.748, respectively). Group A was less disabled and had greater physical health scores than group B (p = 0.014 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Oral corticosteroids for the treatment of lumbar radiating pain can be more effective in pain relief than gabapentin or pregabalin. The satisfaction of patients and physicians with the drug and objective improvement status were not inferior to that with gabapentin or pregabalin.
Adolescent ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones/*therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Amines/therapeutic use ; Analgesics/therapeutic use ; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain/*drug therapy/*physiopathology ; Lumbosacral Region/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data ; Pregabalin/therapeutic use ; Quality of Life ; Radiculopathy/drug therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult ; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use

Delphi Technique ; Humans ; Radiculopathy ; drug therapy ; surgery ; therapy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) for unilateral radiculopathy by the midline or paramedian approaches and to determine the prognostic factors of CIESI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 182 patients who underwent CIESI from January 2009 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria were no previous spinal steroid injection, presence of a cross-sectional image, and presence of follow-up records. Exclusion criteria were patients with bilateral cervical radiculopathy and/or dominant cervical axial pain, combined peripheral neuropathy, and previous cervical spine surgery. Short-term clinical outcomes were evaluated at the first follow-up after CIESI. We compared the clinical outcomes between the midline and paramedian approaches. Possible prognostic factors for the outcome, such as age, gender, duration of radiculopathy, and cause of radiculopathy were also analyzed. RESULTS: Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections were effective in 124 of 182 patients (68.1%) at the first follow-up. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes of CIESI, between midline (69.6%) and paramedian (63.7%) approaches (p = 0.723). Cause of radiculopathy was the only significant factor affecting the efficacy of CIESI. Patients with disc herniation had significantly better results than patients with neural foraminal stenosis (82.9% vs. 56.0%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the midline and paramedian approaches in CIESI, for unilateral radiculopathy. The cause of the radiculopathy is significantly associated with the treatment efficacy; patients with disc herniation experience better pain relief than those with neural foraminal stenosis.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/*therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Cord/physiopathology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Epidural ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/*drug therapy/radiography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiculopathy/*drug therapy/radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

No Abstract available.
Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Radiculopathy/*drug therapy ; Lumbosacral Region ; Injections, Epidural ; Humans ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage ; Fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) with using a preganglionic approach for treating lumbar radiculopathy when the nerve root compression was located at the level of the supra-adjacent intervertebral disc. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of the patients who received conventional TFESI at our department from June 2003 to May 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. TFESI was performed in a total of 13 cases at the level of the exiting nerve root, in which the nerve root compression was at the level of the supra-adjacent intervertebral disc (the conventional TFESI group). Since June 2004, we have performed TFESI with using a preganglionic approach at the level of the supra-adjacent intervertebral disc (for example, at the neural foramen of L4-5 for the L5 nerve root) if the nerve root compression was at the level of the supra-adjacent intervertebral disc. Using the inclusion criteria described above, 20 of these patients were also consecutively enrolled in our study (the preganglionic TFESI group). The treatment outcome was assessed using a 5-point patient satisfaction scale and by using a VAS (visual assessment scale). A successful outcome required a patient satisfaction scale score of 3 (very good) or 4 (excellent), and a reduction on the VAS score of > 50% two weeks after performing TFESI. Logistic regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients in the conventional TFESI group, nine showed satisfactory improvement two weeks after TFESI (69.2%). However, in the preganglionic TFESI group, 18 of the 20 patients (90%) showed satisfactory improvement. The difference between the two approaches in terms of TFESI effectiveness was of borderline significance (p = 0.056; odds ratio: 10.483). CONCLUSION: We conclude that preganglionic TFESI has the better therapeutic effect on radiculopathy caused by nerve root compression at the level of the supra-adjacent disc than does conventional TFESI, and the diffence between the two treatments had borderline statistical significance.
Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage ; Spinal Stenosis/complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Radiculopathy/*drug therapy/etiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pain Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Lumbosacral Region ; Logistic Models ; Intervertebral Disk Displacement/complications ; Injections, Epidural/*methods ; Humans ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage ; Fluoroscopy ; Female ; Bupivacaine/administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage ; Aged ; Adult ; Adolescent

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of treatments using metallic implants in the tuberculous spondylitis. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Residual kyphosis and loss of correction remain the major problems following surgery for tuberculous spondylitis. Several authors have used metallic implants for the prevention of these complications. However, the safety of metallic implants use in tuberculous spine infections are still controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients, who underwent surgery, and were stabilized by the use of a metallic implant for tuberculous spondylitis, and followed up for more than 1 year were included in this study. All patients were treated with combined anterior fusion (with or without mesh) and/or posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. The patients were followed up with serial plain radiographs, laboratory inflammatory parameters and neurological recovery. RESULTS: The overall correction of the kyphotic deformity was initially 8.5 degrees, and loss of correction occurred at 5.8 degrees. Although some loss of correction occurred, even after the use of a metallic implant, clinically significant kyphotic deformity was effectively prevented. There were no cases of persistent infection or failure to control infection when the metallic implantation was combined with an anterior radical debridement and chemotherapy. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were eventually normalized in all patients. The preoperative neurological deficits were: incomplete paralysis in 9 cases and radiculopathy in 4. At the final follow-up, 11 cases had completely recovered, partial residual neurological deficits remaining in 2. CONCLUSIONS: The use of instrumentation with metallic implants, in tubercuous spondylitis of the spine, provided immediate stability, and did not prohibit the control of infection when combined with radical debridement and anti-tuberculous chemotherapy.
Blood Sedimentation ; C-Reactive Protein ; Congenital Abnormalities ; Debridement ; Drug Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kyphosis ; Paralysis ; Radiculopathy ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine ; Spondylitis*