Objective To evaluate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG).Methods Clinical data of 130 patients with obesity who underwent LSG from April 2020 to January 2021 and completed follow-up in time were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were divided into two groups as surgical method,there were 52 cases in three-port group and 78 cases in four-port group.Perioperative indicators and improvement of obesity in two groups were compared.Results All procedures were performed via LSG.Compared with four-port group,the mean operative time of three-port group was shorter[(88.35±22.64)min vs.(98.29±26.25)min,P=0.027].There were no significant differences in amount of bleeding intraoperative,postoperative pain,postoperative drainage,hospital stay after operation,postoperative complication rate and weight loss 6 months and 2 years after surgery(P>0.05).Conclusions Under the premise of no increase in surgical complications and operative time,three-port LSG can reduce the number and size of surgical scars,which is conducive to skin beauty,and obtain the same weight loss effect as four-port LSG,and can be used as a routine operation for sleeve gastrectomy.

Clinical research progress in bariatric and metabolism research had promoted the development in clinical practice. In U. S and Europe, pivotal scientific questions had been explored by clinical researchers, which brought the updating of guidelines, accumulation in key evidences, promotion of the consensus of metabolic benefits, following further development in scientific area. Compared to U. S and Europe, clinical practice in bariatric and metabolic surgery development in China started later. Clinical research in China just developed into initial phase with few achievements with high quality and breakthrough contribution. However, with wider practice, larger patient population and higher quality of surgery, clinical research in bariatric and metabolic surgery in China will go to a new stage through clinical research with standardized guidance, broad cooperation and clinical data digitalization and standardization.

Clinical research progress in bariatric and metabolism research had promoted the development in clinical practice. In U. S and Europe, pivotal scientific questions had been explored by clinical researchers, which brought the updating of guidelines, accumulation in key evidences, promotion of the consensus of metabolic benefits, following further development in scientific area. Compared to U. S and Europe, clinical practice in bariatric and metabolic surgery development in China started later. Clinical research in China just developed into initial phase with few achievements with high quality and breakthrough contribution. However, with wider practice, larger patient population and higher quality of surgery, clinical research in bariatric and metabolic surgery in China will go to a new stage through clinical research with standardized guidance, broad cooperation and clinical data digitalization and standardization.

Objective:To investigate the relationship between the positive surgical margin and clinical factors such as neoadjuvant hormonal therapy after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) in high-risk patients with prostate cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 164 patients with high-risk prostate cancer being performed RARP by one surgeon were analyzed retrospectively in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2022. The mean patient’s age was (65.3±6.2) years old, mean body mass index (BMI) was (25.6±3.0) kg/m 2, the median value of total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) before operation was 18.6(11.3, 31.3)ng/ml, the median value of Gleason score before operation was 7 (7, 8), the median value of prostate volume was 29.3 (22.4, 40.2) ml, and the clinical stage was T 2aN 0M 0-T 4N 0M 0. 80 patients with prostate cancer were treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. All of them were treated with complete androgen blockade with a median course of 3 months. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the correlation between age, BMI, prostate volume, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, preoperative tPSA, clinical stage, Gleason score before operation and positive surgical margin. Then multivariate logistic regression was used to further analyze the independent risk factor of positive surgical margin after RARP. Results:The postoperative pathological diagnosis included pT 2 stage in 111 cases (67.7%), pT 3a stage in 15 cases (9.1%), pT 3b stage in 25 cases (15.2%), pT 4 stage in 13 cases (7.9%). No lymph node metastasis was noticed in all patients. The Gleason scores included 6 in 11 cases (6.7%), 3+ 4 in 26 cases (15.9%), 4+ 3 in 36 cases (22.0%), 8 in 17 cases (10.4%), 9-10 in 24 cases (14.6%), un-evaluation due to endocrine therapy in 50 (30.5%). The positive surgical margin of high-risk patients with prostate cancer was 44.5% (73/164). Univariate analysis showed that the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, tPSA and clinical stage were correlated with positive surgical margin ( P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that non-neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, preoperative tPSA>20ng/ml and clinical stage>T 2b were independent risk factors for positive surgical margin of high-risk patients with prostate cancer. Stratified analysis showed that when the preoperative tPSA was 10-20 ng/ml(21.1% vs.55.9%, P=0.014), the clinical stage was T 2c(29.6% vs.49.1%, P=0.040), the Gleason score before operation was 7(19.4% vs.54.1%, P=0.003), the positive surgical margin of high-risk patients in the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group was significantly lower than that in the non-neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Non-neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, preoperative tPSA>20 ng/ml and clinical stage>T 2b were independent risk factors for positive surgical margin of RARP in the high-risk patients with prostate cancer. For high-risk patients with preoperative tPSA of 10-20 ng/ml, clinical stage of T 2c and Gleason score before operation of 7, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy has important clinical significance in reducing the positive surgical margin of RARP.

Objective:To observe the clinical characteristics of esophageal reflux after total gastrectomy (ERATG), and to explore the mechanism of occurrence.Methods:Fourteen gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy were prospectively enrolled in this study. The postoperative symptoms were observed and recorded and 24 h MII-pH with pH monitoring was performed to investigate the characteristics of postoperative reflux.Results:After total gastrectomy patients were with different degrees of ERATG as heartburn, appetite loss, chest tightness and belching. The overall nature of ERATG is mainly weak acid, with a pH between 4 and 7. ERATG involved esophageal-jejunal anastomosis and a length of esophagus 7 cm above the anastomosis. Patients with typical reflux symptoms had a lower pH minimum in the upright position than those without typical symptoms[(4.76±0.71) vs.(5.68±0.37), t=2.866, P<0.05]. Patients with typical reflux symptoms had a higher frequency of reflux of mixed liquid and liquid-air reflux than those without typical symptoms[liquid(31.25±29.76) vs.(4.50±9.14), t=0.011, P<0.05; liquid-air(19.50±12.99) vs.(2.00±2.61), t=0.004, P<0.05]. Conclusion:ERATG is mainly a upward reflux of weakly acidic gas, with typical symptoms of heartburn, appetite loss, chest tightness and belching. Patients with typical symptoms usually have lower pH in the upright position.

Objective:To investigate the role of indocyanine green(ICG) fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 7 patients who had undergone laparoscopic anterior resection with the use of ICG fluorescence imaging at Peking University People′s Hospital between Oct 2018 and Mar 2019. The clinicopathological variables, surgical factors, short-term outcome and complications were analyzed.Results:The median operation time was 185 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. The median time from ICG injection to anastomotic perfusion was 45 s. One patient received extended proximal resection of bowel due to poor perfusion as suggested by ICG imaging. The median time to soft diet was 4 days, and the median hospital stay was 8 days. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16. There were no major complications in all these patients. No adverse events related to ICG were recorded.Conclusions:ICG fluorescence imaging was safe and effective in detecting insufficient blood supply around newly established bowel anastomsis, hence potentially reducing the anastomotic leakage rate.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors(MPNST) of the bladder is a very rare malignant tumor, usually secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), with a few sporadic cases. This paper reports a case of 70-year-old man with bladder MPNST who underwent transurethral resection. Adjuvant intravesical instillation with gemcitabine was given after surgery, and there was no local recurrence and distant metastasis after 12-month follow-up. This paper also made a corresponding literature review.

Objective:To compare the postoperative functional prognosis of transanal mesorectal excision (taTME) and conventional total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer.Methods:Totally 49 patients underwent taTME and 478 patients underwent conventional TME at Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People′s Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching method was used to perform 1 versus 1 matching between the taTME and conventional TME groups, and 36 pairs of patients were successfully matched. After matching, the median age of patients in taTME group and conventional TME group was 60.5 (16.0) years and 60.5 (13.0) years ( M( Q R)), respectively, and the proportion of male patients was 66.7% (24/36) and 55.6% (20/36) , respectively. EORTC QLQ-C30 scale was used to assess quality of life, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scale and Wexner constipation score were used to evaluate anal function, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) was used to evaluate urinary function,international index of erectile function (IIEF) -5 and female sexual function index (FSFI) score were used to evaluate male and female sexual function, respectively, and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) and patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale were used to evaluate psych function. The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ 2 test, and Fisher exact test were used for comparison between groups, and Wilcoxon rank sum test or McNemar test was used for comparison between paired data. Results:There were no significant differences in surgery time, postoperative hospital stays, conversion rate, morbidity rate, surgery cost, and numbers of lymph node yield between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the conventional TME group, the intraoperative blood loss in the taTME group was significantly higher (100 (100) ml vs. 80 (50) ml, U=424.5, P=0.010), the prophylactic stoma rate was significantly higher (96.9%(31/36) vs. 63.6%(21/36), χ 2=11.218, P<0.01), the total hospitalization cost was significantly lower (74 297.7 (16 746.4) CNY vs. 91 781.3 (26 228.4) CNY, U=413.0, P=0.008). There were no significant differences in anal and urinary function between the two groups (LARS scalescore: Z=-0.513, P=0.608, Wexner constipation score: Z=-0.992, P=0.321, IPSS: Z=-1.807, P=0.071). In terms of psych function, significant difference in GAD-7 scale was seen between the two groups ( Z=-2.311, P=0.021), patients with generalized anxiety disorder accounting for 26.7% (8/30) and 46.9% (15/32), respectively. Conclusions:Compared with conventional TME surgery, taTME has a significantly increased blood loss and prophylactic stoma rate. There are no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative anal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction between taTME and conventinal TME. taTME can alleviate the financial burden and general anxiety disorder to a certain extent.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and prognosis of three surgical methods for presacral recurrent rectal cancer (PRRC).Methods:A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Case inclusion criteria: (1) primary rectal cancer without distant metastasis and undergoing radical surgery; (2) patients undergoing radical surgery after the diagnosis of PRRC; (3) complete inpatient, outpatient and follow-up data. Clinical data of 47 patients meeting the above criteria who underwent operation at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Peking University People's Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Of the 47 patients, 31 were male and 16 were female; the mean age was 57 years old; 9 (19.1%) were low differentiation or signet ring cell carcinoma, 38 (80.9%) were medium differentiation; 19 (40.4%) received neoadjuvant therapy. According to operative procedure, 22 patients were in the abdominal/abdominoperineal resection group, 15 in the sacrectomy group and 10 in the abdominosacral resection group. The operative data, postoperative data and prognosis were compared among the three groups. Survival curve was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used to compare survival difference among three groups.Results:There were no significant differences in baseline data among three groups (all P>0.05). All the 47 patients completed the radical resection successfully. The mean operation time was (4.7±2.1) hours, the median intraoperative blood loss was 600 ml, and the median postoperative hospitalization time was 17 days. Fifteen cases (31.9%) had perioperative complications, of which 3 cases were grade III-IV. There was no perioperative death. The mean operative time was (7.4±1.6) hours in the abdominosacral resection group, (4.9±1.6) hours in the abdominal/abdominoperineal resection group, and (3.0±1.1) hours in the sacroectomy group, with a significant difference ( F=25.071, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days and perioperative complications among the three groups (all P>0.05). The median follow-up period of all the patients was 24 months, 12 cases (25.5%) developed postoperative dysfunction. The incidence of postoperative dysfunction in the abdominosacral resection group was 5/10, which was higher than 4/15 in the sacrectomy group and 3/22 (13.6%) in the abdominoperineal resection group with statistically significant difference (χ 2=9.307, P=0.010). The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 86.1% and 40.2% respectively. The 1-year overall survival rates were 86.0%, 86.7% and 83.3%, and the 3-year overall survival rates were 33.2%, 40.0% and 62.5% in the abdominal/abdominoperineal resection group, sacrectomy group and abdominosacral resection group, respectively, whose difference was not statistically significant (χ 2=0.222, P=0.895). Conclusions:Abdominal/abdominoperineal resection, sacrectomy and abdominosacral resection are all effective for PRRC. Intraoperative function protection should be concerned for patients undergoing abdominosacral resection.

Objective:To investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in patients with presacral recurrent rectal cancer (PRRC).Methods:PRRC was defined as recurrence of rectal cancer after radical surgery involving posteriorly the presacral soft tissue, the sacrum/coccyx, and/or sacral nerve root. The diagnosis is confirmed with clinical symptoms (pain of pelvis/back/lower limb, bloody stools, increased frequency of defecation, and abnormal secretions), physical examination of perineal or pelvic masses, radiological findings, colonoscopy with histopathological biopsy, and the evaluation by multi-disciplinary team (MDT). Inclusion criteria: (1) primary rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery without distant metastasis; (2) PRRC was diagnosed; (3) complete inpatient, outpatient and follow-up data. According to the above criteria, clinical data of 72 patients with PRRC in Peking University People′s Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological features and follow-up data were summarized. Cox proportional hazard models was used to analyze the prognostic factors of PRRC.Results:Among 72 patients, 45 were male and 27 were female with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7:1.0. The median age at recurrence was 58 (34 to 83) years and the median interval from surgery to recurrence was 2.0 (0.2 to 17.0) years. The main symptom was pain in 48.6% (35/72) of patients. In addition, gastrointestinal symptoms were found in 25.0% (18/72) of patients. The presacral recurrent sites were presacral fascia in 36 (50.0%) patients, lower sacrum (S3~S5 or coccyx) in 25 (34.7%) patients, and higher sacrum (S1~S2) in 11 (15.3%) patients. Forty-seven (65.3%) patients underwent radical surgery (abdominal resection, abdominoperineal resection, sacrectomy, abdominosacral resection), 12 (16.7%) underwent non-radical surgery (colostomy, cytoreductive surgery), and 13 (18.1%) did not undergo any surgery but only receive palliative chemoradiotherapy and nutritional support treatment. Thirty-three (45.8%) patients received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, etc.). All the patients received follow-up, and the median follow-up time was 19 (2 to 72) months. The median overall survival time was 14 (1 to 65) months. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 67.1% and 32.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age at recurrence ( P=0.031) and radical resection ( P<0.001) were associated with prognosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radical resection was independent factor of good prognosis (RR=0.140, 95%CI: 0.061-0.322, P<0.001). Conclusions:Patients tend to develop presacral recurrent rectal cancer within 2 years after primary surgery. The main symptom is pain. Patients undergoing radical resection have a relatively good prognosis.