OBJECTIVETo observe the clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of high altitude heart disease associated with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in children.

METHODSFifty children (aged 2 months to 2 years) with high altitude heart disease associated with severe PAH, who were continuously transferred to the Intensive Care Unit between January 2011 and October 2013, were randomly assigned to observation and control groups. The control group was given conventional treatment, while the observation group received oral sildenafil [1 mg/(kg . d)] three times daily for 7-10 days in addition to the conventional treatment. Before and after treatment, hemodynamics, blood gas, routine blood parameters, and blood biochemical parameters were recorded.

RESULTSAfter treatment, the observation group had a significantly higher decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure and significantly higher increases in arterial partial pressure of oxygen, cardiac output, cardiac index, and oxygenation index compared with the control group (P<0.05). In the observation group, there were no significant changes in mean arterial pressure, routine blood parameters and blood biochemical parameters (P>0.05), and no obvious adverse reactions were found.

CONCLUSIONSFor children with high altitude heart disease associated with severe PAH, sildenafil can effectively reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve cardiac function and does not cause adverse reactions. This therapy has good safety according to the preliminary evaluation.

Altitude ; Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension ; Female ; Heart Diseases ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pulmonary ; complications ; physiopathology ; Infant ; Male ; Piperazines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Vasodilator Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have pulmonary hypertension (PH) that adversely affects survival. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether PH-specific therapies have an effect for stable COPD. Data sources were Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Korea med and references from relevant publications. Randomized prospective trials that compared PH specific therapy in COPD for more than 6 weeks with placebo were included. The outcomes were the exercise capacity and adverse events. Four randomized controlled trials involving 109 subjects were included in the analysis. Two trials involved bosentan, one sildenafil and one beraprost. The studies varied in duration of treatment from 3 to 18 months. In a pooled analysis of four trials, exercise-capacity was not significantly improved with PH-specific treatment for COPD (risk ratio, -5.1; 95% CI, -13.0 to 2.8). COPD with overt PH significantly improved the exercise capacity (mean difference, 111.6; 95% CI, 63.3 to 159.9) but COPD with PH unknown did not (mean difference, 26.6; 95% CI, -24.3 to 77.5). There was no significant difference in hypoxemia (mean difference, 2.6; 95% CI, -3.7 to 8.8). PH specific treatments have a significant effect in improving exercise capacity in COPD with overt PH.
Anoxia ; Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Databases, Factual ; Epoprostenol/adverse effects/analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pulmonary/complications/*drug therapy ; Piperazines/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*etiology ; Purines/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Sulfonamides/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Sulfones/adverse effects/therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo investigate the protective effect of L-carnitine (LC) combined with sildenafil on the reproductive endocrine function of male rats with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODSA total of 40 male SD rats were randomly divided into five groups, group A taken as normal controls, and groups B, C, D and E made into DM models by injection of streptozotocin at 65 mg/kg. Then the rats in groups A and B were treated with normal saline, C with sildenafil at 5 mg per kg per d, D with LC at 300 mg per kg per d, and E with sildenafil at 5 mg per kg per d plus LC at 300 mg per kg per d, all via gastric gavage for 6 weeks, followed by determination of the levels of testosterone (T), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) in the serum of the rats.

RESULTSAfter 6 weeks of treatment, the T, FSH and LH levels were (25.25 +/- 2.67) nmol/L, (5.78 +/- 0.61) IU/L and (625.21 +/- 43.45) ng/L in group A, (9.63 +/- 1.71) nmol/L, (1.98 +/- 0.42) IU/L and (479.89 +/- 27.62) ng/L in group B, (18.98 +/- 3.07) nmol/L, (5.08 +/- 0.33) IU/L and (586.57 +/- 31.72) ng/L in group C, (16.18 +/- 2.65) nmol/L, (4.63 +/- 0.30) IU/L and (540.78 +/- 25.52) ng/L in group D, and (23.65 +/- 2.66) nmol/L, (5.59 +/- 0.48) IU/L and (621.53 +/- 36. 40) ng/L in group E. The three parameters were significantly lower in B than in the other four groups (P < 0.01), and so were they in C and D than in A and E (P < 0.05), but showed no significant differences either between C and D (P > 0. 05) or between A and E (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSix-week medication of either sildenafil or LC alone could increase the levels of T, FSH and LH in the serum of DM rats, but the combination of the two had an even more obvious increasing effect, which indicates a still better protective effect on the reproductive endocrine function of diabetic male rats.

Animals ; Carnitine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone ; blood ; Luteinizing Hormone ; blood ; Male ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Testosterone ; blood

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most popular and disturbing sexual problems, which impairs patients' health and affects their quality of life. Sildenafil citrate, the first oral PDE-5 inhibitor in the world, has established its efficacy and safety credit in both doctors and ED patients. The authors reviewed the results of related studies in the last decade and made deeper insights into the use of sildenafil citrate in such aspects as the general drug tolerance and its influence on the cardiovascular system, potentiality of concomitant diseases with co-administration of other drugs, long-term safety, and ocular and genital safety.
Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo review and assess the update studies regarding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE) and then provide practical recommendations and possible mechanisms concerning state of the art knowledge for the use of SSRIs in alleviating PE.

DATA SOURCESUsing the Medline, 48 articles published from January 1st, 1996 to August 1st, 2006 concerning the use of SSRIs and their possible mechanisms in alleviating PE were found and reviewed.

STUDY SELECTIONPE, rapid ejaculation, early ejaculation and SSRIs were employed as the keywords, and relevant articles about the use of SSRIs and their possible mechanisms in the treatment of PE were selected.

RESULTSMany kinds of SSRIs, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and citalopram, have widely been employed to treat PE. However, their effects are moderate and there is no a universal agreement about the kind, dose, protocol and duration. Dapoxetine, as the first prescription treatment of PE, may change this bottle-neck situation. SSRIs are suggested to be used in young men with lifelong PE, and acquired PE when etiological factors are removed but PE still exists. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE(5)-Is) are suggested to be employed alone or combined with SSRIs when SSRIs fail to treat PE or sexual dysfunction associated with SSRIs occurs. The protocol of taking drugs on demand based on taking them daily for a suitable period is proposed to be chosen firstly. The possible mechanisms include increasing serotonergic neurotransmission and activating 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT(2C)) receptors, then switching the ejaculatory threshold to a higher level, decreasing the penile sensitivity and their own effect of antidepression.

CONCLUSIONThe efficacies of the current SSRIs are moderate in the treatment of PE and they have not been approved by the FDA, therefore new SSRI like dapoxetine needs to be further evaluated.

Clinical Trials as Topic ; Ejaculation ; drug effects ; Humans ; Male ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; therapeutic use ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological ; drug therapy ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; therapeutic use

The rate of erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy is from 10% to 100%. The prevalence of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is more than one third. In the patients who had undergone bilateral NS, 72% responded to sildenafil, 71.7% and 59.7% responded to 20 mg and 10 mg of vardenafil respectively. For all randomized patients who received tadalafil, the mean percentage of successful penetration attempts was 54% and the mean percentage of successful intercourse attempts was 41%. For the subgroup with evidence of postoperative tumescence these values were 69% and 52%, respectively. No head-to-head trials have been performed with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.
Carbolines ; therapeutic use ; Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Humans ; Imidazoles ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Prostatectomy ; adverse effects ; Purines ; therapeutic use ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; therapeutic use ; Tadalafil ; Triazines ; therapeutic use ; Vardenafil Dihydrochloride

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are recommended as first-line treatment of erectile dysfunction in many guidelines, because of their convenience, higher efficacy, and less side-effects. Since its first launch in 1998, sildenafil has been currently the best investigated phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor with respect to long-term trails and quantity. Clinical trials showed the efficacy of sildenafil compared with placebo in many of the groups of patients who have ED, including those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, depression, radical prostatectomy and dialysis. Typically the adverse effects reported in patients from clinical trials of sildenafil have been mild to moderate, and commonly include flushing and dyspepsia and transient visual disturbances. This article summarized recent reports on efficacy and safety of phosphodiesters 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Safety ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

Erectile dysfunction is a common ailment in middle-aged and old men. The management of ED has entered a new stage since sildenafil was used to treat ED in 1998. Sildenafil became the first-line treatment for its efficacy and safety. In recent years, new PDE5 inhibitors--vardenafil and tadalafil came into market in succession, providing more options available for oral therapy. This review is about the development of preclinical and clinical medicine research on the three PDE5 inhibitors, and provide information for clinical choices.
Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical effects of treatment with oral sildenafil on severe pulmonary hypertension after cardiac surgery.

METHODSFrom September 2002 to January 2005, oral sildenafil was added to the treatment regime in 27 cases of severe pulmonary hypertension after cardiac surgery. All these cases were given general treatments including intravenous prostaglandin E1 and inhalation of nitric oxide before the use of sildenafil, which did not show obvious effects on decreasing pulmonary pressure. Then a combined treatment [general treatment plus oral sildenafil (1-2 mg/kg, q8h; Pfizer Ltd)] was instituted. Pulmonary artery pressure, systolic pulmonary artery pressure/systolic systemic blood pressure (Pp/Ps) were measured before and every hour after adding sildenafil.

RESULTSOne hour after adding sildenafil, the patients' pulmonary artery pressure decreased remarkably (P < 0.01) with no adverse effects on systematic artery pressure. SO(2) and PaO(2) of all cases improved respectively (P < 0.05). One or two days later, the patients' hemodynamics were stable and some patients stopped inhaling nitric oxide and the dosage of prostaglandin E1 decreased. 25 cases stopped use of ventilator and were discharged safely. 2 cases died of multiple organ dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONSildenafil is a highly selective and effective pulmonary hypertension vasodilator, which can be given for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension after cardiac surgery.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pulmonary ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; therapeutic use ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; therapeutic use ; Vasodilator Agents ; therapeutic use ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil plus sertraline with those of sertraline alone in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).

METHODSSeventy-two patients with PE but without any obvious organic cause were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into Groups A and B of equal number. Group A received 50 mg sertraline daily 4 to 6 hours before planned sexual activity for 12 weeks, and Group B were given 50 mg sertraline daily plus 50 mg sildenafil as needed, 1 hour before planned sexual activity, for 12 weeks. Before and after the treatment, the mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time, the intercourse satisfaction, the mean number of coituses per week and the drug-related side effects were evaluated.

RESULTSThe mean intravaginal ejaculatory latency time was (0.59 +/- 0.12), (3.9 +/- 0.15) minutes (P < 0.001) at baseline and post-treatment in Group A, and (0.56 +/- 0.11), (5.6 +/- 0.12) minutes (P < 0.001) in Group B, improved in both of the 2 groups, but more significantly in Group B (P < 0.05). Before and after the treatment, the mean intercourse satisfaction domain values of the IIEF were (8.9 +/- 1.2), (10.8 +/- 1.1) (P < 0.05) and (8.8 +/- 1.1), (13.8 +/- 1.3) (P < 0.001) in Groups A and B, respectively, significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.05) after the treatment; the mean numbers of coituses per week in Groups A and B were (0.9 +/- 0.2), (1.9 +/- 0.3) (P < 0.05) and (1.0 +/- 0.2), (2.7 +/- 0.2) (P <0.001) respectively, significantly larger in Group B (P<0.05) after the treatment. As for the side effects, there was a higher rate of headaches (P < 0.01) and flushing episodes (P < 0.001) in Group B than in Group A.

CONCLUSIONSertraline combined with sildenafil can produce significantly better results than sertraline alone in patients with premature ejaculation. However, the combined treatment is associated with a slight increase in the drug-related side effects.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Ejaculation ; Genital Diseases, Male ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Purines ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Sertraline ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects