1.25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review.
Daniel S STRAND ; Daejin KIM ; David A PEURA
Gut and Liver 2017;11(1):27-37
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were clinically introduced more than 25 years ago and have since proven to be invaluable, safe, and effective agents for the management of a variety of acid-related disorders. Although all members in this class act in a similar fashion, inhibiting active parietal cell acid secretion, there are slight differences among PPIs relating to their pharmacokinetic properties, metabolism, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical indications. Nevertheless, each is effective in managing gastroesophageal reflux disease and uncomplicated or complicated peptic ulcer disease. Despite their overall efficacy, PPIs do have some limitations related to their short plasma half-lives and requirement for meal-associated dosing, which can lead to breakthrough symptoms in some individuals, especially at night. Longer-acting PPIs and technology to prolong conventional PPI activity have been developed to specifically address these limitations and may improve clinical outcomes.
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Metabolism
;
Peptic Ulcer
;
Pharmacokinetics
;
Plasma
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors*
;
Proton Pumps*
;
Protons*
;
Rabeprazole
;
United States Food and Drug Administration
2.Hybrid Therapy Regimen for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication.
Zhi-Qiang SONG ; Jian LIU ; Li-Ya ZHOU
Chinese Medical Journal 2016;129(8):992-999
OBJECTIVEHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication remains a challenge with increasing antibiotic resistance. Hybrid therapy has attracted widespread attention because of initial report with good efficacy and safety. However, many issues on hybrid therapy are still unclear such as the eradication efficacy, safety, compliance, influencing factors, correlation with antibiotic resistance, and comparison with other regimens. Therefore, a comprehensive review on the evidence of hybrid therapy for H. pylori infection was conducted.
DATA SOURCESThe data used in this review were mainly from PubMed articles published in English up to September 30, 2015, searching by the terms of "Helicobacter pylori" or "H. pylori", and "hybrid".
STUDY SELECTIONClinical research articles were selected mainly according to their level of relevance to this topic.
RESULTSTotally, 1871 patients of 12 studies received hybrid therapy. The eradication rates were 77.6-97.4% in intention-to-treat and 82.6-99.1% in per-protocol analyses. Compliance was 93.3-100.0%, overall adverse effects rate was 14.5-67.5%, and discontinued medication rate due to adverse effects was 0-6.7%. H. pylori culture and sensitivity test were performed only in 13.3% patients. Pooled analysis showed that the eradication rates with dual clarithromycin and metronidazole susceptible, isolated metronidazole or clarithromycin resistance, and dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were 98.5%, 97.6%, 92.9%, and 80.0%, respectively. Overall, the efficacy, compliance, and safety of hybrid therapy were similar with sequential or concomitant therapy. However, hybrid therapy might be superior to sequential therapy in Asians.
CONCLUSIONSHybrid therapy showed wide differences in the efficacy but consistently good compliance and safety across different regions. Dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were the key factor to efficacy. Hybrid therapy was similar to sequential or concomitant therapy in the efficacy, safety, and compliance.
Clarithromycin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Helicobacter pylori ; drug effects ; Humans ; Medication Adherence ; Metronidazole ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; administration & dosage
3.Comparison on Oral versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors for Prevention of Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Lesions.
Yeoun Su JUNG ; Kyeong Ok KIM ; Si Hyung LEE ; Byung Ik JANG ; Tae Nyeun KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2016;67(2):74-80
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has been used for the prevention of post endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding, the route of administration has not been confirmed. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous and oral PPI administration for the prevention of delayed post ESD bleeding. METHODS: Total 166 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to 30 mg lansoprazol twice a day (PO group) and 120 mg pantoprazole intravenous injection (IV group) for 48 hours. Finally, 65 patients in PO group and 87 patients in IV group were analyzed. After ESD, all patients underwent follow up endoscopy after 24 hours and were observed the symptoms of bleeding up to 60 days after ESD. RESULTS: Age, sex and use of anticoagulants were not different between groups. At follow up endoscopy after 24 hours, oozing and exposed vessel was noted in 4.6% of PO group and 8.0% of IV group and there was no significant difference. Delayed bleeding occurred in 4 of 65 patients (6.2%) in the PO group and 8 of 87 patients (9.2%) in the IV group (p>0.999). By multivariate analysis, oozing or exposed vessels at follow up endoscopy were risk factors for delayed bleeding (OR=17.5, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the delayed bleeding, length of hospital stay according to the administration route. Bleeding stigmata at follow up endoscopy was risk factor of delayed bleeding. Oral PPI administration can cost-effectively replace IV PPI for prevention of post ESD bleeding.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use
;
*Administration, Oral
;
Aged
;
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
;
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/*adverse effects
;
Female
;
Gastroscopy
;
Humans
;
*Injections, Intravenous
;
Lansoprazole/therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Odds Ratio
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology/*prevention & control
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use
;
Risk Factors
;
Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
4.Ten-day Sequential Therapy versus Bismuth Based Quadruple Therapy as Second Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection.
Sung Bum KIM ; Si Hyung LEE ; Kyeong Ok KIM ; Byung Ik JANG ; Tae Nyeun KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2015;66(5):261-267
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ten-day sequential therapy has been evaluated as the first line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication but studies on sequential therapy as a second line therapy is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 10-day sequential therapy and quadruple therapy as second line treatment for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple therapy. METHODS: Patients who did not respond to standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication were assigned to either 10-day sequential or bismuth based quadruple therapy as second line treatment from January 2009 to December 2014 at Yeungnam University Medical Center. Post treatment H. pylori status was determined by rapid urease test, giemsa staining, or 13C-urea breath test. Eradication rate and side effects of both therapies were compared. RESULTS: A total of 158 H. pylori infected patients were included and 70 patients were treated by bismuth based quadruple therapy and 88 patients by 10-day sequential therapy. Age and sex were not significantly different between the two groups. Eradication rate was 84.3% (59/70) in quadruple group and 56.8% (50/88) in sequential group. Side effects occurred significantly higher in quadruple group than sequential group (27.1% vs. 11.4%, p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: For second line H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple therapy, bismuth based quadruple therapy showed significantly higher H. pylori eradication rate than 10-day sequential therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of 10-day sequential therapy as a second line H. pylori eradication treatment.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use
;
Bismuth/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use
;
Diarrhea/etiology
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Female
;
Helicobacter Infections/*drug therapy
;
Helicobacter pylori/drug effects
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects/pharmacology/therapeutic use
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Taste Disorders/etiology
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult
5.Can proton pump inhibitors reduce rebleeding following Histoacryl sclerotherapy for gastric variceal hemorrhage?.
Ka Rham KIM ; Chung Hwan JUN ; Kyu Man CHO ; Jin Woo WI ; Seon Young PARK ; Sung Bum CHO ; Wan Sik LEE ; Chang Hwan PARK ; Young Eun JOO ; Hyun Soo KIM ; Sung Kyu CHOI ; Jong Sun REW
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2015;30(5):593-601
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in reducing rebleeding and bleeding-related death rates after endoscopic gastric variceal obliteration (GVO) using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC). METHODS: This study enrolled 341 patients who were consecutively diagnosed with and treated for bleeding gastric varices. The patients were divided into PPI and non-PPI groups, and their endoscopic findings, initial hemostasis outcomes, rebleeding and bleeding-related death rates, and treatment-related complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of initial hemostasis was 97.1%. rebleeding occurred in 2.2% of patients within 2 weeks, 3.9% of patients within 4 weeks, 18.9% of patients within 6 months, and 27.6% of patients within 12 months of the GVO procedure. A previous history of variceal bleeding (relative risk [RR], 1.955; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.263 to 3.028; p = 0.003) and use of PPIs (RR, 0.554; 95% CI, 0.352 to 0.873; p = 0.011) were associated with rebleeding. Child-Pugh class C (RR, 10.914; 95% CI, 4.032 to 29.541; p < 0.001), failure of initial hemostasis (RR, 13.329; 95% CI, 2.795 to 63.556; p = 0.001), and the presence of red-colored concomitant esophageal varices (RR, 4.096; 95% CI, 1.320 to 12.713; p = 0.015) were associated with bleeding-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of PPIs reduces rebleeding after GVO using NBC in patients with gastric variceal hemorrhage. However, prophylactic use of PPIs does not reduce bleeding-related death.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Chi-Square Distribution
;
Enbucrilate/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis/etiology/mortality/*therapy
;
Hemostasis, Endoscopic/adverse effects/*methods/mortality
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Odds Ratio
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Sclerosing Solutions/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Sclerotherapy/adverse effects/*methods/mortality
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult
6.Efficacy of 7-Day and 14-Day Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy and 7-Day and 14-Day Moxifloxacin-Based Triple Therapy as Second-Line Eradication for Helicobacter pylori Infection.
Seong Tae LEE ; Dong Ho LEE ; Ji Hyun LIM ; Nayoung KIM ; Young Soo PARK ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Hyun Jin JO ; In Sung SONG
Gut and Liver 2015;9(4):478-485
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bismuth-containing quadruple and moxifloxacin-based triple regimens are recommended as second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of each regimen. METHODS: From August 2004 to October 2012, a total of 949 patients (mean age, 54.32+/-12.08 years; male, 49.4%) who failed H. pylori eradication with a standard triple regimen were included. Patients treated with a bismuth-containing quadruple regimen for 7 and 14 days were designated as 7-BMT and 14-BMT, respectively, and those treated with a moxifloxacin-based triple regimen for 7 and 14 days were designated as 7-MA and 14-MA, respectively. H. pylori eradication was confirmed using the 13C-urea breath test, rapid urease test or histology. RESULTS: The eradication rates by 7-BMT, 14-BMT, 7-MA, and 14-MA were 66.4% (290/437), 71.1% (113/159), 53.1% (51/96), and 73.5% (189/257), respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and 76.5% (284/371), 83.8% (109/130), 55.6% (50/90), and 80.6% (187/232), respectively, by per-protocol analysis (PP). The eradication rates were higher in 14-BMT than 7-BMT by the ITT and PP analyses (p=0.277 and p=0.082, respectively). The 14-BMT and 14-MA treatments showed similar efficacies by ITT and PP (p=0.583 and p=0.443, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 7-BMT, 14-BMT, and 14-MA treatments showed similar and suboptimal efficacies. In both regimens, extending the duration of treatment may be reasonable considering the high level of antibiotic resistance in Korea.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Amoxicillin/administration & dosage
;
Antacids/*administration & dosage
;
Anti-Infective Agents/*administration & dosage
;
Bismuth/*administration & dosage
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination/methods
;
Female
;
Fluoroquinolones/*administration & dosage
;
Helicobacter Infections/*drug therapy
;
*Helicobacter pylori
;
Humans
;
Intention to Treat Analysis
;
Male
;
Metronidazole/administration & dosage
;
Middle Aged
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tetracycline/administration & dosage
;
Treatment Outcome
7.Additive Effect of Pronase on the Eradication Rate of First-Line Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection.
Chang Seok BANG ; Yeon Soo KIM ; Sang Hyun PARK ; Jin Bong KIM ; Gwang Ho BAIK ; Ki Tae SUK ; Jai Hoon YOON ; Dong Joon KIM
Gut and Liver 2015;9(3):340-345
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori colonizes on the apical surface of gastric surface mucosal cells and the surface mucous gel layer. Pronase is a premedication enzyme for endoscopy that can disrupt the gastric mucus layer. We evaluated the additive effects of pronase combined with standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: This prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled study was conducted between June and October 2012. A total of 116 patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled in the study (n=112 patients, excluding four patients who failed to meet the inclusion criteria) and were assigned to receive either the standard triple therapy, which consists of a proton pump inhibitor with amoxicillin and clarithromycin twice a day for 7 days (PAC), or pronase (20,000 tyrosine units) combined with the standard triple therapy twice a day for 7 days (PACE). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rates of PAC versus PACE were 76.4% versus 56.1% (p=0.029). In the per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 87.5% versus 68.1% (p=0.027). There were no significant differences concerning adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the interim analysis of the trial, pronase does not have an additive effect on the eradication of H. pylori infection (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01645761).
Adult
;
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Clarithromycin/therapeutic use
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination/methods
;
Female
;
Gastric Mucosa/drug effects/microbiology
;
Helicobacter Infections/*drug therapy
;
Helicobacter pylori/*drug effects
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pronase/*therapeutic use
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use
;
Single-Blind Method
;
Treatment Outcome
8.Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors in a local setting.
Christopher Tze Wei CHIA ; Wan Peng LIM ; Charles Kien Fong VU
Singapore medical journal 2014;55(7):363-366
INTRODUCTIONThere are growing concerns that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be inappropriate in instances that do not conform to evidence-based indications. This point-prevalence study aimed to investigate the frequency, indications and appropriateness of use of PPIs in hospitalised patients on a randomly chosen day.
METHODSOn a randomly chosen day, all inpatients were documented, and those on any form of PPIs on that day were determined. Indications for maintaining these patients on PPIs were obtained from the electronic medical records, which were then recorded and cross-referenced against a list of accepted indications adapted from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved list.
RESULTSIn all, 1,025 inpatients were documented. Of the 477 (46.5%) inpatients using PPIs, only 219 (45.9%) fulfilled the FDA-approved indications, while the majority (n = 258, 54.1%) did not. Overall, PPIs were not strictly indicated for use in 206 (43.2%) inpatients, according to FDA criteria. Of the 477 inpatients on PPIs, 52 (10.9%) had borderline indications based on expert consensus/guidelines other than FDA criteria.
CONCLUSIONAlthough the use of PPIs is prevalent in hospitals, less than half of the hospitalised patients using PPIs in our study had evidence-based indications that supported such use. The overuse of PPIs has a negative impact on healthcare costs and may lead to adverse effects. Steps to curb the inappropriate use of PPIs should address factors such as indications for the initiation of PPIs, and reassessment of the need for ongoing PPI use in inpatients upon discharge and during outpatient reviews.
Anemia ; drug therapy ; Dyspepsia ; drug therapy ; Electronic Health Records ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing ; statistics & numerical data ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevalence ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Stomach Diseases ; drug therapy ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration
9.Changes in the Eradication Rate of Conventional Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;63(3):141-145
Although, the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea has declined owing to the eradication therapy, recent seroprevalence of H. pylori infection is still reported to be as high as 54.4%. Until now, "standard regimen" for eradication of H. pylori has been conventional triple therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. However, with the increase in antibiotic resistance, especially against clarithromycin, the eradication rate of conventional triple therapy has steadily declined during the past 13 years in Korea. Present eradication rate of standard triple therapy is reported to be less than 80%, which is the Maginot line of efficacy for the currently available regimen. Therefore, new first line eradication regimen is needed to enhance the eradication rate of H. pylori infection.
Amoxicillin/pharmacology/therapeutic use
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology/*therapeutic use
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Clarithromycin/pharmacology/therapeutic use
;
Disease Eradication/trends
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Helicobacter Infections/*drug therapy
;
*Helicobacter pylori/drug effects
;
Humans
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use
;
Republic of Korea
10.Trends in the Eradication Rates of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea: Multicenter Study over 13 Years.
Yeoun Su JUNG ; Si Hyung LEE ; Chan Seo PARK ; Myung Jin OH ; Kyeong Ok KIM ; Byung Ik JANG ; Seong Woo JEON ; Min Kyu JUNG ; Kyung Sik PARK ; Eun Soo KIM ; Kwang Bum CHO ; Jin Tae JUNG ; Joong Goo KWON ; Eun Young KIM ; Wan Jung KIM ; Chang Heon YANG
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;63(2):82-89
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori infection have been reported to have decreased over the years due to antibiotics resistance. The aim of this study is to investigate the trend of eradication rates of first-line triple therapy for H. pylori over the past 13 year period, and to evaluate factors affecting H. pylori eradication in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea. METHODS: A total of 2,982 patients with H. pylori infection who were treated with either 1 week or 2 weeks first-line therapy (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) from January 1999 through December 2011 were included in this study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. RESULTS: The overall H. pylori eradication rate was 87.2%. The eradication rates from 1999 to 2011 fluctuated between 78.0% and 95.7%, but no definite evidence of a decreasing tendency was seen over the 13 year period (p=0.113). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the eradication rate according to the duration of therapy (p=0.592). However, there was a significant difference in the eradication rate among various PPIs (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no decreasing trend in the H. pylori eradication rate over the past 13 years in Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea. There also was no difference in the eradication rates depending on duration of therapy. However, a significant difference was noted among various PPIs.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Clarithromycin/therapeutic use
;
Disease Eradication/*trends
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Esomeprazole/therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Helicobacter Infections/*drug therapy/pathology
;
*Helicobacter pylori
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Omeprazole/therapeutic use
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use
;
Rabeprazole/therapeutic use
;
Republic of Korea
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail