PURPOSE: We aimed to study clinicopathological parameters and complications of patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion guided prostate biopsy (MRI-TRUS FGB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 576 patients who underwent MRI-TRUS FGB of prostate from May 2003 to December 2017 retrospectively. The clinicopathological features and complications were presented, using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (2.4%) readmitted within 30 days after MRI-TRUS FGB due to complications, and 85.7% (12 of 14) of them complained mild to moderate complications, the Clavien-Dindo classification grades I and II. The most common complication was hematuria (n=5, 0.9%), followed by acute urinary retention (n=3, 0.5%), dysuria (n=2, 0.3%), fever (n=1, 0.2%), hematochezia (n=1, 0.2%). According to multivariate analysis, only age was the significant risk factor of overall complications and bleeding related complications. Two hundred thirteen patients were diagnosed as prostate cancer after MRI-TRUS FGB. When the Likert suspicious scale of prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was ≤4, 27.8% (137 of 493) were diagnosed as prostate cancer, of whom 56.2% (77 of 137) were confirmed as prostate cancer only at randomized 12 cores. When the ADC suspicious level was grade 5, 91.6% (76 of 83) were diagnosed as prostate cancer, of whom 11.8% (7 of 76) were confirmed as prostate cancer only at randomized 12 cores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the safety of MRI-TRUS FGB in terms of complications. When ADC suspicious level is grade 5, MRI-TRUS FGB alone could be a reasonable measure to diagnose prostate cancer, but randomized 12-core prostate biopsy would be recommended additionally when ADC suspicious level is ≤4.
Biopsy ; Classification ; Diffusion ; Dysuria ; Fever ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; Hematuria ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pathology ; Prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography ; Urinary Retention

To explore the value for contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CETRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
 Methods: Prostate biopsy from 207 cases of suspected prostate cancer were collected between January 2013 and March 2015. These patients were performed ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Central Hospital of Changsha. They were randomly divided into a radiography group (n=104) and a non-radiography group (n=103) according to the order of treatment. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) was the first choice in the 2 groups, and CETRUS was conducted in the radiography group. Then, the transrectal biopsy was carried out in the 2 groups. The diagnostic value of CETRUS in prostate cancer was evaluated by pathological examination, a gold standard.
 Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and coincidence rates of TRUS in diagnosing prostate cancer were 65%, 60.4%, and 62.8%, respectively, while those rates of CETRUS in diagnosing prostate cancer were 89%, 78%, and 84%, respectively, with significant difference between the above 2 groups (all P<0.05).
 Conclusion: The sensitivities, specificities, and coincidence rates for CETRUS are superior to TRUS in diagnosing prostate cancer, which can provide a clinical basis for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Contrast Media ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Radiography, Interventional ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography ; methods

Aged ; Asian People ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy/methods* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multimodal Imaging/methods* ; Prostate/pathology* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology* ; Rectum/diagnostic imaging* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Ultrasonography

This study was performed to evaluate prostate-specific antigen-age volume (PSA-AV) scores in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) in a Chinese biopsy population. A total of 2355 men who underwent initial prostate biopsy from January 2006 to November 2015 in Huashan Hospital were recruited in the current study. The PSA-AV scores were calculated and assessed together with PSA and PSA density (PSAD) retrospectively. Among 2133 patients included in the analysis, 947 (44.4%) were diagnosed with PCa. The mean age, PSA, and positive rates of digital rectal examination result and transrectal ultrasound result were statistically higher in men diagnosed with PCa (all P < 0.05). The values of area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of PSAD and PSA-AV were 0.864 and 0.851, respectively, in predicting PCa in the entire population, both performed better than PSA (AUC = 0.805; P < 0.05). The superiority of PSAD and PSA-AV was more obvious in subgroup with PSA ranging from 2.0 ng ml^-1 to 20.0 ng ml^-1. A PSA-AV score of 400 had a sensitivity and specificity of 93.7% and 40.0%, respectively. In conclusion, the PSA-AV score performed equally with PSAD and was better than PSA in predicting PCa. This indicated that PSA-AV score could be a useful tool for predicting PCa in Chinese population.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging/pathology* ; Area Under Curve ; Asian People ; Digital Rectal Examination ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; ROC Curve ; Reference Values ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Objective: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of "one-puncture one-needle" transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in the prevention of postoperative infections. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about "one-puncture one-needle" (the observation group) and "one-person one-needle" (the control group) TRUS-guided prostate biopsy performed in the Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province from January 2005 to December 2015, and compared the incidence rates of puncture-related infection between the two strategies. By "one-puncture one-needle", one needle was used for one biopsy puncture, while by "one-person one-needle", one needle was used for all biopsy punctures in one patient and the needle was sterilized with iodophor after each puncture. RESULTS: Totally, 120 patients received 6+1-core or 12+1-core "one-person one-needle" and 466 underwent 12+1-core "one-puncture one-needle" TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in age, the prostate volume, the serum PSA level, or the detection rate of prostate cancer (P >0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group showed remarkably lower incidence rates of puncture-related urinary tract infection (7.5% vs 0.9%, P <0.05), fever (5.0% vs 1.1%, P <0.05), bacteriuria (2.5% vs 0.2%, P <0.05), and total infections (16.7% vs 2.6%, P<0.05) postoperatively. Two cases of bacteremia or sepsis were found in each of the groups, with no significant difference between the two. CONCLUSIONS "One-puncture one-needle" TRUS-guided prostate biopsy can effectively prevent puncture-related infections.
Bacteremia ; etiology ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Case-Control Studies ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate ; pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; blood ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterilization ; methods ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urinary Tract Infections ; prevention & control

PURPOSE: To compare prostate cancer detection rates between 12 cores transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) and visually estimated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-visual-Bx) for patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level less than 10 ng/mL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 76 patients with PSA levels below 10 ng/mL underwent 3.0 Tesla mp-MRI and TRUS-Bx prospectively in 2014. In patients with abnormal lesions on mp-MRI, we performed additional MRI-visual-Bx. We compared pathologic results, including the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer cores (cancer length greater than 5 mm and/or any Gleason grade greater than 3 in the biopsy core). RESULTS: The mean PSA was 6.43 ng/mL. In total, 48 of 76 (63.2%) patients had abnormal lesions on mp-MRI, and 116 targeted biopsy cores, an average of 2.42 per patient, were taken. The overall detection rates of prostate cancer using TRUS-Bx and MRI-visual-Bx were 26/76 (34.2%) and 23/48 (47.9%), respectively. In comparing the pathologic results of TRUS-Bx and MRI-visual-Bx cores, the positive rates were 8.4% (77 of 912 cores) and 46.6% (54 of 116 cores), respectively (p<0.001). Mean cancer core lengths and mean cancer core percentages were 3.2 mm and 24.5%, respectively, in TRUS-Bx and 6.3 mm and 45.4% in MRI-visual-Bx (p<0.001). In addition, Gleason score ≥7 was noted more frequently using MRI-visual-Bx (p=0.028). The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer was 27/77 (35.1%) and 40/54 (74.1%) for TRUS-Bx and MRI-visual-Bx, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MRI-visual-Bx showed better performance in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, compared to TRUS-Bx among patients with a PSA level less than 10 ng/mL.
Adenocarcinoma/blood/diagnosis/*pathology ; Aged ; Biopsy/*methods ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/*methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Prostate/diagnostic imaging/*pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/*blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms/blood/diagnosis/*pathology ; Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods

ObjectiveTo explore the application value of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound (RTCEU) in improving the detection rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

METHODSThis prospective study included 91 male patients with abnormally high PSA (4－20 μg/L) or abnormalities in DRE or MRI, who underwent 12+X prostate biopsy following conventional transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and RTCEU examination. We compared the numbers of suspected prostatic nodules before and after RTCEU as well as the detection rates of prostate cancer between conventional TRUS-guided 12PBx and 12PBx plus lesion-targeted biopsy procedures.

RESULTSTotally, 57 of the 86 suspected lesions on TRUS (66.3%), and 108 of the 118 abnormal nodules on RTCEU (91.5%) were confirmed to be prostate cancer. RTCEU achieved a significantly higher detection rate than TRUS (P<0.01). A total of 39 cases of prostate cancer (42.8%) were detected by RTCEU, while only 28 (30.7%) by TRUS, with statistically significant difference in the detection rate between the two procedures (P=0.033).

CONCLUSIONSReal-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound can significantly improve the detection rate of prostate cancer and provide a valuable guide to targeted prostate biopsy.

Contrast Media ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; blood ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Ultrasonography, Interventional

PURPOSE: To assess the rates of infectious complications before and after the change of prophylactic antibiotic regimens in prostate needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 5,577 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy at Asan Medical Center between August 2005 and July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 (n=1,743) included patients treated between 2005 and 2009 with fluoroquinolone for 3 days, group 2 (n=2,723) included those treated between 2009 and 2012 with ceftriaxone once before the biopsy and fluoroquinolone before biopsy and continue therapy for 3 days, and group 3 (n=1,111) received the same treatment for more than 7 days after the biopsy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models addressed risk factors associated with infectious complication after prostate needle biopsy. RESULTS: Infectious complication after prostate needle biopsy developed in 18 (group 1), seven (group 2), and two patients (group 3) (p=0.001). In group 1, seven patients with infectious complication had positive blood cultures and harbored fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli, four had ceftriaxone susceptible isolates, and three had extended spectrum beta-lactamase-positive E. coli. Two patients in group 1 required intensive care because of septic shock. In multivariable analysis, the patients with combination of fluoroquinolone and ceftriaxone had significantly lower infectious complication rate than the fluoroquinolon alone (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftriaxone and fluoroquinolone before prostate needle biopsy decreased the risk of potentially serious infectious complications.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*methods ; Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects/methods ; Ceftriaxone/*therapeutic use ; Cross Infection/epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control ; Drug Evaluation/methods ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Escherichia coli/drug effects ; Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology/prevention & control ; Fluoroquinolones/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is the most useful technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer; however, many patients describe the procedure as uncomfortable and painful. We investigated the effect of the patient's position on pain scales during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2012 and June 2013, a total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were included in this study. Seventy patients underwent the procedure in the lithotomy position performed by a urologist and the other patients (n=58) underwent the procedure in the left lateral decubitus (LLD) position performed by a radiologist. Pain was assessed by using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores from 0 to 10. Using a linear regression model, we analyzed the correlation between pain scale score and clinical variables with a focus on patient position. RESULTS: No significant differences related to age, body mass index, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), hematuria, pyuria, International Prostate Symptom Score, or the cancer detection rate were observed between the lithotomy and the LLD groups. In the correlation analysis, VAS score showed a significant correlation with diabetes mellitus, PSA level, and lithotomy position (p<0.05). In the multiple linear regression model, VAS score showed a significant correlation with lithotomy position (beta=-0.772, p=0.003) and diabetes mellitus (beta=-0.803, p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the lithotomy position may be the proper way to reduce pain during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.
Aged ; Biopsy, Needle/*adverse effects/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain/etiology/*prevention & control ; Pain Measurement/methods ; Patient Positioning/*methods ; Posture/physiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods

PURPOSE: We compared location of positive cores in biopsy and location of positive surgical margin (PSM) following radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients who were diagnosed as prostate cancer by standard 12-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy, and who have PSM after radical prostatectomy. After exclusion of number of biopsy cores <12, and lack of biopsy location data, 46 patients with PSM were identified. Locations of PSM in pathologic specimen were reported as 6 difference sites (apex, base and lateral in both sides). Discordance of biopsy result and PSM was defined when no positive cores in biopsy was identified at the location of PSM. RESULTS: Most common location of PSM were right apex (n=21) and left apex (n=15). Multiple PSM was reported in 21 specimens (45.7%). In 32 specimens (69.6%) with PSM, one or more concordant positive biopsy cores were identified, but 14 specimens (28%) had no concordant biopsy cores at PSM location. When discordant rate was separated by locations of PSM, right apex PSM had highest rate of discordant (38%). The discordant group had significantly lower prostate volume and lower number of positive cores in biopsy than concordant group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that one fourth of PSM occurred at location where tumor was not detected at biopsy and that apex PSM had highest rate of discordant. Careful dissection to avoid PSM should be performed in every location, including where tumor was not identified in biopsy.
Aged ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prostatectomy/*methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms/*pathology/*surgery/ultrasonography ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods