OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of propofol sedation on psychological stress in patients undergoing surgery under epidural anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled to undergo elective ileostomy closure under epidural anesthesia were randomized into propofol sedation group and control group (=30). The patients in the sedation group received a loading dose of propofol of 0.6 mg·kg· h followed by a maintenance dose with continuous infusion of 3 mg·kg· h given after the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score reached 2-3. An equivalent volume of normal saline was administered in patients in the control group. The patients' preoperative and intraoperative anxiety scores were assessed with the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) on the day before and on the first day after the surgery, respectively. The mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), SpO, OAA/S, and the indicators of psychological stress of brain functional state of the patients (including the wavelet index [WLi], anxiety index [ANXi], comfortable index [CFi] and pain index [Pi]) were recorded at 5 min after entering the operating room (T), at the time of lumbar puncture (T) and change to supine position after the puncture (T), at 20 s (T), 40 s (T), and 60 s (T) after intravenous administration, and at 2 min (T), 4 min (T), 6 min (T), 8 min (T), 10 min (T) and 40 min (T) after skin incision. The patient's satisfaction with anesthesia was assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score on the first day after the operation. Serum cortisol level was measured before anesthesia and at the end of operation to calculate the changes in cortisol level. RESULTS: The two groups of patients were comparable for preoperative SAI scores (>0.05); The patients in the sedation group appeared to have lower intraoprative SAI scores, but this difference was not statistically significant (=0.05). MBP, HR, and SpO at the time points from T to T and OAA/S, WLi, ANXi, CFi, and Pi at the time points from T to T were significantly lower in the sedation group (all < 0.05), and these parameters were not significantly different between the two groups at the other time points (all >0.05). The patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the sedation group (Z=2.07, < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative levels, serum cortisol level at the end of the operation was increased in the sedation group but lowered in the control group, and the variations of serum cortisol level differed significantly between the two groups (=4.75, < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative propofol sedation can alleviate the patients' anxiety, improve the comfort level, and lessen physiological stress during surgeries under epidural anesthesia.
Anesthesia, Epidural ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Conscious Sedation ; Heart Rate ; drug effects ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Ileostomy ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Stress, Psychological ; drug therapy ; Visual Analog Scale

Anaphylaxis during anesthesia is rare, but often fatal. Rocuronium is a neuromuscular relaxant used for induction of anesthesia. We experienced a case of anaphylaxis after rocuronium administration during induction of anesthesia. A 64-year-old female patient was scheduled for bilateral radius fracture fixation. The history of patient showed no specific findings other than hypersensitivity to mackerel. She had no previous experience of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 100 mg and continuous infusion was begun with remifentanil 0.25 µg/kg/min, followed by rocuronium 40 mg. Immediately after intravenous administration of rocuronium, the manual ventilation became difficult, and the patient developed erythema and severe hypotension. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis based on clinical features and started treatment. First, we performed endotracheal intubation promptly. Then, immediate intravenous administration of epinephrine and fluid followed. Despite adequate treatment, hypotension was not corrected and intravenous epinephrine was administered. However, ventricular tachycardia occurred which was successfully treated with a defibrillator. Later, the patient uneventfully recovered in the intensive care unit. The patient was not tested for skin prick test, but rocuronium was the most likely cause of anaphylaxis at that time. The authors unexpectedly experienced drug-induced anaphylaxis, which is life-threatening to the patient. Clinicians should be aware of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention as anaphylaxis can be hazardous to the patient.
Administration, Intravenous ; Anaphylaxis* ; Anesthesia* ; Defibrillators ; Diagnosis ; Epinephrine ; Erythema ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypotension ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intensive Care Units ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Middle Aged ; Perciformes ; Propofol ; Radius Fractures ; Skin ; Tachycardia, Ventricular ; Ventilation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 5% lidocaine patch in reducing propofol-induced pain and cannula-induced pain. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 126 patients were divided into one of three groups: pretreatment with a 5% lidocaine patch (Lidotop®) and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group A); pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group B); or pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of 2% lidocaine (40 mg) with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group C) for induction of anesthesia. Pain severity was evaluated on a four-point verbal rating scale during intravenous cannulation, propofol injection, and 24 h after the operation (recall). RESULTS: Eighteen patients (47.4%) in Group A complained of cannula-induced pain compared with 35 (94.6%) in Group B and 36 (94.7%) in Group C (P < 0.001). Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of propofol-induced pain and recall of propofol-induced pain compared with Group B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01), whereas there was no difference compared with Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative transdermal administration of 5% lidocaine patch is an effective and simple method in reducing propofol-induced pain as well as cannula-induced pain.
Administration, Cutaneous ; Anesthesia ; Catheterization ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lidocaine* ; Methods ; Propofol

Dentists often sedate patients in order to reduce their dental phobia and stress during dental treatment. Sedatives are administered through various routes such as oral, inhalation, and intravenous routes. Intravenous administration has the advantage of rapid onset of action, predictable duration of action, and easy titration. Typically, midazolam, propofol or dexmedetomidine are used as intravenous sedatives. Administration of these sedatives via infusion by using a syringe pump is more effective and successful than infusing them as a bolus. However, during intravenous infusion of sedatives or opioids using a syringe pump, fatal accidents may occur due to the clinician's carelessness. To prevent such risks, smart syringe pumps have been introduced clinically. They allow clinicians to perform effective sedation by using a computer to control the dose of the drug being infused. To ensure patient safety, various alarm features along with a drug library, which provides drug information and prevents excessive infusion by limiting the dose, have been added to smart pumps. In addition, programmed infusion systems and target-controlled infusion systems have also been developed to enable effective administration of sedatives. Patient-controlled infusion, which allows a patient to control his/her level of sedation through self-infusion, has also been developed. Safer and more successful sedation may be achieved by fully utilizing these new features of the smart pump.
Administration, Intravenous ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Dental Anxiety ; Dentists ; Dexmedetomidine ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Infusion Pumps ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Inhalation ; Midazolam ; Patient Safety ; Propofol ; Syringes*

Injection pain of propofol remains a common clinical problem. Previous studies demonstrated that propofol injection pain was alleviated by applying nitroglycerin ointment to the skin of injection site, which inspires us to test whether venous vasodilation induced by fluid preload could alleviate the pain. Different types or volumes of fluid preload were compared. 200 ASA I-II adult patients were randomly assigned to five groups of 40 each. A 20 G cannula was established on the dorsum or wrist of the hand. When fluid preload given with Plasma-Lyte A 100 mL (P100 group), 250 mL (P250 group), 500 mL (P500 group), 0.9% saline 500 mL (N500 group) or Gelofusine 500 mL (G500 group) was completed within 30 min, respectively, Propofol (0.5 mg/kg, 1%) was injected at a rate of 0.5 mL/s. A blind investigator assessed the pain using a four-point scale. Incidence of pain in P100, P250, and P500 groups was 87.5%, 57.5% and 35%, respectively (P<0.05). The median pain intensity score was significantly lower in P500 group than that in P250 and P100 groups (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). Comparison of the effect of different types of solution preload indicated that the highest incidence of pain was in N500 group (62.5%) (N500 vs. P500, P=0.014; N500 vs. G500, P=0.007). The median pain intensity score in N500 group was higher than that in P500 group (P<0.05) and G500 group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between P500 and G500 groups. It is suggested that Plasma-Lyte A or Gelofusine preload with 500 mL before propofol injection is effective in alleviating propofol-induced pain.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Electrolytes ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; drug therapy ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Plasma Substitutes ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Polygeline ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring during colonoscopic sedation is debated. We aimed to determine whether BIS monitoring was useful for propofol dose titration, and to evaluate differences in sedative administration between expert and inexperienced medical personnel during colonoscopy procedures that required moderate sedation. METHODS: Between February 2012 and August 2013, 280 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo a screening colonoscopy participated in this study and were randomly allocated to the expert or inexperienced endoscopist group. Each group was further divided into either a BIS or a modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) subgroup. Trained nurses administered combined propofol sedation and monitored sedation using either the BIS or MOAA/S scale. RESULTS: The mean BIS value throughout the procedure was 74.3 +/- 6.7 for all 141 patients in the BIS group. The mean total propofol dose administered in the BIS group was higher than that in the MOAA/S group, independently of the endoscopists' experience level (36.9 +/- 29.6 and 11.3 +/- 20.7, respectively; p < 0.001). The total dose of propofol administered was not significantly different between the inexperienced endoscopist group and the expert endoscopist group, both with and without the use of BIS (p = 0.430 and p = 0.640, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with monitoring using the MOAA/S score alone, BIS monitoring was not effective for titrating the dose of propofol during colonoscopy, irrespective of colonoscopist experience.
Adult ; Aged ; Anesthetics, Intravenous/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; *Clinical Competence ; *Colonoscopy ; Conscious Sedation/adverse effects/*nursing ; Consciousness/*drug effects ; *Consciousness Monitors ; Electroencephalography/*instrumentation/*nursing ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Nurse Anesthetists ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Propofol/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Republic of Korea

To explore the effect of long-time propofol infusion on myocardial enzymes, mitochondrial cytochrome C and ATP in rabbits. 
 Methods: A total of 18 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups: a control group, a propofol group and an intralipid group. The rabbits were continuously infused with 0.9% normal saline in the control group, 1% propofol in the propofol group, and 10% intralipid in the intralipid group, respectivey. The arterial blood was collected at 0, 8, 16 h and the end of experiment to examine creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB). In the end, the myocardial mitochondria from myocardial tissues was separated by differential centrifugation, and mitochondrial cytochrome C content and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels were examined by high performance liquid chromatography.
 Results: Compared with the control group, the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria were increased in the propofol group and the intralipid group (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the ATP content of the mitochondria among the 3 groups (P>0.05). The levels of CK were increased at 8, 16 and 24 h after infusion in the propofol group and the intralipid group compared with that before the infusion (all P<0.05); compared with the control group, the levels of CK were increased at 8, 16 and 24 h after infusion in the propofol group and the intralipid group (all P<0.05); compared with the intralipid group, the levels of CK were increased at 8, 16 and 24 h after infusion in the propofol group (all P>0.05); compared with the control group, the levels of CK-MB were obviously increased in the infusion of propofol for 24 h in the propofol group (P<0.05).
 Conclusion: The levels of serum CK increase after the infusion of propofol and intralipid for a long time, and the levels of CK-MB also elevate in the infusion of propofol. Propofol and intralipid can increase the release of myocardial mitochondrial cytochrome C, but they don't affect the ATP production in myocardial mitochondrial.
Adenosine Triphosphate ; metabolism ; Animals ; Creatine Kinase ; blood ; metabolism ; Creatine Kinase, MB Form ; blood ; metabolism ; Cytochromes c ; metabolism ; Emulsions ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Mitochondria ; drug effects ; Myocardium ; chemistry ; enzymology ; Phospholipids ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Polyphosphates ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Rabbits ; Soybean Oil ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology

BACKGROUNDThe optimal ventilated status under total intravenous or inhalation anesthesia in neurosurgical patients with a supratentorial tumor has not been ascertained. The purpose of this study was to intraoperatively compare the effects of moderate hyperventilation on the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO 2 ), cerebral oxygen extraction ratio (O 2 ER), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in patients with a supratentorial tumor under different anesthetic regimens.

METHODSTwenty adult patients suffered from supratentorial tumors were randomly assigned to receive a propofol infusion followed by isoflurane anesthesia after a 30-min stabilization period or isoflurane followed by propofol. The patients were randomized to one of the following two treatment sequences: hyperventilation followed by normoventilation or normoventilation followed by hyperventilation during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia, respectively. The ventilation and end-tidal CO 2 tension were maintained at a constant level for 20 min. Radial arterial and jugular bulb catheters were inserted for the blood gas sampling. At the end of each study period, we measured the change in the arterial and jugular bulb blood gases.

RESULTSThe mean value of the jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO 2 ) significantly decreased, and the oxygen extraction ratio (O 2 ER) significantly increased under isoflurane or propofol anesthesia during hyperventilation compared with those during normoventilation (SjO 2 : t = -2.728, P = 0.011 or t = -3.504, P = 0.001; O 2 ER: t = 2.484, P = 0.020 or t = 2.892, P = 0.009). The SjO 2 significantly decreased, and the O 2 ER significantly increased under propofol anesthesia compared with those values under isoflurane anesthesia during moderate hyperventilation (SjO 2 : t = -2.769, P = 0.012; O 2 ER: t = 2.719, P = 0.013). In the study, no significant changes in the SjO 2 and the O 2 ER were observed under propofol compared with those values under isoflurane during normoventilation.

CONCLUSIONSOur results suggest that the optimal ventilated status under propofol or isoflurane anesthesia in neurosurgical patients varies. Hyperventilation under propofol anesthesia should be cautiously performed in neurosurgery to maintain an improved balance between the cerebral oxygen supply and demand.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthetics, Inhalation ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; Arterial Pressure ; physiology ; Blood Gas Analysis ; Craniotomy ; methods ; Female ; Heart Rate ; physiology ; Humans ; Hyperventilation ; chemically induced ; physiopathology ; Isoflurane ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo explore the anesthetic effects of repeated administration of propofol combined with vitamin C in mice.

METHODSForty mice were subjected to daily intraperitoneal injections of 80 mg/kg propofol (P80 group), 70 mg/kg propofol and 50 mg/kg vitamin C (P70+Vc50 group), 55 mg/kg propofol and 100 mg/kg vitamin C (P55+Vc100 group), or 50 mg/kg propofol and 200 mg/kg vitamin C (P50+Vc200 group) for 6 consecutive days, and the anesthesia induction time and anesthesia duration were recorded.

RESULTSCompared with the P80 group, the mice in P55 + Vc100 group and P50 + Vc200 group showed significantly shorter anesthesia duration on the first 3 days (P<0.05). In all the groups, anesthesia duration was significantly shortened in the following days compared with that on day 1 (P<0.01); anesthesia duration was shorter on day 3 than on day 2 in P50 + Vc200 group (P<0.01), and was shorter on days 4, 5, and 6 than on day 2 in all the groups (P<0.01). In all the groups, the rate of loss of righting reflex (LORR) decreased gradually with time in a similar pattern.

CONCLUSIONVitamin C can reduce the dose of propofol without obviously affecting the anesthetic effect to reduce the incidence of drug tolerance and potential dose-related side effects of propofol.

Anesthesia ; Anesthesia Recovery Period ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Ascorbic Acid ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Drug Tolerance ; Mice ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology

OBJECTIVETo assess the effects of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on propofol dosage in target-controlled infusion (TCI) and hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODSSixty patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into control group (n=30) and the Dex group (n=30). The patients in Dex group received a loading dose of Dex (1 µg/kg, infused within 10 min) before the surgery followed by continuous infusion at the rate of 0.3 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1) till the end of the surgery, and the control patients received saline infusion in the same manner. Heart rate, blood pressure, bispectral index (BIS), and propofol dose in TCI were recorded during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were observed during and after the surgery.

RESULTSNo difference was found in the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia between the control group and Dex group (P>0.05), but heart rate and blood pressure were lower in Dex group during extubation (P<0.05). The dose of propofol in TCI was significantly less in Dex group than in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONDex can reduce hemodynamic abnormalities caused by extubation and decrease the dosage of propofol in TCI, and may serve as an ideal adjuvant drug for general anesthesia.

Anesthesia, General ; Blood Pressure ; Bradycardia ; Dexmedetomidine ; therapeutic use ; Heart Rate ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Laparoscopy ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use