2.Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer and risk factors for postoperative complications.
K C ZHANG ; C R LU ; B L ZHANG ; L CHEN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(2):144-147
Surgical resection plays pivotal role in the treatment of gastric cancer. Adequate preoperative evaluation, precise intraoperative maneuver and delicate postoperative management lay the foundation for successful gastrectomy. The aim of preoperative evaluation is to stage tumor and identify potential risk factors (including preoperative factors like age, ASA status, body mass index, comorbidity, hypoalbuminemia, and intraoperative factors like blood loss and combined resection) which could lead to postoperative complication. With the management of prehabilitation, adequate medical decision could be made and patient's fast recovery could be ensured. With the rapid adoption of ERAS concept, there is increasing attention to prehabilitation which focus on optimization of cardio-pulmonary capacity and muscular-skeletal capacity. Despite of the efficacy of prehabilitation demonstrated by randomized controlled trials, consensus has yet to be reached on the following items: specific intervention, optimal measurement, candidate population and optimal timing for intervention. Balancing the efficiency and safety, preoperative evaluation could be put into clinical practice smoothly.
Humans
;
Stomach Neoplasms/complications*
;
Preoperative Care/adverse effects*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Gastrectomy/adverse effects*
;
Risk Factors
3.Bowel preparation before elective surgery for colorectal cancer.
Ruo Xu DOU ; Zuo Lin ZHOU ; Jian Ping WANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(7):645-647
For elective surgery of colorectal cancer, current evidence supports preoperative mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics. Meanwhile, for patients with varied degrees of intestinal stenosis, individualized protocol is required to avoid adverse events. We hereby summarize recent high-quality evidences and updates of guidelines and consensus, and recommend stratified bowel preparation based on the clinical practice of our institute as follows. (1) For patients with unimpaired oral intake, whose tumor can be passed by colonoscopy, mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics are given. (2) For patients without symptoms of bowel obstruction but with impaired oral intake or incomplete colonoscopy due to tumor-related stenosis, small-dosage laxative is given for several days before surgery, and oral antibiotics the day before surgery. (3) For patients with bowel obstruction, mechanical bowel preparation or enema is not indicated. We proposed this evidence-based, individualized protocol for preoperative bowel preparation for the reference of our colleagues, in the hope of improving perioperative outcomes and reducing adverse events.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Constriction, Pathologic/etiology*
;
Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Preoperative Care/methods*
;
Surgical Wound Infection/etiology*
4.Classification of alar abnormalities and the relevant treatments.
Quanding YAN ; Xiancheng WANG ; Yiwen DENG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2022;47(1):123-128
At present, nasal abnormalities is often classified from different perspectives, such as the alar-columella relationship, nasal base width, and the condition of alar hyperplasia. However, due to the impact of race and region, different people may be applied to different classification methods, resulting in different clinical diagnosis and treatments. So far, there is no unified standard for alar deformity classification to guide clinical treatment. In alar-columella relationship, the retracted ala and the hanging columella, hanging ala and retracted columella are easily confused. According to the classification of nasal base width, it is easy to confuse the alar flare with wide alar base. Therefore, the accurate preoperative evaluation of the nasal ala and the selection of appropriate clinical treatments for different abnormalities are beneficial for surgeons to achieve perfect rhinoplasty results.
Cleft Lip
;
Humans
;
Hyperplasia
;
Nasal Septum/surgery*
;
Nose
;
Preoperative Care
;
Rhinoplasty/methods*
6.Multimodal prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: A retrospective study.
Ning Qi PANG ; Stephanie Shengjie HE ; Joel Qi Xuan FOO ; Natalie Hui Ying KOH ; Tin Wei YUEN ; Ming Na LIEW ; John Peter RAMYA ; Yijun LOY ; Glenn Kunnath BONNEY ; Wai Kit CHEONG ; Shridhar Ganpathi IYER ; Ker Kan TAN ; Wan Chin LIM ; Alfred Wei Chieh KOW
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2021;50(12):892-902
INTRODUCTION:
Prehabilitation may benefit older patients undergoing major surgeries. Currently, its efficacy has not been conclusively proven. This is a retrospective review of a multimodal prehabilitation programme.
METHODS:
Patients aged 65 years and above undergoing major abdominal surgery between May 2015 and December 2019 in the National University Hospital were included in our institutional programme that incorporated aspects of multimodal prehabilitation and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts as 1 holistic perioperative pathway to deal with issues specific to older patients. Physical therapy, nutritional advice and psychosocial support were provided as part of prehabilitation.
RESULTS:
There were 335 patients in the prehabilitation cohort and 256 patients whose records were reviewed as control. No difference in postoperative length of stay (
CONCLUSION
The current study found no differences in traditional surgical outcome measures with and without prehabilitation. An increase in patient mobility in the immediate postoperative period was noted with prehabilitation, as well as an association between prehabilitation and increased adherence to postoperative adjuvant therapy. Larger prospective studies will be needed to validate the findings of this retrospective review.
Humans
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Preoperative Care
;
Preoperative Exercise
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Prehabilitation for gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(2):122-127
Gastrointestinal cancer and related treatments (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) are associated with declined functional status (FS) that has impact on quality of life, clinical outcome and continuum of care. Psychological distress drives an impressive burden of physiological and psychiatric conditions in oncologic care. Cancer patients often experience anxiety, depression, low self-esteem and fears of recurrence and death. Cancer prehabilitation is a process from cancer diagnosis to the beginning of treatment, which includes psychological, physical and nutritional assessments for a baseline functional level, identification of comorbidity, and targeted interventions that improve patient's health and functional capacity to reduce the incidence and the severity of current and future impairments with cancer, chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation program encompasses a series of planned, structured, repeatable and purposive interventions including comprehensive physical exercise, nutritional therapy, and relieving anxiety and depression, which integrates into best perioperative management ERAS pathway and aims at using the preoperative period to prevent or attenuate the surgery-related functional decline, to cope with surgical stress and to improve the consequences. However, a number of questions remain in regards to prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer surgery, which consists of the optimal makeup of training programs, the timing and approach of the intervention, how to improve compliance, how to measure functional capacity, and how to make cost-effective analysis. Therefore, more high-level evidence-based studies are expected to evaluate the value of implementation of prehabilitation into standard practice.
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/psychology*
;
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Humans
;
Preoperative Care
;
Preoperative Exercise
;
Quality of Life
;
Recovery of Function
8.Anesthesia management in cesarean section for a patient with coronavirus disease 2019.
Xianhui KANG ; Rong ZHANG ; Huiliang HE ; Yongxing YAO ; Yueying ZHENG ; Xiaohong WEN ; Shengmei ZHU
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2020;49(1):249-252
Since the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardio-pulmonary function of pregnant women, the anesthetic management in the cesarean section for the patients, as well as the protection for medical staff is significantly different from that in ordinary surgical operation. This paper reports a pregnant woman with COVID-19, for whom a cesarean section was successfully performed in our hospital on February 8, 2020. Anesthetic management, protection of medical staff and psychological intervention for the patients during the operation are discussed. Importance should be attached to the preoperative evaluation of pregnant women with COVID-19 and the implementation of anesthesia plan. For ordinary COVID-19 patients intraspinal anesthesia is preferred in cesarean section, and the influence on respiration and circulation in both maternal and infant should be reduced; while for severe or critically ill patients general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be adopted. The safety of medical environment should be ensured, and level-Ⅲ standard protection should be taken for anesthetists. Special attention and support should be given to maternal psychology. It is important to give full explanation before operation to reduce anxiety; to relieve the discomfort during operation to reduce tension; to avoid the bad mood of patients due to pain after operation.
Anesthesia
;
Betacoronavirus
;
Cesarean Section
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
complications
;
surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Injections, Spinal
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
complications
;
diagnosis
;
surgery
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
;
surgery
;
Pregnancy Outcome
;
Preoperative Care
9.Value of preoperative localization techniques for solitary pulmonary nodules in singleport thoracoscopic surgery.
Ming LIAO ; Zhe HE ; Enwu XU ; Dehua WU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2020;40(5):718-722
To evaluate the value and clinical effect of different preoperative localization techniques for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) before single-port thoracoscopic surgery.From January 2018 to June 2019, 54 patients diagnosed with solitary pulmonary nodules received single-port thoracoscopic surgery in Thoracic Department of General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA. Based on the location methods of the nodules, the patients were divided into group A (34 cases) with preoperative CT-guided Hook-wire (a common positioning needle usually using in mammary gland) positioning and group B (20 cases) with preoperative CT-guided methylene blue location.The success rate of localization in group A was 94.18% (32/34), significantly higher than that in group B [85% (17/20), < 0.05). No intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy occurred in group A, while the conversion rate was 10% (2/20) in group B ( < 0.05). The average positioning cost was significantly higher in group A than in group B (1715±109 1021±86 RMB yuan, < 0.05), but the total hospitalization cost was similar between the two groups (50 114±3788 47871±5902 RMB yuan, >0.05). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (6.71±1.23 8.19±2.61 days, < 0.05).Compared with the traditional methylene blue localization method, Hook-wire localization positioning can significantly increase the success rate of localization, and can be used as the standard preoperative localization method in patients undergoing single-port thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule resection, especially in those with deep nodule location from the visceral pleura.
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Preoperative Care
;
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
;
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.Pain management strategies in penile implantation.
Jeffrey L ELLIS ; Andrew M HIGGINS ; Jay SIMHAN
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020;22(1):34-38
The opioid epidemic continues to be a serious public health concern. Many have pointed to prescription drug misuse as a nidus for patients to become addicted to opioids and as such, urologists and other surgical subspecialists must critically define optimal pain management for the various procedures performed within their respective disciplines. Controlling pain following penile prosthesis implantation remains a unique challenge for urologists, given the increased pain patients commonly experience in the postoperative setting. Although most of the existing urological literature focuses on interventions performed in the operating room, there are many studies that examine the role of preoperative adjunctive pain medicine in diminishing postoperative narcotic requirements. There are relatively few studies looking at postoperative strategies for managing pain in prosthetic surgery with follow-up past the immediate hospitalization. This review assess the various strategies employed for managing pain following penile implantation through the lens of the current state of the opioid crisis, thus examining how urologists can responsibly treat pain without contributing to the growing threat of opioid addiction.
Analgesics/therapeutic use*
;
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use*
;
Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use*
;
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use*
;
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use*
;
Gabapentin/therapeutic use*
;
Humans
;
Intraoperative Care
;
Male
;
Nerve Block/methods*
;
Opioid Epidemic
;
Pain Management/methods*
;
Pain, Postoperative/therapy*
;
Penile Implantation/methods*
;
Pregabalin/therapeutic use*
;
Preoperative Care

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail