1.Comparison of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt with Covered Stent and Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration in Managing Isolated Gastric Varices.
Seung Kwon KIM ; Kristen A LEE ; Steven SAUK ; Kevin KORENBLAT
Korean Journal of Radiology 2017;18(2):345-354
OBJECTIVE: Although a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is commonly placed to manage isolated gastric varices, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) has also been used. We compare the long-term outcomes from these procedures based on our institutional experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with isolated gastric varices who underwent either TIPS with a covered stent or BRTO between January 2000 and July 2013. We identified 52 consecutive patients, 27 who had received TIPS with a covered stent and 25 who had received BRTO. We compared procedural complications, re-bleeding rates, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in procedural complications between patients who underwent TIPS (7%) and those who underwent BRTO (12%) (p = 0.57). There were also no statistically significant differences in re-bleeding rates from gastric varices between the two groups (TIPS, 7% [2/27]; BRTO, 8% [2/25]; p = 0.94) or in developing new ascites following either procedure (TIPS, 4%; BRTO, 4%; p = 0.96); significantly more patients who underwent TIPS developed hepatic encephalopathy (22%) than did those who underwent BRTO (0%, p = 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in mean survival between the two groups (TIPS, 30 months; BRTO, 24 months; p = 0.16); median survival for the patients who received TIPS was 16.6 months, and for those who underwent BRTO, it was 26.6 months. CONCLUSION: BRTO is an effective method of treating isolated gastric varices with similar outcomes and complication rates to those of TIPS with a covered stent but with a lower rate of hepatic encephalopathy.
Ascites
;
Esophageal and Gastric Varices*
;
Hepatic Encephalopathy
;
Humans
;
Hypertension, Portal
;
Methods
;
Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stents*
2.Percutaneous retrieval of a misplaced transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent using the rigid endobronchial forceps.
Gastrointestinal Intervention 2016;5(2):156-158
Summary of Event: A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stent (Viatorr) was misplaced into main portal vein and superior mesenteric vein. This misplaced covered stent was then successfully retrieved using the rigid endobronchial forceps. Teaching Point: Before release the covered portion of the TIPS stent (Viatorr), it is necessary to confirm the position of uncovered portion in portal vein and covered portion in parenchymal tract. The endobronchial forceps technique is a safe and efficient method for retrieving a misplaced TIPS stent.
Device Removal
;
Mesenteric Veins
;
Methods
;
Portal Vein
;
Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical*
;
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic
;
Stents*
;
Surgical Instruments*
3.Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for the management of gastric varices: Treatment algorithm according to clinical manifestations.
Seung Kwon KIM ; Steven SAUK ; Carlos J GUEVARA
Gastrointestinal Intervention 2016;5(3):170-176
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are widely used in the management of bleeding gastric varices (GV). More recently, several studies have demonstrated balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) as an effective treatment method for bleeding isolated GV, especially in patients with contraindications for a TIPS placement. Both TIPS and BRTO can effectively treat bleeding GV with low rebleeding rates. Careful patient selection for TIPS and BRTO procedures is required to best treat the patient's individual clinical situation.
Balloon Occlusion
;
Embolization, Therapeutic
;
Esophageal and Gastric Varices*
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Patient Selection
;
Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical*
;
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic
4.Intrahepatic portosystemic shunt assisted by percutaneous transhepatic approach for treatment of portal vein thrombosis.
Jian-jun LUO ; Zhi-ping YAN ; Jian-hua WANG ; Qing-xin LIU ; Zhu-ting FANG ; Wen ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2013;21(11):855-859
OBJECTIVETo retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy combined with pharmacologic thrombolysis to treat non-acute and symptomatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) using an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPS) assisted by percutaneous transhepatic approach.
METHODSFrom April 2006 to May 2012, 18 patients with non-acute and symptomatic PVT were treated with balloon dilation, sheath-directed thrombus aspiration and continuous infusion of urokinase using the IPS assisted by percutaneous transhepatic approach. The significance of differences in the portosystemic gradient measured before and after therapy was assessed by paired samples t-test, and survival analysis was made by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTSIPS was successfully created in all patients. The mean duration of the thrombolytic therapy was 65.3 +/- 29.5 h, and the mean concentration of urokinase used for the thrombolysis was 2324000 +/- 945000 U. Comparison of the mean portosystemic gradients showed a significant improvement in response to the therapy (before: 33.8 +/- 4.9 mm Hg vs. after: 15.4 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; P less than 0.001). The overall rate of clinical improvement was 94.4%. One patient died on day 2 post-therapy and another two patients experienced mild hepatic encephalopathy or right hemothorax, respectively, on day 5 post-therapy, with conservative medical management achieving complete recovery for both. The mean follow-up time was 18.6 +/- 17.5 months, during which only one patient died and five others experienced shunt dysfunction; all remaining patients showed maintenance of shunt patency without symptoms of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONMechanical thrombectomy combined with pharmacologic thrombolysis via the IPS assisted by percutaneous transhepatic approach is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with non-acute and symptomatic PVT.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portal Vein ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombolytic Therapy ; Venous Thrombosis ; therapy
5.Protective effects of affiliating portasystemic shunt on graft injury in small-for-size liver transplantation in miniature pigs.
Jian-jun LENG ; Jia-hong DONG ; Ben-li HAN ; Shu-guo ZHENG ; Huai-zhi WANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2009;47(14):1083-1087
OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the protective effects of affiliating portasystemic shunt on small-for-size graft in liver transplantation.
METHODSFifteen Chinese Bama miniature pigs were divided into three groups: group A (small-for-size liver transplantation), group B (distal splenorenal shunt + small-for-size liver transplantation), and group C (mesocaval H-shape shunt + small-for-size liver transplantation). Animals were followed up for 7 days with survival, dynamical liver function biochemical parameters, liver biopsies, portal venous pressure (PVP) and portal blood flow (PBF).
RESULTSAnimal survivals were as follows: group A, 1/5, group B, 3/5 and group C, 5/5.Group A resulted in abnormal liver function parameters that were significantly ameliorated in group B and C. The histological examination of graft in group A displayed severe pathologic changes including hepatocyte vacuolar change or necrosis, sinusoidal congestion, parenchymal hemorrhage. Affiliating portasystemic shunt significantly alleviated graft injuries in group B and C. PVP rose and peaked up to 28.6 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa), PBF fluctuated after reperfusion in group A, but group B and C with affiliating portasystemic shunt showed significantly lower PVP and maintained rather stable PBF after reperfusion. There were also statistical differences in PVP or PBF between group B and C.
CONCLUSIONSAffiliating portasystemic shunt effectively might protect small-for-size graft from injuries after reperfusion.
Animals ; Female ; Liver ; pathology ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Models, Animal ; Portal Pressure ; Portal Vein ; physiology ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; methods ; Random Allocation ; Regional Blood Flow ; Survival Rate ; Swine ; Swine, Miniature
6.Analysis of risk factors for selective devascularization in patients with portal hypertension.
Ya-Juan CAO ; Min XIE ; Shan-Hua BAO ; Yi-Ming PAN ; Bi-Yun XU
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2008;46(1):18-20
OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors for selective devascularization in patients with portal hypertension.
METHODSThe clinical data of 160 patients with portal hypertension underwent selective devascularization were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to the postoperative complications. Thirty-two clinical factors were analyzed using logistic regression.
RESULTSSingle-factor analysis showed that history of jaundice, Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification, total bilirubin (before the operation), prolongation of prothrombin time, pre-operative free portal pressure, ascites, leukocyte count (1 week after the operation) and hemoglobin (1 week after the operation) were significantly different between the high-risk group and low-risk group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that decrease of free portal pressure, total bilirubin (before the operation), prolongation of prothrombin time, ascites, leukocyte count (1 week after the operation) and hemoglobin (1 week after the operation) were still significantly different between the two groups (chi2 = 53.337, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONSThe risk factors of selective devascularization in patients with portal hypertension are decrease of free portal pressure, pre-operative total bilirubin, prolongation of prothrombin time, ascites, post-operative leukocyte count and hemoglobin.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; surgery ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Young Adult
10.Use of direct portal vein puncture portography with modified TIPS treatment in patients with portal hypertension and gastro-esophageal varices bleeding.
Chang-qing LI ; Dong-hai XU ; Dao-zhen XU ; Hong-lu LI ; Jian-guo CHU ; Xin-min LI ; Yi MA ; Qing-hong JING
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2005;13(6):403-406
OBJECTIVETo explore a better procedure for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in order to improve its safety and to extend its indications.
METHODSTo puncture the right portal branch under sonographic guidance in 20 patients with portal hypertension and gastro-esophageal bleeding. The Teflon sheath with gold marker was put into the portal vein; anterior and lateral portography was made, portal pressure was measured and the gastric coronal vein was embolized. The gold marker was put into the portal vein puncture site and the Rups-100 was guided under the gold marker during the TIPS puncture procedure. Anterior and lateral portography was again made to make sure the puncture site was 2 cm away from the portal vein bifurcation. In some cases a 10F sheath was used to suck the thrombosis in the portal vein, and a balloon was used to dilate the parenchyma channel and then a stent was released smoothly.
RESULTS20 reformed TIPS were successfully performed on all patients and their gastric-esophageal bleedings were controlled immediately. 37 punctures were made in 20 of those cases; the average puncture per patient was 1.85+/-0.67, lower than that of the traditional method. The pressure of the portal vein declined from (30.5+/-1.1) mmHg to (16.9+/-0.9) mmHg, P < 0.05, showing that the difference of portal vein pressure before and after the reformed TIPS was significant. 25 stents were placed, and no complications occurred during the procedure in any of the cases.
CONCLUSIONDirect portal vein puncture portography and gold marker guided TIPS procedure is feasible and safe; the indications of TIPS could be further extended.
Adult ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; etiology ; surgery ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; complications ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; methods ; Portography

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail