1.Predatory Journals: What Can We Do to Protect Their Prey?
Christine LAINE ; Dianne BABSKI ; Vivienne C. BACHELET ; Till W. BÄRNIGHAUSEN ; Christopher BAETHGE ; Kirsten BIBBINS-DOMINGO ; Frank FRIZELLE ; Laragh GOLLOGY ; Sabine KLEINERT ; Elizabeth LODER ; João MONTEIRO ; Eric J. RUBIN ; Peush SAHNI ; Christina C. WEE ; Jin-Hong YOO ; Lilia ZAKHAMA
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(2):e77-
2.Predatory Journals: What Can We Do to Protect Their Prey?
Christine LAINE ; Dianne BABSKI ; Vivienne C. BACHELET ; Till W. BÄRNIGHAUSEN ; Christopher BAETHGE ; Kirsten BIBBINS-DOMINGO ; Frank FRIZELLE ; Laragh GOLLOGY ; Sabine KLEINERT ; Elizabeth LODER ; João MONTEIRO ; Eric J. RUBIN ; Peush SAHNI ; Christina C. WEE ; Jin-Hong YOO ; Lilia ZAKHAMA
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(2):e77-
3.Predatory Journals: What Can We Do to Protect Their Prey?
Christine LAINE ; Dianne BABSKI ; Vivienne C. BACHELET ; Till W. BÄRNIGHAUSEN ; Christopher BAETHGE ; Kirsten BIBBINS-DOMINGO ; Frank FRIZELLE ; Laragh GOLLOGY ; Sabine KLEINERT ; Elizabeth LODER ; João MONTEIRO ; Eric J. RUBIN ; Peush SAHNI ; Christina C. WEE ; Jin-Hong YOO ; Lilia ZAKHAMA
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(2):e77-
4.Predatory Journals: What Can We Do to Protect Their Prey?
Christine LAINE ; Dianne BABSKI ; Vivienne C. BACHELET ; Till W. BÄRNIGHAUSEN ; Christopher BAETHGE ; Kirsten BIBBINS-DOMINGO ; Frank FRIZELLE ; Laragh GOLLOGY ; Sabine KLEINERT ; Elizabeth LODER ; João MONTEIRO ; Eric J. RUBIN ; Peush SAHNI ; Christina C. WEE ; Jin-Hong YOO ; Lilia ZAKHAMA
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(2):e77-
5.Ending nuclear weapons, before they end us
Kamran Abbasi ; Parveen Ali ; Virginia Barbour ; Marion Birch ; Inga Blum ; Peter Doherty ; Andy Haines ; Ira Helfand ; Richard Horton ; Kati Juva ; José ; Florencio F. Lapeñ ; a, Jr. ; Robert Mash ; Olga Mironova ; Arun Mitra ; Carlos Monteiro ; Elena N. Naumova ; David Onazi ; Tilman Ruff ; Peush Sahni ; James Tumwine ; Carlos Umañ ; a ; Paul Yonga ; Joe Thomas ; Chris Zielinski
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;40(1):6-8
6.Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible Global Health Emergency
Kamran Abbasi ; Parveen Ali ; Virginia Barbour ; Thomas Benfield ; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo ; Stephen Hancocks ; Richard Horton ; Laurie Laybourn-Langton ; Robert Mash ; Peush Sahni ; Wadeia Mohammad Sharief ; Paul Yonga ; Chris Zielinsk
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;38(2):6-8
Over 200 health journals call on the United Nations, political leaders, and health professionals to recognise that climate change and biodiversity loss are one indivisible crisis and must be tackled together to preserve health and avoid catastrophe. This overall environmental crisis is now so severe as to be a global health emergency.
Armed Conflicts
;
Nuclear Energy
;
Radiation
;
Climate Change
;
Global Warming
7.Reducing the risks of nuclear war - the role of health professionals
Kamran Abbasi ; Parveen Ali ; Virginia Barbour ; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo ; Marcel GM Olde Rikkert ; Andy Haines ; Ira Helfand ; Richard Horton ; Robert Mash ; Arun Mitra ; Carlos Monteiro ; Elena N. Naumova ; Eric J. Rubin ; Tilman Ruff ; Peush Sahni ; James Tumwine ; Paul Yonga ; Chris Zielinski
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;38(2):9-10
In January, 2023, the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the hands of the Doomsday Clock forward to 90’s before midnight, reflecting the growing risk of nuclear war.1 In August, 2022, the UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the world is now in “a time of nuclear danger not seen since the height of the Cold War.2 The danger has been underlined by growing tensions between many nuclear armed states.1,3 As editors of health and medical journals worldwide, we call on health professionals to alert the public and our leaders to this major danger to public health and the essential life support systems of the planet—and urge action to prevent it.
Armed Conflicts
;
Nuclear Energy
;
Radiation
8.Efficacy and tolerability of exclusive enteral nutrition in adult patients with complicated Crohn’s disease
Sanchit SHARMA ; Arti GUPTA ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Samagra AGARWAL ; Namrata SINGH ; Sandeep GOYAL ; Saransh JAIN ; Vipin GUPTA ; Pabitra SAHU ; Sudheer Kumar VUYYURU ; Bhaskar KANTE ; Raju SHARMA ; Rajesh PANWAR ; Peush SAHNI ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2021;19(3):291-300
Background/Aims:
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), an established modality for pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) is seldomly utilized in adults. The present study reports the outcome of EEN in adult CD patients at a tertiary care hospital in India.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of CD patients who received EEN as a sole modality/adjunct to other treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes changed in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and clinical response (decline in CDAI > 70), respectively, at 4 and 8 weeks. Subgroup analysis evaluated response across different phenotypes, EEN formulations and prior treatment. Linear mixed effect model was created to assess the predictors of EEN response.
Results:
Thirty-one CD patients received EEN over median duration of 4 weeks (range, 2–6 weeks). CDAI showed a significant improvement post EEN at 4 (baseline 290 [260–320] vs. 240 [180–280], P= 0.001) and 8 weeks (baseline 290 [260–320] vs. 186 [160–240], P= 0.001), respectively. The cumulative clinical response rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 37.3% and 80.4% respectively. The clinical response rates at 8 weeks across B1 (n = 4), B2 (n = 18) and B3 (n = 9) phenotypes were 50%, 78.8% and 100% respectively (log-rank test, P= 0.093). The response rates at 8 weeks with polymeric (n = 8) and semi-elemental diet (n = 23) were 75% and 82.6%% respectively (log-rank test, P= 0.49). Baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.002–1.017; P= 0.046) predicted response to EEN.
Conclusions
EEN was effective in inducing clinical response across different phenotypes of CD. Baseline disease activity remained the most important predictor of clinical response to EEN.
9.High mucosal cytomegalovirus DNA helps predict adverse short-term outcome in acute severe ulcerative colitis
Saransh JAIN ; Divya NAMDEO ; Pabitra SAHU ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Peush SAHNI ; Prasenjit DAS ; Raju SHARMA ; Vipin GUPTA ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Lalit DAR ; Simon PL TRAVIS ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2021;19(4):438-447
Background/Aims:
Predictors of short-term outcome of intravenous (IV) steroid therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) have been well described, but the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as a predictor of outcome remains debatable. We investigated the role of quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a predictor of short-term outcome in patients with ASUC.
Methods:
Consecutive patients with ASUC satisfying Truelove and Witts criteria hospitalized at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) from May 2016 to July 2019 were included; all received IV steroid. The primary outcome measure was steroid-failure defined as the need for rescue therapy (with ciclosporin or infliximab) or colectomy during admission. AIIMS’ index (ulcerative colitis index of severity > 6 at day 1+fecal calprotectin > 1,000 μg/g at day 3), with quantitative CMV PCR on biopsy samples obtained at initial sigmoidoscopy were correlated with the primary outcome.
Results:
Thirty of 76 patients (39%) failed IV corticosteroids and 12 (16%) underwent surgery. Patients with steroid failure had a significantly higher mucosal CMV DNA than responders (3,454 copies/mg [0–2,700,000] vs. 116 copies/mg [0–27,220]; P< 0.01). On multivariable analysis, mucosal CMV DNA load > 2,000 copies/mg (odds ratio [OR], 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6–39.7; P< 0.01) and AIIMS’ index (OR, 39.8; 95% CI, 4.4–364.4; P< 0.01) were independent predictors of steroid-failure and need for colectomy. The combination correctly predicted outcomes in 84% of patients with ASUC.
Conclusions
High mucosal CMV DNA ( > 2,000 copies/mg) independently predicts failure of IV corticosteroids and short-term risk of colectomy and it has an additional value to the established markers of disease severity in patients with ASUC.
10.Efficacy and tolerability of exclusive enteral nutrition in adult patients with complicated Crohn’s disease
Sanchit SHARMA ; Arti GUPTA ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Samagra AGARWAL ; Namrata SINGH ; Sandeep GOYAL ; Saransh JAIN ; Vipin GUPTA ; Pabitra SAHU ; Sudheer Kumar VUYYURU ; Bhaskar KANTE ; Raju SHARMA ; Rajesh PANWAR ; Peush SAHNI ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2021;19(3):291-300
Background/Aims:
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), an established modality for pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) is seldomly utilized in adults. The present study reports the outcome of EEN in adult CD patients at a tertiary care hospital in India.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of CD patients who received EEN as a sole modality/adjunct to other treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes changed in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and clinical response (decline in CDAI > 70), respectively, at 4 and 8 weeks. Subgroup analysis evaluated response across different phenotypes, EEN formulations and prior treatment. Linear mixed effect model was created to assess the predictors of EEN response.
Results:
Thirty-one CD patients received EEN over median duration of 4 weeks (range, 2–6 weeks). CDAI showed a significant improvement post EEN at 4 (baseline 290 [260–320] vs. 240 [180–280], P= 0.001) and 8 weeks (baseline 290 [260–320] vs. 186 [160–240], P= 0.001), respectively. The cumulative clinical response rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 37.3% and 80.4% respectively. The clinical response rates at 8 weeks across B1 (n = 4), B2 (n = 18) and B3 (n = 9) phenotypes were 50%, 78.8% and 100% respectively (log-rank test, P= 0.093). The response rates at 8 weeks with polymeric (n = 8) and semi-elemental diet (n = 23) were 75% and 82.6%% respectively (log-rank test, P= 0.49). Baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.002–1.017; P= 0.046) predicted response to EEN.
Conclusions
EEN was effective in inducing clinical response across different phenotypes of CD. Baseline disease activity remained the most important predictor of clinical response to EEN.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail