OBJECTIVETo compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) versus open repair (OR) for perforated peptic ulcers.

METHODSFrom January 2010 to June 2014, in Shanghai Tongji Hospital, 119 patients who were diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcers and planned to receive operation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into LR (58 patients) and OR(61 patients) group by computer. Intra-operative and postoperative parameters were compared between two groups. This study was registered as a randomized controlled trial by the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ChiCTR-TRC-11001607).

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in baseline data between two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences of operation time, morbidity of postoperative complication, mortality, reoperation probability, decompression time, fluid diet recovery time and hospitalization cost were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to OR group, LR group required less postoperative fentanyl [(0.74±0.33) mg vs. (1.04±0.39) mg, t=-4.519, P=0.000] and had shorter hospital stay [median 7(5 to 9) days vs. 8(7 to 10) days, U=-2.090, P=0.001]. In LR group, 3 patients(5.2%) had leakage in perforation site after surgery. One case received laparotomy on the second day after surgery for diffuse peritonitis. The other two received conservative treatment (total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition). There was no recurrence of perforation in OR group. One patient of each group died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) 22 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONLR may be preferable for treating perforated peptic ulcers than OR, however preventive measures during LR should be taken to avoid postopertive leak in perforation site.

China ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; rehabilitation ; Laparotomy ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Multiple Organ Failure ; epidemiology ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; Parenteral Nutrition, Total ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Peritonitis ; therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome

Surgical operation in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes is popularizing rapidly in China. Correct prevention and recognition of perioperation-related operative complications is the premise of ensuring surgical safety. Familiar complications of the operation include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary artery embolism, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic fistula and marginal ulcer. The prevention of deep venous thrombosis is better than treatment. The concrete measures contain physical prophylaxis (graduated compression stocking and intermittent pneumatic compression leg sleeves) and drug prophylaxis (unfractionated heparin and low molecular heparin), and the treatment is mainly thrombolysis or operative thrombectomy. The treatment of pulmonary artery embolism includes remittance of pulmonary arterial hypertension, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, operative thrombectomy, interventional therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Hemorrhage is a rarely occurred but relatively serious complication after bariatric surgery. The primary cause of anastomotic bleeding after laparoscopic gastric bypass is incomplete hemostasis or weak laparoscopic repair. The common bleeding site in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gastric stump and close to partes pylorica, and the bleeding may be induced by malformation and weak repair technique. Patients with hemodynamic instability caused by active bleeding or excessive bleeding should timely received surgical treatment. Anastomotic fistula in gastric bypass can be divided into gastrointestinal anastomotic fistula and jejunum-jejunum anastomotic fistula. The treatment of postoperative anastomotic fistula should vary with each individual, and conservative treatment or operative treatment should be adopted. Anastomotic stenosis is mainly related to the operative techniques. Stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy often occurs in gastric angle, and the treatment methods include balloon dilatation and stent implantation, and surgical treatment should be performed when necessary. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass is a kind of peptic ulcer occurring close to small intestine mucosa in the junction point of stomach and jejunum. Ulcer will also occur in the vestige stomach after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and the occurrence site locates mostly in the gastric antrum incisal margin. Preoperative anti-HP (helicobacter pylorus) therapy and postoperative continuous administration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for six months is the main means to prevent and treat marginal ulcer. For patients on whom conservative treatment is invalid, endoscopic repair or surgical repair should be considered. Different surgical procedures will generate different related operative complications. Fully understanding and effectively dealing with the complications of various surgical procedures through multidisciplinary cooperation is a guarantee for successful operation.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; Catheterization ; China ; Conservative Treatment ; Constriction, Pathologic ; etiology ; therapy ; Digestive System Fistula ; etiology ; therapy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; Gastric Mucosa ; pathology ; Gastric Stump ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Hemostasis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Heparin ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Intestine, Small ; pathology ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Margins of Excision ; Peptic Ulcer ; etiology ; therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Pulmonary Embolism ; etiology ; therapy ; Stents ; Stockings, Compression ; Thrombectomy ; Thrombolytic Therapy ; Venous Thrombosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy

Endoscopic hemostasis is the first-line treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Although several factors are known to be risk factors for rebleeding, little is known about the use of antithrombotics. We tried to verify whether the use of antithrombotics affects rebleeding rate after a successful endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer disease (PUD). UGIB patients who underwent successful endoscopic hemostasis were included. Rebleeding was diagnosed when the previously treated lesion bled again within 30 days of the initial episode. Of 522 UGIB patients with PUD, rebleeding occurred in 93 patients (17.8%). The rate of rebleeding was higher with aspirin medication (P=0.006) and after a long endoscopic hemostasis (P<0.001). Of all significant variables, procedure time longer than 13.5 min was related to the rate of rebleeding (OR, 2.899; 95% CI, 1.768-4.754; P<0.001) on the logistic regression analysis. The rate of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for PUD is higher in the patients after a long endoscopic hemostasis. Endoscopic hemostasis longer than 13.5 min is related to rebleeding after a successful endoscopic hemostasis for PUD.
Antithrombins/*therapeutic use ; Aspirin/adverse effects ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy/*surgery ; Hemorrhage/*drug therapy ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer/*surgery ; Recurrence ; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology

INTRODUCTIONLaparoscopic simple closure (LSC) coupled with Helicobacter pylori eradication is a well-recognised treatment for perforated duodenal ulcers. This study aimed to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted on patients who underwent LSC of perforated duodenal ulcers from January 2002 to December 2009. Patients were stratified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologist classification and Boey's risk score.

RESULTSOf the 213 patients, 22 (10.3%) were excluded as they required conversion to open surgery. 191 (89.7%) patients who underwent successful laparoscopic repair were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 39 (range 19-73) years, and the majority were male (n = 180, 94%). Median duration of pre-hospital symptoms was eight hours and median time from admission to surgery was six hours. Median operative time was 65 minutes and median hospital stay was five days. Ten patients (median age 53.5 years) required intensive care unit admission. Two patients developed leakage from the suture line - one required re-exploration and the other was managed conservatively. Four patients had intra-abdominal abscesses - one required re-exploration, while three were managed by percutaneous radiological drainage. One patient developed pneumonia and one had pulmonary embolism. There were no surgical site infections. All patients were followed up as surgical outpatients (median duration 36 days). None of the patients required definitive surgery. There was one death in the cohort.

CONCLUSIONLSC of perforated duodenal ulcers is a reliable, safe and minimally invasive procedure that has low morbidity.

Adult ; Aged ; Duodenal Ulcer ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Since the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research has first developed the guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in 1998, the revised guideline was proposed in 2009 by the same group. Although the revised guideline was made by comprehensive review of previous articles and consensus of authoritative expert opinions, the evidence-based developmental process was not applied in the revision of the guideline. This new guideline has been revised especially in terms of changes in the indication and treatment of H. pylori infection in Korea, and developed by the adaptation process as evidence-based method; 6 guidelines were retrieved by systematic review and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II process, 21 statements were made with grading system and revised by modified Delphi method. After revision, 11 statements for the indication of test and treatment, 4 statements for the diagnosis and 4 statements for the treatment have been developed, respectively. The revised guideline has been reviewed by external experts before the official endorsement, and will be disseminated for usual clinical practice in Korea. Also, the scheduled update and revision of the guideline will be made periodically.
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Aspirin/therapeutic use ; Bismuth/therapeutic use ; Breath Tests ; Clarithromycin/therapeutic use ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology ; Gastroscopy ; Helicobacter Infections/complications/*diagnosis/drug therapy ; *Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/complications ; Metaplasia/complications ; Metronidazole/therapeutic use ; Peptic Ulcer/complications/drug therapy ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/complications/surgery ; Tetracycline/therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

METHODSStudies on comparison between laparoscopic repair(LR) and open repair(OR) of perforated peptic ulcer were collected. Data of operating time, blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality between LR group and OR group were meta-analyzed using fixed effect model and random effect model.

RESULTSNineteen studies including 1507 patients were selected for this study,including laparoscopic surgery(n=673) and open surgery(n=834). There were significant differences in blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, wound infection rate and mortality between LR group and OR group. However, no significant differences existed in operative time, postoperative sepsis, pulmonary infection, abdominal abscess, and suture leakage between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONSLaparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is associated with improved outcomes in terms of less blood loss, quicker recovery, and lower rates of wound infection and mortality. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is safe and feasible.

Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

Intrahepatic abscess is an unusual complication of peptic ulcer disease. We present a case of gastric cancer in which the ulcer penetrated into the left lobe of liver with subsequent abscess and fistula formation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy confirmed ulcers and a fistula opening in the antrum. Abdominal computed tomogram showed a subcapsular liver abscess adjacent to the gastric antrum. Subtotal gastrectomy with curettage of the fistulous tract was performed. The final diagnosis was the signet ring cell gastric carcinoma complicating subcapsular liver abscess. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in Korea.
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Humans ; Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification ; Liver Abscess/diagnosis/*etiology/microbiology ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation/*complications/diagnosis ; Stomach Neoplasms/complications/*diagnosis/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVETo assess the risk factors of stress-related ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODSFrom May 1999 to July 2007, 285 periampullary cancer patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital. The clinical data, pathological results, type of operation, and postoperative treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with stress-related ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were selected for risk factor analysis, and other patients were taken as control group.

RESULTS35 patients (12.3%) developed stress-related ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathological examination showed pancreatic cancer in 5 cases, duodenal cancer in 8, common bile duct cancer in 10, ampullary carcinoma in 11, and solid-pseudopapillary tumors in 1. Single variate analysis demonstrated that alcohol, preoperative bilirubin level, operation time, lymph node metastasis, prealbumin decrease after operation and other complication were significantly associated with the stress-related ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Logistic regression in multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative bilirubin level, operation time, other complication, prealbumin decrease after surgery were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONStress-related ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage are one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Preoperative bilirubin level, operation time, other complications, and prealbumin decrease after operation are four independently risk factors.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Alcoholism ; complications ; Ampulla of Vater ; Bilirubin ; blood ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Duodenal Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; adverse effects ; Peptic Ulcer ; etiology ; Prealbumin ; metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stress, Psychological ; complications ; Young Adult

Peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding is the main cause of non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Negative outcomes include re-bleeding and death, and many of the deaths are associated with decompensation of coexisting medical conditions precipitated by acute bleeding event. Accurate analysis of risk for clinical features can help physician to decide treatment modality. Endoscopy can detect bleeding stigmata and perform therapeutic hemostasis. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) compared with placebo or H2RA reduces mortality following PU bleeding among patients with high-risk endoscopic findings, and reduces re-bleeding rates and surgical intervention. PPI treatment initiated prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding significantly reduces the proportion of patients with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) at index endoscopy but does not reduce mortality, re-bleeding or the need for surgery. The strategy of giving oral PPI before and after endoscopy, with endoscopic hemostasis for those with major SRH, is likely to be the most cost-effective. The treatment of H. pyori infection was found to be more effective than anti-secretory therapy in preventing recurrent bleeding from PU. H. pyori eradication alone and eradication followed by misoprostol (with switch to PPI, if misoprostol is not tolerated) are the two most cost-effective strategies to prevent ulcer bleeding among H. pyori-infected NSAID users, although the data cannot exclude PPIs also being cost-effective treatment. This review focuses specifically on the current treatment of patients with acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer.
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis ; Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Helicobacter pylori ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic ; Humans ; Misoprostol/therapeutic use ; Peptic Ulcer/surgery/*therapy ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/surgery/*therapy ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In geriatric patients with peptic ulcer, the use of NSAID and prevalence of chronic illness have been increased, but the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infected portion decreased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of geriatric patients (aged 65 or older) with peptic ulcer bleeding and compare with non-geriatric patients (less than 65 years old). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 88 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding treated with therapeutic endoscopy from January 2006 to December 2006. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of geriatric patients (n=34, 38.6%) with those of non-geriatric patients (n=54, 61.4%). RESULTS: Hypertension (52.9% vs. 24.1%), cardiovascular disease (35.3% vs. 13.0%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (20.6% vs. 3.7%) were more prevalent in the geriatric group, compared with the non-geriatric group (p<0.05). The geriatric group had taken more ulcerogenic drugs than the non-geriatric group (64.7% vs. 33.3%, p<0.05); aspirin plus clopidogrel (23.6% vs. 13.0%) and aspirin (20.6% vs. 11.0%). Sixteen (21.1%) of the 76 cases had H. pylori-negative ulcer. Between the two groups, there was no difference in the prevalence of H. pylori-negative ulcer (25.9% vs. 18.4%, p>0.05). The amount of transfusion length of ICU stay, rebleeding rate, operation rate and mortality were not different between the two groups. The length of hospital stay in the geriatric patients was significantly longer than the non-geriatric group (12.3+/-10.6 vs. 7.2+/-5.9 days, p<0.05). In multiple regression analysis, old age was a significant risk factor for longer hospital stay (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The geriatric patients with bleeding peptic ulcer had longer hospital stay than the non-geriatric patients in our study. The important emerging etiologies such as ulcerogenic drug and associated chronic illness should be checked and treated in these patients.
Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Duodenal Ulcer/*diagnosis/surgery/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medication Adherence ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/*diagnosis/surgery/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Ulcer/*diagnosis/surgery/therapy ; Treatment Outcome