Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

Recently, aducanumab, a beta amyloid targeted immunotherapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Although many questions need to be answered, this approval provides a promising hope for the development of AD drugs that could be supported by new biomarkers such as blood-based ones and composite neuropsychological tests that can confirm pathologic changes in early stages of AD. It is important to elucidate the complexity of AD which is known to be associated with other factors such as vascular etiologies and neuro-inflammation. Through the second international conference of the Korean Dementia Association (KDA), researchers from all over the world have participated in the exchange of opinions with KDA members on the most up-to-date topics. The Academic Committee of the KDA summarizes lectures to provide the depth of the conference as well as discussions. This will be an important milestone to widen the latest knowledge in the research of AD’s diagnosis, therapeutics, pathogenesis that can lead to the establishment of future directions.