OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and effectiveness of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma. METHODS: A clinical data of 36 patients with limb osteoid osteomas admitted between June 2016 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 patients underwent orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted surgery group), and 20 patients underwent tumor resection after lotcated by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy (open surgery group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, lesion site, tumor nidus diameter, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ( P>0.05). The operation time, lesion resection time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, lesion resection accuracy, and postoperative analgesic use frequency were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS scores for pain severity were compared preoperatively and at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Compared with the open surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had a longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less fluoroscopy frequency, less postoperative analgesic use frequency, and higher lesion resection accuracy ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in lesion resection time ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up after surgery, with a follow-up period of 3-24 months (median, 12 months) in the two groups. No postoperative complication such as wound infection or fracture occurred in either group during follow-up. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up. The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 days and 3 months after surgery when compared with preoperative value ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in robot-assisted surgery group than that in open surgery group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores at 3 months between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with open surgery, robot-assisted resection of limb osteoid osteomas has longer operation time, but the accuracy of lesion resection improve, intraoperative blood loss reduce, and early postoperative pain is lighter. It has the advantages of precision and minimally invasive surgery.
Humans ; Robotics ; Osteoma, Osteoid/surgery* ; Orthopedics ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Retrospective Studies ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Bone Neoplasms/surgery* ; Analgesics ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate short-term effectiveness and clinical application advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted resection for osteoid osteoma compared with traditional open surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 48 osteoid osteoma patients who met the selection criteria between July 2022 and April 2023. Among them, 23 patients underwent orthopedic robot-assisted resection (robot-assisted surgery group), and 25 patients received traditional open surgery (traditional surgery group). There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, lesion location and size, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score between the two groups. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative lesion localization time, initial localization success rate, infection, and recurrence were recorded and compared. VAS scores before surgery and at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery and MSTS score before surgery and at 3 months after surgery were assessed. RESULTS: All patients completed the surgery successfully, with no significant difference in surgical time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared to the traditional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter lesion localization time, and shorter hospitalization time, with significant differences ( P<0.05). The initial localization success rate was higher in the robot-assisted surgery group than in the traditional surgery group, but the difference between the two groups was not significant ( P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 3-12 months in the robot-assisted surgery group (median, 6 months) and 3-14 months in the traditional surgery group (median, 6 months). The postoperative MSTS scores of both groups improved significantly when compared to those before surgery ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the changes in MSTS scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). The postoperative VAS scores of both groups showed a gradually decreasing trend over time ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after surgery ( P>0.05). During follow-up, except for 1 case of postoperative infection in the traditional surgery group, there was no infections or recurrences in other cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION Orthopedic robot-assisted osteoid osteoma resection achieves similar short-term effectiveness when compared to traditional open surgery, with shorter lesion localization time.
Humans ; Robotics ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Osteoma, Osteoid/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Bone Neoplasms/surgery*

Humans ; Osteoma, Osteoid/surgery* ; Bone Neoplasms/surgery* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Objective: To explore the clinical characteristics, intervention and treatment of tympanic osteoma at different locations. Methods: The medical history, audiological and imaging examination, operation and follow-up results of two patients with tympanic osteoma at different sites were reviewed and summarized. Furthermore, the clinical characteristics and interventions of 36 patients reported in literatures with tympanic osteomas were also summarized and analyzed. Results: Osteoma of the two patients collected in this study located at promontory and incus respectively;both of them presented with intact tympanum and conductive deafness, without obvious etiology or predisposing factor. Both of them underwent surgeries and the hearing improved significantly. For patient one, the ossicular chain was intact and restored to activity after removed the osteoma. For patient two, an artificial ossicle was implanted after removed the osteoma and incus. In the 36 patients reported in literatures, the average age was 26.5 years, and 39.47% of them located at promontory; in addition, the main symptoms of them were progressive hearing loss, tinnitus and ear stuffy. Conclusions: Patients with tympanic osteoma are characterized by conduction deafness with intact tympanic membrane, and the most common lesion is promontory. Hearing can be restored by excision of the osteoma and maintenance or reconstruction of the ossicle chain.
Adult ; Ear Ossicles/surgery* ; Ear, Middle/surgery* ; Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery* ; Humans ; Osteoma/surgery* ; Tympanic Membrane

Endoscopes ; Endoscopy ; Ethmoid Sinus ; Frontal Sinus ; Humans ; Osteoma/surgery* ; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/surgery*

To evaluate the radiological features of osteoid osteoma around lesser trochante of femur, and to analyze the outcomes of treatment with open surgery.
 Methods: From July 2013 to August 2015, 14 patients (9 males, 5 females) with osteoid osteoma around lesser trochanter were retrospectively reviewed. The ages of patients were 9-44 (average 20) years old. The duration of symptom was 3-36 (average 8) months. After the X-ray plain radiography, CT and MR, all patients underwent open resection. No intense exercise was allowed in the first three months after the operation.
 Results: There were 9 cases of cortical type, and 5 cases of subperiosteal type. The niduses were found by plain radiographs in 9 patients. By CT scan, the niduses were found in all 14 patients. The average pre-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) without NSAIDs was 6.5. One month after the operation, the average VAS was 0 for all patients. The follow up time for all patients was 9-34 (average 20) months. No recurrence, infection, neurovascular injury or fracture was found during the follow up.
 Conclusion: Open resection is a feasible method for osteoid osteoma around lesser trochanter of femur with satisfied outcome and low complication rate.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Child ; Cortical Bone ; pathology ; Female ; Femur ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Osteoma, Osteoid ; complications ; surgery ; Pain ; etiology ; surgery ; Periosteum ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome

Osteoid osteoma was first reported in 1935 by Jaffe. It is a kind of benign bone disease with the limitation of well-defined lesions. It is rarely seen in the periorbital region. The only symptom of the patient was unilateral proptosis of right. The result of MRI examination was cystic masses in the edge of the right orbit. The tumor was complete removed by the nasal endoscopic approach during the surgery. Pathology result was reported as osteoid osteoma. There was no significant complications of diplopia, visual acuity decreased, enophthalmos, cerebrospinal fluid leakage and others.
Endoscopy ; Exophthalmos ; Face ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Nasal Surgical Procedures ; Nose ; Osteoma, Osteoid ; surgery ; Skull Base ; pathology ; Skull Base Neoplasms ; surgery

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical features, diagnosis and endoscopic surgical intervention for small steoma of nasal sinuses causing nasal and facial pain. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed on 21 patients with nasal and facial pain caused by small osteoma of nasal sinuses, and nasal endoscopic surgery was included in the treatment of all cases. RESULT: The nasal and facial pain of all the patients was relieved. Except for one ase exhibiting periorbital bruise after operation, the other patients showed no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Nasal and facial pain caused by small osteoma of nasal sinuses was clinically rare, mostly due to the neuropathic pain of nose and face caused by local compression resulting from the expansion of osteoma. Early diagnosis and operative treatment can significantly relieve nasal and facial pain.
Endoscopy ; Face ; Facial Pain ; Humans ; Nasal Surgical Procedures ; Osteoma ; surgery ; Paranasal Sinuses ; pathology ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVECondylectomy was performed to treat condylar osteoma or hyperplasia. Introduced two methods of condylectomy via intraoral approach and evaluated their clinical results.

METHODSThirty-five patients, aging from 22 to 57.21 years, were treated by condylectomy via intraoral approach, of which 21 were condyle osteoma, 14 hemimandibular hyperplasia and condylar hyperplasia. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) were used in 32 patients and intraoral condylectomy via coronoid process resection was used in 3 patients.

RESULTSThe treatment results including oral function and facial symmetry after the operation were good in all patients. The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction syndrome alleviated or disappeared. The follow-up period was 6 months to 3 years, and no relapse of condylar osteoma or hyperplasia was found. The patients who had IVRO and TMJ reconstruction had some degree of transplanted bone resorption, and one patients had relapse of facial deformity. But the patients who had intraoral condylectomy via coronoid process resection only had mild condyle remodeling and no obvious bone resorption was noted.

CONCLUSIONSThe two methods of intraoral condylectomy introduced in this stugy can successfully correct the facial deformity and TMJ dysfunction caused by condylar osteoma or hyperplasia. But the surgeons need to have excellent surgical skills and careful selection of the indications.

Adult ; Facial Asymmetry ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Male ; Mandible ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Mandibular Condyle ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Mandibular Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Oral Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Osteoma ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Temporomandibular Joint ; physiology ; surgery ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ; surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience of diagnosis and treatment on osteoma in the external auditory canal. METHOD: Retrospective study were undertaken in 26 patients with osteoma in the external auditory canal operated in author's unit. RESULT: Osteomas were removed through interauricular approach in all patients and confirmed by histopathological examination. The hearing of 22 patients with conductive hearing loss became normal after operation. The air conduction hearing threshold in 2 patients with mixed hearing loss improved average 15 dB and 20 dB respectively after operation. The follow up was more than 1 year, and no recurrence or complications had occurred. CONCLUSION Osteoma in the external auditory canal is an uncommon benign lesion. The method of choice in diagnosis is temporal bone CT scan. Osteoma must be distinguished from exostosis in the external auditory canal. Osteoma is confirmed by pathological diagnosis and surgery is the only method for treatment.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Ear Canal ; pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoma ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult