PURPOSE: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (PHNET) is a very rare neoplasm, requiring strict exclusion of metastasis from possible extrahepatic primary sites for its diagnosis. METHODS: We reviewed our clinical experience of 13 patients with primary hepatic NET who underwent liver resection from January 1997 to December 2015. RESULTS: The mean age of the 13 patients (8 males and 5 females) was 51.1 ± 12.8 years; the most common clinical manifestation was vague, nonspecific abdominal pain (n = 9). Of them, 11 patients underwent preoperative liver biopsy, 7 of which correctly diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Ten patients underwent R0 resection, and 3 underwent R1 resection. Diagnosis of PHNET was confirmed both immunohistochemically and by absence of extrahepatic primary sites. All tumors were single lesions, with a mean size of 9.6 ± 7.6 cm and a median size of 4.3 cm; all showed positive staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin. During a mean follow-up period of 95.1 ± 86.6 months, 7 patients died from tumor recurrence, whereas the other 6 remain alive to date, making the 5-year tumor recurrence rate 56.0% and the 5-year patient survival rate 61.5%. When confined to R0 resection, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were 42.9% and 70.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 proliferative index was the only risk factor for tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: PHNET is a very rare tumor with no specific clinical features, and its final diagnosis depends primarily on pathology, immunohistochemistry, and exclusion of metastasis from other sites. Aggressive surgical treatment is highly recommended for PHNET because of acceptably favorable postresection outcomes.
Abdominal Pain ; Biopsy ; Carcinoid Tumor ; Diagnosis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Liver ; Male ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; Pathology ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; Synaptophysin

The liver is one of the most common sites to which malignancies preferentially metastasize. Although a substantial number of liver malignancies are primary tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the metastasis of carcinomas to the liver is relatively common and frequently encountered in clinical settings. Representative carcinomas that frequently metastasize to the liver include colorectal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, lung carcinoma, and gastric carcinoma. The diagnostic confirmation of suspected metastatic lesions in the liver is generally achieved through a histopathologic examination of biopsy tissues. Although morphology is the most important feature for a pathologic differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas, immunohistochemical studies facilitate the differentiation of metastatic carcinoma origins and subtypes. Useful immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas in the liver include cytokeratins (CK7, CK19, and CK20), neuroendocrine markers (CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A), and tissue-specific markers (CDX2, SATB2, TTF-1, GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, etc.). Here, we provide a brief review about the pathologic differential diagnosis of major metastatic carcinomas in the liver.
Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Immunohistochemistry ; Keratins ; Liver Neoplasms ; Liver ; Lung ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; Pathology ; Synaptophysin

Upper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors which are increasingly recognised by practising endoscopists. After confirmation by endoscopic biopsies of these focal lesions, many questions may arise. As NETs are less frequently encountered compared to other malignancies or gastrointestinal pathology, many endoscopists may not fully understand the natural history, diagnosis and management of these tumors. In this review, we aim to update the practising endoscopist on the key clinical features and management of patients with upper gastrointestinal NET.
Biopsy ; Diagnosis* ; Humans ; Natural History ; Neuroendocrine Tumors* ; Pathology

Primary malignant small bowel tumor as a rare kind of intestinal tumor is associated with a poor prognosis. The pathological types were various and complicated, such as adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, malignant lymphoma, and malignant stromal tumor. The atypical early stage symptom resulted in difficult diagnosis at early stage, high misdiagnosis rate and lack of standard therapy schemes and means. In the past, X-ray, CT, MRI, and PET-CT were the main examination methods for primary small bowel tumor. However, with the development of radiology, a series of new diagnosis methods, including electronic enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy, multi-slice spiral CT enteroclysis and so on, promotes the diagnosis accurate rate. Surgery is still the most important method in the small bowel tumor treatment, and the alternative of the surgical method should depend on the tumor location, size and relationship with the adjacent organs. Application of the laparoscopic surgery for the small bowel tumor is still in the initial stage. Besides, some researches have confirmed that chemotherapy, radiotherapy, target therapy and endocrinotherapy have effects on the specific kind of small bowel tumor. Therefore this article will review the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis and treatment of the primary malignant small bowel tumors.
Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Capsule Endoscopy ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Humans ; Intestinal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Intestine, Small ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Lymphoma ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; pathology ; therapy ; Tomography, Spiral Computed

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms(gNENs).

METHODSClinicopathologic data of 104 patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms admitted in Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2000 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Tumor proliferation activity classification (G1, G2 and G3) and TNM staging were observed. The clinicopathologic features of the whole group were collected and the univariate and multivariate analysis were determined by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard model to detect the prognosis-determining features.

RESULTSOf all the patients, 66 cases(63.5%) were neuroendocrine carcinoma, 25 cases(24.0%) were mixed adenoendocrine carcinoma and 12 cases (11.5%) were neuroendocrine tumor. For G grades, 92 cases (88.5%) were G3 grade, 8 cases(7.7%) were G2 grade and 4 cases (3.8%) were G1 grade. TNM staging results showed that stageI( was found in 6 cases (5.8%), stageII(A in 6 cases (5.8%), stageII(B in 9 cases (8.7%), stage III(A in 8 cases (7.7%), stage III(B in 55 cases (52.9%) and stageIIII( in 20 cases (19.2%). For T stage, 7 cases (6.7%) were T1, 12 cases (11.5%) were T2, 24 cases (23.1%) were T3, and 61 cases (58.7%) were T4. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 73 cases (70.2%) and distant metastasis occurred in 20 cases(19.2%). Eighty-six patients were followed up for 6 to 186 months. The median survival was 33.0 months(95% CI: 28.3 to 36.6), and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 49% and 31%. Clinicopathologic features which were considered statistically significant on univariate analysis were selected to Cox proportional hazard model. Univariate analysis showed that risk factors of reducing survival rate included tumor size, pathological type, proliferation activity grades, and depth of invasion (all P<0.05), as well as chromogranin A expression, tumor staging, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis(all P<0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that the stage of gNEN was the independent risk factor of the prognosis (RR=14.213, 95% CI: 1.316 to 153.524, P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONLate staging is the main clinical feature and a prognostic factor for gNENs.

Carcinoma ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo investigate neuroendocrine differentiation and Wilms' tumor protein-1 (WT-1) expression in breast mucinous carcinoma and their clinicopathological significance.

METHODSThe clinicopathological data of 65 patients with breast mucinous carcinoma, including 31 cases of mixed mucinous carcinoma, 23 cases of hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma and 11 cases of hypercellular pure mucinous carcinoma, admitted in Taizhou Hospital from January 2010 to June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The expression of neuroendocrine markers and WT-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry staining in all cases.

RESULTSThe mixed mucinous carcinomas and hypercelluar pure mucinous carcinomas had higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis and human epidermal recepter 2 (HER-2) positive than hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma (all (P<0.01). However, the difference was not significant between mixed mucinous carcinomas and hypercellular pure mucinous carcinomas (all P>0.05). The expression of neuroendocrine marker was stronger in hypercellular mucinous carcinoma than that in mixed mucinous carcinoma and hypocellular mucinous carcinoma (all (P<0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant between mixed mucinous carcinoma and hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma (P>0.05). The expression of WT-1 was weaker in mixed mucinous carcinoma than that in hypercellular and hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma(all (P<0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant between hypercellular and hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma (P>0.05). The mucinous carcinomas with lymph node metastasis had lower expression of neuroendocrine markers than those without lymph node metastasis ((P<0.01). The expression of WT-1 in breast mucinous carcinoma with lymph node metastasis trended lower than that in those without lymph node metastasis, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONHypercellular pure mucinous breast carcinoma has higher rates of lymph node metastasis and HER-2 amplification than hypocellular pure mucinous carcinoma, the sub-classification of breast pure mucinous carcinoma should be considered. Neuroendocrine differentiation and WT-1 expression may be helpful in distinguishing the subtypes of breast mucinous carcinoma. Breast mucinous carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation trends to have less lymph node metastasis.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous ; classification ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms ; classification ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Incidence ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; WT1 Proteins ; metabolism

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors are common in pathological practice and its pathological classification and histological grading are not exactly the same as that of those in the digestive tract and pancreas. In 2015 edition of World Health Organization classification, pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors are classified as carcinoid tumors (including typical carcinoid and atypical carcinoid), small cell lung carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and precursor lesion diffuse idiopathic neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia; each category has distinctive morphological and immunohistochemical features. The morphologic features including growth patterns and cytological appearances are keys for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor, and immunohistochemical findings are also critical for its diagnosis. Furthermore, the diagnostic criteria vary for different types of specimen. In this article, we present a concise review and summary of the update of clinicopathological characterizations of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor, with an emphasis on its diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis.
Carcinoid Tumor ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Lung Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; classification ; diagnosis ; pathology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the association of neuroendocrine differentiation with progression and prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODSClinicopathological data of 240 patients with gastric adenocarcinomas were retrospectively analyzed. The expression of chromogranin A, synaptophysin and secrectagogin in cancer tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The association of neuoroendocrine differentiation parameters with disease progression and survival of patients was analyzed.

RESULTSThe expression of synaptophysin was positively correlated with depth of invasion and secretagogin more often expressed in cases with lymph node metastasis. In Lauren diffuse type of cancer, expression of chromogranin A and secretagogin was unfavorable prognostic predictor. In TNM stage II adenocarcinoma, expression of chromogranin A and synaptophysin related to poor survival, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that synaptophysin was an independent predictor for poor survival.

CONCLUSIONNeuroendocrine differentiation predicts deeper depth of invasion, more possibility of lymph node metastasis and poor survival in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; metabolism ; Chromogranin A ; metabolism ; Disease Progression ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Secretagogins ; metabolism ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Synaptophysin ; metabolism

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has been gradually increasing and most of NENs are located in gastroenteropancreatic system. With the application of target therapeutic drugs in recent years, the precise pathological diagnosis is required critically for effective clinical treatment: target therapy needs targeted pathological diagnosis. In this article, the definition of NENs, and the century-long evolution of diagnostic terms and grades are reviewed. The eight steps of pathological diagnosis of NENs for clinical needs are described. Four inconsistent concepts in NENs diagnosis are also discussed, that is immunohistochemical biomarkers of pathological diagnosis, subpopulation of neuroendocrine neoplasms with high proliferative activity, general adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation and molecular genetics characteristics. To correctly understand these issues would be of great value for diagnosis and treatment of NENs.
Biomarkers, Tumor ; analysis ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; pathology ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology test (LCT) in pancreatic lesions sampled by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA).

METHODSA retrospective analysis of 556 cases of LCT smears sampled by EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions was performed, and 164 cases had histologic diagnosis with subsequent surgical resection or biopsy and immunohistochemistry. The accuracy of the cytologic diagnosis was assessed using the histologic diagnosis as the gold standard. The discrepant cases were reviewed to identify sources of errors.

RESULTSThe satisfactory rate for EUS-FNA was 96.0%(534/556). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 87.7%(128/146), 13/16, 97.7%(128/131), 41.9%(13/31) and 87.0%(141/162) respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was lower in cystic lesions than that in solid lesions. The LCT sensitivities of adenocarcinoma, lymphoma and neuroendocrine tumors were higher than those of cystic tumors and mesenchymal tumors. False positive diagnosis was mainly due to epithelial abnormalities in inflammatory reaction. False negative diagnosis was mainly due to scanty or lack of tumor cells in the smears, or mild atypia that was insufficient for diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONSEUS-FNA is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Standardized terminology and nomenclature are helpful to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue ; diagnosis ; Neuroendocrine Tumors ; diagnosis ; Pancreas ; cytology ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specimen Handling