OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection on the incidence and bacteriological profile of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 494 pregnant women with positive GBS screening results and 526 neonates born by these women. According to whether the pregnant woman received IAP, the neonates were divided into two groups: IAP (n=304) and control (n=222). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical indices, incidence rate of EONS, and distribution of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the IAP group had a significantly lower proportion of children with abnormal clinical manifestations (P<0.001) and a significantly lower incidence rate of EONS (P=0.022). In the IAP group, Escherichia coli (2.3%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture of the neonates with EONS, while GBS (3.2%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in the control group. The IAP group had a significantly higher detection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli than the control group (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS Although IAP can significantly reduce the incidence rate of EONS in neonates born to pregnant women with positive GBS screening results, the infection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli may increase after IAP treatment. Therefore, it is needed to enhance the monitoring of blood culture results of neonates with EONS and timely adjust treatment plan according to drug susceptibility test results.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control* ; Neonatal Sepsis/prevention & control* ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious ; Retrospective Studies ; Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control* ; Streptococcus agalactiae

The gastrointestinal structure, function and immunity of preterm infants are immature. Furthermore the gastrointestinal microbe colonization is abnormal. Therefore the preterm infants are prone to a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Probiotics can regulate gastrointestinal microbe constitute, improve gastrointestinal barrier function, reduce gastrointestinal inflammation response and regulate the immunity. At present, it is used for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and feeding intolerance. The safety and efficacy of probiotics for preterm infants are still controversial.
Apoptosis ; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing ; prevention & control ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; immunology ; microbiology ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infant, Premature, Diseases ; prevention & control ; Invasive Fungal Infections ; prevention & control ; Neonatal Sepsis ; prevention & control ; Probiotics ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

INTRODUCTIONThe addition of glutamine to parenteral nutrition (PN) in neonates has not shown significant benefits as compared to adults thus far. This study aimed to determine the potential benefits of the addition of glutamine to neonatal PN in a tertiary hospital in a middle-income country.

METHODSThis was a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Babies who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and who required PN were eligible for inclusion in the study. The subjects were randomised to receive either glutamine-added PN (intervention) or standard PN (control). The most important outcomes included time to full enteral nutrition, incidence of sepsis and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), clinical or culture-proven sepsis.

RESULTSOut of 270 subjects, 132 were randomised to the intervention group and 138, to the control group. Baseline data were comparable in both groups. The median time taken to reach full enteral nutrition was similar for both intervention and control groups (six days in each group, p-value is 0.52). The incidences of NEC, clinical sepsis and culture-proven sepsis did not differ significantly in the intervention and control groups (5.8 vs. 7.1 percent, p-value is 0.68; 15.7 percent vs. 10.2 percent, p-value is 0.21 and 16.5 percent vs. 15.7 percent, p-value is 0.38, respectively). Other outcomes such as duration of ventilation, duration of NICU stay and a subgroup analysis for preterm and term babies also showed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONAddition of glutamine to neonatal PN was not shown to improve outcome.

Double-Blind Method ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Glutamine ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care, Neonatal ; Malaysia ; Male ; Parenteral Nutrition ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; diagnosis ; Sepsis ; microbiology ; prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome