Objective: Mammography is essential for reducing breast cancer mortality; however, its performance varies globally. This study aimed to evaluate mammography screening outcomes in Korea over 12 years and investigate regional variations. Materials and Methods: We analyzed mammography data from 42 million Korean women, aged 40 years and older, who participated in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) from 2009 to 2020. Performance metrics—including recall rate (RR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), cancer detection rate (CDR), interval cancer rate (ICR), and dense breast rate (DBR), were computed. Twelve-year trends in these metrics were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Regional variations were also examined across Korea’s 237 districts, stratified by age groups. Results: From 2009 to 2020, 42165405 mammography screenings were conducted through the KNCSP, increasing from 2821132 screenings in 2009 to 3596204 in 2020. The RR decreased from 17.2% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2020 (average annual percent change [AAPC] = -3.7%), while the PPV increased from 0.8% to 2.8%; AAPC = 10.7%), the CDR increased from 1.5 to 3.1 per 1000; AAPC = 7.3%), and the ICR rose from 0.9 to 1.6 per 1000; (AAPC = 5.2%). Regional variations were noted; however, differences in the RR, sensitivity, specificity, and FPR decreased over time. Conclusion While mammography performance improved from 2009 to 2020, the PPV and sensitivity remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring. Regional disparities in performance, although reduced, persist. These findings provide essential baseline data for improving mammography quality and addressing inequities in breast cancer screening.

Objective: Mammography is essential for reducing breast cancer mortality; however, its performance varies globally. This study aimed to evaluate mammography screening outcomes in Korea over 12 years and investigate regional variations. Materials and Methods: We analyzed mammography data from 42 million Korean women, aged 40 years and older, who participated in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) from 2009 to 2020. Performance metrics—including recall rate (RR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), cancer detection rate (CDR), interval cancer rate (ICR), and dense breast rate (DBR), were computed. Twelve-year trends in these metrics were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Regional variations were also examined across Korea’s 237 districts, stratified by age groups. Results: From 2009 to 2020, 42165405 mammography screenings were conducted through the KNCSP, increasing from 2821132 screenings in 2009 to 3596204 in 2020. The RR decreased from 17.2% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2020 (average annual percent change [AAPC] = -3.7%), while the PPV increased from 0.8% to 2.8%; AAPC = 10.7%), the CDR increased from 1.5 to 3.1 per 1000; AAPC = 7.3%), and the ICR rose from 0.9 to 1.6 per 1000; (AAPC = 5.2%). Regional variations were noted; however, differences in the RR, sensitivity, specificity, and FPR decreased over time. Conclusion While mammography performance improved from 2009 to 2020, the PPV and sensitivity remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring. Regional disparities in performance, although reduced, persist. These findings provide essential baseline data for improving mammography quality and addressing inequities in breast cancer screening.

Objective: Mammography is essential for reducing breast cancer mortality; however, its performance varies globally. This study aimed to evaluate mammography screening outcomes in Korea over 12 years and investigate regional variations. Materials and Methods: We analyzed mammography data from 42 million Korean women, aged 40 years and older, who participated in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) from 2009 to 2020. Performance metrics—including recall rate (RR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), cancer detection rate (CDR), interval cancer rate (ICR), and dense breast rate (DBR), were computed. Twelve-year trends in these metrics were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Regional variations were also examined across Korea’s 237 districts, stratified by age groups. Results: From 2009 to 2020, 42165405 mammography screenings were conducted through the KNCSP, increasing from 2821132 screenings in 2009 to 3596204 in 2020. The RR decreased from 17.2% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2020 (average annual percent change [AAPC] = -3.7%), while the PPV increased from 0.8% to 2.8%; AAPC = 10.7%), the CDR increased from 1.5 to 3.1 per 1000; AAPC = 7.3%), and the ICR rose from 0.9 to 1.6 per 1000; (AAPC = 5.2%). Regional variations were noted; however, differences in the RR, sensitivity, specificity, and FPR decreased over time. Conclusion While mammography performance improved from 2009 to 2020, the PPV and sensitivity remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring. Regional disparities in performance, although reduced, persist. These findings provide essential baseline data for improving mammography quality and addressing inequities in breast cancer screening.

Objective: Mammography is essential for reducing breast cancer mortality; however, its performance varies globally. This study aimed to evaluate mammography screening outcomes in Korea over 12 years and investigate regional variations. Materials and Methods: We analyzed mammography data from 42 million Korean women, aged 40 years and older, who participated in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) from 2009 to 2020. Performance metrics—including recall rate (RR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), cancer detection rate (CDR), interval cancer rate (ICR), and dense breast rate (DBR), were computed. Twelve-year trends in these metrics were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Regional variations were also examined across Korea’s 237 districts, stratified by age groups. Results: From 2009 to 2020, 42165405 mammography screenings were conducted through the KNCSP, increasing from 2821132 screenings in 2009 to 3596204 in 2020. The RR decreased from 17.2% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2020 (average annual percent change [AAPC] = -3.7%), while the PPV increased from 0.8% to 2.8%; AAPC = 10.7%), the CDR increased from 1.5 to 3.1 per 1000; AAPC = 7.3%), and the ICR rose from 0.9 to 1.6 per 1000; (AAPC = 5.2%). Regional variations were noted; however, differences in the RR, sensitivity, specificity, and FPR decreased over time. Conclusion While mammography performance improved from 2009 to 2020, the PPV and sensitivity remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring. Regional disparities in performance, although reduced, persist. These findings provide essential baseline data for improving mammography quality and addressing inequities in breast cancer screening.

Objective: Mammography is essential for reducing breast cancer mortality; however, its performance varies globally. This study aimed to evaluate mammography screening outcomes in Korea over 12 years and investigate regional variations. Materials and Methods: We analyzed mammography data from 42 million Korean women, aged 40 years and older, who participated in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) from 2009 to 2020. Performance metrics—including recall rate (RR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), cancer detection rate (CDR), interval cancer rate (ICR), and dense breast rate (DBR), were computed. Twelve-year trends in these metrics were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Regional variations were also examined across Korea’s 237 districts, stratified by age groups. Results: From 2009 to 2020, 42165405 mammography screenings were conducted through the KNCSP, increasing from 2821132 screenings in 2009 to 3596204 in 2020. The RR decreased from 17.2% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2020 (average annual percent change [AAPC] = -3.7%), while the PPV increased from 0.8% to 2.8%; AAPC = 10.7%), the CDR increased from 1.5 to 3.1 per 1000; AAPC = 7.3%), and the ICR rose from 0.9 to 1.6 per 1000; (AAPC = 5.2%). Regional variations were noted; however, differences in the RR, sensitivity, specificity, and FPR decreased over time. Conclusion While mammography performance improved from 2009 to 2020, the PPV and sensitivity remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring. Regional disparities in performance, although reduced, persist. These findings provide essential baseline data for improving mammography quality and addressing inequities in breast cancer screening.

Objective: Previous research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Koreans has primarily focused on genetic diversity because of its high heritability. However, the emerging recognition of transgenerational epigenetic changes has recently shifted research attention towards epigenetic perspectives. Methods: This study investigated the DNA methylation patterns of the promoter regions of candidate genes such asNR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in blood samples from ASD probands and their unaffected siblings. The analysis included 54 families (ASD proband group: 54; unaffected biological sibling group: 63). The diagnostic process involved screening the probands and their siblings for ASD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition.Intelligence, social ability, and medical history were thoroughly assessed using various scales and questionnaires.Genomic DNA from blood samples was analyzed using a methylation-sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction to examine the DNA methylation status of candidate genes. Results: Methylation levels in candidate gene promoter regions differed significantly between the proband and sibling groups for all candidate genes. Correlation analysis between the proband and sibling groups revealed strong and significant correlations in NR3C1 and ASCL1 methylation. Additionally, in the analysis of the relationship between DNA and ASD phenotypes, FOXO3 methylation correlated with social quotient in probands, and ASCL1 methylation was associated with nonverbal communication, and daily living skills as measured by the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Notably, ASCL1 methylation was significantly associated with parental age at pregnancy. Conclusion This study proposes DNA methylation of NR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in peripheral blood samples is a potential epigenetic biomarker of ASD.

Objective: Previous research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Koreans has primarily focused on genetic diversity because of its high heritability. However, the emerging recognition of transgenerational epigenetic changes has recently shifted research attention towards epigenetic perspectives. Methods: This study investigated the DNA methylation patterns of the promoter regions of candidate genes such asNR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in blood samples from ASD probands and their unaffected siblings. The analysis included 54 families (ASD proband group: 54; unaffected biological sibling group: 63). The diagnostic process involved screening the probands and their siblings for ASD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition.Intelligence, social ability, and medical history were thoroughly assessed using various scales and questionnaires.Genomic DNA from blood samples was analyzed using a methylation-sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction to examine the DNA methylation status of candidate genes. Results: Methylation levels in candidate gene promoter regions differed significantly between the proband and sibling groups for all candidate genes. Correlation analysis between the proband and sibling groups revealed strong and significant correlations in NR3C1 and ASCL1 methylation. Additionally, in the analysis of the relationship between DNA and ASD phenotypes, FOXO3 methylation correlated with social quotient in probands, and ASCL1 methylation was associated with nonverbal communication, and daily living skills as measured by the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Notably, ASCL1 methylation was significantly associated with parental age at pregnancy. Conclusion This study proposes DNA methylation of NR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in peripheral blood samples is a potential epigenetic biomarker of ASD.

Objective: Previous research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Koreans has primarily focused on genetic diversity because of its high heritability. However, the emerging recognition of transgenerational epigenetic changes has recently shifted research attention towards epigenetic perspectives. Methods: This study investigated the DNA methylation patterns of the promoter regions of candidate genes such asNR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in blood samples from ASD probands and their unaffected siblings. The analysis included 54 families (ASD proband group: 54; unaffected biological sibling group: 63). The diagnostic process involved screening the probands and their siblings for ASD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition.Intelligence, social ability, and medical history were thoroughly assessed using various scales and questionnaires.Genomic DNA from blood samples was analyzed using a methylation-sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction to examine the DNA methylation status of candidate genes. Results: Methylation levels in candidate gene promoter regions differed significantly between the proband and sibling groups for all candidate genes. Correlation analysis between the proband and sibling groups revealed strong and significant correlations in NR3C1 and ASCL1 methylation. Additionally, in the analysis of the relationship between DNA and ASD phenotypes, FOXO3 methylation correlated with social quotient in probands, and ASCL1 methylation was associated with nonverbal communication, and daily living skills as measured by the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Notably, ASCL1 methylation was significantly associated with parental age at pregnancy. Conclusion This study proposes DNA methylation of NR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in peripheral blood samples is a potential epigenetic biomarker of ASD.

Objective: Previous research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Koreans has primarily focused on genetic diversity because of its high heritability. However, the emerging recognition of transgenerational epigenetic changes has recently shifted research attention towards epigenetic perspectives. Methods: This study investigated the DNA methylation patterns of the promoter regions of candidate genes such asNR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in blood samples from ASD probands and their unaffected siblings. The analysis included 54 families (ASD proband group: 54; unaffected biological sibling group: 63). The diagnostic process involved screening the probands and their siblings for ASD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition.Intelligence, social ability, and medical history were thoroughly assessed using various scales and questionnaires.Genomic DNA from blood samples was analyzed using a methylation-sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction to examine the DNA methylation status of candidate genes. Results: Methylation levels in candidate gene promoter regions differed significantly between the proband and sibling groups for all candidate genes. Correlation analysis between the proband and sibling groups revealed strong and significant correlations in NR3C1 and ASCL1 methylation. Additionally, in the analysis of the relationship between DNA and ASD phenotypes, FOXO3 methylation correlated with social quotient in probands, and ASCL1 methylation was associated with nonverbal communication, and daily living skills as measured by the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Notably, ASCL1 methylation was significantly associated with parental age at pregnancy. Conclusion This study proposes DNA methylation of NR3C1, ASCL1, and FOXO3 in peripheral blood samples is a potential epigenetic biomarker of ASD.

Purpose: The rate of interval colorectal cancer (iCRC) is now accepted as a key performance indicator of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We aimed to examine the association between endoscopist volumes and the rate of iCRC among individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within a nationwide population-based CRC screening program. Materials and Methods: Individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent colonoscopy after a positive FIT from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2020 in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) were enrolled. We converted the data into per-endoscopist screening results, calculated the iCRC rates per endoscopist, and compared them to the previous year’s annual volume that was divided into five groups (V1, 1-9; V2, 10-29; V3, 30-59; V4, 60-119; V5, ≥ 120). Results: A total of 10,412 endoscopists performed 216,907 colonoscopies. Overall, the average rate of iCRC per endoscopist was 8.46 per 1,000 examinations. Compared with the group with the highest volume (V5 group), the rate of iCRC was 2.21 times higher in the V1 group. Similar trends were observed in the other groups (V2: relative risks [RR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57 to 2.94; V3: RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.13; V4: RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.67). Conclusion The findings emphasize that endoscopists with lower procedure volumes have higher risks of interval cancer being missed or undetected. To maximize the preventative impact of colonoscopy for CRC, this issue should be addressed by monitoring endoscopist volumes and variations in performances.