Background: A healthcare system’s collapse due to a pandemic, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can expose healthcare workers (HCWs) to various mental health problems. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the depression and anxiety of HCWs. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire-based survey was conducted on HCWs who worked in healthcare facilities and public health centers in Korea in December 2020. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were used to measure depression and anxiety. To investigate factors associated with depression and anxiety, stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: A total of 1,425 participating HCWs were included. The mean depression score (PHQ-9) of HCWs before and after COVID-19 increased from 2.37 to 5.39, and the mean anxiety score (GAD-7) increased from 1.41 to 3.41. The proportion of HCWs with moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) increased from 3.8% before COVID-19 to 19.5% after COVID-19, whereas that of HCWs with moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 10) increased from 2.0% to 10.1%. In our study, insomnia, chronic fatigue symptoms and physical symptoms after COVID-19, anxiety score (GAD-7) after COVID-19, living alone, and exhaustion were positively correlated with depression. Furthermore, post-traumatic stress symptoms, stress score (Global Assessment of Recent Stress), depression score (PHQ-9) after COVID-19, and exhaustion were positively correlated with anxiety. Conclusion In Korea, during the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs commonly suffered from mental health problems, including depression and anxiety. Regularly checking the physical and mental health problems of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial, and social support and strategy are needed to reduce the heavy workload and psychological distress of HCWs.

Automated blood culture systems are widely used in clinical microbiology laboratories to minimize the workload of laboratory personnel and permit fast turnaround times. However, sometimes false positive signals occur due to leukocytosis, presence of fastidious bacteria, or unexplained causes. We experienced false positive signal in a patient with hyperleukocytosis for the first time since the automated blood culture system was introduced in our hospital over 20 years ago. We present two case reports with literature review and describe the procedure for dealing with false-positive cases in our hospital.

Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a serious pathogen causing various infections in humans. We evaluated the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae causing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)13 in Korea and investigated the epidemiological characteristics of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. Methods: S. pneumoniae isolates causing IPD were collected from 16 hospitals in Korea between 2017 and 2019. Serotyping was performed using modified sequential multiplex PCR and the Quellung reaction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the broth microdilution method. Multilocus sequence typing was performed on MDR isolates for epidemiological investigations. Results: Among the 411 S. pneumoniae isolates analyzed, the most prevalent serotype was 3 (12.2%), followed by 10A (9.5%), 34 (7.3%), 19A (6.8%), 23A (6.3%), 22F (6.1%), 35B (5.8%), 11A (5.1%), and others (40.9%). The coverage rates of PCV7, PCV10, PCV13, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV)23 were 7.8%, 7.8%, 28.7%, and 59.4%, respectively. Resistance rates to penicillin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, and levofloxacin were 13.1%, 9.2%, 80.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. MDR isolates accounted for 23.4% of all isolates. Serotypes 23A, 11A, 19A, and 15B accounted for the highest proportions of total isolates at 18.8%, 16.7%, 14.6%, and 8.3%, respectively. Sequence type (ST)166 (43.8%) and ST320 (12.5%) were common among MDR isolates. Conclusions Non-PCV13 serotypes are increasing among invasive S. pneumoniae strains causing IPD. Differences in antimicrobial resistance were found according to the specific serotype. Continuous monitoring of serotypes and antimicrobial resistance is necessary for the appropriate management of S. pneumoniae infections.

While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is ongoing, monkeypox has been rapidly spreading in non-endemic countries since May 2022. Accurate and rapid laboratory tests are essential for identifying and controlling monkeypox. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have proposed guidelines for diagnosing monkeypox in clinical laboratories in Korea. These guidelines cover the type of tests, selection of specimens, collection of specimens, diagnostic methods, interpretation of test results, and biosafety. Molecular tests are recommended as confirmatory tests. Skin lesion specimens are recommended for testing in the symptomatic stage, and the collection of both blood and oropharyngeal swabs is recommended in the presymptomatic or prodromal stage.

Plasma exchange performed with the aid of acid-citrate-dextrose formula A (ACD-A) is generally regarded as safe. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH) can serve as an anticoagulant for patients experiencing serious side effects such as anaphylaxis. No guidelines have currently been defined for the stand-alone UFH dosing during plasma exchange. We describe here two patients who developed anaphylaxis to ACD-A during plasma exchange, and we successfully used UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. The first patient was a 55-year-old man who required plasma exchange before ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. During plasma exchange, he developed an allergic reaction. Thereafter, UFH was used as a standalone anticoagulant during four sessions of plasma exchange; the UFH (5,000 units) was added to a 500 mL normal saline bag and the UFH:whole blood ratio was maintained at 1:28. The second patient was an 80-year-old woman with steroid pulse-resistant neuromyelitis optica. She developed an allergic reaction during the first session of plasma exchange. The patient subsequently underwent five successful sessions of plasma exchange using UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. These findings may be useful when establishing a protocol for UFH as a standalone anticoagulant during plasma exchange in patients who develop an allergic reaction to citrate.

Background: Detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is important during the selection of an appropriate donor prior to organ transplantation and also for monitoring the patients after transplantation. In this study, we compared antibodies detected via C3d assays, which monitors C3d complement-binding activities of HLA antibodies with those detected via single antigen bead (SAB) assays. Methods: A total of 66 serum samples were tested in parallel by SAB assays (Immucor Transplant Diagnostics, USA) and C3d assays (Immucor) for the detection of HLA class II antibodies. The relationship between these two methods was analyzed based on the types, numbers, median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values, and positivity of the antibodies using MATCH IT! Antibody (Immucor) program. Results: The number of antibodies obtained based on SAB and C3d assays was the highest with 24 samples (36.4%) in the 11–20 range and 23 (34.8%) in the 2–5 range detected via each assay. Among the SAB-positive antibodies, only 28 (6.4%) of the 440 antibodies with MFI ≤3,000 were C3d-positive, and 341 (61.3%) of the 556 antibodies with MFI ≥3,001 were C3d-positive. Whereas, among the 442 C3d-positive antibodies, SAB assays were positive except for 32 (7.2%) and 41 (9.3%) antibodies in the sections of MFI ≤500 and 1,001 ≤MFI ≤10,000, respectively. C3d-positive samples had higher maximum MFI values based on SAB assays, compared with C3d-negative samples. Conclusions MFI values of HLA class II antibodies detected through SAB assays in C3d-positive samples were higher than those in C3d-negative samples.

Background: Detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is important during the selection of an appropriate donor prior to organ transplantation and also for monitoring the patients after transplantation. In this study, we compared antibodies detected via C3d assays, which monitors C3d complement-binding activities of HLA antibodies with those detected via single antigen bead (SAB) assays. Methods: A total of 66 serum samples were tested in parallel by SAB assays (Immucor Transplant Diagnostics, USA) and C3d assays (Immucor) for the detection of HLA class II antibodies. The relationship between these two methods was analyzed based on the types, numbers, median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values, and positivity of the antibodies using MATCH IT! Antibody (Immucor) program. Results: The number of antibodies obtained based on SAB and C3d assays was the highest with 24 samples (36.4%) in the 11–20 range and 23 (34.8%) in the 2–5 range detected via each assay. Among the SAB-positive antibodies, only 28 (6.4%) of the 440 antibodies with MFI ≤3,000 were C3d-positive, and 341 (61.3%) of the 556 antibodies with MFI ≥3,001 were C3d-positive. Whereas, among the 442 C3d-positive antibodies, SAB assays were positive except for 32 (7.2%) and 41 (9.3%) antibodies in the sections of MFI ≤500 and 1,001 ≤MFI ≤10,000, respectively. C3d-positive samples had higher maximum MFI values based on SAB assays, compared with C3d-negative samples. Conclusions MFI values of HLA class II antibodies detected through SAB assays in C3d-positive samples were higher than those in C3d-negative samples.

The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea was reported in January 2020.As the secondary transmissions accelerated within the country, the government revised the outbreak alert for COVID-19 from attention to caution. Mid-February, when a massive outbreak was reported from a church in Daegu, our institution initiated testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). More than 300 laboratory tests were performed within the first 2 months, before the number of cases began to decline. Here, we describe our experience of 4 months at the department of Laboratory Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, located in Daegu, where a massive COVID-19 outbreak occurred.