1.Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nonobese and Lean Individuals
Yonsei Medical Journal 2025;66(5):269-276
Purpose:
The impact of vitamin D deficiency on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk in individuals without obesity or insulin resistance has not been thoroughly evaluated. We aimed to identify whether low serum levels of 25(OH)D independently contribute to NAFLD risk in nonobese or lean individuals.
Materials and Methods:
This study analyzed 241208 asymptomatic health check-up examinees who had abdominal ultrasonography. NAFLD risk was evaluated based on obesity status and serum 25(OH)D levels.
Results:
The overall NAFLD prevalence was 25.5%. Among the 178630 nonobese and 126909 lean participants, the prevalence rates were 13.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the prevalence of NAFLD, comparing serum 25(OH)D levels of 10–19 and ≥20 ng/mL with <10 ng/mL, were 0.96 (0.93–0.99) and 0.80 (0.77–0.83), respectively. Among nonobese participants, the corresponding adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90–0.99) and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. Similar results were observed among lean participants, with those having a 25(OH)D level of ≥20 ng/mL demonstrating a significantly lower odds of NAFLD (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83). Moreover, these results were consistent even among nonobese and lean individuals who showed no signs of insulin resistance.
Conclusion
Insufficient 25(OH)D levels independently increased the risk of NAFLD, suggesting its role in the NAFLD pathogenesis, regardless of obesity or insulin resistance status. Considering the established relationship between vitamin D deficiency and nonobese/lean NAFLD, maintaining adequate 25(OH)D levels may aid in preventing the development of NAFLD, even among nonobese or lean individuals.
2.Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nonobese and Lean Individuals
Yonsei Medical Journal 2025;66(5):269-276
Purpose:
The impact of vitamin D deficiency on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk in individuals without obesity or insulin resistance has not been thoroughly evaluated. We aimed to identify whether low serum levels of 25(OH)D independently contribute to NAFLD risk in nonobese or lean individuals.
Materials and Methods:
This study analyzed 241208 asymptomatic health check-up examinees who had abdominal ultrasonography. NAFLD risk was evaluated based on obesity status and serum 25(OH)D levels.
Results:
The overall NAFLD prevalence was 25.5%. Among the 178630 nonobese and 126909 lean participants, the prevalence rates were 13.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the prevalence of NAFLD, comparing serum 25(OH)D levels of 10–19 and ≥20 ng/mL with <10 ng/mL, were 0.96 (0.93–0.99) and 0.80 (0.77–0.83), respectively. Among nonobese participants, the corresponding adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90–0.99) and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. Similar results were observed among lean participants, with those having a 25(OH)D level of ≥20 ng/mL demonstrating a significantly lower odds of NAFLD (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83). Moreover, these results were consistent even among nonobese and lean individuals who showed no signs of insulin resistance.
Conclusion
Insufficient 25(OH)D levels independently increased the risk of NAFLD, suggesting its role in the NAFLD pathogenesis, regardless of obesity or insulin resistance status. Considering the established relationship between vitamin D deficiency and nonobese/lean NAFLD, maintaining adequate 25(OH)D levels may aid in preventing the development of NAFLD, even among nonobese or lean individuals.
4.Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nonobese and Lean Individuals
Yonsei Medical Journal 2025;66(5):269-276
Purpose:
The impact of vitamin D deficiency on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk in individuals without obesity or insulin resistance has not been thoroughly evaluated. We aimed to identify whether low serum levels of 25(OH)D independently contribute to NAFLD risk in nonobese or lean individuals.
Materials and Methods:
This study analyzed 241208 asymptomatic health check-up examinees who had abdominal ultrasonography. NAFLD risk was evaluated based on obesity status and serum 25(OH)D levels.
Results:
The overall NAFLD prevalence was 25.5%. Among the 178630 nonobese and 126909 lean participants, the prevalence rates were 13.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the prevalence of NAFLD, comparing serum 25(OH)D levels of 10–19 and ≥20 ng/mL with <10 ng/mL, were 0.96 (0.93–0.99) and 0.80 (0.77–0.83), respectively. Among nonobese participants, the corresponding adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90–0.99) and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. Similar results were observed among lean participants, with those having a 25(OH)D level of ≥20 ng/mL demonstrating a significantly lower odds of NAFLD (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83). Moreover, these results were consistent even among nonobese and lean individuals who showed no signs of insulin resistance.
Conclusion
Insufficient 25(OH)D levels independently increased the risk of NAFLD, suggesting its role in the NAFLD pathogenesis, regardless of obesity or insulin resistance status. Considering the established relationship between vitamin D deficiency and nonobese/lean NAFLD, maintaining adequate 25(OH)D levels may aid in preventing the development of NAFLD, even among nonobese or lean individuals.
5.DRG2 levels in prostate cancer cell lines predict response to PARP inhibitor during docetaxel treatment
Jeong Min LEE ; Won Hyeok LEE ; Seung Hyeon CHO ; Jeong Woo PARK ; Hyuk Nam KWON ; Ji Hye KIM ; Sang Hun LEE ; Ji Hyung YOON ; Sungchan PARK ; Seong Cheol KIM
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2025;66(1):56-66
Purpose:
Developmentally regulated GTP-binding protein 2 (DRG2) regulates microtubule dynamics and G2/M arrest during docetaxel treatment. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) acts as an important repair system for DNA damage caused by docetaxel treatment. This study investigated whether DRG2 expression affects response to PARP inhibitors (olaparib) using prostate cancer cell lines PC3, DU145, LNCaP-FGC, and LNCaP-LN3.
Materials and Methods:
The cell viability and DRG2 expression levels were assessed using colorimetric-based cell viability assay and western blot. Cells were transfected with DRG2 siRNA, and pcDNA6/V5-DRG2 was used to overexpress DRG2. Flow cytometry was applied for cell cycle assay and apoptosis analysis using the Annexing V cell death assay.
Results:
The expression of DRG2 was highest in LNCaP-LN3 and lowest in DU145 cells. Expressions of p53 in PC3, DU145, and the two LNCaP cell lines were null-type, high-expression, and medium-expression, respectively. In PC3 (DRG2 high, p53 null) cells, docetaxel increased G2/M arrest without apoptosis; however, subsequent treatment with olaparib promoted apoptosis. In DU145 and LNCaP-FGC (DRG2 low), docetaxel increased sub-G1 but not G2/M arrest and induced apoptosis, whereas olaparib had no additional effect. In LNCaP-LN3 (DRG2 high, p53 wild-type), docetaxel increased sub-G1 and G2/M arrest, furthermore olaparib enhanced cell death. Docetaxel and olaparib combination treatment had a slight effect on DRG2 knockdown PC3, but increased apoptosis in DRG2-overexpressed DU145 cells.
Conclusions
DRG2 and p53 expressions play an important role in prostate cancer cell lines treated with docetaxel, and DRG2 levels can predict the response to PARP inhibitors.
8.Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nonobese and Lean Individuals
Yonsei Medical Journal 2025;66(5):269-276
Purpose:
The impact of vitamin D deficiency on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk in individuals without obesity or insulin resistance has not been thoroughly evaluated. We aimed to identify whether low serum levels of 25(OH)D independently contribute to NAFLD risk in nonobese or lean individuals.
Materials and Methods:
This study analyzed 241208 asymptomatic health check-up examinees who had abdominal ultrasonography. NAFLD risk was evaluated based on obesity status and serum 25(OH)D levels.
Results:
The overall NAFLD prevalence was 25.5%. Among the 178630 nonobese and 126909 lean participants, the prevalence rates were 13.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the prevalence of NAFLD, comparing serum 25(OH)D levels of 10–19 and ≥20 ng/mL with <10 ng/mL, were 0.96 (0.93–0.99) and 0.80 (0.77–0.83), respectively. Among nonobese participants, the corresponding adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90–0.99) and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. Similar results were observed among lean participants, with those having a 25(OH)D level of ≥20 ng/mL demonstrating a significantly lower odds of NAFLD (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83). Moreover, these results were consistent even among nonobese and lean individuals who showed no signs of insulin resistance.
Conclusion
Insufficient 25(OH)D levels independently increased the risk of NAFLD, suggesting its role in the NAFLD pathogenesis, regardless of obesity or insulin resistance status. Considering the established relationship between vitamin D deficiency and nonobese/lean NAFLD, maintaining adequate 25(OH)D levels may aid in preventing the development of NAFLD, even among nonobese or lean individuals.
10.Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nonobese and Lean Individuals
Yonsei Medical Journal 2025;66(5):269-276
Purpose:
The impact of vitamin D deficiency on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk in individuals without obesity or insulin resistance has not been thoroughly evaluated. We aimed to identify whether low serum levels of 25(OH)D independently contribute to NAFLD risk in nonobese or lean individuals.
Materials and Methods:
This study analyzed 241208 asymptomatic health check-up examinees who had abdominal ultrasonography. NAFLD risk was evaluated based on obesity status and serum 25(OH)D levels.
Results:
The overall NAFLD prevalence was 25.5%. Among the 178630 nonobese and 126909 lean participants, the prevalence rates were 13.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for the prevalence of NAFLD, comparing serum 25(OH)D levels of 10–19 and ≥20 ng/mL with <10 ng/mL, were 0.96 (0.93–0.99) and 0.80 (0.77–0.83), respectively. Among nonobese participants, the corresponding adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.90–0.99) and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. Similar results were observed among lean participants, with those having a 25(OH)D level of ≥20 ng/mL demonstrating a significantly lower odds of NAFLD (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83). Moreover, these results were consistent even among nonobese and lean individuals who showed no signs of insulin resistance.
Conclusion
Insufficient 25(OH)D levels independently increased the risk of NAFLD, suggesting its role in the NAFLD pathogenesis, regardless of obesity or insulin resistance status. Considering the established relationship between vitamin D deficiency and nonobese/lean NAFLD, maintaining adequate 25(OH)D levels may aid in preventing the development of NAFLD, even among nonobese or lean individuals.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail