1.A New Agenda for Optimizing Roles and Infrastructure in a Mental Health Service Model for South Korea
Eunsoo KIM ; Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yu-Ri LEE ; In Suk LEE ; Kyoung-Sae NA ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Hwoyeon SEO ; Soo Bong JUNG ; Sung Joon CHO ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):26-39
Objective:
As the demand for community mental health services continues to grow, the need for well-equipped and organized services has become apparent. This study aimed to optimize the roles and infrastructure of mental health services, by establishing, among other initiatives, standardized operating models.
Methods:
The study was conducted in multiple phases from May 12, 2021, to December 29, 2021. Stakeholders within South Korea and metropolitan mental health welfare centers were targeted, but addiction management support centers, including officials, patients, and their families, were integrated as well. A literature review and survey, focus group interviews, a Delphi survey, and expert consultation contributed to comprehensive revisions and improvements of the mental health service model.
Results:
The proposed model for community mental health welfare centers emphasizes the expansion of personnel and infrastructure, with a focus on severe mental illnesses and suicide prevention. The model for metropolitan mental health welfare centers delineates essential tasks in areas such as project planning and establishment, community research, and education about severe mental illnesses. The establishment of a 24-hour emergency intervention center was a crucial feature. In the integrated addiction support center model, the need to promote addiction management is defined as an essential task and the establishment of national governance for addiction policies is recommended.
Conclusion
This study proposed standard operating models for three types of mental health service centers. To meet the increasing need for community care, robust mental health service delivery systems are of primary importance.
2.A New Agenda for Optimizing Roles and Infrastructure in a Mental Health Service Model for South Korea
Eunsoo KIM ; Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yu-Ri LEE ; In Suk LEE ; Kyoung-Sae NA ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Hwoyeon SEO ; Soo Bong JUNG ; Sung Joon CHO ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):26-39
Objective:
As the demand for community mental health services continues to grow, the need for well-equipped and organized services has become apparent. This study aimed to optimize the roles and infrastructure of mental health services, by establishing, among other initiatives, standardized operating models.
Methods:
The study was conducted in multiple phases from May 12, 2021, to December 29, 2021. Stakeholders within South Korea and metropolitan mental health welfare centers were targeted, but addiction management support centers, including officials, patients, and their families, were integrated as well. A literature review and survey, focus group interviews, a Delphi survey, and expert consultation contributed to comprehensive revisions and improvements of the mental health service model.
Results:
The proposed model for community mental health welfare centers emphasizes the expansion of personnel and infrastructure, with a focus on severe mental illnesses and suicide prevention. The model for metropolitan mental health welfare centers delineates essential tasks in areas such as project planning and establishment, community research, and education about severe mental illnesses. The establishment of a 24-hour emergency intervention center was a crucial feature. In the integrated addiction support center model, the need to promote addiction management is defined as an essential task and the establishment of national governance for addiction policies is recommended.
Conclusion
This study proposed standard operating models for three types of mental health service centers. To meet the increasing need for community care, robust mental health service delivery systems are of primary importance.
3.A New Agenda for Optimizing Roles and Infrastructure in a Mental Health Service Model for South Korea
Eunsoo KIM ; Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yu-Ri LEE ; In Suk LEE ; Kyoung-Sae NA ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Hwoyeon SEO ; Soo Bong JUNG ; Sung Joon CHO ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):26-39
Objective:
As the demand for community mental health services continues to grow, the need for well-equipped and organized services has become apparent. This study aimed to optimize the roles and infrastructure of mental health services, by establishing, among other initiatives, standardized operating models.
Methods:
The study was conducted in multiple phases from May 12, 2021, to December 29, 2021. Stakeholders within South Korea and metropolitan mental health welfare centers were targeted, but addiction management support centers, including officials, patients, and their families, were integrated as well. A literature review and survey, focus group interviews, a Delphi survey, and expert consultation contributed to comprehensive revisions and improvements of the mental health service model.
Results:
The proposed model for community mental health welfare centers emphasizes the expansion of personnel and infrastructure, with a focus on severe mental illnesses and suicide prevention. The model for metropolitan mental health welfare centers delineates essential tasks in areas such as project planning and establishment, community research, and education about severe mental illnesses. The establishment of a 24-hour emergency intervention center was a crucial feature. In the integrated addiction support center model, the need to promote addiction management is defined as an essential task and the establishment of national governance for addiction policies is recommended.
Conclusion
This study proposed standard operating models for three types of mental health service centers. To meet the increasing need for community care, robust mental health service delivery systems are of primary importance.
4.A New Agenda for Optimizing Roles and Infrastructure in a Mental Health Service Model for South Korea
Eunsoo KIM ; Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yu-Ri LEE ; In Suk LEE ; Kyoung-Sae NA ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Hwoyeon SEO ; Soo Bong JUNG ; Sung Joon CHO ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):26-39
Objective:
As the demand for community mental health services continues to grow, the need for well-equipped and organized services has become apparent. This study aimed to optimize the roles and infrastructure of mental health services, by establishing, among other initiatives, standardized operating models.
Methods:
The study was conducted in multiple phases from May 12, 2021, to December 29, 2021. Stakeholders within South Korea and metropolitan mental health welfare centers were targeted, but addiction management support centers, including officials, patients, and their families, were integrated as well. A literature review and survey, focus group interviews, a Delphi survey, and expert consultation contributed to comprehensive revisions and improvements of the mental health service model.
Results:
The proposed model for community mental health welfare centers emphasizes the expansion of personnel and infrastructure, with a focus on severe mental illnesses and suicide prevention. The model for metropolitan mental health welfare centers delineates essential tasks in areas such as project planning and establishment, community research, and education about severe mental illnesses. The establishment of a 24-hour emergency intervention center was a crucial feature. In the integrated addiction support center model, the need to promote addiction management is defined as an essential task and the establishment of national governance for addiction policies is recommended.
Conclusion
This study proposed standard operating models for three types of mental health service centers. To meet the increasing need for community care, robust mental health service delivery systems are of primary importance.
5.A New Agenda for Optimizing Roles and Infrastructure in a Mental Health Service Model for South Korea
Eunsoo KIM ; Hyeon-Ah LEE ; Yu-Ri LEE ; In Suk LEE ; Kyoung-Sae NA ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Chul-Hyun CHO ; Hwoyeon SEO ; Soo Bong JUNG ; Sung Joon CHO ; Hwa-Young LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(1):26-39
Objective:
As the demand for community mental health services continues to grow, the need for well-equipped and organized services has become apparent. This study aimed to optimize the roles and infrastructure of mental health services, by establishing, among other initiatives, standardized operating models.
Methods:
The study was conducted in multiple phases from May 12, 2021, to December 29, 2021. Stakeholders within South Korea and metropolitan mental health welfare centers were targeted, but addiction management support centers, including officials, patients, and their families, were integrated as well. A literature review and survey, focus group interviews, a Delphi survey, and expert consultation contributed to comprehensive revisions and improvements of the mental health service model.
Results:
The proposed model for community mental health welfare centers emphasizes the expansion of personnel and infrastructure, with a focus on severe mental illnesses and suicide prevention. The model for metropolitan mental health welfare centers delineates essential tasks in areas such as project planning and establishment, community research, and education about severe mental illnesses. The establishment of a 24-hour emergency intervention center was a crucial feature. In the integrated addiction support center model, the need to promote addiction management is defined as an essential task and the establishment of national governance for addiction policies is recommended.
Conclusion
This study proposed standard operating models for three types of mental health service centers. To meet the increasing need for community care, robust mental health service delivery systems are of primary importance.
6.Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Current Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment
Hirut Yadeta TURE ; Nan Young LEE ; Na Ri KIM ; Eon Jeong NAM
Vascular Specialist International 2024;40(3):26-
Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a condition characterized by episodic, excessive vasoconstriction in the fingers and toes, triggered by cold or stress. This leads to a distinctive sequence of color changes in the digits. Pallor indicates reduced blood flow due to oxygen deprivation, while erythema appears as reperfusion. RP can be primary, with no identifiable underlying cause, or secondary, associated with other conditions. These conditions include autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic sclerosis, vascular diseases; and neurological conditions. While the exact cause of RP remains unclear, genetic and hormonal (estrogen) factors are likely contributors. The pathogenesis of RP involves a complex interaction between the vascular wall, nerves, hormones, and humoral factors, disrupting the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation. In primary RP, the vascular abnormalities are primarily functional. However, in secondary RP, both functional and structural components occur in blood vessels. This explains why digital tissue damage frequently occurs in secondary RP but not primary RP. Diagnosis of RP is primarily clinical. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have aided in diagnosis and monitoring, but nail fold capillaroscopy remains the gold standard for distinguishing between primary and secondary RP. If there are signs of acute ischemic injury, vascular imaging, particularly preoperatively, is crucial to rule out other vasoocclusive conditions. Management of RP focuses on alleviating symptoms and preventing tissue damage. Vasodilator medications are the first-line treatment when general measures like warmth and stress management are not sufficient. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as nifedipine, are commonly used for vasodilation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs are alternative options for patients who do not respond to CCBs or have ischemic tissue damage. Bosentan, an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, has shown effectiveness in treating and preventing digital ulcers, especially in patients with multiple ulcers. For severe cases, botulinum toxin injections or sympathectomy surgery can be used to control RP symptoms. However, botulinum toxin injections require repeated administration, and sympathectomy’s long-term effectiveness is uncertain.Fat grafting is a promising surgical therapy for promoting healing and preventing tissue injury.
7.Lecanemab: Appropriate Use Recommendations by Korean Dementia Association
Kee Hyung PARK ; Geon Ha KIM ; Chi-Hun KIM ; Seong-Ho KOH ; So Young MOON ; Young Ho PARK ; Sang Won SEO ; Bora YOON ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Byeong C. KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Hae Ri NA ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Chan-Nyoung LEE ; Hak Young RHEE ; San JUNG ; Jee Hyang JEONG ; Hojin CHOI ; Dong Won YANG ; Seong Hye CHOI
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2024;23(4):165-187
Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.
8.Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Current Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment
Hirut Yadeta TURE ; Nan Young LEE ; Na Ri KIM ; Eon Jeong NAM
Vascular Specialist International 2024;40(3):26-
Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a condition characterized by episodic, excessive vasoconstriction in the fingers and toes, triggered by cold or stress. This leads to a distinctive sequence of color changes in the digits. Pallor indicates reduced blood flow due to oxygen deprivation, while erythema appears as reperfusion. RP can be primary, with no identifiable underlying cause, or secondary, associated with other conditions. These conditions include autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic sclerosis, vascular diseases; and neurological conditions. While the exact cause of RP remains unclear, genetic and hormonal (estrogen) factors are likely contributors. The pathogenesis of RP involves a complex interaction between the vascular wall, nerves, hormones, and humoral factors, disrupting the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation. In primary RP, the vascular abnormalities are primarily functional. However, in secondary RP, both functional and structural components occur in blood vessels. This explains why digital tissue damage frequently occurs in secondary RP but not primary RP. Diagnosis of RP is primarily clinical. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have aided in diagnosis and monitoring, but nail fold capillaroscopy remains the gold standard for distinguishing between primary and secondary RP. If there are signs of acute ischemic injury, vascular imaging, particularly preoperatively, is crucial to rule out other vasoocclusive conditions. Management of RP focuses on alleviating symptoms and preventing tissue damage. Vasodilator medications are the first-line treatment when general measures like warmth and stress management are not sufficient. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as nifedipine, are commonly used for vasodilation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs are alternative options for patients who do not respond to CCBs or have ischemic tissue damage. Bosentan, an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, has shown effectiveness in treating and preventing digital ulcers, especially in patients with multiple ulcers. For severe cases, botulinum toxin injections or sympathectomy surgery can be used to control RP symptoms. However, botulinum toxin injections require repeated administration, and sympathectomy’s long-term effectiveness is uncertain.Fat grafting is a promising surgical therapy for promoting healing and preventing tissue injury.
9.Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Current Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment
Hirut Yadeta TURE ; Nan Young LEE ; Na Ri KIM ; Eon Jeong NAM
Vascular Specialist International 2024;40(3):26-
Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a condition characterized by episodic, excessive vasoconstriction in the fingers and toes, triggered by cold or stress. This leads to a distinctive sequence of color changes in the digits. Pallor indicates reduced blood flow due to oxygen deprivation, while erythema appears as reperfusion. RP can be primary, with no identifiable underlying cause, or secondary, associated with other conditions. These conditions include autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic sclerosis, vascular diseases; and neurological conditions. While the exact cause of RP remains unclear, genetic and hormonal (estrogen) factors are likely contributors. The pathogenesis of RP involves a complex interaction between the vascular wall, nerves, hormones, and humoral factors, disrupting the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation. In primary RP, the vascular abnormalities are primarily functional. However, in secondary RP, both functional and structural components occur in blood vessels. This explains why digital tissue damage frequently occurs in secondary RP but not primary RP. Diagnosis of RP is primarily clinical. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have aided in diagnosis and monitoring, but nail fold capillaroscopy remains the gold standard for distinguishing between primary and secondary RP. If there are signs of acute ischemic injury, vascular imaging, particularly preoperatively, is crucial to rule out other vasoocclusive conditions. Management of RP focuses on alleviating symptoms and preventing tissue damage. Vasodilator medications are the first-line treatment when general measures like warmth and stress management are not sufficient. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as nifedipine, are commonly used for vasodilation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs are alternative options for patients who do not respond to CCBs or have ischemic tissue damage. Bosentan, an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, has shown effectiveness in treating and preventing digital ulcers, especially in patients with multiple ulcers. For severe cases, botulinum toxin injections or sympathectomy surgery can be used to control RP symptoms. However, botulinum toxin injections require repeated administration, and sympathectomy’s long-term effectiveness is uncertain.Fat grafting is a promising surgical therapy for promoting healing and preventing tissue injury.
10.Lecanemab: Appropriate Use Recommendations by Korean Dementia Association
Kee Hyung PARK ; Geon Ha KIM ; Chi-Hun KIM ; Seong-Ho KOH ; So Young MOON ; Young Ho PARK ; Sang Won SEO ; Bora YOON ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Byeong C. KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Hae Ri NA ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Chan-Nyoung LEE ; Hak Young RHEE ; San JUNG ; Jee Hyang JEONG ; Hojin CHOI ; Dong Won YANG ; Seong Hye CHOI
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2024;23(4):165-187
Lecanemab (product name Leqembi ® ) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The Korean Dementia Association has created recommendations for the appropriate use of lecanemab to assist clinicians. These recommendations include selecting patients for administration, necessary pre-administration tests and preparations,administration methods, monitoring for amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and communication with patients and caregivers. Lecanemab is recommended for patients with MCI or mild dementia who confirmed positive amyloid biomarkers, and should not be administered to patients with severe hypersensitivity to lecanemab or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. To predict the risk of ARIA before administration, apolipoprotein E genotyping is conducted, and regular brain MRI evaluations are recommended to monitor for ARIA during treatment. The most common adverse reactions are infusion-related reactions, which require appropriate management upon occurrence. Additional caution is needed when co-administering with anticoagulants or tissue plasminogen activator due to the risk of macrohemorrhage. Clinicians should consider the efficacy and necessary conditions for administration, as well as the safety of lecanemab, to make a comprehensive decision regarding its use.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail