Objectives: This study explored the stigma and mental health challenges that vulnerable populations faced during COVID-19 using in-depth interviews with 32 participants. Methods: A generic qualitative methodology was employed, with data collected via face-to-face and Zoom interviews conducted from March to August 2021. Results: Two major themes emerged: the nature of stigmatization and mental health impacts.The participants reported increased exposure to personal information, worsening institutional stigmatization, and routine social exclusion, leading to internalized stigma. They experienced extreme fear, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, suicidal thoughts, and declining physical health. Conclusion The results underscore the necessity of a comprehensive mental health support system that integrates psychological interventions, stigma prevention education, anti-stigma initiatives, and customized policies. Future research should investigate the prolonged impact of pandemic-induced stigma and devise effective strategies for support and intervention.

Objectives: This study explored the stigma and mental health challenges that vulnerable populations faced during COVID-19 using in-depth interviews with 32 participants. Methods: A generic qualitative methodology was employed, with data collected via face-to-face and Zoom interviews conducted from March to August 2021. Results: Two major themes emerged: the nature of stigmatization and mental health impacts.The participants reported increased exposure to personal information, worsening institutional stigmatization, and routine social exclusion, leading to internalized stigma. They experienced extreme fear, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, suicidal thoughts, and declining physical health. Conclusion The results underscore the necessity of a comprehensive mental health support system that integrates psychological interventions, stigma prevention education, anti-stigma initiatives, and customized policies. Future research should investigate the prolonged impact of pandemic-induced stigma and devise effective strategies for support and intervention.

Objectives: This study explored the stigma and mental health challenges that vulnerable populations faced during COVID-19 using in-depth interviews with 32 participants. Methods: A generic qualitative methodology was employed, with data collected via face-to-face and Zoom interviews conducted from March to August 2021. Results: Two major themes emerged: the nature of stigmatization and mental health impacts.The participants reported increased exposure to personal information, worsening institutional stigmatization, and routine social exclusion, leading to internalized stigma. They experienced extreme fear, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, suicidal thoughts, and declining physical health. Conclusion The results underscore the necessity of a comprehensive mental health support system that integrates psychological interventions, stigma prevention education, anti-stigma initiatives, and customized policies. Future research should investigate the prolonged impact of pandemic-induced stigma and devise effective strategies for support and intervention.

Objectives: This study explored the stigma and mental health challenges that vulnerable populations faced during COVID-19 using in-depth interviews with 32 participants. Methods: A generic qualitative methodology was employed, with data collected via face-to-face and Zoom interviews conducted from March to August 2021. Results: Two major themes emerged: the nature of stigmatization and mental health impacts.The participants reported increased exposure to personal information, worsening institutional stigmatization, and routine social exclusion, leading to internalized stigma. They experienced extreme fear, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, suicidal thoughts, and declining physical health. Conclusion The results underscore the necessity of a comprehensive mental health support system that integrates psychological interventions, stigma prevention education, anti-stigma initiatives, and customized policies. Future research should investigate the prolonged impact of pandemic-induced stigma and devise effective strategies for support and intervention.

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalization. We present the current diagnostic and therapeutic status of AP as revealed by analysis of a large multicenter dataset. Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with AP between 2018 and 2019 in 12 tertiary medical centers in Korea were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In total, 676 patients were included, of whom 388 (57.4%) were male, and the mean age of all patients was 58.6 years. There were 355 (52.5%), 301 (44.5%), and 20 (3.0%) patients with mild, moderate, and severe AP, respectively, as assessed by the revised Atlanta classification. The most common etiologies of AP were biliary issues (41.6%) and alcohol consumption (24.6%), followed by hypertriglyceridemia (6.8%). The etiology was not identified in 111 (16.4%) patients at the time of initial admission. The overall mortality rate was 3.3%, increasing up to 45.0% among patients with severe AP. Notably, 70.0% (14/20) of patients with severe AP and 81.5% (154/189) of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome had received <4 L per day during the initial 24 hours of admission. Only 23.8% (67/281) of acute biliary pancreatitis patients underwent cholecystectomy during their initial admission. In total, 17.8% of patients experienced recurrent attacks during follow-up. However, none of the patients with acute biliary pancreatitis experienced recurrent attacks if they had undergone cholecystectomy during their initial admission. Conclusions This study provides insights into the current status of AP in Korea, including its etiology, severity, and management. Results reveal disparities between clinical guidelines and their practical implementation for AP treatment.

Objective: The Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease–Cognition (SCOPA-Cog) was developed to assess cognition in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the SCOPACog (K-SCOPA-Cog). Methods: We enrolled 129 PD patients with movement disorders from 31 clinics in South Korea. The original version of the SCOPA-Cog was translated into Korean using the translation-retranslation method. The test–retest method with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used to assess reliability. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Korean version (MOCA-K) and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) were used to assess concurrent validity. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.797, and the ICC was 0.887. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation with the K-MMSE and MOCA-K scores (r = 0.546 and r = 0.683, respectively). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the K-SCOPA-Cog has good reliability and validity.

The diagnosis of common bile duct (CBD) stones is conducted through various imaging tests, endoscopic examinations, and the patient's clinical presentation. In patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, initial tests such as liver function tests, abdominal ultrasound, and abdominal computed tomography can be performed. Based on the results of these initial tests, symptomatic patient with cholelithiasis can be classified into low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk groups. Low risk of choledocholithiasis is characterized by normal liver function test results and absence of CBD dilation on abdominal ultrasound. For patients in this category, additional tests are not necessary unless symptoms indicating CBD stones persist. Intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis is identified by abnormal liver function test results or CBD dilation on abdominal ultrasound. Additional tests such as endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography can be performed. If CBD stones are confirmed in the additional tests, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is required. High risk of choledocholithiasis is diagnosed when there is clinical evidence of cholangitis or CBD stones are identified on imaging tests. In such cases, ERCP is recommended for both diagnosis and treatment purposes without the need for further additional tests.