1.Post-living donor liver transplant biliary strictures: prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes in a retrospective study
Shekhar Singh JADAUN ; Phani Kumar NEKARAKANTI ; Sushant BHATIA ; Mukesh KUMAR ; Pankaj SINGH ; Vikas SINGLA ; Shweta A. SINGH ; Shaleen AGARWAL ; Sanjiv SAIGAL ; Subhash GUPTA
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):55-65
Background:
Post-liver transplant biliary strictures are a common cause of morbidity among patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Limited data are available concerning the response rates to various treatment modalities and the long-term outcomes for these individuals.
Methods:
This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2022.
Results:
Between 2006 and 2022, a total of 3,550 patients underwent liver transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,956 patients were included in the analysis.During the study period, 344 patients (11.6%) developed biliary strictures. Of these, 77.0% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the primary treatment for biliary strictures, while the remainder received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Identified risk factors for post-liver transplant biliary strictures included the presence of multiple biliary anastomoses, bile leak, and older donor and recipient ages. The overall graft and patient survival rates were comparable between patients with and without biliary strictures, at both 1 year (93.0% vs. 96.3%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 79.2%).
Conclusions
Biliary strictures are observed in approximately 11% of recipients following LDLT. While the presence of biliary strictures is associated with increased morbidity, it does not significantly impact patient survival.
2.Post-living donor liver transplant biliary strictures: prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes in a retrospective study
Shekhar Singh JADAUN ; Phani Kumar NEKARAKANTI ; Sushant BHATIA ; Mukesh KUMAR ; Pankaj SINGH ; Vikas SINGLA ; Shweta A. SINGH ; Shaleen AGARWAL ; Sanjiv SAIGAL ; Subhash GUPTA
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):55-65
Background:
Post-liver transplant biliary strictures are a common cause of morbidity among patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Limited data are available concerning the response rates to various treatment modalities and the long-term outcomes for these individuals.
Methods:
This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2022.
Results:
Between 2006 and 2022, a total of 3,550 patients underwent liver transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,956 patients were included in the analysis.During the study period, 344 patients (11.6%) developed biliary strictures. Of these, 77.0% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the primary treatment for biliary strictures, while the remainder received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Identified risk factors for post-liver transplant biliary strictures included the presence of multiple biliary anastomoses, bile leak, and older donor and recipient ages. The overall graft and patient survival rates were comparable between patients with and without biliary strictures, at both 1 year (93.0% vs. 96.3%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 79.2%).
Conclusions
Biliary strictures are observed in approximately 11% of recipients following LDLT. While the presence of biliary strictures is associated with increased morbidity, it does not significantly impact patient survival.
3.Post-living donor liver transplant biliary strictures: prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes in a retrospective study
Shekhar Singh JADAUN ; Phani Kumar NEKARAKANTI ; Sushant BHATIA ; Mukesh KUMAR ; Pankaj SINGH ; Vikas SINGLA ; Shweta A. SINGH ; Shaleen AGARWAL ; Sanjiv SAIGAL ; Subhash GUPTA
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):55-65
Background:
Post-liver transplant biliary strictures are a common cause of morbidity among patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Limited data are available concerning the response rates to various treatment modalities and the long-term outcomes for these individuals.
Methods:
This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2022.
Results:
Between 2006 and 2022, a total of 3,550 patients underwent liver transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,956 patients were included in the analysis.During the study period, 344 patients (11.6%) developed biliary strictures. Of these, 77.0% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the primary treatment for biliary strictures, while the remainder received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Identified risk factors for post-liver transplant biliary strictures included the presence of multiple biliary anastomoses, bile leak, and older donor and recipient ages. The overall graft and patient survival rates were comparable between patients with and without biliary strictures, at both 1 year (93.0% vs. 96.3%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 79.2%).
Conclusions
Biliary strictures are observed in approximately 11% of recipients following LDLT. While the presence of biliary strictures is associated with increased morbidity, it does not significantly impact patient survival.
4.Post-living donor liver transplant biliary strictures: prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes in a retrospective study
Shekhar Singh JADAUN ; Phani Kumar NEKARAKANTI ; Sushant BHATIA ; Mukesh KUMAR ; Pankaj SINGH ; Vikas SINGLA ; Shweta A. SINGH ; Shaleen AGARWAL ; Sanjiv SAIGAL ; Subhash GUPTA
Clinical Transplantation and Research 2025;39(1):55-65
Background:
Post-liver transplant biliary strictures are a common cause of morbidity among patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Limited data are available concerning the response rates to various treatment modalities and the long-term outcomes for these individuals.
Methods:
This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2022.
Results:
Between 2006 and 2022, a total of 3,550 patients underwent liver transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,956 patients were included in the analysis.During the study period, 344 patients (11.6%) developed biliary strictures. Of these, 77.0% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the primary treatment for biliary strictures, while the remainder received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Identified risk factors for post-liver transplant biliary strictures included the presence of multiple biliary anastomoses, bile leak, and older donor and recipient ages. The overall graft and patient survival rates were comparable between patients with and without biliary strictures, at both 1 year (93.0% vs. 96.3%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 79.2%).
Conclusions
Biliary strictures are observed in approximately 11% of recipients following LDLT. While the presence of biliary strictures is associated with increased morbidity, it does not significantly impact patient survival.
5.Management of proximal tibial stress fracture associated with advanced knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review
Kumar Mukesh SAINI ; Mahendra SINGH ; Devendra SINGH ; Manohar Prem SEERVI ; Jayavardhan Pera REDDY ; Ramana Neelam REDDY
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2024;27(3):147-152
Purpose::Tibial stress fracture associated with knee osteoarthritis is an unusual and difficult clinical scenario. There is no clear existing treatment guideline for this uncommon clinical disease. The aim of this study is to review the impact of various treatment options for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis associated with proximal tibial stress fracture.Methods::The study was performed using the databases of PubMed and Scopus. Methodological index for non-randomized studies score was used to evaluate the included studies’ bias. The concluded data included the treatment approach, reported outcome measure, and time to fracture union. The literature search was started in December 2021 and accomplished in January 2022. A narrative description of the different methods and comparison of their results were done.Results::Out of total assessed 69 studies, 9 studies were included in our review. The commonest treatment approach used was total knee arthroplasty by long tibial stem extension. The mean preoperative knee society score and knee functional score were 30.62 and 23.17, respectively. The mean postoperative knee society knee score was 86.87, while the functional score was 83.52. The average reported time to achieve fracture union was 4 months (a range of 2.07 - 5.50 months).Conclusion::The optimal clinical outcome for treating either acute or mobile tibial stress fracture in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis can be achieved with long stem total knee arthroplasty. However, due to heterogeneity of data, comparison of different treatment options for chronic proximal tibial stress fracture mal-union/non-union coexisting with knee osteoarthritic and such inferences need to be judged cautiously.
6.Serum albumin is the strongest predictor of anti-tumor necrosis factor nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease in resource-constrained regions lacking therapeutic drug monitoring
Peeyush KUMAR ; Sudheer K. VUYYURU ; Prasenjit DAS ; Bhaskar KANTE ; Mukesh Kumar RANJAN ; David Mathew THOMAS ; Sandeep MUNDHRA ; Pabitra SAHU ; Pratap Mouli VENIGALLA ; Saransh JAIN ; Sandeep GOYAL ; Rithvik GOLLA ; Shubi VIRMANI ; Mukesh K. SINGH ; Karan SACHDEVA ; Raju SHARMA ; Nihar Ranjan DASH ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2023;21(4):460-470
Background/Aims:
Evidence on predictors of primary nonresponse (PNR), and secondary loss of response (SLR) to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in inflammatory bowel disease is scarce from Asia. We evaluated clinical/biochemical/molecular markers of PNR/SLR in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD).
Methods:
Inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with anti-TNF agents (January 2005–October 2020) were ambispectively included. Data concerning clinical and biochemical predictors was retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Immunohistochemistry for expression of oncostatin M (OSM), OSM receptor (OSM-R), and interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R) were done on pre anti-TNF initiation mucosal biopsies.
Results:
One-hundred eighty-six patients (118 CD, 68 UC: mean age, 34.1±13.7 years; median disease duration at anti-TNF initiation, 60 months; interquartile range, 28–100.5 months) were included. PNR was seen in 17% and 26.5% and SLR in 47% and 28% CD and UC patients, respectively. In CD, predictors of PNR were low albumin (P<0.001), postoperative recurrence (P=0.001) and high IL-7R expression (P<0.027) on univariate; and low albumin alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03–0.28; P<0.001) on multivariate analysis respectively. Low albumin (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.62; P=0.001) also predicted SLR. In UC, predictors of PNR were low albumin (P<0.001), and high C-reactive protein (P<0.001), OSM (P<0.04) and OSM-R (P=0.07) stromal expression on univariate; and low albumin alone (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03–0.39; P=0.001) on multivariate analysis respectively.
Conclusions
Low serum albumin at baseline significantly predicted PNR in UC and PNR/SLR in CD patients. Mucosal markers of PNR were high stromal OSM/OSM-R in UC and high IL-7R in CD patients.
7.Interferon-gamma release assay has poor diagnostic accuracy in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease in tuberculosis endemic areas
Karan SACHDEVA ; Peeyush KUMAR ; Bhaskar KANTE ; Sudheer K. VUYYURU ; Srikant MOHTA ; Mukesh K. RANJAN ; Mukesh K. SINGH ; Mahak VERMA ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2023;21(2):226-234
Background/Aims:
Intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and Crohn’s disease (CD) frequently present with a diagnostic dilemma because of similar presentation. Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) has been used in differentiating ITB from CD, but with sparse reports on its diagnostic accuracy in tuberculosis endemic regions and this study evaluated the same.
Methods:
Patients with definitive diagnosis of ITB (n=59) or CD (n=49) who underwent IGRA testing (n=307) were retrospectively included at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (July 2014 to September 2021). CD or ITB was diagnosed as per standard criteria. IGRA was considered positive at >0.35 IU/mL.Relevant data was collected and IGRA results were compared between ITB and CD to determine its accuracy.
Results:
Among 59 ITB patients (mean age, 32.6±13.1 years; median disease duration, 1 year; male, 59.3%), 24 were positive and 35 tested negative for IGRA. Among 49 CD patients (mean age, 37.8±14.0; median disease duration, 4 years; male, 61.2%), 12 were positive and 37 tested negative for IGRA. Hence, for diagnosing ITB, IGRA showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 40.68%, 75.51%, 66.67%, and 51.39%, respectively. The area under the curve of IGRA for ITB diagnosis was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.75). In a subset (n=64), tuberculin skin test (TST) showed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 64.7%, 73.3%, 73.3%, and 64.71%, respectively. IGRA and TST were concordant in 38 (59.4%) patients with κ=0.17.
Conclusions
In a tuberculosis endemic region, IGRA had poor diagnostic accuracy for differentiating ITB from CD, suggesting a limited value of IGRA in this setting.
8.Correlation of fecal calprotectin and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with ulcerative colitis
Nagesh KAMAT ; Sudheer K VUYYURU ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Pabitra SAHU ; Bhaskar KANTE ; Peeyush KUMAR ; Mukesh Kumar RANJAN ; Mukesh Kumar SINGH ; Sambuddha KUMAR ; Vikas SACHDEV ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Vineet AHUJA
Intestinal Research 2022;20(2):269-273
9.Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: an update
Arshdeep SINGH ; Ramit MAHAJAN ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Amit Kumar DUTTA ; Abhinav ANAND ; Charles N. BERNSTEIN ; Devendra DESAI ; C. Ganesh PAI ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Harsh Vardhan TEVETHIA ; Joyce WY MAK ; Kirandeep KAUR ; Kiran PEDDI ; Mukesh Kumar RANJAN ; Perttu ARKKILA ; Rakesh KOCHHAR ; Rupa BANERJEE ; Saroj Kant SINHA ; Siew Chien NG ; Stephen HANAUER ; Suhang VERMA ; Usha DUTTA ; Vandana MIDHA ; Varun MEHTA ; Vineet AHUJA ; Ajit SOOD
Intestinal Research 2022;20(1):11-30
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), once considered a disease of the Western hemisphere, has emerged as a global disease. As the disease prevalence is on a steady rise, management of IBD has come under the spotlight. 5-Aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and biologics are the backbone of treatment of IBD. With the advent of biologics and small molecules, the need for surgery and hospitalization has decreased. However, economic viability and acceptability is an important determinant of local prescription patterns. Nearly one-third of the patients in West receive biologics as the first/initial therapy. The scenario is different in developing countries where biologics are used only in a small proportion of patients with IBD. Increased risk of reactivation of tuberculosis and high cost of the therapy are limitations to their use. Thiopurines hence become critical for optimal management of patients with IBD in these regions. However, approximately one-third of patients are intolerant or develop adverse effects with their use. This has led to suboptimal use of thiopurines in clinical practice. This review article discusses the clinical aspects of thiopurine use in patients with IBD with the aim of optimizing their use to full therapeutic potential.
10.Determining the Neurocognitive Status and the Functional Ability of Patients to Screen for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND)
Ritika AGARWAL ; Ravinder Singh AUJLA ; Amit GUPTA ; Mukesh KUMAR
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2020;19(1):19-27
BACKGROUND:
AND PURPOSE: To adequately evaluate the extent of neurocognitive impairment in patient living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV), a battery of neuropsychological tests is typically administered which are neither cost effective nor time efficient in the outpatient clinical setting. The aim of the study was to assess neurocognitive status and functional ability of people living with HIV and find a brief screening tool to identify those who would benefit from a full diagnostic evaluation.
METHODS:
The study enrolled 160 PLHIV (80 pre-antiretroviral therapy [ART] and 80 on ART) fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Neurocognitive assessment and an assessment of Functional ability was done by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale scale, respectively.
RESULTS:
The study population consisted of 75.6% males and 24.4% females with mean age of 44±10 years. The overall prevalence of HIV associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in the study subjects was 52.5%. Of these, 47.5% had asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment and 5% had minor neurocognitive disorder. In MoCA, the most frequently affected domains were Language (97.6%), visuospatial ability (92.9%) and memory (71.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of HAND in both groups were similar suggesting that neurocognitive impairment starts early in HIV infection. Memory and Visuospatial function impairment had the most predictive potential for detecting the presence of HAND. HAND screening is recommended in all PLHIV at enrolment into care. Simple tools like MoCA can be used in busy outpatient settings by healthcare workers to screen for HAND.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail