1.Tenecteplase Beyond 4.5 Hours in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Mohammad ALADAWI ; Mohammad T. ABUAWWAD ; Mohammad J. J. TAHA ; Yasmeena Abdelall KOZAA ; Warda A. ALRUBASY ; Abdullah HAMAD ; Fatema Ahmad ALHNIDI ; Mohamed ELFIL ; Zaid NAJDAWI ; Xiaohan PENG ; Felicia HATAWAY ; Ekaterina BAKRADZE ; Michael J. LYERLY
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):184-194
Background:
and Purpose Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended within 4.5 hours of last known well (LKW) time, many patients present beyond this window.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating tenecteplase (TNK) administration in AIS patients within 4.5 to 24 hours of LKW. The primary outcomes assessed functional independence and ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days.
Results:
Three RCTs were included, comprising 1,054 patients (532 TNK and 522 standard medical therapy) with a mean age of 69 years, 59% males, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10.5. TNK treatment was associated with mRS 0–2 at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.70, P=0.023), indicating a 33% higher likelihood of achieving functional independence. However, the ordinal mRS shift showed no significant difference (standardized mean difference: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.37–0.39, P=0.09). Safety outcomes indicated no difference in the rates of sICH (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.86–5.00, P=0.1), and no difference in 90-day mortality (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76–1.53, P=0.67).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests TNK might be safe and effective for selected AIS patients in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window, offering improved functional outcomes without a significant increase in hemorrhagic complications.
2.Effectiveness of an Informal Home Care Support Intervention Program to Reduce Loneliness and Improve Quality of Life among Lonely Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study
Ahmad KOUSHA ; Elham LOTFALINEZHAD ; Haidar NADRIAN ; Karen ANDERSEN-RANBERG ; Shannon FREEMAN ; Fatemeh BARATI ; Hasan MOSAZADEH ; Mina HASHEMIPARAST ; Mohamed Asghari JAFARABADI ; Ahmad SOHRABI ; Mohammad Reza HONARVAR
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2025;46(3):185-194
Background:
Establishing cost-effective informal care services for lonely older adults living at home in developing countries can be an innovative approach for improving their well-being. This study investigated the effectiveness of an informal home care support intervention program (HoSIP) reducing the loneliness and improving quality of life of lonely community-dwelling older adults.
Methods:
This quasi-experimental pre-post study employed a non-randomized control group design with a 12-week intervention period and three follow-up points at the end of the HoSIP. Questionnaires were used to measure feelings of loneliness (20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale), quality of life (Control, Autonomy, Self‐Realization and Pleasure Scale), general health (12-item General Health Questionnaire), social network (six-item Lubben Social Network Scale), social support (12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), and self-care ability (17-item Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to gauge the effect of the intervention program over time and in comparison to the control group. Data analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., USA).
Results:
We found a significant relationship between the outcome variables, including feelings of loneliness (P<0.001) and quality of life (P<0.001), at different stages of measurement. Despite the positive feasibility results, the implementation of the HoSIP faced challenges due to a lack of facilities (e.g., place restriction for holding educational classes, educational facilities like computers, video projector, and whiteboard at daycare center) and the absence of supporting organizations.
Conclusion
Utilizing the existing capabilities of older adults to provide online and face-to-face care services can be a cost-effective way to improve their quality of life and reduce loneliness. The process of facilitating such informal care services for lonely older adults should be managed by either governmental or non-governmental organizations to reduce the rate of social isolation among this vulnerable population.
3.Whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 from residual viral RNA present on positive rapid antigen test kits for genomic surveillance
Mohd Ishtiaq Anasir ; Khayri Kamel ; Nor Malizza G Adypatti ; Mohammad Syafiq Jamaluddin ; Farah Amira Ahmad ; Siti Nurhidayah Norhisham ; Muhammad Zulfazli Mohamad Sukri ; Nur Rafiqah Rosli ; Siti Norazrina Saif ; Nurul Izzati Basarudin ; Mohamad Azzam-Sayuti ; Akmal Hayat Abdul Karim ; Mahirah Kamil Puat ; Ravindran Thayan ; Rozainanee Mohd Zain
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2025;16(1):06-11
This report describes an approach to recover SARS-CoV-2 RNA from rapid antigen test kit (RTK-antigen) cassettes for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). RNA samples were recovered from 33 RTK-antigen cassettes for WGS, with 18 samples achieving more than 80% genome coverage. This work provides a proof-of-concept that positive RTK-antigen cassettes can be safely transported, stored and subjected to WGS, enabling swift identification of circulating variants.
4.Effectiveness of an Informal Home Care Support Intervention Program to Reduce Loneliness and Improve Quality of Life among Lonely Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study
Ahmad KOUSHA ; Elham LOTFALINEZHAD ; Haidar NADRIAN ; Karen ANDERSEN-RANBERG ; Shannon FREEMAN ; Fatemeh BARATI ; Hasan MOSAZADEH ; Mina HASHEMIPARAST ; Mohamed Asghari JAFARABADI ; Ahmad SOHRABI ; Mohammad Reza HONARVAR
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2025;46(3):185-194
Background:
Establishing cost-effective informal care services for lonely older adults living at home in developing countries can be an innovative approach for improving their well-being. This study investigated the effectiveness of an informal home care support intervention program (HoSIP) reducing the loneliness and improving quality of life of lonely community-dwelling older adults.
Methods:
This quasi-experimental pre-post study employed a non-randomized control group design with a 12-week intervention period and three follow-up points at the end of the HoSIP. Questionnaires were used to measure feelings of loneliness (20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale), quality of life (Control, Autonomy, Self‐Realization and Pleasure Scale), general health (12-item General Health Questionnaire), social network (six-item Lubben Social Network Scale), social support (12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), and self-care ability (17-item Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to gauge the effect of the intervention program over time and in comparison to the control group. Data analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., USA).
Results:
We found a significant relationship between the outcome variables, including feelings of loneliness (P<0.001) and quality of life (P<0.001), at different stages of measurement. Despite the positive feasibility results, the implementation of the HoSIP faced challenges due to a lack of facilities (e.g., place restriction for holding educational classes, educational facilities like computers, video projector, and whiteboard at daycare center) and the absence of supporting organizations.
Conclusion
Utilizing the existing capabilities of older adults to provide online and face-to-face care services can be a cost-effective way to improve their quality of life and reduce loneliness. The process of facilitating such informal care services for lonely older adults should be managed by either governmental or non-governmental organizations to reduce the rate of social isolation among this vulnerable population.
5.Efficacy of Amitriptyline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Minahil IQBAL ; Sara HIRA ; Humza SAEED ; Sufyan SHAHID ; Suha T BUTT ; Kamran RASHID ; Mohammad AHMAD ; Hammad HUSSAIN ; Anzalna MUGHAL ; Gabriel P A COSTA ; Fernanda GUSHKEN ; Neil NERO ; Shreya SENGUPTA ; Akhil ANAND
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2025;31(1):28-37
Background/Aims:
Amitriptyline is prescribed off-label for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy.
Methods:
A systematic literature review was conducted until November 10, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to study the efficacy of amitriptyline in patients with IBS. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared amitriptyline to placebo. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using R Software 4.2.3 and heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics.
Results:
Seven trials were included with 796 patients (61% female). Amitriptyline was associated with better treatment response (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.47 to 11.39; P < 0.001), reduced Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scores (MD, –50.72; 95% CI, –94.23 to –7.20; P = 0.020) and improved diarrhea (OR, 10.55; 95% CI, 2.90 to 38.41; P < 0.001). No significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the adverse effects was observed. Three trials showed an overall low risk of bias, 2 trials showed an overall high risk of bias due to randomization and missing data, and 2 trials had some concerns regarding missing data.
Conclusions
Amitriptyline was found to be well-tolerated and effective in treating IBS compared to placebo. These findings support the use of amitriptyline for the management of IBS, particularly among patients with the IBS diarrhea subtype. Future research should focus on the dose-dependent effects of amitriptyline in IBS to better guide clinicians in personalized titration regimens.
6.Efficacy of Amitriptyline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Minahil IQBAL ; Sara HIRA ; Humza SAEED ; Sufyan SHAHID ; Suha T BUTT ; Kamran RASHID ; Mohammad AHMAD ; Hammad HUSSAIN ; Anzalna MUGHAL ; Gabriel P A COSTA ; Fernanda GUSHKEN ; Neil NERO ; Shreya SENGUPTA ; Akhil ANAND
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2025;31(1):28-37
Background/Aims:
Amitriptyline is prescribed off-label for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy.
Methods:
A systematic literature review was conducted until November 10, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to study the efficacy of amitriptyline in patients with IBS. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared amitriptyline to placebo. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using R Software 4.2.3 and heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics.
Results:
Seven trials were included with 796 patients (61% female). Amitriptyline was associated with better treatment response (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.47 to 11.39; P < 0.001), reduced Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scores (MD, –50.72; 95% CI, –94.23 to –7.20; P = 0.020) and improved diarrhea (OR, 10.55; 95% CI, 2.90 to 38.41; P < 0.001). No significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the adverse effects was observed. Three trials showed an overall low risk of bias, 2 trials showed an overall high risk of bias due to randomization and missing data, and 2 trials had some concerns regarding missing data.
Conclusions
Amitriptyline was found to be well-tolerated and effective in treating IBS compared to placebo. These findings support the use of amitriptyline for the management of IBS, particularly among patients with the IBS diarrhea subtype. Future research should focus on the dose-dependent effects of amitriptyline in IBS to better guide clinicians in personalized titration regimens.
7.Tenecteplase Beyond 4.5 Hours in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Mohammad ALADAWI ; Mohammad T. ABUAWWAD ; Mohammad J. J. TAHA ; Yasmeena Abdelall KOZAA ; Warda A. ALRUBASY ; Abdullah HAMAD ; Fatema Ahmad ALHNIDI ; Mohamed ELFIL ; Zaid NAJDAWI ; Xiaohan PENG ; Felicia HATAWAY ; Ekaterina BAKRADZE ; Michael J. LYERLY
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):184-194
Background:
and Purpose Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended within 4.5 hours of last known well (LKW) time, many patients present beyond this window.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating tenecteplase (TNK) administration in AIS patients within 4.5 to 24 hours of LKW. The primary outcomes assessed functional independence and ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days.
Results:
Three RCTs were included, comprising 1,054 patients (532 TNK and 522 standard medical therapy) with a mean age of 69 years, 59% males, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10.5. TNK treatment was associated with mRS 0–2 at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.70, P=0.023), indicating a 33% higher likelihood of achieving functional independence. However, the ordinal mRS shift showed no significant difference (standardized mean difference: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.37–0.39, P=0.09). Safety outcomes indicated no difference in the rates of sICH (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.86–5.00, P=0.1), and no difference in 90-day mortality (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76–1.53, P=0.67).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests TNK might be safe and effective for selected AIS patients in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window, offering improved functional outcomes without a significant increase in hemorrhagic complications.
8.Effectiveness of an Informal Home Care Support Intervention Program to Reduce Loneliness and Improve Quality of Life among Lonely Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study
Ahmad KOUSHA ; Elham LOTFALINEZHAD ; Haidar NADRIAN ; Karen ANDERSEN-RANBERG ; Shannon FREEMAN ; Fatemeh BARATI ; Hasan MOSAZADEH ; Mina HASHEMIPARAST ; Mohamed Asghari JAFARABADI ; Ahmad SOHRABI ; Mohammad Reza HONARVAR
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2025;46(3):185-194
Background:
Establishing cost-effective informal care services for lonely older adults living at home in developing countries can be an innovative approach for improving their well-being. This study investigated the effectiveness of an informal home care support intervention program (HoSIP) reducing the loneliness and improving quality of life of lonely community-dwelling older adults.
Methods:
This quasi-experimental pre-post study employed a non-randomized control group design with a 12-week intervention period and three follow-up points at the end of the HoSIP. Questionnaires were used to measure feelings of loneliness (20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale), quality of life (Control, Autonomy, Self‐Realization and Pleasure Scale), general health (12-item General Health Questionnaire), social network (six-item Lubben Social Network Scale), social support (12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), and self-care ability (17-item Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to gauge the effect of the intervention program over time and in comparison to the control group. Data analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., USA).
Results:
We found a significant relationship between the outcome variables, including feelings of loneliness (P<0.001) and quality of life (P<0.001), at different stages of measurement. Despite the positive feasibility results, the implementation of the HoSIP faced challenges due to a lack of facilities (e.g., place restriction for holding educational classes, educational facilities like computers, video projector, and whiteboard at daycare center) and the absence of supporting organizations.
Conclusion
Utilizing the existing capabilities of older adults to provide online and face-to-face care services can be a cost-effective way to improve their quality of life and reduce loneliness. The process of facilitating such informal care services for lonely older adults should be managed by either governmental or non-governmental organizations to reduce the rate of social isolation among this vulnerable population.
9.Efficacy of Amitriptyline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Minahil IQBAL ; Sara HIRA ; Humza SAEED ; Sufyan SHAHID ; Suha T BUTT ; Kamran RASHID ; Mohammad AHMAD ; Hammad HUSSAIN ; Anzalna MUGHAL ; Gabriel P A COSTA ; Fernanda GUSHKEN ; Neil NERO ; Shreya SENGUPTA ; Akhil ANAND
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2025;31(1):28-37
Background/Aims:
Amitriptyline is prescribed off-label for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy.
Methods:
A systematic literature review was conducted until November 10, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to study the efficacy of amitriptyline in patients with IBS. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared amitriptyline to placebo. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using R Software 4.2.3 and heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics.
Results:
Seven trials were included with 796 patients (61% female). Amitriptyline was associated with better treatment response (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.47 to 11.39; P < 0.001), reduced Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scores (MD, –50.72; 95% CI, –94.23 to –7.20; P = 0.020) and improved diarrhea (OR, 10.55; 95% CI, 2.90 to 38.41; P < 0.001). No significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the adverse effects was observed. Three trials showed an overall low risk of bias, 2 trials showed an overall high risk of bias due to randomization and missing data, and 2 trials had some concerns regarding missing data.
Conclusions
Amitriptyline was found to be well-tolerated and effective in treating IBS compared to placebo. These findings support the use of amitriptyline for the management of IBS, particularly among patients with the IBS diarrhea subtype. Future research should focus on the dose-dependent effects of amitriptyline in IBS to better guide clinicians in personalized titration regimens.
10.Tenecteplase Beyond 4.5 Hours in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Mohammad ALADAWI ; Mohammad T. ABUAWWAD ; Mohammad J. J. TAHA ; Yasmeena Abdelall KOZAA ; Warda A. ALRUBASY ; Abdullah HAMAD ; Fatema Ahmad ALHNIDI ; Mohamed ELFIL ; Zaid NAJDAWI ; Xiaohan PENG ; Felicia HATAWAY ; Ekaterina BAKRADZE ; Michael J. LYERLY
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):184-194
Background:
and Purpose Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended within 4.5 hours of last known well (LKW) time, many patients present beyond this window.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating tenecteplase (TNK) administration in AIS patients within 4.5 to 24 hours of LKW. The primary outcomes assessed functional independence and ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days.
Results:
Three RCTs were included, comprising 1,054 patients (532 TNK and 522 standard medical therapy) with a mean age of 69 years, 59% males, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10.5. TNK treatment was associated with mRS 0–2 at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.70, P=0.023), indicating a 33% higher likelihood of achieving functional independence. However, the ordinal mRS shift showed no significant difference (standardized mean difference: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.37–0.39, P=0.09). Safety outcomes indicated no difference in the rates of sICH (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.86–5.00, P=0.1), and no difference in 90-day mortality (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76–1.53, P=0.67).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests TNK might be safe and effective for selected AIS patients in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window, offering improved functional outcomes without a significant increase in hemorrhagic complications.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail