Background/Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with the development of hyperkalemia. We evaluated the relationship between the serum aldosterone-to-potassium ratio (APR) and the risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with stage 3–4 CKD receiving an ACEI or ARB for at least 3 months were evaluated. Serum aldosterone and potassium concentrations were measured simultaneously, and serum APR was calculated (ng/mL per mmol/L). Patients were divided into two groups for comparison according to the median value above or below 2.42. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the development of hyperkalemia (defined as a serum potassium level > 5.5 mmol/L). Incidence rates and risk factors of hyperkalemia were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 144 hyperkalemic events in 81 patients (43.5%) were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 24.6 events/100 person-years. The incidence rate was significantly higher in patients with a low serum APR than in patients with a high APR (35.8 events/100 patient-years vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years, p < 0.001). In addition, diabetes mellitus, history of hyperkalemia, CKD progression during the follow-up period, and low serum APR were predictors of the development of hyperkalemia. Conclusions Low serum APR was associated with the occurrence of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD receiving ACEIs or ARBs, suggesting that the identification of patients administered these drugs who are at high risk for hyperkalemia may be achieved using this index.

Background/Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with the development of hyperkalemia. We evaluated the relationship between the serum aldosterone-to-potassium ratio (APR) and the risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with stage 3–4 CKD receiving an ACEI or ARB for at least 3 months were evaluated. Serum aldosterone and potassium concentrations were measured simultaneously, and serum APR was calculated (ng/mL per mmol/L). Patients were divided into two groups for comparison according to the median value above or below 2.42. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the development of hyperkalemia (defined as a serum potassium level > 5.5 mmol/L). Incidence rates and risk factors of hyperkalemia were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 144 hyperkalemic events in 81 patients (43.5%) were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 24.6 events/100 person-years. The incidence rate was significantly higher in patients with a low serum APR than in patients with a high APR (35.8 events/100 patient-years vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years, p < 0.001). In addition, diabetes mellitus, history of hyperkalemia, CKD progression during the follow-up period, and low serum APR were predictors of the development of hyperkalemia. Conclusions Low serum APR was associated with the occurrence of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD receiving ACEIs or ARBs, suggesting that the identification of patients administered these drugs who are at high risk for hyperkalemia may be achieved using this index.

Background/Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with the development of hyperkalemia. We evaluated the relationship between the serum aldosterone-to-potassium ratio (APR) and the risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with stage 3–4 CKD receiving an ACEI or ARB for at least 3 months were evaluated. Serum aldosterone and potassium concentrations were measured simultaneously, and serum APR was calculated (ng/mL per mmol/L). Patients were divided into two groups for comparison according to the median value above or below 2.42. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the development of hyperkalemia (defined as a serum potassium level > 5.5 mmol/L). Incidence rates and risk factors of hyperkalemia were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 144 hyperkalemic events in 81 patients (43.5%) were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 24.6 events/100 person-years. The incidence rate was significantly higher in patients with a low serum APR than in patients with a high APR (35.8 events/100 patient-years vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years, p < 0.001). In addition, diabetes mellitus, history of hyperkalemia, CKD progression during the follow-up period, and low serum APR were predictors of the development of hyperkalemia. Conclusions Low serum APR was associated with the occurrence of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD receiving ACEIs or ARBs, suggesting that the identification of patients administered these drugs who are at high risk for hyperkalemia may be achieved using this index.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Background/Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with the development of hyperkalemia. We evaluated the relationship between the serum aldosterone-to-potassium ratio (APR) and the risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with stage 3–4 CKD receiving an ACEI or ARB for at least 3 months were evaluated. Serum aldosterone and potassium concentrations were measured simultaneously, and serum APR was calculated (ng/mL per mmol/L). Patients were divided into two groups for comparison according to the median value above or below 2.42. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the development of hyperkalemia (defined as a serum potassium level > 5.5 mmol/L). Incidence rates and risk factors of hyperkalemia were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 144 hyperkalemic events in 81 patients (43.5%) were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 24.6 events/100 person-years. The incidence rate was significantly higher in patients with a low serum APR than in patients with a high APR (35.8 events/100 patient-years vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years, p < 0.001). In addition, diabetes mellitus, history of hyperkalemia, CKD progression during the follow-up period, and low serum APR were predictors of the development of hyperkalemia. Conclusions Low serum APR was associated with the occurrence of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD receiving ACEIs or ARBs, suggesting that the identification of patients administered these drugs who are at high risk for hyperkalemia may be achieved using this index.

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the differences in patency between helical interwoven nitinol stents and balloon angioplasty in patients with arteriovenous graft (AVG) malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent helical interwoven nitinol stent placement (n = 15) or balloon angioplasty (n = 25) between January 2016 and September 2021. The primary and secondary patency rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Dialysis was possible post-intervention in all patients who showed no specific complications, including stent fracture. The average primary patency of the stent placement group was longer than that of the balloon angioplasty group but did not differ significantly (8.5 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.319). The mean secondary patency period was 17.6 months in the stent placement group, which was shorter than that in the balloon angioplasty group (18.8 months); however, this difference was also not statistically significant (p = 0.660). Conclusion Helical interwoven nitinol stents could maintain patency in patients with AVG malfunction caused by venous anastomosis stenosis, but they did not improve patency compared to balloon angioplasty.

Background/Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with the development of hyperkalemia. We evaluated the relationship between the serum aldosterone-to-potassium ratio (APR) and the risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients with stage 3–4 CKD receiving an ACEI or ARB for at least 3 months were evaluated. Serum aldosterone and potassium concentrations were measured simultaneously, and serum APR was calculated (ng/mL per mmol/L). Patients were divided into two groups for comparison according to the median value above or below 2.42. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the development of hyperkalemia (defined as a serum potassium level > 5.5 mmol/L). Incidence rates and risk factors of hyperkalemia were assessed. Results: During the follow-up period, 144 hyperkalemic events in 81 patients (43.5%) were identified, yielding an incidence rate of 24.6 events/100 person-years. The incidence rate was significantly higher in patients with a low serum APR than in patients with a high APR (35.8 events/100 patient-years vs. 12.9 events/100 patient-years, p < 0.001). In addition, diabetes mellitus, history of hyperkalemia, CKD progression during the follow-up period, and low serum APR were predictors of the development of hyperkalemia. Conclusions Low serum APR was associated with the occurrence of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD receiving ACEIs or ARBs, suggesting that the identification of patients administered these drugs who are at high risk for hyperkalemia may be achieved using this index.

Formaldehyde was classified as a Group I Carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2006. While the IARC has stated that there is a lack of evidence that formaldehyde causes brain cancer, three meta-analyses have consistently reported a significantly higher risk of brain cancer in workers exposed to high levels of formaldehyde. Therefore, we report a case of a worker who was diagnosed with glioblastoma after being exposed to high concentrations of formaldehyde while working with formaldehyde resin in the paper industry.

Formaldehyde was classified as a Group I Carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2006. While the IARC has stated that there is a lack of evidence that formaldehyde causes brain cancer, three meta-analyses have consistently reported a significantly higher risk of brain cancer in workers exposed to high levels of formaldehyde. Therefore, we report a case of a worker who was diagnosed with glioblastoma after being exposed to high concentrations of formaldehyde while working with formaldehyde resin in the paper industry.