A secondary analysis of data from national bereavement surveys conducted in 2014, 2016, and 2018 was conducted with the aim of identifying the contribution of various patient and bereavement backgrounds to the outcomes of the Bereavement Survey. The data were evaluated in terms of structure and process of care (CES), achievement of a desirable death (GDI), complexity grief (BGQ), and depression (PHQ-9). The large data set and comprehensive analysis of bereavement survey outcomes clarified the need for adjustment of confounding variables and which variables should be adjusted for in future analyses. Overall, the contribution of the background factors examined in this study to the CES (Adj-R2=0.014) and overall satisfaction (Adj-R2=0.055) was low. The contribution of the GDI (Adj-R2=0.105) was relatively high, and that of the PHQ-9 (Max-rescaled R2=0.200) and BGQ (Max-rescaled R2=0.207) was non-negligible.

The aims of this study were (1) to develop and validate the scale to measure evidence-based nursing practice in cancer pain management and (2) to identify associated factors. We developed potential items based on the 2014 version of Japanese Clinical Guidelines for Cancer Pain Management and administered anonymous questionnaire for 189 oncology nurses in a designated cancer center. We conducted a re-test to test reliability.167 nurses participated in the study. As a result of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, we developed a nursing practice scale of cancer pain management and its shortened version. This scale consists of 1 domain 50 items The Cronbach’s α coefficient showing internal consistency was 0.98 (shortened version 0.88). The intra-class correlation coefficient of reliability was 0.52 (shortened version 0.77). Concurrent validity was confirmed by the correlation between the total score of the whole scale and the total score of the practice of palliative care, knowledge, difficulty, self-confidence scale. We concluded that this scale was valid and reliable. Factors related to the nursing practice of cancer pain management were years of experience in cancer nursing, opportunities of postgraduate education, and satisfaction with postgraduate education. This scale can be used for evaluation of daily clinical practice and practice evaluation after educational efforts such as cancer pain nursing training.

Purpose: To examine the feasibility of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), a comprehensive palliative care scale, for non-cancer patients. Methods: Twenty non-cancer patients and 20 healthcare providers who provide care to the participating patients were asked to complete the IPOS questionnaire, and cognitive interviews were conducted with them. The interviews were analysed using content analysis, a qualitative analysis method. Results: About half to 90% of both patients and healthcare providers answered that they did not find it difficult to answer or understand all items of the IPOS. Therefore, we confirmed its surface validity, and the content validity of the IPOS was confirmed. Conclusion: The surface validity and content validity of the IPOS for non-cancer patients were confirmed, and it became clear that the IPOS can be used as a comprehensive assessment tool for the palliative care of non-cancer patients.

Purpose: Palliative care implementation should take into account the perceptions and acceptability of healthcare providers. This study aimed to identify physicians’ perceptions of palliative care and barriers to palliative care practice in the critical care setting. Methods: A nationwide, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to physicians working in intensive care units, and free-text data were qualitatively analyzed. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 873 respondents, and 436 responded (50% response rate). Of these, 95 (11%) who responded to the open-ended sections were included in the analysis. Conclusion: Japanese physicians working in ICUs recognized that palliative care was their role and practiced it as part of their usual care. They felt, however, that the practice was difficult and not sufficient. Barriers to practice included the lack of human resources and availability of palliative care teams, and the lack of uniformity in the perception of palliative care in the critical care setting.

Purpose: Our purpose is to report an actual performance of our farewell prayer gathering held by the chaplain in our inpatient hospice at the Japan Baptist Hospital, and to describe what impressions and thoughts the bereaved families had about our farewell prayer gathering. Method: The questionnaires were sent to 84 patients’ families asking about our farewell prayer gathering. We analyzed the content of their comments. Results: Among the 40 families that responded, 15 families experienced our farewell prayer gathering. The words such as “prayer” and “participation of the staff” were mentioned as the favored experiences. The bereaved families felt “an emotional closure”, “peace of mind”, and “healing of mind and body”. They also found the gathering as “an opportunity to look back” and “special memorable moment”. Discussion: Our farewell prayer gathering is likely to be helpful for the bereaved to give peace to their mind and to reduce feelings of loss. By sharing the voices of bereaved families, it will be helpful for the betterment of grief care to future bereaved families in hospice care. We would like to see further research in the future.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a patient registry system for assessing PCT (palliative care team) by PRO (Patient-reported outcome) in Japan. Methods: We operated a patient registry system with electronic data collection at eight hospitals in 2021 in Japan. We consecutively included newly referred patients for a month and followed up with them for a month. IPOS or ESAS obtained as PRO at the start of the intervention, three days later, and every week after. The primary endpoint was the response rate to the symptom rating scale by patients and providers. Results: 318 patients were enrolled. The patient response rate was 59.1% at intervention and 37.0% after intervention, and the medical provider response rate was 98.4% at intervention and 70.3% after intervention. Interviews with PCT members indicated that participants required support to input PRO responses required support and paper questionnaire was better and that managing the survey date and overall management was burdensome. Discussion: Although only about half of the patients were able to respond to the PRO, this was the same level as in previous studies. The system and its operation method have many problems. We found that improvements such as reducing items and making the patient interviews paper-based are necessary to expand the system nationwide.

Objective: The aims of this study were to (i) clarify whether there are differences between bereaved families and medical staffs in their preferences for life-prolonging treatments, and (ii) investigate the factors associated with preferences for life-prolonging treatments. Methods: Cross-sectional internet survey was conducted in October 2019. Participants are bereaved families(n=618), physicians(n=206), nurses(n=206), and care workers(n=206) who registered with the internet survey company. We asked the subjects about the relative importance of 36 components of a good death in dementia and their preferences for 7 treatment items that they might need at the end of life. Results: Statistically significant differences in end-of-life medical preference between bereaved families and medical professionals included “Nutrition from gastrostomy when oral intake is difficult” (p<0.01), “Surgery for life-threatening disease” (p<0.01). As a result of logistic regression analysis, a surrogate decision-maker among bereaved family members tended to wish intravenous infusion (OR: 1.62, p=0.02) and continuation of oral medicine (OR: 1.74, p<0.01). The medical professionals who regarded good relationships with people as a requirement of good end-of-life care tended to wish surgery (OR: 2.15, p<0.01) and life-prolonging treatment (OR: 2.00, p=0.01). Conclusions: This result suggest that since the medical preferences between medical staff and the family members don’t necessarily correspond, medical professionals need to take it into consideration when they discuss the treatment options.

This study sought to evaluate how a training program on spiritual care affected physicians’ confidence, self-reported practice, and attitudes in caring for terminally ill cancer patients who express meaninglessness in living. Questionnaires were distributed to participating physicians before and after the training program. A total of 30 physicians completed the program. Confidence and self-reported practice regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patients who express meaninglessness significantly improved after the training: effect size, 1.3 (P=0.0001) and 1.2 (P=0.0001), respectively. Moreover, physician-reported helplessness significantly decreased (effect size, 0.8; P=0.0001) and positive appraisal and willingness to participate in caring for terminally ill cancer patients experiencing meaninglessness significantly improved (effect size, 0.8, P=0.0001; effect size, 0.4, P=0.0001, respectively). Overall, 96–100% of the participating physicians reported the program was useful for understanding the concept of spiritual care and for learning a practical approach for caring for such patients.

Objectives: The study purpose was to examine quality-of-life (QOL) of pediatric cancer patients at end-of-life and related factors using a QOL proxy rating scale from the nurse’s perspective. Methods: We conducted a survey in October 2015−February 2016. The subjects to be surveyed were nurses who were primarily in charge of patients with childhood cancer at end-of-life. We investigated 22 items of the Good Death Inventory for Pediatrics (GDI-P) and their related factors. Results: In total, 53 proxy evaluate questionnaires were completed from 18 centers. Among the eight factors of GDI-P, “Relief from physical and psychological suffering” was the lowest. The total score of GDI-P was positively correlated with the structure and process of care (r=0.58). Although there was a bias in the number of cases, in the case of the place of death was the intensive care unit, the total score of GDI-P was lower than home and the general ward. Conclusions: It was suggested that the top priority in improving QOL was relief from suffering and the structure and process of care were related to QOL.

To decide the policy to promote palliative care properly, a new questionnaire has been added to Patient’s behavior survey to assess Quality of Life (QOL) of inpatients and outpatients in Japan. The aim of this study was to survey QOL score of general population in Japan by using a questionnaire of patient’s behavior survey. A large nationwide postal survey was conducted from January through February 2013 in Japan. A total of 2400 subjects were selected randomly from among members of the general population who were 20 to 79 years of age and lived in Japan. A total of 978 (41.1%) questionnaires were analyzed, and reference data of QOL score weighted by the national standard value of sex-age group population were calculated. Correlation coefficients were calculated between QOL score and SF-8TM, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) score. In addition, sociodemographic factors related to QOL score were evaluated. From the perspectives of public health and administrative policy, the results of this survey will provide important basic data to evaluate patient’s behavior survey broadly and continuously with the goal of establishing a palliative care system in Japan.