1.Physicians’ awareness and experiences of patient safety from 2021 to 2023 in Korea: a cross-sectional survey study
Minsu OCK ; Hyeran JEONG ; Jung-Ha KIM ; Hokee YUM ; Jae Ho LEE ; Min-Woo JO
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2025;68(4):253-265
Purpose:
We aimed to derive insights by analyzing the results of a patient safety awareness survey conducted by the Regional Patient Safety Center of the Korean Medical Association.
Methods:
Survey questions were developed in three domains: sociodemographic characteristics, patient safety awareness, and patient safety education needs. An online anonymous survey targeting Korean physicians was conducted annually from 2021 to 2023. Chi-square tests were used to verify differences in responses by year and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results:
A total of 774 physicians participated in the survey over the three-year period. Approximately half of the participants were still assessed to have insufficient knowledge about patient safety, and no clear year-over-year improvement was observed. Additionally, while patient safety incidents appeared common, the proportion of respondents who reported incidents remained around 20%. However, participants showed high levels of agreement or engagement in patient participation activities related to patient safety (over 90%), with 60% having previously received patient safety-related education, and nearly 90% expressing willingness to participate in future education. The findings also highlighted a particular urgency in improving patient safety awareness among clinic-based physicians.
Conclusion
Promoting awareness of patient safety incident reporting methods and encouraging clinic-based physicians to report incidents should be prioritized. The study’s findings will provide a foundation for more effectively fostering physician engagement in patient safety improvement activities.
2.Physicians’ awareness and experiences of patient safety from 2021 to 2023 in Korea: a cross-sectional survey study
Minsu OCK ; Hyeran JEONG ; Jung-Ha KIM ; Hokee YUM ; Jae Ho LEE ; Min-Woo JO
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2025;68(4):253-265
Purpose:
We aimed to derive insights by analyzing the results of a patient safety awareness survey conducted by the Regional Patient Safety Center of the Korean Medical Association.
Methods:
Survey questions were developed in three domains: sociodemographic characteristics, patient safety awareness, and patient safety education needs. An online anonymous survey targeting Korean physicians was conducted annually from 2021 to 2023. Chi-square tests were used to verify differences in responses by year and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results:
A total of 774 physicians participated in the survey over the three-year period. Approximately half of the participants were still assessed to have insufficient knowledge about patient safety, and no clear year-over-year improvement was observed. Additionally, while patient safety incidents appeared common, the proportion of respondents who reported incidents remained around 20%. However, participants showed high levels of agreement or engagement in patient participation activities related to patient safety (over 90%), with 60% having previously received patient safety-related education, and nearly 90% expressing willingness to participate in future education. The findings also highlighted a particular urgency in improving patient safety awareness among clinic-based physicians.
Conclusion
Promoting awareness of patient safety incident reporting methods and encouraging clinic-based physicians to report incidents should be prioritized. The study’s findings will provide a foundation for more effectively fostering physician engagement in patient safety improvement activities.
3.Physicians’ awareness and experiences of patient safety from 2021 to 2023 in Korea: a cross-sectional survey study
Minsu OCK ; Hyeran JEONG ; Jung-Ha KIM ; Hokee YUM ; Jae Ho LEE ; Min-Woo JO
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2025;68(4):253-265
Purpose:
We aimed to derive insights by analyzing the results of a patient safety awareness survey conducted by the Regional Patient Safety Center of the Korean Medical Association.
Methods:
Survey questions were developed in three domains: sociodemographic characteristics, patient safety awareness, and patient safety education needs. An online anonymous survey targeting Korean physicians was conducted annually from 2021 to 2023. Chi-square tests were used to verify differences in responses by year and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results:
A total of 774 physicians participated in the survey over the three-year period. Approximately half of the participants were still assessed to have insufficient knowledge about patient safety, and no clear year-over-year improvement was observed. Additionally, while patient safety incidents appeared common, the proportion of respondents who reported incidents remained around 20%. However, participants showed high levels of agreement or engagement in patient participation activities related to patient safety (over 90%), with 60% having previously received patient safety-related education, and nearly 90% expressing willingness to participate in future education. The findings also highlighted a particular urgency in improving patient safety awareness among clinic-based physicians.
Conclusion
Promoting awareness of patient safety incident reporting methods and encouraging clinic-based physicians to report incidents should be prioritized. The study’s findings will provide a foundation for more effectively fostering physician engagement in patient safety improvement activities.
4.Well-being Index Scores and Subjective Health Status of Korean Healthcare Workers
Yoonhee SHIN ; Bohyun PARK ; Nam-eun KIM ; Eun Jeong CHOI ; Minsu OCK ; Sun Ha JEE ; Sue K. PARK ; Hyeong Sik AHN ; Hyesook PARK ;
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2022;55(3):226-233
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective level of health-related quality of life of Korean healthcare workers using various quality-of-life instruments.
Methods:
This study included 992 participants, who were doctors and nurses. A survey was conducted between November 28 and December 4, 2019. Data from 954 participants divided into 3 groups (physicians, residents, and nurses) were analyzed. Four measurement tools (29 questions) were used in the survey to evaluate subjective health status and well-being.
Results:
In the Mayo Well-being Index, burnout during work (88.5%) and emotional difficulties caused by work (84.0%) were frequently cited by the respondents. Regarding questions on burnout and emotional difficulties, residents and nurses had the highest scores (91.0 and 89.6%, respectively). Emotional problems, such as anxiety, depression, and irritability, accounted for a high percentage (73.1%) of the total, while 82.2% of respondents reported that their work schedules interfered with their leisure and family time. There was no significant difference among the groups in subjective health status. However, 10.1% of the residents experienced very low quality of life, which was a higher proportion than that of physicians (2.7%) and nurses (5.2%).
Conclusions
The level of well-being that Korean medical workers experienced in relation to work was lower than the results of the United States healthcare workers surveyed using the same tool. This study was unique in that it conducted a subjective quality-of-life survey on Korean healthcare workers.
5.Estimation of Utility Weights for Prostate-related Health States in Korea
Seon-Ha KIM ; Minsu OCK ; Min-Woo JO ; Sungchan PARK
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2022;55(3):243-252
Objectives:
Very limited previous research has investigated the utility weights of prostate-related diseases in the general population in Korea. The purpose of this study was to calculate the utility of prostate-related health states in the Korean general public using the standard gamble (SG) method.
Methods:
Seven health states for hypothetical prostate cancers, 1 for benign prostate hyperplasia, and 1 for erectile dysfunction were developed based on patient education material and previous publications. In total, 460 responses from the Korean general population were used to analyze the utility of prostate-related health states. Computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted, and utility values were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and SG. Mean utility values were calculated for each prostate-related health state.
Results:
The mean utility values of prostate cancer derived from SG ranged from 0.281 (metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer) to 0.779 (localized prostate cancer requiring prostatectomy). The utility value of benign prostate hyperplasia was 0.871, and that of erectile dysfunction was 0.812. The utility values obtained using the SG method in all conditions were higher than the values obtained by VAS. There were no significant demographic variables affecting utility values in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Our findings might be useful for economic evaluation and utility calculation of screening and interventions for prostate-related conditions in the general population.
6.Development and Validation of a Novel Generic Health-related Quality of Life Instrument With 20 Items (HINT-20).
Min Woo JO ; Hyeon Jeong LEE ; Soo Young KIM ; Seon Ha KIM ; Hyejung CHANG ; Jeonghoon AHN ; Minsu OCK
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2017;50(1):38-59
OBJECTIVES: Few attempts have been made to develop a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument and to examine its validity and reliability in Korea. We aimed to do this in our present study. METHODS: After a literature review of existing generic HRQoL instruments, a focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, and expert consultations, we selected 30 tentative items for a new HRQoL measure. These items were evaluated by assessing their ceiling effects, difficulty, and redundancy in the first survey. To validate the HRQoL instrument that was developed, known-groups validity and convergent/discriminant validity were evaluated and its test-retest reliability was examined in the second survey. RESULTS: Of the 30 items originally assessed for the HRQoL instrument, four were excluded due to high ceiling effects and six were removed due to redundancy. We ultimately developed a HRQoL instrument with a reduced number of 20 items, known as the Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 20 items (HINT-20), incorporating physical, mental, social, and positive health dimensions. The results of the HINT-20 for known-groups validity were poorer in women, the elderly, and those with a low income. For convergent/discriminant validity, the correlation coefficients of items (except vitality) in the physical health dimension with the physical component summary of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) were generally higher than the correlations of those items with the mental component summary of the SF-36v2, and vice versa. Regarding test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total HINT-20 score was 0.813 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel generic HRQoL instrument, the HINT-20, was developed for the Korean general population and showed acceptable validity and reliability.
Aged
;
Female
;
Focus Groups
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Quality of Life*
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Reproducibility of Results
7.How Can We Use Hospital-Standardized Mortality Ratio as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Care in Korea?.
Seon Ha KIM ; Eun Young CHOI ; Hyeon Jeong LEE ; Minsu OCK ; Min Woo JO ; Sang il LEE
Health Policy and Management 2017;27(2):114-120
The hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR) is a widely used generic measure for assessing quality of hospital care in many countries. However, the validity of HSMR as a quality indicator is still controversial. We critically reviewed characteristics of HSMR and suggested how to use HSMR as a quality indicator in the Korean setting. The association between HSMR and other quality measures of hospital care is inconclusive. In addition current HSMR model has shortcomings in risk adjustment because of the lack of clinical data, accuracy of disease coding, coding variation among hospitals, end-of-life care issues, and so on. Therefore, HSMR should be used as an indicator for improvement, not for judgement such as public reporting and pay-for-performance. More efforts will be needed to tackle practical and methodological weaknesses of HSMR in the Korean setting.
Clinical Coding
;
Korea*
;
Mortality*
;
Quality of Health Care
;
Risk Adjustment
8.Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.
Soon Hyun AHN ; Hyun Jun HONG ; Soon Young KWON ; Kee Hwan KWON ; Jong Lyel ROH ; Junsun RYU ; Jun Hee PARK ; Seung Kuk BAEK ; Guk Haeng LEE ; Sei Young LEE ; Jin Choon LEE ; Man Ki CHUNG ; Young Hoon JOO ; Yong Bae JI ; Jeong Hun HAH ; Minsu KWON ; Young Min PARK ; Chang Myeon SONG ; Sung Chan SHIN ; Chang Hwan RYU ; Doh Young LEE ; Young Chan LEE ; Jae Won CHANG ; Ha Min JEONG ; Jae Keun CHO ; Wonjae CHA ; Byung Joon CHUN ; Ik Joon CHOI ; Hyo Geun CHOI ; Kang Dae LEE
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2017;10(1):1-43
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Advisory Committees
;
Consensus
;
Counseling
;
Drug Therapy
;
Glottis
;
Humans
;
Laryngeal Neoplasms*
;
Neck*
9.Reserpine treatment activates AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK).
Rackhyun PARK ; Kang Il LEE ; Hyunju KIM ; Minsu JANG ; Thi Kim Quy HA ; Won Keun OH ; Junsoo PARK
Natural Product Sciences 2017;23(3):157-161
Reserpine is a well-known medicine for the treatment of hypertension, however the role of reserpine in cell signaling is not fully understood. Here, we report that reserpine treatment induces the phosphorylation of AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) at threonine 172 (T172) in PC12 cells. Phosphorylation of AMPK T172 is regulated by upstream signaling molecules, and the increase of phospho-T172 indicates that AMPK is activated. When we examined the FOXO3a dependent transcription by using the FHRE-Luc reporter assay, reserpine treatment repressed the FHRE-Luc reporter activity in a dose dependent manner. Finally, we showed that reserpine treatment induced the phosphorylation of AMPK as well as cell death in MCF-7 cells. These results suggest that AMPK is a potential cellular target of reserpine.
AMP-Activated Protein Kinases*
;
Animals
;
Cell Death
;
Hypertension
;
MCF-7 Cells
;
PC12 Cells
;
Phosphorylation
;
Reserpine*
;
Threonine
10.Exploratory Study of Dimensions of Health-related Quality of Life in the General Population of South Korea.
Seon Ha KIM ; Min Woo JO ; Minsu OCK ; Sang Il LEE
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2017;50(6):361-368
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore dimensions in addition to the 5 dimensions of the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) that could satisfactorily explain variation in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the general population of South Korea. METHODS: Domains related to HRQoL were searched through a review of existing HRQoL instruments. Among the 28 potential dimensions, the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L and 7 additional dimensions (vision, hearing, communication, cognitive function, social relationships, vitality, and sleep) were included. A representative sample of 600 subjects was selected for the survey, which was administered through face-to-face interviews. Subjects were asked to report problems in 12 health dimensions at 5 levels, as well as their self-rated health status using the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and a 5-point Likert scale. Among subjects who reported no problems for any of the parameters in the EQ-5D-5L, we analyzed the frequencies of problems in the additional dimensions. A linear regression model with the EQ-VAS as the dependent variable was performed to identify additional significant dimensions. RESULTS: Among respondents who reported full health on the EQ-5D-5L (n=365), 32% reported a problem for at least 1 additional dimension, and 14% reported worse than moderate self-rated health. Regression analysis revealed a R2 of 0.228 for the original EQ-5D-5L dimensions, 0.200 for the new dimensions, and 0.263 for the 12 dimensions together. Among the added dimensions, vitality and sleep were significantly associated with EQ-VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significant dimensions for assessing self-rated health among members of the general public, in addition to the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L. These dimensions could be considered for inclusion in a new preference-based instrument or for developing a country-specific HRQoL instrument.
Cognition
;
Hearing
;
Korea*
;
Linear Models
;
Patient Outcome Assessment
;
Quality of Life*
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Visual Analog Scale

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail