6.Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023
Hsu-Heng YEN ; Jia-Feng WU ; Horng-Yuan WANG ; Ting-An CHANG ; Chung-Hsin CHANG ; Chen-Wang CHANG ; Te-Hsin CHAO ; Jen-Wei CHOU ; Yenn-Hwei CHOU ; Chiao-Hsiung CHUANG ; Wen-Hung HSU ; Tzu-Chi HSU ; Tien-Yu HUANG ; Tsung-I HUNG ; Puo-Hsien LE ; Chun-Che LIN ; Chun-Chi LIN ; Ching-Pin LIN ; Jen-Kou LIN ; Wei-Chen LIN ; Yen-Hsuan NI ; Ming-Jium SHIEH ; I-Lun SHIH ; Chia-Tung SHUN ; Tzung-Jiun TSAI ; Cheng-Yi WANG ; Meng-Tzu WENG ; Jau-Min WONG ; Deng-Chyang WU ; Shu-Chen WEI
Intestinal Research 2024;22(3):213-249
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by alternating periods of inflammation and remission. Although UC incidence is lower in Taiwan than in Western countries, its impact remains considerable, demanding updated guidelines for addressing local healthcare challenges and patient needs. The revised guidelines employ international standards and recent research, emphasizing practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system. Since the inception of the guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has acknowledged the need for ongoing revisions to incorporate emerging therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. This updated guideline aims to align UC management with local contexts, ensuring comprehensive and context-specific recommendations, thereby raising the standard of care for UC patients in Taiwan. By adapting and optimizing international protocols for local relevance, these efforts seek to enhance health outcomes for patients with UC. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Management of Crohn’s disease in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023
Jia-Feng WU ; Hsu-Heng YEN ; Horng-Yuan WANG ; Ting-An CHANG ; Chung-Hsin CHANG ; Chen-Wang CHANG ; Te-Hsin CHAO ; Jen-Wei CHOU ; Yenn-Hwei CHOU ; Chiao-Hsiung CHUANG ; Wen-Hung HSU ; Tzu-Chi HSU ; Tien-Yu HUANG ; Tsung-I HUNG ; Puo-Hsien LE ; Chun-Che LIN ; Chun-Chi LIN ; Ching-Pin LIN ; Jen-Kou LIN ; Wei-Chen LIN ; Yen-Hsuan NI ; Ming-Jium SHIEH ; I-Lun SHIH ; Chia-Tung SHUN ; Tzung-Jiun TSAI ; Cheng-Yi WANG ; Meng-Tzu WENG ; Jau-Min WONG ; Deng-Chyang WU ; Shu-Chen WEI
Intestinal Research 2024;22(3):250-285
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			 Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, fluctuating inflammatory condition that primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract. Although the incidence of CD in Taiwan is lower than that in Western countries, the severity of CD presentation appears to be similar between Asia and the West. This observation indicates the urgency for devising revised guidelines tailored to the unique reimbursement system, and patient requirements in Taiwan. The core objectives of these updated guidelines include the updated treatment choices and the integration of the treat-to-target strategy into CD management, promoting the achievement of deep remission to mitigate complications and enhance the overall quality of life. Given the diversity in disease prevalence, severity, insurance policies, and access to medical treatments in Taiwan, a customized approach is imperative for formulating these guidelines. Such tailored strategies ensure that international standards are not only adapted but also optimized to local contexts. Since the inception of its initial guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (TSIBD) has acknowledged the importance of continuous revisions for incorporating new therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. The latest update leverages international standards and recent research findings focused on practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Personalization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder According to the Existing Psychiatric Comorbidity
Po-Han CHOU ; Yen-Feng LIN ; Ming-Kuei LU ; Hsin-An CHANG ; Che-Sheng CHU ; Wei Hung CHANG ; Taishiro KISHIMOTO ; Alexander T. SACK ; Kuan-Pin SU
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2021;19(2):190-205
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are evidenced-based treatments for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who fail to respond to standard first-line therapies. However, although various TMS protocols have been proven to be clinically effective, the response rate varies across clinical applications due to the heterogeneity of real-world psychiatric comorbidities, such as generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, or substance use disorder, which are often observed in patients with MDD. Therefore, individualized treatment approaches are important to increase treatment response by assigning a given patient to the most optimal TMS treatment protocol based on his or her individual profile. This literature review summarizes different rTMS or TBS protocols that have been applied in researches investigating MDD patients with certain psychiatric comorbidities and discusses biomarkers that may be used to predict rTMS treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the need for the validation of neuroimaging and electrophysiological biomarkers associated with rTMS treatment responses. Finally, we discuss on which directions future efforts should focus for developing the personalization of the treatment of depression with rTMS or iTBS.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Personalization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder According to the Existing Psychiatric Comorbidity
Po-Han CHOU ; Yen-Feng LIN ; Ming-Kuei LU ; Hsin-An CHANG ; Che-Sheng CHU ; Wei Hung CHANG ; Taishiro KISHIMOTO ; Alexander T. SACK ; Kuan-Pin SU
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2021;19(2):190-205
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are evidenced-based treatments for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who fail to respond to standard first-line therapies. However, although various TMS protocols have been proven to be clinically effective, the response rate varies across clinical applications due to the heterogeneity of real-world psychiatric comorbidities, such as generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, or substance use disorder, which are often observed in patients with MDD. Therefore, individualized treatment approaches are important to increase treatment response by assigning a given patient to the most optimal TMS treatment protocol based on his or her individual profile. This literature review summarizes different rTMS or TBS protocols that have been applied in researches investigating MDD patients with certain psychiatric comorbidities and discusses biomarkers that may be used to predict rTMS treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the need for the validation of neuroimaging and electrophysiological biomarkers associated with rTMS treatment responses. Finally, we discuss on which directions future efforts should focus for developing the personalization of the treatment of depression with rTMS or iTBS.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Maintenance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: randomized study of an Asian Gynecologic Oncology Group
Chyong Huey LAI ; Elizabeth VALLIKAD ; Hao LIN ; Lan Yan YANG ; Shih Ming JUNG ; Hsueh Erh LIU ; Yu Che OU ; Hung Hsueh CHOU ; Cheng Tao LIN ; Huei Jean HUANG ; Kuan Gen HUANG ; Jiantai QIU ; Yao Ching HUNG ; Tzu I WU ; Wei Yang CHANG ; Kien Thiam TAN ; Chiao Yun LIN ; Angel CHAO ; Chee Jen CHANG
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):5-
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail