This review examines the challenges associated with occupational disease surveillance in Korea, particularly emphasizing the limitations of current data sources such as the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (IACI) statistics and special health examinations. The IACI system undercounts cases due to its emphasis on severe diseases and restrictions on approvals. Special health examinations, although they cover a broad workforce, are constrained by their annual scheduling, which leads to missed acute illnesses and subclinical conditions. The paper also explores the history of occupational disease surveillance in Korea, highlighting the fragmented and disease-specific approach of earlier systems. The authors introduce the newly established Korea Occupational Disease Surveillance Center (KODSC), a comprehensive nationwide system designed to gather, analyze, and interpret data on occupational diseases through a network of regional centers. By incorporating hospital-based surveillance and focusing on acute poisonings and other sentinel events, the KODSC aims to overcome the limitations of previous systems and promote collaboration with various agencies. Although it is still in the early stages of implementation, the KODSC demonstrates potential for improving data accuracy and contributing valuable insights for public health policy.

This review examines the challenges associated with occupational disease surveillance in Korea, particularly emphasizing the limitations of current data sources such as the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (IACI) statistics and special health examinations. The IACI system undercounts cases due to its emphasis on severe diseases and restrictions on approvals. Special health examinations, although they cover a broad workforce, are constrained by their annual scheduling, which leads to missed acute illnesses and subclinical conditions. The paper also explores the history of occupational disease surveillance in Korea, highlighting the fragmented and disease-specific approach of earlier systems. The authors introduce the newly established Korea Occupational Disease Surveillance Center (KODSC), a comprehensive nationwide system designed to gather, analyze, and interpret data on occupational diseases through a network of regional centers. By incorporating hospital-based surveillance and focusing on acute poisonings and other sentinel events, the KODSC aims to overcome the limitations of previous systems and promote collaboration with various agencies. Although it is still in the early stages of implementation, the KODSC demonstrates potential for improving data accuracy and contributing valuable insights for public health policy.

This review examines the challenges associated with occupational disease surveillance in Korea, particularly emphasizing the limitations of current data sources such as the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (IACI) statistics and special health examinations. The IACI system undercounts cases due to its emphasis on severe diseases and restrictions on approvals. Special health examinations, although they cover a broad workforce, are constrained by their annual scheduling, which leads to missed acute illnesses and subclinical conditions. The paper also explores the history of occupational disease surveillance in Korea, highlighting the fragmented and disease-specific approach of earlier systems. The authors introduce the newly established Korea Occupational Disease Surveillance Center (KODSC), a comprehensive nationwide system designed to gather, analyze, and interpret data on occupational diseases through a network of regional centers. By incorporating hospital-based surveillance and focusing on acute poisonings and other sentinel events, the KODSC aims to overcome the limitations of previous systems and promote collaboration with various agencies. Although it is still in the early stages of implementation, the KODSC demonstrates potential for improving data accuracy and contributing valuable insights for public health policy.

Objectives: Clinical situations that make it challenging to differentiate odontogenic cysts from non-odontogenic cysts and benign tumors of the jaw include cases with cystic conditions accompanied by secondary infection, impacted teeth, cortical thinning and expansion, or external root resorption.This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications in patients undergoing cyst enucleation of the jaw, propose a clinical model, and determine the necessary indications for preoperative root canal of adjacent teeth. Materials and Methods: A review of surgical, pathological, and radiological reports, as well as medical records, was conducted. Pathological diagnosis, lesion size, history of preoperative endodontic treatment of the adjacent tooth, operator details, surgical procedures, age, gender, and complications (with severity) were analyzed. Results: This study involved 77 patients (55 men, 22 women) and found 10 complications. Procedure type (cyst enucleation only, apicoectomy and bone graft, or bone graft only) and lesion size were significant risk factors. Preoperative root canal therapy and men gender also tended to positively correlate with complications, while age was not a factor. Conclusion Within the limitations of our study, additional procedures contributed to lower risk of complications with the exception of bone graft.A large cyst size was also associated with a higher risk of complications. It is important to consider the possibility of a second procedure and take thorough precautions to prevent infection when performing bone grafts. Patients should be informed of these risks in advance, scheduled for regular follow-up, and provided additional treatment when necessary.

Background: and Purpose The pain lateralization in cluster headache (CH) may be related to the asymmetry in the functions of the brain hemispheres. The right-sided dominance of pain in CH has been found inconsistently across studies, and so we aimed to characterize this and identify the factors influencing pain lateralization during current and previous bouts. Methods: This study enrolled 227 patients from the Korean Cluster Headache Registry between October 2018 and December 2020. We evaluated the side of pain during current and previous bouts, demographic features, and clinical characteristics, including handedness. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the side of pain. Results: The 227 patients with CH included 131 (57.7%) with right-sided pain and 86 (37.9%) with left-sided pain during the current bout (p<0.001). The 189 patients with previous bouts of CH included 86.8% who consistently reported the same side of pain throughout multiple bouts (side-locked pain), with a higher prevalence of pain on the right than the left side (55.0% vs. 31.7%, p<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that higher age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]=1.045, p=0.031) and shorter CH attacks (OR=0.992, p=0.017) were associated with left-side-locked pain. However, handedness was not associated with the lateralization of leftside-locked pain. Conclusions This study has confirmed the predominance of right-sided pain throughout multiple CH bouts. We found that higher age at diagnosis and shorter CH attacks were associated with left-side-locked pain, suggesting that certain clinical factors are associated with the pain laterality. However, the underlying mechanisms linking these factors to lateralized pain remain unclear and therefore require further investigation.

Background: and Purpose The pain lateralization in cluster headache (CH) may be related to the asymmetry in the functions of the brain hemispheres. The right-sided dominance of pain in CH has been found inconsistently across studies, and so we aimed to characterize this and identify the factors influencing pain lateralization during current and previous bouts. Methods: This study enrolled 227 patients from the Korean Cluster Headache Registry between October 2018 and December 2020. We evaluated the side of pain during current and previous bouts, demographic features, and clinical characteristics, including handedness. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the side of pain. Results: The 227 patients with CH included 131 (57.7%) with right-sided pain and 86 (37.9%) with left-sided pain during the current bout (p<0.001). The 189 patients with previous bouts of CH included 86.8% who consistently reported the same side of pain throughout multiple bouts (side-locked pain), with a higher prevalence of pain on the right than the left side (55.0% vs. 31.7%, p<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that higher age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]=1.045, p=0.031) and shorter CH attacks (OR=0.992, p=0.017) were associated with left-side-locked pain. However, handedness was not associated with the lateralization of leftside-locked pain. Conclusions This study has confirmed the predominance of right-sided pain throughout multiple CH bouts. We found that higher age at diagnosis and shorter CH attacks were associated with left-side-locked pain, suggesting that certain clinical factors are associated with the pain laterality. However, the underlying mechanisms linking these factors to lateralized pain remain unclear and therefore require further investigation.

Objectives: Clinical situations that make it challenging to differentiate odontogenic cysts from non-odontogenic cysts and benign tumors of the jaw include cases with cystic conditions accompanied by secondary infection, impacted teeth, cortical thinning and expansion, or external root resorption.This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications in patients undergoing cyst enucleation of the jaw, propose a clinical model, and determine the necessary indications for preoperative root canal of adjacent teeth. Materials and Methods: A review of surgical, pathological, and radiological reports, as well as medical records, was conducted. Pathological diagnosis, lesion size, history of preoperative endodontic treatment of the adjacent tooth, operator details, surgical procedures, age, gender, and complications (with severity) were analyzed. Results: This study involved 77 patients (55 men, 22 women) and found 10 complications. Procedure type (cyst enucleation only, apicoectomy and bone graft, or bone graft only) and lesion size were significant risk factors. Preoperative root canal therapy and men gender also tended to positively correlate with complications, while age was not a factor. Conclusion Within the limitations of our study, additional procedures contributed to lower risk of complications with the exception of bone graft.A large cyst size was also associated with a higher risk of complications. It is important to consider the possibility of a second procedure and take thorough precautions to prevent infection when performing bone grafts. Patients should be informed of these risks in advance, scheduled for regular follow-up, and provided additional treatment when necessary.

This review examines the challenges associated with occupational disease surveillance in Korea, particularly emphasizing the limitations of current data sources such as the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (IACI) statistics and special health examinations. The IACI system undercounts cases due to its emphasis on severe diseases and restrictions on approvals. Special health examinations, although they cover a broad workforce, are constrained by their annual scheduling, which leads to missed acute illnesses and subclinical conditions. The paper also explores the history of occupational disease surveillance in Korea, highlighting the fragmented and disease-specific approach of earlier systems. The authors introduce the newly established Korea Occupational Disease Surveillance Center (KODSC), a comprehensive nationwide system designed to gather, analyze, and interpret data on occupational diseases through a network of regional centers. By incorporating hospital-based surveillance and focusing on acute poisonings and other sentinel events, the KODSC aims to overcome the limitations of previous systems and promote collaboration with various agencies. Although it is still in the early stages of implementation, the KODSC demonstrates potential for improving data accuracy and contributing valuable insights for public health policy.

Background: and Purpose The pain lateralization in cluster headache (CH) may be related to the asymmetry in the functions of the brain hemispheres. The right-sided dominance of pain in CH has been found inconsistently across studies, and so we aimed to characterize this and identify the factors influencing pain lateralization during current and previous bouts. Methods: This study enrolled 227 patients from the Korean Cluster Headache Registry between October 2018 and December 2020. We evaluated the side of pain during current and previous bouts, demographic features, and clinical characteristics, including handedness. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the side of pain. Results: The 227 patients with CH included 131 (57.7%) with right-sided pain and 86 (37.9%) with left-sided pain during the current bout (p<0.001). The 189 patients with previous bouts of CH included 86.8% who consistently reported the same side of pain throughout multiple bouts (side-locked pain), with a higher prevalence of pain on the right than the left side (55.0% vs. 31.7%, p<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that higher age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]=1.045, p=0.031) and shorter CH attacks (OR=0.992, p=0.017) were associated with left-side-locked pain. However, handedness was not associated with the lateralization of leftside-locked pain. Conclusions This study has confirmed the predominance of right-sided pain throughout multiple CH bouts. We found that higher age at diagnosis and shorter CH attacks were associated with left-side-locked pain, suggesting that certain clinical factors are associated with the pain laterality. However, the underlying mechanisms linking these factors to lateralized pain remain unclear and therefore require further investigation.

Objectives: Clinical situations that make it challenging to differentiate odontogenic cysts from non-odontogenic cysts and benign tumors of the jaw include cases with cystic conditions accompanied by secondary infection, impacted teeth, cortical thinning and expansion, or external root resorption.This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications in patients undergoing cyst enucleation of the jaw, propose a clinical model, and determine the necessary indications for preoperative root canal of adjacent teeth. Materials and Methods: A review of surgical, pathological, and radiological reports, as well as medical records, was conducted. Pathological diagnosis, lesion size, history of preoperative endodontic treatment of the adjacent tooth, operator details, surgical procedures, age, gender, and complications (with severity) were analyzed. Results: This study involved 77 patients (55 men, 22 women) and found 10 complications. Procedure type (cyst enucleation only, apicoectomy and bone graft, or bone graft only) and lesion size were significant risk factors. Preoperative root canal therapy and men gender also tended to positively correlate with complications, while age was not a factor. Conclusion Within the limitations of our study, additional procedures contributed to lower risk of complications with the exception of bone graft.A large cyst size was also associated with a higher risk of complications. It is important to consider the possibility of a second procedure and take thorough precautions to prevent infection when performing bone grafts. Patients should be informed of these risks in advance, scheduled for regular follow-up, and provided additional treatment when necessary.