Mechanical power (MP) has been reported to be associated with clinical outcomes. Because the original MP equation is derived from paralyzed patients under volume-controlled ventilation, its application in practice could be limited in patients receiving pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Recently, a simplified equation for patients under PCV was developed. We investigated the association between MP and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Korean data from the Fourth International Study of Mechanical Ventilation. We extracted data of patients under PCV on day 1 and calculated MP using the following simplified equation: MPPCV = 0.098 ∙ respiratory rate ∙ tidal volume ∙ (ΔPinsp + positive end-expiratory pressure), where ΔPinsp is the change in airway pressure during inspiration. Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine association between MPPCV and ICU mortality. The interaction of MPPCV and use of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) was also analyzed. Results: A total of 125 patients was eligible for final analysis, of whom 38 died in the ICU. MPPCV was higher in non-survivors (17.6 vs. 26.3 J/min, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, only MPPCV was significantly associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.090; 95% confidence interval, 1.029–1.155; P=0.003). There was no significant effect of the interaction between MPPCV and use of NMBA on ICU mortality (P=0.579). Conclusions: MPPCV is associated with ICU mortality in patients mechanically ventilated with PCV mode, regardless of NMBA use.

Mechanical power (MP) has been reported to be associated with clinical outcomes. Because the original MP equation is derived from paralyzed patients under volume-controlled ventilation, its application in practice could be limited in patients receiving pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Recently, a simplified equation for patients under PCV was developed. We investigated the association between MP and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Korean data from the Fourth International Study of Mechanical Ventilation. We extracted data of patients under PCV on day 1 and calculated MP using the following simplified equation: MPPCV = 0.098 ∙ respiratory rate ∙ tidal volume ∙ (ΔPinsp + positive end-expiratory pressure), where ΔPinsp is the change in airway pressure during inspiration. Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine association between MPPCV and ICU mortality. The interaction of MPPCV and use of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) was also analyzed. Results: A total of 125 patients was eligible for final analysis, of whom 38 died in the ICU. MPPCV was higher in non-survivors (17.6 vs. 26.3 J/min, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, only MPPCV was significantly associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.090; 95% confidence interval, 1.029–1.155; P=0.003). There was no significant effect of the interaction between MPPCV and use of NMBA on ICU mortality (P=0.579). Conclusions: MPPCV is associated with ICU mortality in patients mechanically ventilated with PCV mode, regardless of NMBA use.

Mechanical power (MP) has been reported to be associated with clinical outcomes. Because the original MP equation is derived from paralyzed patients under volume-controlled ventilation, its application in practice could be limited in patients receiving pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Recently, a simplified equation for patients under PCV was developed. We investigated the association between MP and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Korean data from the Fourth International Study of Mechanical Ventilation. We extracted data of patients under PCV on day 1 and calculated MP using the following simplified equation: MPPCV = 0.098 ∙ respiratory rate ∙ tidal volume ∙ (ΔPinsp + positive end-expiratory pressure), where ΔPinsp is the change in airway pressure during inspiration. Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine association between MPPCV and ICU mortality. The interaction of MPPCV and use of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) was also analyzed. Results: A total of 125 patients was eligible for final analysis, of whom 38 died in the ICU. MPPCV was higher in non-survivors (17.6 vs. 26.3 J/min, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, only MPPCV was significantly associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.090; 95% confidence interval, 1.029–1.155; P=0.003). There was no significant effect of the interaction between MPPCV and use of NMBA on ICU mortality (P=0.579). Conclusions: MPPCV is associated with ICU mortality in patients mechanically ventilated with PCV mode, regardless of NMBA use.

Mechanical power (MP) has been reported to be associated with clinical outcomes. Because the original MP equation is derived from paralyzed patients under volume-controlled ventilation, its application in practice could be limited in patients receiving pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Recently, a simplified equation for patients under PCV was developed. We investigated the association between MP and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Korean data from the Fourth International Study of Mechanical Ventilation. We extracted data of patients under PCV on day 1 and calculated MP using the following simplified equation: MPPCV = 0.098 ∙ respiratory rate ∙ tidal volume ∙ (ΔPinsp + positive end-expiratory pressure), where ΔPinsp is the change in airway pressure during inspiration. Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine association between MPPCV and ICU mortality. The interaction of MPPCV and use of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) was also analyzed. Results: A total of 125 patients was eligible for final analysis, of whom 38 died in the ICU. MPPCV was higher in non-survivors (17.6 vs. 26.3 J/min, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, only MPPCV was significantly associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.090; 95% confidence interval, 1.029–1.155; P=0.003). There was no significant effect of the interaction between MPPCV and use of NMBA on ICU mortality (P=0.579). Conclusions: MPPCV is associated with ICU mortality in patients mechanically ventilated with PCV mode, regardless of NMBA use.

Purpose: An endoscopic subureteral injection (EI) using a bulking agent is a highly successful surgical procedure, particularly for low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Despite the serious adverse effects, routine voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to determine radiographic success after EI remains controversial. This study evaluated the necessity of routine postoperative VCUG in children with primary low-grade VUR. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to August 2021, children who underwent EI for primary low-grade (I-III) VUR with a history of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to July 2018, routine VCUG following EI was performed on all children. Thereafter, postoperative VCUG was performed only if indicated. Clinical success was defined as no fUTI during a 12-month follow-up, and radiographic success was defined as the disappearance of VUR on postoperative VCUG. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups were compared. Results: Thirty-six children were analyzed in this study. Three children (8.3%) experienced postoperative fUTI. In the routine group, clinical and radiographic success was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) and 15/17 (88.2%), respectively. Two children in the routine group experienced radiographic failure. Among these, one child showed clinical success, and the other underwent additional EI due to clinical failure. Of the indicated group, clinical failure was observed in 2/19 (10.5%). Of them, persistent VUR was identified in one child. Conclusions Clinical and radiologic success after EI for primary low-grade VUR is high, and routine VCUG for confirming radiographic success has a limited impact on the clinical course.

Purpose: An endoscopic subureteral injection (EI) using a bulking agent is a highly successful surgical procedure, particularly for low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Despite the serious adverse effects, routine voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to determine radiographic success after EI remains controversial. This study evaluated the necessity of routine postoperative VCUG in children with primary low-grade VUR. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to August 2021, children who underwent EI for primary low-grade (I-III) VUR with a history of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to July 2018, routine VCUG following EI was performed on all children. Thereafter, postoperative VCUG was performed only if indicated. Clinical success was defined as no fUTI during a 12-month follow-up, and radiographic success was defined as the disappearance of VUR on postoperative VCUG. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups were compared. Results: Thirty-six children were analyzed in this study. Three children (8.3%) experienced postoperative fUTI. In the routine group, clinical and radiographic success was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) and 15/17 (88.2%), respectively. Two children in the routine group experienced radiographic failure. Among these, one child showed clinical success, and the other underwent additional EI due to clinical failure. Of the indicated group, clinical failure was observed in 2/19 (10.5%). Of them, persistent VUR was identified in one child. Conclusions Clinical and radiologic success after EI for primary low-grade VUR is high, and routine VCUG for confirming radiographic success has a limited impact on the clinical course.

Purpose: An endoscopic subureteral injection (EI) using a bulking agent is a highly successful surgical procedure, particularly for low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Despite the serious adverse effects, routine voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to determine radiographic success after EI remains controversial. This study evaluated the necessity of routine postoperative VCUG in children with primary low-grade VUR. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to August 2021, children who underwent EI for primary low-grade (I-III) VUR with a history of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to July 2018, routine VCUG following EI was performed on all children. Thereafter, postoperative VCUG was performed only if indicated. Clinical success was defined as no fUTI during a 12-month follow-up, and radiographic success was defined as the disappearance of VUR on postoperative VCUG. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups were compared. Results: Thirty-six children were analyzed in this study. Three children (8.3%) experienced postoperative fUTI. In the routine group, clinical and radiographic success was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) and 15/17 (88.2%), respectively. Two children in the routine group experienced radiographic failure. Among these, one child showed clinical success, and the other underwent additional EI due to clinical failure. Of the indicated group, clinical failure was observed in 2/19 (10.5%). Of them, persistent VUR was identified in one child. Conclusions Clinical and radiologic success after EI for primary low-grade VUR is high, and routine VCUG for confirming radiographic success has a limited impact on the clinical course.

Purpose: An endoscopic subureteral injection (EI) using a bulking agent is a highly successful surgical procedure, particularly for low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Despite the serious adverse effects, routine voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to determine radiographic success after EI remains controversial. This study evaluated the necessity of routine postoperative VCUG in children with primary low-grade VUR. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to August 2021, children who underwent EI for primary low-grade (I-III) VUR with a history of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to July 2018, routine VCUG following EI was performed on all children. Thereafter, postoperative VCUG was performed only if indicated. Clinical success was defined as no fUTI during a 12-month follow-up, and radiographic success was defined as the disappearance of VUR on postoperative VCUG. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups were compared. Results: Thirty-six children were analyzed in this study. Three children (8.3%) experienced postoperative fUTI. In the routine group, clinical and radiographic success was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) and 15/17 (88.2%), respectively. Two children in the routine group experienced radiographic failure. Among these, one child showed clinical success, and the other underwent additional EI due to clinical failure. Of the indicated group, clinical failure was observed in 2/19 (10.5%). Of them, persistent VUR was identified in one child. Conclusions Clinical and radiologic success after EI for primary low-grade VUR is high, and routine VCUG for confirming radiographic success has a limited impact on the clinical course.

Purpose: An endoscopic subureteral injection (EI) using a bulking agent is a highly successful surgical procedure, particularly for low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Despite the serious adverse effects, routine voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to determine radiographic success after EI remains controversial. This study evaluated the necessity of routine postoperative VCUG in children with primary low-grade VUR. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to August 2021, children who underwent EI for primary low-grade (I-III) VUR with a history of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) were analyzed retrospectively. From January 2016 to July 2018, routine VCUG following EI was performed on all children. Thereafter, postoperative VCUG was performed only if indicated. Clinical success was defined as no fUTI during a 12-month follow-up, and radiographic success was defined as the disappearance of VUR on postoperative VCUG. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups were compared. Results: Thirty-six children were analyzed in this study. Three children (8.3%) experienced postoperative fUTI. In the routine group, clinical and radiographic success was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) and 15/17 (88.2%), respectively. Two children in the routine group experienced radiographic failure. Among these, one child showed clinical success, and the other underwent additional EI due to clinical failure. Of the indicated group, clinical failure was observed in 2/19 (10.5%). Of them, persistent VUR was identified in one child. Conclusions Clinical and radiologic success after EI for primary low-grade VUR is high, and routine VCUG for confirming radiographic success has a limited impact on the clinical course.