Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical nurses' nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction and organizational commitment on quality of nursing service. Methods: This study used a descriptive research design. Data were collected from 209 general nurses working in a tertiary hospitals in D city using self-report questionnaires from November 28 to December 14, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction, organizational commitment, and quality of nursing services. The regression analysis showed nursing character (β=.75, p<.001), organizational communication satisfaction (β=.12, p=.034) significantly influenced quality of nursing service, and explained 64.0% of the quality of nursing service. Conclusion The findings indicate that the quality of nursing service can be improved by raising nursing character and organizational communication satisfaction. Therefore, to improve the quality of nursing services, repeated and continuous implementation of training programs, including education to enhance nursing character, is necessary. Additionally, it is essential to develop and apply a programs to strengthen organizational communication satisfaction.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical nurses' nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction and organizational commitment on quality of nursing service. Methods: This study used a descriptive research design. Data were collected from 209 general nurses working in a tertiary hospitals in D city using self-report questionnaires from November 28 to December 14, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction, organizational commitment, and quality of nursing services. The regression analysis showed nursing character (β=.75, p<.001), organizational communication satisfaction (β=.12, p=.034) significantly influenced quality of nursing service, and explained 64.0% of the quality of nursing service. Conclusion The findings indicate that the quality of nursing service can be improved by raising nursing character and organizational communication satisfaction. Therefore, to improve the quality of nursing services, repeated and continuous implementation of training programs, including education to enhance nursing character, is necessary. Additionally, it is essential to develop and apply a programs to strengthen organizational communication satisfaction.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical nurses' nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction and organizational commitment on quality of nursing service. Methods: This study used a descriptive research design. Data were collected from 209 general nurses working in a tertiary hospitals in D city using self-report questionnaires from November 28 to December 14, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction, organizational commitment, and quality of nursing services. The regression analysis showed nursing character (β=.75, p<.001), organizational communication satisfaction (β=.12, p=.034) significantly influenced quality of nursing service, and explained 64.0% of the quality of nursing service. Conclusion The findings indicate that the quality of nursing service can be improved by raising nursing character and organizational communication satisfaction. Therefore, to improve the quality of nursing services, repeated and continuous implementation of training programs, including education to enhance nursing character, is necessary. Additionally, it is essential to develop and apply a programs to strengthen organizational communication satisfaction.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical nurses' nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction and organizational commitment on quality of nursing service. Methods: This study used a descriptive research design. Data were collected from 209 general nurses working in a tertiary hospitals in D city using self-report questionnaires from November 28 to December 14, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between nursing character, organizational communication satisfaction, organizational commitment, and quality of nursing services. The regression analysis showed nursing character (β=.75, p<.001), organizational communication satisfaction (β=.12, p=.034) significantly influenced quality of nursing service, and explained 64.0% of the quality of nursing service. Conclusion The findings indicate that the quality of nursing service can be improved by raising nursing character and organizational communication satisfaction. Therefore, to improve the quality of nursing services, repeated and continuous implementation of training programs, including education to enhance nursing character, is necessary. Additionally, it is essential to develop and apply a programs to strengthen organizational communication satisfaction.

Purpose: Children with comorbidities have a higher risk of severe, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study investigated the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 in children and adolescents with diabetes between January and March 2022. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 123 children and adolescents (73 with type 1 diabetes and 50 with type 2 diabetes, 59 males and 64 females) aged <18 years who had been diagnosed with diabetes. Data were collected from 7 academic medical centers in Daegu, South Korea. Results: Thirty-five children with diabetes were diagnosed with COVID-19 (18 with type 1 and 17 with type 2 diabetes). Eighteen of the 35 children with diabetes and COVID-19 and 50 of the 88 children with diabetes alone received a COVID-19 vaccination. No significant differences were observed between patients with diabetes and COVID-19 and patients with diabetes alone in the type of diabetes diagnosed, sex, age, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, or vaccination status. All children with diabetes and COVID-19 had mild clinical features and were safely managed in their homes. Fourteen children had a fever of 38℃ or higher that lasted for more than 2 days, 11 of whom were not vaccinated (p=0.004). None experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. Conclusion All children and adolescents with pre-existing diabetes had mild symptoms of COVID-19 due to low disease severity, high vaccination rates, uninterrupted access to medical care, and continuous glucose monitoring. Unvaccinated children with diabetes who experienced COVID-19 presented with higher and more frequent fevers compared to vaccinated children.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of bulky nodal involvement in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with anal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy at three medical centers between 2004 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included distant metastasis at diagnosis, 2D radiotherapy, and salvage treatment for local relapse. Bulky N+ was defined as nodes with a long diameter of 2 cm or greater. Results: A total of 104 patients were included, comprising 51 with N0, 46 with non-bulky N+, and seven with bulky N+. The median follow-up duration was 54.0 months (range, 6.4 to 162.2 months). Estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS) rates for patients with bulky N+ were 42.9%, 42.9%, and 47.6%, respectively. Bulky N+ was significantly associated with inferior PFS, LRRFS, and OS compared to patients without or with non-bulky N+, even after multivariate analysis. We proposed a new staging system incorporating bulky N+ as N2 category, with estimated 5-year LRRFS, PFS, and OS rates of 81.1%, 80.6%, and 86.2% for stage I, 67.7%, 60.9%, and 93.3% for stage II, and 42.9%, 42.9%, and 47.6% for stage III disease, enhancing the predictability of prognosis. Conclusion Patients with bulky nodal disease treated with standard chemoradiotherapy experienced poor survival outcomes, indicating the potential necessity for further treatment intensification.

Background/Aims: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is related to an increased risk of extrahepatic malignancy (EHM), and antiviral treatment is associated with an incidence of EHM comparable to controls. We compared the risks of EHM and intrahepatic malignancy (IHM) between entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. Methods: Using data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea, this nationwide cohort study included treatment-naïve CHB patients who initiated ETV (n=24,287) or TDF (n=29,199) therapy between 2012 and 2014. The primary outcome was the development of any primary EHM. Secondary outcomes included overall IHM development. E-value was calculated to assess the robustness of results to unmeasured confounders. Results: The median follow-up duration was 5.9 years, and all baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score matching. EHM incidence rate differed significantly between within versus beyond 3 years in both groups (P<0.01, Davies test). During the first 3 years, EHM risk was comparable in the propensity score-matched cohort (5.88 versus 5.84/1,000 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]=1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.88–1.17, P=0.84). After year 3, however, TDF was associated with a significantly lower EHM incidence compared to ETV (4.92 versus 6.91/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.70, 95% CI=0.60–0.81, P<0.01; E-value for SHR=2.21). Regarding IHM, the superiority of TDF over ETV was maintained both within (17.58 versus 20.19/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.88, 95% CI=0.81–0.95, P<0.01) and after year 3 (11.45 versus 16.20/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.68, 95% CI=0.62–0.75, P<0.01; E-value for SHR=2.30). Conclusions TDF was associated with approximately 30% lower risks of both EHM and IHM than ETV in CHB patients after 3 years of antiviral therapy.