Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To observe the effects of brain-computer interface-controlled pedal training system on bal-ance function and serum interleukin-6(IL-6)and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)levels in ischemic stroke pa-tients.Methods Forty patients with ischemic stroke who were hospitalized from September 2022 to September 2023 were selected as observation subjects.The patients were equally divided into stroke control group and stroke experimental group according to the random number table method.At the same time,20 healthy subjects with similar gender and age were recruited as the healthy control group to collect relevant plantar pressure data.Patients in the stroke control group received conventional rehabilitation training including the upper and lower extremity active and passive motor training system,and the stroke experimental group replaced the upper and lower extremity active and passive motor training system in the stroke control group with the brain-computer interface-controlled pedal training system for rehabilitation treatment,and other things remained unchanged.Bilateral plantar pressure symmetry index(SI)and center of body pressure(COP)swing area were collected from both groups of stroke patients with eyes open and closed using the plantar pressure assessment system before and after 4 weeks of treatment.Fugl-meyer low-er extremity motor function score(FMA-LE)and berg balance scale(BBS)were used to evaluate the two groups of stroke patients.Serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels were also compared between the two groups before and after treat-ment.Results ① The SI value and COP swing area in the eyes open and closed state improved in both groups of stroke patients after treatment compared with that before admission,and the results of the stroke experimental group were better than those of the stroke control group(P＜0.05),but there was still a gap with the healthy control group(P＜0.05).②The BBS and FMA-LE scores of stroke patients in both groups were higher after treatment than before treatment,and the scores of the stroke experimental group were greater than those of the stroke control group,with statistically significant differences(all P＜0.05).③Serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels decreased in both groups of stroke patients after treatment compared with before,and the degree of decrease in serum IL-6 and TNF-αlevels in the stroke experimental group was greater than that in the stroke control group,and the difference was sta-tistically significant(P＜0.001,P＜0.05).Conclusion Brain-computer interface-controlled pedal training sys-tem has a facilitating effect on the recovery of balance function in hemiplegic patients with ischemic stroke,and its mechanism may be related to the reduction of serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective:To determine the relationship between tibial plateau stresses and malunion by exploring the changes in mechanical conduction in the knee joint after malunion of Hoffa fracture of the tibial plateau.Methods:This study selected 28 knee joint specimens treated with formalin for preservation, half of which were from male and half from female individuals with an age of (51.4±9.5) years. Their structures were intact, and flexion-extension activities normal. X-ray examinations excluded osteoporosis, tuberculosis, and diseases that could have potentially affected bone quality. The knee specimens were divided into a control group (intact tibia) ( n=4) and 6 groups of tibial plateau Hoffa fracture malunion model: 3 vertical malunion groups (groups V1, V2, and V3, with a vertical displacement of 1, 2, and 3 mm, respectively, n=4) and 3 separation malunion groups (groups S3, S5, and S7, with a separation displacement of 3, 5, and 7 mm, respectively), with half males and half females in each group. After a 600N vertical load was applied at passive knee flexions at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, the stress levels in the medial and lateral compartments of the knee joint were measured using pressure-sensitive films. Results:Under a vertical load of 600 N, when the knee joint was in a neutral position (flexion of 0°), the differences in the medial and lateral tibial plateau stress values were not statistically significant between the malunion models groups and the control group ( P>0.05). When the knee flexion increased to 30°, the medial tibial plateau stress in the V3 and S7 groups was significantly greater than that in the control group ( P<0.05). At a knee flexion of 60°, the medial plateau stress was significantly greater in the V3, S5 and S7 groups than that in the control group, and the differences were significantly greater than the comparisons at a knee flexion of 30° (all P<0.05). When the knee flexion was 90°, the medial plateau stress in the V2, V3, S5 and S7 groups was significantly greater than that in the control group ( P<0.05), but the lateral tibial plateau stress in the V3 group was significantly smaller than that in the control group ( P<0.05). When the knee flexion was further increased to 120°, the differences in the medial and lateral plateau stress values were statistically significant between all the malunion groups and the control group ( P<0.05), and the differences significantly greater than the comparisons at a knee flexion of 90° (all P<0.05). Under a vertical load of 600 N, the differences in the stresses on the medial and lateral plateaus were not statistically significant between the control group and all the malunion groups at a knee flexion of 0° ( P>0.05). When the knee flexion increased to 30°, the difference between the medial and lateral stresses was not statistically significant in the control group ( P>0.05), but was statistically significant in the V3 and S7 groups ( P<0.05). When the knee flexion reached 60°, 90°, and 120°, the differences between the medial and lateral tibial plateau stresses in all the groups were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The peak knee stresses after malunion of Hoffa fracture of the tibial plateau correlate with the severity of malunion and knee flexion angles. The mechanical properties are not significantly different between a mild malunion knee and a normal knee, but a significant displacement (vertical displacement >2 mm and separation displacement ≥5 mm) may increase the peak knee stresses to increase the risk of knee osteoarthritis. When the severity of malunion is certain, an increase in knee flexion angle increases the difference in the peak stress between the medial and lateral tibial plateaus, thus increasing the risk of knee osteoarthritis.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.