1.Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners
Rushil BOSE ; Matthew EVERS ; Wai-Man LIU ; Shannon GRAP ; Theodore J CIOS
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(3):241-246
Background:
Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.
Methods:
Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).
Results:
Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: “Let trainee perform critical technical steps” (P value = 0.02).
Conclusions
While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.
2.Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners
Rushil BOSE ; Matthew EVERS ; Wai-Man LIU ; Shannon GRAP ; Theodore J CIOS
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(3):241-246
Background:
Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.
Methods:
Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).
Results:
Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: “Let trainee perform critical technical steps” (P value = 0.02).
Conclusions
While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.
3.Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners
Rushil BOSE ; Matthew EVERS ; Wai-Man LIU ; Shannon GRAP ; Theodore J CIOS
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(3):241-246
Background:
Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.
Methods:
Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).
Results:
Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: “Let trainee perform critical technical steps” (P value = 0.02).
Conclusions
While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.
4.Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners
Rushil BOSE ; Matthew EVERS ; Wai-Man LIU ; Shannon GRAP ; Theodore J CIOS
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(3):241-246
Background:
Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.
Methods:
Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).
Results:
Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: “Let trainee perform critical technical steps” (P value = 0.02).
Conclusions
While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.
5.Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners
Rushil BOSE ; Matthew EVERS ; Wai-Man LIU ; Shannon GRAP ; Theodore J CIOS
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(3):241-246
Background:
Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.
Methods:
Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).
Results:
Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: “Let trainee perform critical technical steps” (P value = 0.02).
Conclusions
While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.
6.Impact of medical school responses during the COVID-19 pandemic on student satisfaction: a nationwide survey of US medical students
Isaac E. KIM JR. ; Daniel D. KIM ; Juliana E. KIM ; Elliott REBELLO ; David CHUNG ; Parker WOOLLEY ; Daniel LEE ; Brittany A. BORDEN ; Aaron WANG ; Douglas VILLALTA ; Agatha SUTHERLAND ; Sebastian DE ARMAS ; Matthew LIU ; Hannah KIM ; Grace Sora AHN ; Reed GEISLER ; Alexander YANG ; Bowon JOUNG ; John SLATE-ROMANO ; Michal RAJSKI ; Alison E. KIM ; Roxanne VREES ; Kristina MONTEIRO
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2022;34(2):167-174
Purpose:
Medical schools have faced various challenges in preparing their clinical students for the frontlines of a pandemic. This study investigated medical students’ satisfaction with their institutions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with the intention of guiding educators in future public health crises.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study surveying students in clinical rotations, the primary outcome was overall satisfaction regarding medical schools’ responses to the pandemic, and the four secondary outcomes were school communication, exposure to COVID-19, availability of personal protective equipment, and access to COVID-19 testing.
Results:
The survey was distributed to ten medical schools, of which 430 students responded for a response rate of 13.0%. While most students were satisfied (61.9%, n=266) with their schools’ response, more than one in five (21.9%, n=94) were dissatisfied. Among the four secondary outcomes, communication with students was most predictive of overall satisfaction.
Conclusion
In future crises, schools can best improve student satisfaction by prioritizing timely communication.
7.Genomic and transcriptomic analysis unveils population evolution and development of pesticide resistance in fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda.
Furong GUI ; Tianming LAN ; Yue ZHAO ; Wei GUO ; Yang DONG ; Dongming FANG ; Huan LIU ; Haimeng LI ; Hongli WANG ; Ruoshi HAO ; Xiaofang CHENG ; Yahong LI ; Pengcheng YANG ; Sunil Kumar SAHU ; Yaping CHEN ; Le CHENG ; Shuqi HE ; Ping LIU ; Guangyi FAN ; Haorong LU ; Guohai HU ; Wei DONG ; Bin CHEN ; Yuan JIANG ; Yongwei ZHANG ; Hanhong XU ; Fei LIN ; Bernard SLIPPERS ; Alisa POSTMA ; Matthew JACKSON ; Birhan Addisie ABATE ; Kassahun TESFAYE ; Aschalew Lemma DEMIE ; Meseret Destaw BAYELEYGNE ; Dawit Tesfaye DEGEFU ; Feng CHEN ; Paul K KURIA ; Zachary M KINYUA ; Tong-Xian LIU ; Huanming YANG ; Fangneng HUANG ; Xin LIU ; Jun SHENG ; Le KANG
Protein & Cell 2022;13(7):513-531
The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda, is a destructive pest native to America and has recently become an invasive insect pest in China. Because of its rapid spread and great risks in China, understanding of FAW genetic background and pesticide resistance is urgent and essential to develop effective management strategies. Here, we assembled a chromosome-level genome of a male FAW (SFynMstLFR) and compared re-sequencing results of the populations from America, Africa, and China. Strain identification of 163 individuals collected from America, Africa and China showed that both C and R strains were found in the American populations, while only C strain was found in the Chinese and African populations. Moreover, population genomics analysis showed that populations from Africa and China have close relationship with significantly genetic differentiation from American populations. Taken together, FAWs invaded into China were most likely originated from Africa. Comparative genomics analysis displayed that the cytochrome p450 gene family is extremely expanded to 425 members in FAW, of which 283 genes are specific to FAW. Treatments of Chinese populations with twenty-three pesticides showed the variant patterns of transcriptome profiles, and several detoxification genes such as AOX, UGT and GST specially responded to the pesticides. These findings will be useful in developing effective strategies for management of FAW in China and other invaded areas.
Animals
;
China
;
Genomics
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Pesticides
;
Spodoptera/genetics*
;
Transcriptome
8.Association of Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Apolipoproteins with Stroke Subtypes in an International Case Control Study (INTERSTROKE)
Martin J. O’DONNELL ; Matthew MCQUEEN ; Allan SNIDERMAN ; Guillaume PARE ; Xingyu WANG ; Graeme J. HANKEY ; Sumathy RANGARAJAN ; Siu Lim CHIN ; Purnima RAO-MELACINI ; John FERGUSON ; Denis XAVIER ; Liu LISHENG ; Hongye ZHANG ; Prem PAIS ; Patricio LOPEZ-JARAMILLO ; Albertino DAMASCENO ; Peter LANGHORNE ; Annika ROSENGREN ; Antonio L. DANS ; Ahmed ELSAYED ; Alvaro AVEZUM ; Charles MONDO ; Conor JUDGE ; Hans-Christoph DIENER ; Danuta RYGLEWICZ ; Anna CZLONKOWSKA ; Nana POGOSOVA ; Christian WEIMAR ; Romana IQBAL ; Rafael DIAZ ; Khalid YUSOFF ; Afzalhussein YUSUFALI ; Aytekin OGUZ ; Ernesto PENAHERRERA ; Fernando LANAS ; Okechukwu S. OGAH ; Adesola OGUNNIYI ; Helle K. IVERSEN ; German MALAGA ; Zvonko RUMBOLDT ; Shahram OVEISGHARAN ; Fawaz AL HUSSAIN ; Yongchai NILANONT ; Salim YUSUF ;
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):224-235
Background:
and Purpose The association of dyslipidemia with stroke has been inconsistent, which may be due to differing associations within etiological stroke subtypes. We sought to determine the association of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins within stroke subtypes.
Methods:
Standardized incident case-control STROKE study in 32 countries. Cases were patients with acute hospitalized first stroke, and matched by age, sex and site to controls. Concentrations of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1), and apoB were measured. Non-HDL-C was calculated. We estimated multivariable odds ratio (OR) and population attributable risk percentage (PAR%). Outcome measures were all stroke, ischemic stroke (and subtypes), and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Results:
Our analysis included 11,898 matched case-control pairs; 77.3% with ischemic stroke and 22.7% with ICH. Increasing apoB (OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.14 per standard deviation [SD]) and LDL-C (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10 per SD) were associated with an increase in risk of ischemic stroke, but a reduced risk of ICH. Increased apoB was significantly associated with large vessel stroke (PAR 13.4%; 95% CI, 5.6 to 28.4) and stroke of undetermined cause. Higher HDL-C (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.78 per SD) and apoA1 (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.66 per SD) were associated with ischemic stroke (and subtypes). While increasing HDL-C was associated with an increased risk of ICH (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.27 per SD), apoA1 was associated with a reduced risk (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85 per SD). ApoB/A1 (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.44 per SD) had a stronger magnitude of association than the ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.31 per SD) with ischemic stroke (P<0.0001).
Conclusions
The pattern and magnitude of association of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins with stroke varies by etiological stroke subtype. While the directions of association for LDL, HDL, and apoB were opposing for ischemic stroke and ICH, apoA1 was associated with a reduction in both ischemic stroke and ICH. The ratio of apoB/A1 was the best lipid predictor of ischemic stroke risk.
9.Comprehensive functional annotation of susceptibility variants identifies genetic heterogeneity between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Na QIN ; Yuancheng LI ; Cheng WANG ; Meng ZHU ; Juncheng DAI ; Tongtong HONG ; Demetrius ALBANES ; Stephen LAM ; Adonina TARDON ; Chu CHEN ; Gary GOODMAN ; Stig E BOJESEN ; Maria Teresa LANDI ; Mattias JOHANSSON ; Angela RISCH ; H-Erich WICHMANN ; Heike BICKEBOLLER ; Gadi RENNERT ; Susanne ARNOLD ; Paul BRENNAN ; John K FIELD ; Sanjay SHETE ; Loic LE MARCHAND ; Olle MELANDER ; Hans BRUNNSTROM ; Geoffrey LIU ; Rayjean J HUNG ; Angeline ANDREW ; Lambertus A KIEMENEY ; Shan ZIENOLDDINY ; Kjell GRANKVIST ; Mikael JOHANSSON ; Neil CAPORASO ; Penella WOLL ; Philip LAZARUS ; Matthew B SCHABATH ; Melinda C ALDRICH ; Victoria L STEVENS ; Guangfu JIN ; David C CHRISTIANI ; Zhibin HU ; Christopher I AMOS ; Hongxia MA ; Hongbing SHEN
Frontiers of Medicine 2021;15(2):275-291
Although genome-wide association studies have identified more than eighty genetic variants associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) risk, biological mechanisms of these variants remain largely unknown. By integrating a large-scale genotype data of 15 581 lung adenocarcinoma (AD) cases, 8350 squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) cases, and 27 355 controls, as well as multiple transcriptome and epigenomic databases, we conducted histology-specific meta-analyses and functional annotations of both reported and novel susceptibility variants. We identified 3064 credible risk variants for NSCLC, which were overrepresented in enhancer-like and promoter-like histone modification peaks as well as DNase I hypersensitive sites. Transcription factor enrichment analysis revealed that USF1 was AD-specific while CREB1 was SqCC-specific. Functional annotation and gene-based analysis implicated 894 target genes, including 274 specifics for AD and 123 for SqCC, which were overrepresented in somatic driver genes (ER = 1.95, P = 0.005). Pathway enrichment analysis and Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis revealed that AD genes were primarily involved in immune-related pathways, while SqCC genes were homologous recombination deficiency related. Our results illustrate the molecular basis of both well-studied and new susceptibility loci of NSCLC, providing not only novel insights into the genetic heterogeneity between AD and SqCC but also a set of plausible gene targets for post-GWAS functional experiments.
Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics*
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics*
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics*
;
Genetic Heterogeneity
;
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
;
Genome-Wide Association Study
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms/genetics*
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
10.Adsorptive hemofiltration for sepsis management: expert recommendations based on the Asia Pacific experience.
Ling ZHANG ; Matthew COVE ; Binh G NGUYEN ; Nuttha LUMLERTGUL ; Kartik GANESH ; Alfred CHAN ; Giang T H BUI ; Chunwen GUO ; Junhua LI ; Songqiao LIU ; Mian PENG ; Kit W FOONG ; Jian ZHANG ; Minmin WANG ; Jacques GOLDSTEIN ; Kai HARENSKI
Chinese Medical Journal 2021;134(18):2258-2260

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail