1.Research Progress on the Protective Effect of Intestinal Flora on Radiation-induced Lung Injury in Thoracic Tumors.
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2023;26(6):467-472
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Radiation therapy is one of the main treatment methods for patients with thoracic malignant tumors, which can effectively improve the survival rate of the patients. However, radiation therapy can also cause damage to normal tissues while treating tumors, leading to radiation-induced lung injury such as radiation pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis. Radiation-induced lung injury is a complex pathophysiological process involving many factors, and its prevention and treatment is one of the difficult problems in the field of radiation medicine. Therefore, the search for sensitive predictors of radiation-induced lung injury can guide clinical radiotherapy and reduce the incidence of radiation-induced lung injury. With the in-depth study of intestinal flora, it can drive immune cells or metabolites to reach lung tissue through the circulatory system to play a role, and participate in the occurrence, development and treatment of lung diseases. At present, there are few studies on intestinal flora and radiation-induced lung injury. Therefore, this paper will comprehensively elaborate the interaction between intestinal flora and radiation-induced lung injury, so as to provide a new direction and strategy for studying the protective effect of intestinal flora on radiation-induced lung injury.
.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Injury/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gastrointestinal Microbiome
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung/pathology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Radiation Injuries/metabolism*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Thoracic Neoplasms
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
2.Preliminary Recommendations on the Timing of Lung Surgery after Novel Coronavirus Infection in Patients with Pulmonary Nodules and Lung Cancer.
Xin LI ; Ming DONG ; Song XU ; Honglin ZHAO ; Sen WEI ; Zuoqing SONG ; Minghui LIU ; Dian REN ; Fan REN ; Qingchun ZHAO ; Renwang LIU ; Chunqiu XIA ; Gang CHEN ; Jun CHEN
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2023;26(2):148-150
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			In recent years, the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a huge impact on the global medical, political and economic fields. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, our understanding of the impact of COVID-19 has grown exponentially. Recently, the COVID-19 epidemic has changed rapidly in China, and there has been controversy over how to carry out surgical operations for patients with lung neoplastic lesions. Some studies have shown that lung cancer patients undergoing surgery are more likely to experience respiratory failure and perioperative death after contracting COVID-19 than the general population, however, delays in cancer treatment are also associated with increased mortality among these patients. In particular, the novel coronavirus Omikron variant has a higher transmissibility and may escape the immunity obtained through the previous novel coronavirus infection and vaccination. In order to minimize the risk of novel coronavirus infection in surgical patients, it is necessary to develop new treatment guidelines, expert consensus and preventive measures. However, the current rapid change of the epidemic situation has led to insufficient time and evidence to develop guidelines and consensus. Therefore, thoracic surgeons need to evaluate specific patient populations at higher risk of severe complications before surgery and weigh the benefit of surgical treatment against the risk of novel coronavirus infection. We try to give some recommendations on lung surgery during the current domestic epidemic situation based on the guidelines and consensus of oncology and thoracic surgery organizations in different regions on lung surgery.
.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms/complications*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			COVID-19
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			SARS-CoV-2
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Pandemics/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
3.Equol and its enantiomers inhibited urethane-induced lung cancer in mice.
Xue YU ; Yong Qiu ZOU ; Ying WANG ; Ze Kun CHEN ; De Fu MA
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2022;54(2):244-248
		                        		
		                        			OBJECTIVE:
		                        			To investigate the effects and mechanisms of equol and its enantiomers on urethane-induced lung cancer in mice.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			A total of 120 5-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 8 groups: lung cancer tumor control group (CG), genistein control group (GCG), low dose racemic equol group (LEG), high dose racemic equol group (HEG), low dose R-equol group (LRE), high dose R-equol group (HRE), low dose S-equol group (LSE) and high dose S-equol group (HSE). Urethane was injected subcutaneously twice a week for 4 weeks to induce lung cancer and then the mice were fed for 4 months. The body weight and food intake of each group were measured and recorded weekly. After the mice were sacrificed, the blood, livers and lungs of the mice were collected. The incidence of lung cancer in each group was recorded. The concentration of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) and 8-hydroxydeoxygunosine (8-OHdG) were detected by the corresponding kits. Western blotting was used to detect the expression of nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) in the livers. Between-group differences in body weight and food intake of the mice were compared using repeated measures ANOVA, and ANOVA for the differences between non-repeated measurements, with post hoc analysis using Tukey's method if there were between-group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed by chi-square test, and if there were differences between the groups, the Bonferroni method was used for pairwise comparison.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			A total of 49 in the 120 mice developed lung cancer. The overall incidence of lung cancer was 40.8%. Compared with the control group, the incidence of lung cancers in each experimental group was lower, and the difference was statistically significant. The incidence of lung cancer in the high-dose experimental group was significantly lower than that in the low-dose experimental group. However, the incidence of lung cancer was similar in the three equol groups and the genistein group at the same dose. Compared with the control group, the high-dose experimental group had higher serum SOD concentration, lower MDA and 8-OHdG concentrations, and the differences were statistically significant. Western blotting analysis showed that the expression levels of Nrf2 protein in the experimental groups were higher than those in the control group except the low-dose racemic equol group, and the Nrf2 protein expression level in the high-dose equol groups was higher than that in the low-dose equol groups.
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			Racemic equol and its enantiomers mayinhibit lung carcinogenesis through antioxidant effects.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Animals
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Body Weight
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Equol
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Genistein
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mice
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mice, Inbred C57BL
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			NF-E2-Related Factor 2
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Superoxide Dismutase
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Urethane/toxicity*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
4.Current Status and Progress of Early Lung Cancer Screening under the Normal State of COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control.
Yuyang WANG ; Na ZHOU ; Dong LIU ; Xiaochun ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2021;24(1):31-35
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence in China. Early detection and identification of symptomatic lung cancer patients and timely screen out asymptomatic patients from high-risk groups require multiple cooperation. At present, although combined imaging, serology, genomics, proteomics and other methods have been combined to screen for suspected lung cancer, there are still problems such as missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Meanwhile, the spread of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has brought new challenges to early lung cancer screening. Under the normalization of epidemic prevention and control, the work of early lung cancer screening should be changed accordingly: improve the population's awareness of cancer prevention and control, strengthen the management of medical procedures, improve the efficiency of tumor detection, optimize detection technology, and utilize internet and big data platforms rationally. We should establish an ideal model, combining multiple screening methods, which is streamlined and efficient for early lung cancer screening under normal epidemic prevention and control.
.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			COVID-19/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			China/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Early Detection of Cancer
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Epidemics
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening worldwide: a systematic review.
C C LIU ; J F SHI ; G X LIU ; W TANG ; X ZHANG ; F LI ; L WANG ; Y MA ; K SU ; S J ZHAO ; Y B GAO ; N LI ; W Q CHEN ; N WU ; M DAI
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2019;40(2):218-226
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective: From the economic point of view, this study was to systematically assess the status quo on lung cancer screening in the world and to provide reference for further research and implementation of the programs, in China. Methods: PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library,CNKI and Wanfang Data were searched to gather papers on studies related to economic evaluation regarding lung cancer screening worldwide, from the inception of studies to June 30(th), 2018. Basic characteristics, methods and main results were extracted. Quality of studies was assessed. Cost were converted to Chinese Yuan under the exchange rates from the World Bank. The ratio of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to local GDP per capita were calculated. Results: A total of 23 studies (only 1 randomized controlled trial) were included and the overall quality was accepted. 22 studies were from the developed countries. Nearly half of the studies (11 studies) took 55 years old as the starting age of the screening program. Smoking history was widely applied for the selection of criteria on target populations (18). Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was involved in every study used to evaluate the economic effectiveness. Annual (17) and once-life time (7) screening were more common frequencies. 22 studies reported ICERs for LDCT screening, compared to no screening, of which 17 were less than 3 times local GDP per capita, and were considered as cost-effectiveness, according to the WHO's recommendation. 15 and 7 studies reported ICERs for annual and once-life time screening, of which 12 and 7 studies were in favor the results of their cost-effectiveness, respectively. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of once-lifetime screening was likely to be superior to the annual screening. Differences of cost-effectiveness among the subgroups, by starting age or by the smoking history, might exist. Conclusions: Based on the studies, evidence from the developed countries demonstrated that LDCT screening programs on lung cancer, implemented among populations selected by age and smoking history, generally appeared more cost-effective. Combined with the local situation of health resource, the findings could provide direction for less developed regions/countries lacking of local evidence. Low frequency of LDCT screening for lung cancer could be adopted when budget was limited. Data on starting ages, smoking history and other important components related to the strategy of screening programs, needs to be precisely evaluated under the situation of local population.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			China
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cost-Benefit Analysis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Early Detection of Cancer/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Quality-Adjusted Life Years
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Clinical Value Evaluation of Perioperative Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy for Lung Cancer Patients.
Hui XU ; Hu LIAO ; Guowei CHE ; Kun ZHOU ; Mei YANG ; Lunxu LIU
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2018;21(10):767-772
		                        		
		                        			BACKGROUND:
		                        			The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in lung cancer patients who underwent surgery increased during the perioperative period, and prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was important part of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, the timing of preventive anticoagulation in patients with lung cancer remained controversial. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for lung cancer patients.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			Retrospective research was conducted on 562 lung cancer patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) anatomic pulmonary resections in West China Hospital from June 2016 to December 2016. 56 patients were treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) anticoagulation 12 hours before operation until discharge, while the other 506 patients were treated with LMWH 24 hours after operation until discharge. The postoperative chest drainage volume, postoperative bleeding, pulmonary embolism incidence, and respiratory complications were analyzed.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			(1) There were no significant differences in prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and international normalized ratio (INR) between the pre-operation prophylactic anticoagulation group (PRE group) [(11.5±3.9) s, (27.8±3.5) s, (0.96±0.06) s] and the post-operation prophylactic anticoagulation group (POST group) [(11.4±1.4) s, (28.3±4.0) s, (0.98±0.07) s] (P=0.796, P=0.250, P=0.137), and there was no significant difference in Caprini score between the PRE group (3.1±1.8) and the POST group (3.3±1.5) (P=0.104). (2) There were no significant differences in anesthesia time and intraoperative bleeding between PRE group [(130.2±53.9) min, (76.8±49.3) mL] and POST group [(142.2±56.5) min, (73.7±41.6) mL] (P=0.067, P=0.201). (3) The total drainage volume in 72 hours after operation in PRE group [(728.1±505.7) mL] was significantly higher than that of POST group [(596.4±373.5) mL] (P=0.005), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in total postoperative drainage volume [(1,066.8±1,314.6) mL vs (907.8±999.8) mL, P=0.203]. (4) There were no significant differences between the two groups in pulmonary embolism incidence (1.785% vs 0.019%, P=0.525) and postoperative bleeding rates (1.785% vs 0.039%, P=0.300). (5) There were no significant differences between PRE group and POST group in subcutaneous emphysema incidence (1.785% vs 1.581%, P=0.989) and pulmonary infection rates (14.285% vs 6.324%, P=0.085).
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSIONS
		                        			The clinical value of preoperative prophylactic anticoagulation is equal to postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation for lung cancer patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Anticoagulants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			pharmacology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			pharmacology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Perioperative Period
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			etiology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			prevention & control
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Safety
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Young Adult
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Expert Consensus for Image-guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Tumors (2018 Version).
Baodong LIU ; Xin YE ; Weijun FAN ; Xiaoguang LI ; Weijian FENG ; Qiang LU ; Yu MAO ; Zhengyu LIN ; Lu LI ; Yiping ZHUANG ; Xudong NI ; Jialin SHEN ; Yili FU ; Jianjun HAN ; Chenrui LI ; Chen LIU ; Wuwei YANG ; Zhiyong SU ; Zhiyuan WU ; Lei LIU
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2018;21(2):76-88
10.Trend of cancer mortality in Hebei province, 1973-2013.
Di LIANG ; Dao Juan LI ; Jin SHI ; Ya Chen ZHANG ; Tian Tian GUO ; Yu Tong HE
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2018;39(1):35-39
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective: To analyze the data of malignant tumor mortality and change in disease burden in Hebei province from 1973 to 2013. Methods: Cancer mortality rate, age-standardized mortality rate and the years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLLs) were calculated by using the data from three rounds of all death causes survey and database of cancer registry in Hebei during 1973-2013. Results: From 1973 to 2013, a linear upward of malignant tumor mortality was observed, with a 51.57% increase. The mortality rate during 1973-1975 was 98.52/100 000 and it was 149.33/100 000 during 2011-2013. During 1973-1975, the YLLs was 17.0/1 000 in males and 12.8/1 000 in females. While during 2011-2013, the YLLs was 23.2/1 000 in males and 15.9/1 000 in females. During 1973-1975, esophagus cancer, stomach cancer and liver cancer were top three leading causes of deaths. During 2011-2013, lung cancer, stomach cancer and liver cancer were main leading causes of deaths. During the past 40 years, the deaths of esophagus cancer and cervix cancer decreased dramatically, but the deaths of lung cancer and breast cancer increased sharply. Conclusions: The disease burden caused by malignant tumor is becoming more serious in Hebei. It is necessary to strengthen the primary prevention and screening of malignant tumor.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Breast Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Esophageal Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mortality/trends*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mortality, Premature
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasms/mortality*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Primary Prevention
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Reference Standards
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Registries
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stomach Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail