Infertility is a prevalent issue affecting many couples during their reproductive years, with a significant number facing challenges in conceiving despite regular unprotected intercourse. Male factor infertility (MFI) contributes significantly to these cases, with a significant proportion of men lacking an identifiable etiology. As such, a thorough assessment of MFI has become increasingly vital for personalized management. This position paper from the Andrology team at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele emphasizes a comprehensive and individualized approach to MFI work-up, addressing the evolving challenges encountered in clinical practice. Our approach involves a thorough diagnostic work-up to identify the underlying causes of MFI, integrating insights from extensive literature review and our proprietary data. Our data demonstrates that an extensive diagnostic assessment allows us to identify at least one underlying cause of MFI in most infertile men. However, challenges persist in diagnosing less severe phenotypes with unclear etiology. We discuss the importance of individualized MFI work-up and its implications for developing rational therapeutic protocols. Lastly, this paper highlights the necessity for a personalized diagnostic assessment, addressing the daily clinical challenges and emphasizing tailored approaches to try to improve outcomes among couples seeking first medical help for infertility.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines. Materials and Methods: A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT’s future use, despite pending guidelines support. Conclusions This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the relationship between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and inhibin B (InhB). Materials and Methods: Data from 1,230 consecutive men presenting for primary couple’s infertility were analyzed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with Charlson comorbidity index. Quartiles of FSH and InhB were considered to determine threshold values. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested association between FSH and InhB values. Results: Overall, 1,080 (87.8%) men had concordant FSH and InhB values. Conversely, 150 patients (12.2%) had discrepancies in FSH and InhB, with 78 (6.3%) and 72 (5.9%) men reporting both low and high FSH and InhB values, respectively. Infertile men with discordant values were younger (median [interquartile range] 38.0 years [34–41 years] vs. 36.0 years [31–40 years]); had smaller testicular volume (TV) (12 mL [10–15 mL] vs. 15 mL [12–20 mL]); and, had more frequently a sperm DNA fragmentation test >30% (179 [59.1%] vs. 40 [78.4%]) than those with concordant values (all p<0.05). Moreover, a higher frequency of previous cryptorchidism (27.3% vs. 11.9%), lower sperm concentration (3.0 million/mL [0.9–11.0 million/mL] vs. 13.8 million/mL [3.1–36.0 million/mL]), lower progressive sperm motility rates (12.0% [5.0%–25.3%] vs. 20.0% [7.0%–36.0%]), and greater rates of non-obstructive azoospermia (36.4% vs. 23.9%) were found in men with discordant FSH and InhB values (all p≤0.005). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; p=0.001), smaller TV (OR, 0.91; p<0.001), and a history of cryptorchidism (OR, 2.49; p<0.001) were associated with discordant FSH and InhB values. Conclusions More than one out of ten infertile men had discordant FSH and InhB values in the real-life setting showing worse clinical profiles than those with concordant levels. Smaller TV and history of cryptorchidism could be used as clinical markers to better tailor the need to test InhB.

Infertility is a prevalent issue affecting many couples during their reproductive years, with a significant number facing challenges in conceiving despite regular unprotected intercourse. Male factor infertility (MFI) contributes significantly to these cases, with a significant proportion of men lacking an identifiable etiology. As such, a thorough assessment of MFI has become increasingly vital for personalized management. This position paper from the Andrology team at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele emphasizes a comprehensive and individualized approach to MFI work-up, addressing the evolving challenges encountered in clinical practice. Our approach involves a thorough diagnostic work-up to identify the underlying causes of MFI, integrating insights from extensive literature review and our proprietary data. Our data demonstrates that an extensive diagnostic assessment allows us to identify at least one underlying cause of MFI in most infertile men. However, challenges persist in diagnosing less severe phenotypes with unclear etiology. We discuss the importance of individualized MFI work-up and its implications for developing rational therapeutic protocols. Lastly, this paper highlights the necessity for a personalized diagnostic assessment, addressing the daily clinical challenges and emphasizing tailored approaches to try to improve outcomes among couples seeking first medical help for infertility.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines. Materials and Methods: A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT’s future use, despite pending guidelines support. Conclusions This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the relationship between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and inhibin B (InhB). Materials and Methods: Data from 1,230 consecutive men presenting for primary couple’s infertility were analyzed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with Charlson comorbidity index. Quartiles of FSH and InhB were considered to determine threshold values. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested association between FSH and InhB values. Results: Overall, 1,080 (87.8%) men had concordant FSH and InhB values. Conversely, 150 patients (12.2%) had discrepancies in FSH and InhB, with 78 (6.3%) and 72 (5.9%) men reporting both low and high FSH and InhB values, respectively. Infertile men with discordant values were younger (median [interquartile range] 38.0 years [34–41 years] vs. 36.0 years [31–40 years]); had smaller testicular volume (TV) (12 mL [10–15 mL] vs. 15 mL [12–20 mL]); and, had more frequently a sperm DNA fragmentation test >30% (179 [59.1%] vs. 40 [78.4%]) than those with concordant values (all p<0.05). Moreover, a higher frequency of previous cryptorchidism (27.3% vs. 11.9%), lower sperm concentration (3.0 million/mL [0.9–11.0 million/mL] vs. 13.8 million/mL [3.1–36.0 million/mL]), lower progressive sperm motility rates (12.0% [5.0%–25.3%] vs. 20.0% [7.0%–36.0%]), and greater rates of non-obstructive azoospermia (36.4% vs. 23.9%) were found in men with discordant FSH and InhB values (all p≤0.005). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; p=0.001), smaller TV (OR, 0.91; p<0.001), and a history of cryptorchidism (OR, 2.49; p<0.001) were associated with discordant FSH and InhB values. Conclusions More than one out of ten infertile men had discordant FSH and InhB values in the real-life setting showing worse clinical profiles than those with concordant levels. Smaller TV and history of cryptorchidism could be used as clinical markers to better tailor the need to test InhB.

Infertility is a prevalent issue affecting many couples during their reproductive years, with a significant number facing challenges in conceiving despite regular unprotected intercourse. Male factor infertility (MFI) contributes significantly to these cases, with a significant proportion of men lacking an identifiable etiology. As such, a thorough assessment of MFI has become increasingly vital for personalized management. This position paper from the Andrology team at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele emphasizes a comprehensive and individualized approach to MFI work-up, addressing the evolving challenges encountered in clinical practice. Our approach involves a thorough diagnostic work-up to identify the underlying causes of MFI, integrating insights from extensive literature review and our proprietary data. Our data demonstrates that an extensive diagnostic assessment allows us to identify at least one underlying cause of MFI in most infertile men. However, challenges persist in diagnosing less severe phenotypes with unclear etiology. We discuss the importance of individualized MFI work-up and its implications for developing rational therapeutic protocols. Lastly, this paper highlights the necessity for a personalized diagnostic assessment, addressing the daily clinical challenges and emphasizing tailored approaches to try to improve outcomes among couples seeking first medical help for infertility.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines. Materials and Methods: A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT’s future use, despite pending guidelines support. Conclusions This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the relationship between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and inhibin B (InhB). Materials and Methods: Data from 1,230 consecutive men presenting for primary couple’s infertility were analyzed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with Charlson comorbidity index. Quartiles of FSH and InhB were considered to determine threshold values. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested association between FSH and InhB values. Results: Overall, 1,080 (87.8%) men had concordant FSH and InhB values. Conversely, 150 patients (12.2%) had discrepancies in FSH and InhB, with 78 (6.3%) and 72 (5.9%) men reporting both low and high FSH and InhB values, respectively. Infertile men with discordant values were younger (median [interquartile range] 38.0 years [34–41 years] vs. 36.0 years [31–40 years]); had smaller testicular volume (TV) (12 mL [10–15 mL] vs. 15 mL [12–20 mL]); and, had more frequently a sperm DNA fragmentation test >30% (179 [59.1%] vs. 40 [78.4%]) than those with concordant values (all p<0.05). Moreover, a higher frequency of previous cryptorchidism (27.3% vs. 11.9%), lower sperm concentration (3.0 million/mL [0.9–11.0 million/mL] vs. 13.8 million/mL [3.1–36.0 million/mL]), lower progressive sperm motility rates (12.0% [5.0%–25.3%] vs. 20.0% [7.0%–36.0%]), and greater rates of non-obstructive azoospermia (36.4% vs. 23.9%) were found in men with discordant FSH and InhB values (all p≤0.005). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; p=0.001), smaller TV (OR, 0.91; p<0.001), and a history of cryptorchidism (OR, 2.49; p<0.001) were associated with discordant FSH and InhB values. Conclusions More than one out of ten infertile men had discordant FSH and InhB values in the real-life setting showing worse clinical profiles than those with concordant levels. Smaller TV and history of cryptorchidism could be used as clinical markers to better tailor the need to test InhB.

Infertility is a prevalent issue affecting many couples during their reproductive years, with a significant number facing challenges in conceiving despite regular unprotected intercourse. Male factor infertility (MFI) contributes significantly to these cases, with a significant proportion of men lacking an identifiable etiology. As such, a thorough assessment of MFI has become increasingly vital for personalized management. This position paper from the Andrology team at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele emphasizes a comprehensive and individualized approach to MFI work-up, addressing the evolving challenges encountered in clinical practice. Our approach involves a thorough diagnostic work-up to identify the underlying causes of MFI, integrating insights from extensive literature review and our proprietary data. Our data demonstrates that an extensive diagnostic assessment allows us to identify at least one underlying cause of MFI in most infertile men. However, challenges persist in diagnosing less severe phenotypes with unclear etiology. We discuss the importance of individualized MFI work-up and its implications for developing rational therapeutic protocols. Lastly, this paper highlights the necessity for a personalized diagnostic assessment, addressing the daily clinical challenges and emphasizing tailored approaches to try to improve outcomes among couples seeking first medical help for infertility.