Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Humans ; Consensus ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy* ; Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy*

Objective:To investigate the timing of rivaroxaban re-administration after upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.Methods:The clinical data of 176 patients who suffered from lower limb deep vein thrombosis due to trauma or surgery and upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to oral rivaroxaban and received treatment in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from May 2018 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into an early group (≤ 7 days) ( n = 84 cases) and a late group (> 7 days) ( n = 92 cases) according to the timing of rivaroxaban re-administration. All patients were followed up for 2 months to record hemoglobin, D-dimer, and platelet values. The progression of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities was observed. The rebleeding rate, progression of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, and mortality were analyzed. Results:There were no significant differences in hemoglobin and D-dimer levels between the two groups on admission (both P > 0.05). After admission, the D-dimer level in the late group was (4.1 ± 2.3) mg/L, which was significantly higher than (3.1 ± 1.9) mg/L in the early group ( t = 3.17, P < 0.05). After admission, hemoglobin level in each group was significantly decreased compared with that on admission (both P < 0.05). The lowest hemoglobin level in the late group was (78.7 ± 8.3) g/L, which was significantly higher than (75.6 ± 8.2) g/L in the early group ( t = 2.32, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in rebleeding rate between early and late groups [5.95% (5/84) vs. 1.08% (1/92)] (log-rank 3.07, P > 0.05). Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis progressed more slowly in the early group compared with the late group [2.38% (2/84) vs. 10.86% (10/92)] (log-rank = 4.61, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Rivaroxaban should be re-administered as soon as possible after upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.